reviewed the essay 300 words or more

Identify another student whose essay has not yet been peer-reviewed. Read the essay and respond to the writer, with answers to the following questions (adapted from Greene & Lidinsky):

  1. What is the writer’s thesis?
  2. How does the writer establish the conversation–identify a gap in people’s knowledge, attempt to modify an existing argument, or try to correct some misunderstanding?
  3. How effectively does the writer distinguish between his or her ideas and the ideas he or she summarizes, paraphrases, or quotes?
  4. To what extent are you persuaded by the writer’s argument? Why?
  5. To what extent does the writer anticipate possible counterarguments?
  6. Can you follow the essay’s organization easily? If so, point to transitions/transitional phrases that help? If not, suggest them.
  7. What do you think is working best? Explain by pointing to specific passages in the writer’s draft.
  8. What do you recommend the writer work further on, and why?

Note: you will need at least 300 words to response appropriately and substantively.

psychology roots

Psychology is a relatively young science, with the first psychology laboratory being opened in 1879, but its roots extend back thousands of years to the ancient Greek philosophers. Psychology’s roots are closely related to both biology and philosophy. Because of its hybrid heritage, psychology is often considered a social science, a natural science, and part of the humanities. What are the benefits of this complex heritage? What are the drawbacks? Why is it important to study the history of psychology? How does the history of psychology inform modern day psychology?

i have homework i need you to do it please

13.7 Define the terms “verification” and “validation.” Describe the types of tests that are directed at each, and explain how they meet the definitions of these terms.

read ten little indians amd summarize

Read the chapter, “Do Not Go Gentle,” from Ten Little Indians.

Then write an essay that addresses each of the following:

1. Describe the various emotions that the main character experienced in this story. Do you think this flow of feelings was realistic? Explain.

2. Some people consider the content of this story to be offensive. What are your thoughts? Justify your opinion with details from the text.

3. Some individuals would consider this story one of hope. What are your thoughts? Justify your answer with details from the text.

4. Did the story end as you expected it to? Explain.

5. What emotions did you go through as you read the story? Support your answer with details from the text.

6. Was Sherman Alexie successful in describing the angst of new parents in this story? Explain by supporting your answer with details from the text.

read the paper write paper as require

Length: 2 pages (about 700-800 words)

Prompt: Using some (or all) of the distinguishing features of science identified by Okasha (http://shamiller.net/phi031/readings.d/okashaChapter1.pdf (链接到外部网站。)链接到外部网站。), give reasons why either economics, political science, or computer science should be considered a genuine science like physics, chemistry, or biology; then give reasons why either economics, political science, or computer science should not be considered a genuine science. Give both sides of the argument, though you do not have to take a side. Note: You should only pick one of the options of economics, political science, or computer science — which are defined below — not all three.

Purpose of the assignment: To apply Okasha’s ideas about the nature of science to a specific (potential) science and to give you practice writing.

Grading criteria:

  1. The individual sentences of your paper must be grammatical.
  2. Your train of thought should be clear; that is, the reader should be able to follow the flow of your ideas.
  3. You should support your ideas with reasons; that is, you should explain why we should think that economics, political science, or computer science is or isn’t a science.

What to avoid:

  1. No fluff, filler, or wasted words, e.g., don’t start the paper with: “From the dawn of humanity philosophers have debated the nature of science…” Make your words count.
  2. Don’t make unsupported assertions, e.g., “Physics is the best science.”
  3. Watch our for repetitive writing as it is often a sign of disorganized thinking.

Writing advice: Do more than one draft of the paper. Revise your work to improve clarity.

Definitions:

  • Economics: the branch of knowledge concerned with the production, consumption, and transfer of wealth.
  • Political Science: the branch of knowledge that deals with systems of government; the analysis of political activity and behavior.
  • Computer Science: the branch of knowledge concerned with the principles and use of computers.

into to optics physics matlab

some questions in physics and Matlab , please see attached theres 7 questions need to be answered

research paper for economic data

Project Outline • Which question you are interested in? • The background of the question. Why it is important? • The economics behind the question. Basic economic analysis. • The basic model that links the economic model and dataset. • The description of the dataset. • The estimation results table based on data. • The empirical analysis from the estimation results. • The plausibility and limitation of the methods. • Possible further extensions. • http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/jae/http://econ.williams.edu/students/onlineresources

managing financial risks

Competency

Evaluate the principles of risk and reward in the investment sector and their applications to the broader area of risk management.

Instructions

LTD Acceptance is a private property and auto insurance carrier that specializes in sports cars and motorcycles. This organization is owned by LTD Capital, a large equity group with over 15 holdings. LTD Acceptance is the parent company’s single largest holding as it drives 70% of total revenue. Due to the inherent risk involved in that segment of the market, many of LTD Acceptance’s competitors do not offer policies for sports cars or motorcycles. This market segment is underserved which is why the organization has 20,000 active policies for a sports car or a motorcycle.

LTD is headquartered in Houston, TX. LTD does not sell insurance directly to the public. Instead, it uses third-party agents to sell its policies. LTD handles all customer service needs including claims intake, policy services, and general questions. The company operates in four states: California, Texas, Louisiana, and Florida. Currently, LTD does not have an active system in place to ensure that its agents are in fact using LTD guidelines to screen potential policyholders. However, no evidence of negligence has emerged so far as the organization has yet to have a year in which it was not profitable. LTD has also had the good fortune of not suffering losses because of natural disasters or catastrophic events.

LTD Acceptance has 18,000 active policies in its book of business, and the firm is yet to experience a year period with high loss ratios. To increase its profitability ratios, LTD has invested the premium dollars across various asset classes. LTD’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) believes the organization should take a calculated risk and allocate the assets more aggressively. As the senior risk analyst, you have carefully analyzed the organization’s numbers and strongly believe that LTD’s favorable loss ratios are a result of chance and not through the sensible use of the firm’s systematic framework for managing risk. You also believe the CFO is purely looking at the rewards and not the risks. Therefore, you do not believe the firm should increase risk exposures at this time.

To convey your point of view, you have decided to conduct a cost-benefit analysis report which should include the following:

  • For this report, provide an introduction which discusses the relationship between risk and reward. Using the information provided in the background of this case, explain why the organization may appear to be in a better position on paper than it really is.
  • Include at least two ways how each party listed below can be adversely impacted if the organization suffers losses as a result of a more aggressive approach.
    • Policyholders
    • Shareholders
    • Vendors
    • Creditors
    • Employees
  • Also include a discussion on how effective financial management aligns with overall risk management.
  • Your conclusion should highlight how the risk assumed in an organization’s activities should be consistent with its long term goals. All business activities include inherent risks. Thus, all the activities and risks the firm takes should help them reach their long-term goals. If the managers engage in activities that create risks outside of this scope, it can create problems. For instance, most firms have the goal of driving sustainability. However, if they are highly leveraged, then seeking additional credit for a project can derail the long term goal of sustainability.

paper on text book this is how you lose her junot diaz

while this assignment is a creative reflection that asks you to redefine the boundaries of literary analysis , do not Iose sight of the text itself as you whrite this paper. As you will notice, each title is followed by the same sub-title, which means concrete analysis of Diaz’s novel is essential. That is, reference to specific scenes, inclusion of relevant textual detail, and use of quotes are mandatory

Pick one only
a) The hitch-hiker’s guide to belonging: a response toJunot Diaz’s This is how you lose her

b) what I would have done differently: a response to Junot Diaz’s This is how you lose her

c) The role of shifting perspectives in Junot Diaz’s This is how you lose her

d) MY own personal guide to cheating: a response to Junot Diaz’s This is how you lose her

There is more requirement that I will send on attachment .

blackboard discussion 1

need the answer to only discuss in blackboard.

it should be one page.

no need to write as essay , no need for introduction or conclusion. I want to show as my opinion

– use words like this. i believe. i think

answer all the parts of the question

use the material to answer the question. and also put opinion.

do not write too long sentences.

you should write in comprehensive way.

They are two questions:

:Based on our reading for this week, please answer two questions, be sure question two has two parts.

1.) The evolving higher education landscape is more complex than ever before, especially with technology changing the landscape of higher education. While traditional institutions are beginning to offer online programs, for-profit institutions have led the way. Not only are they meeting the growing demands of the workforce market, but they’re also meeting the needs of students with less of an expense. Most importantly, they invest in new technology, innovate rapidly and have the ability to quickly shift programs based on student demand and preferences. With this in mind, where do you see traditional nonprofit institutions in the next 10 years? Should administrators at traditional nonprofit institutions be concerned?

2.) “With regard to costs, it has been argued that the different institutional norms of the for-profit institutions may enable these providers to reduce costs and achieve greater efficiencies than their peers in the nonprofit sector (Kirp, 2003; Marchese, 1998). The spiraling costs of higher education, at public and private institutions, and the increased burden on individual students, are creating enormous pressure on the nonprofit institutions in the United States and around the world (Duderstadt and Womack, 2003; Ehrenberg, 2000)”

Secondly, carefully read the above from page 11; which was quoted in the late 90s and early 2000s. That said, as technology continues to rapidly evolve, and enrollment growth continues to decline while student debt continues to rise, how can traditional institutions ensure that they’re equipped to meet the growing demands of current and future students?