Annoyed Bibliography (Slavery and its Effects to Society)

We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

I am attaching the Proposal Paper from Week 3.

Required Resources

  • Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (This includes the source from Week 3 Proposal.)

Instructions
Create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources (including your source from Week 3). Include the following: ( I am attaching the paper from week 3)

  • Introduction and thesis for your paper (to the best extent as you know it at this time)
  • Publication details
  • Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)

The annotation section should include the following:

  • Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
  • Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles.
  • State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
  • Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
  • Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.

Example Publication

APA Reference
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.

Annotation Example
In this article, Mezirow (2003) makes a distinction between “instrumental” and “communicative” learning. “Instrumental learning” refers to those processes which measure and gage learning, such as tests, grades, comments, quizzes, attendance records and the like. “Communicative learning,” on the other hand, refers to understanding created over time between individuals in what Mezirow calls “critical-dialectical-discourse,” (p. 59) which is a fancy way of saying, important conversation between 2 or more speakers. Another key idea Mezirow discusses is “transformative learning,” (p. 61) which changes the mind, the heart, the values and beliefs of people so that they may act better in the world. Mezirow argues that “hungry, desperate, homeless, sick, destitute, and intimidated people obviously cannot participate fully and freely in discourse” (p. 59). On the one hand, he is right: there are some people who cannot fully engage because their crisis is so long and deep, they are prevented. But, I don’t think Mezirow should make the blanket assumption that everyone in unfortunate circumstances is incapable of entering the discourse meaningfully. One thing is certain: if we gave as much attention to the non-instrumental forms of intelligence–like goodness, compassion, forgiveness, wonder, self-motivation, creativity, humor, love, and other non-measured forms of intelligence in our school curriculums, we’d see better people, actors in the world, and interested investigators than we currently have graduating high school.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 1-2 paragraphs per annotation
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page

Grading
This activity will be graded based on Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric.

Rubric

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 100 pts

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 100 pts

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

5.0 pts

Outstanding

Meets length requirement

0.0 pts

No Effort

Does not meet length requirement

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

10.0 pts

Outstanding

Addresses all aspects of the assignment.

8.5 pts

Above Average

Addresses most aspects of the assignment.

7.5 pts

Average

Addresses some aspects of the assignment.

6.0 pts

Below Average

Addresses few aspects of the assignment.

0.0pts

No Marks

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation

50.0 pts

Outstanding

For all 5 sources, the annotations summarize the articles; identify the key points; analyze the issues; assess the value of the source.

42.5 pts

Above Average

For 4 sources, the annotations summarize the articles; identify the key points; analyze the issues; assess the value of the source.

37.5 pts

Average

For 3 sources, the annotations summarize the articles; identify the key points; analyze the issues; assess the value of the source.

30.0 pts

Below Average

For 1 or 2 sources, the annotations summarize the articles; identify the key points; analyze the issues; assess the value of the source.

0.0pts

No Marks

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

10.0 pts

Outstanding

Ideas are logically organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion that come together in complete concepts.

8.5 pts

Above Average

Ideas are well organized, including inviting introduction (with a thesis statement) and a satisfactory conclusion, with complete concepts.

7.5 pts

Average

Organization and concepts need some restructuring.

6.0 pts

Below Average

Organization and concepts are difficult to follow and incomplete.

0.0pts

No Marks

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

15.0 pts

Outstanding

Throughout the whole work, the writing actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.

12.75 pts

Above Average

Throughout most of the work, the writing actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.

11.25 pts

Average

Throughout some of the work, the writing actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.

9.0 pts

Below Average

Throughout little of the work, the writing actively engages with the topic; is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.

0.0pts

No Marks

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting

10.0 pts

Outstanding

Throughout the whole work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style.

8.5 pts

Above Average

Throughout most of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style.

7.5 pts

Average

Throughout some of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style.

6.0 pts

Below Average

Throughout little of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style; format (margins, spacing font size) adheres to APA style.

0.0pts

No Marks

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Writerbay.net

Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net