450 final

Type: This assignment consists of a research analysis paper approximately four to six pages in length, double-spaced (This page count does not include a title page, abstract (optional), table of contents (optional), Reference/Bibliography page(s) (please see the course overview for information on the Chicago writing style). The source material should result primarily from self-led external research of scholarly articles. In addition, the course required reading materials may be used. The paper should have four to six pages of content which are the written results of your research efforts.

Topic: Choose a terrorist incident, organization, leader, or development focusing on American domestic terrorism. Make sure you narrow down your topic. Your paper can not be a simple historical description of what happened, but it should also include analysis and content learned about the topic. What were the implications and consequences of the topic to the present and future?

You may use this reference for ideas, but keep in mind it must be on an American terrorism topic

Citation and Reference Style

Attention Please: Students will follow the Chicago Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework to the course. A quick guide may be found at: The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017 available online. The Author-Date system is recommended.

All written submissions should be submitted in Times New Roman 12pt font with 1″ margins, typewritten in double-spaced format. College-level work is expected to be free of grammar, usage, and style errors.

Cjs405 ind project

 

Your Unit 5 Research Methods paper is a culmination of everything you researched about your selected topic in Criminal Justice. You will now synthesize your collected information from your Unit 4 problem statement and Annotated Bibliography. That means you will provide your personal assessment in a professional analysis research paper. Here is your roadmap:

  • Unit 4 DB – You wrote a problem statement and described the issue.
  • Unit 4 IP – You conducted research by creating 5 Annotated Bibliographies.
  • Unit 5 IP – You will now use your Unit 4 Annotated Bibliography to create your Literature Review. You will include a title page, an introduction to the problem, a topic analysis, a conclusion and a reference page See below for detailed information on how to write your Unit 5 Literature Review – and how to format your paper.

Here is a basic outline for you to follow for your Unit 5 Research Methods paper:

  • Title Page –

APA formatted.

  • Introduction to the Problem –  – This is where you discuss the issues or problems in your chosen topic. You may reuse your DB4 problem statement for this part of your research paper, as long as you make any applicable updates, based upon your research – and edit it so that it is not longer than 1 page.
  • Literature Review – – This is where you discuss or write about background information that you discovered when you completed your 5 Annotated Bibliographies in Unit 4. Do not copy-and-paste your Annotated Bibliography into your research paper. Instead, write in paragraph form, about the information that you discovered and documented in your Annotated Bibliography. Specifically, in your literature review, you will discuss what those authors wrote about in their articles. 
  • Topic Analysis –  – This is where you present your own personal, professional and scholarly analysis about your topic, which is based on all of your research.
  • Conclusion – – This is where you present your final conclusions and recommendations on how to mitigate or possibly solve the research problem(s) that were identified.
  • Reference Page – APA formatted.

3

Impact of Racial Profiling

Student Name

Course

Date

Racial profiling is as prejudiced behavior by law enforcer’s officials by aiming individuals for crime suspicion based on their ethnicity, race, national origin, and religion. Law enforcement officials rely on individuals’ characteristics and believe they were associated with a particular crime (Headley and Wright, 2020). An example of racial profiling is when law enforcers stop drivers belonging to a specific race after they have violated minor traffic rules or when they use race or religion to determine the pedestrians’ viability to search for illegal contraband.

Racial profiling is problematic because it continues to be a profoundly longstanding issue in the United States despite the claims that the country has entered the post-colonial era. Racial profiling happens daily in cities and towns within the country, with law enforcement and private security continues to target individuals of color by holding humiliating and frightening searches, interrogations, and detentions without proper proof of criminal activity (Pittman, 2020). The United States constitution rules racial profiling illegal because the constitution mandates to treat its citizens equally and free them from unreasonable seizures and searches. Racial profiling is highly ineffective and its only outcome is the alienation of communities from the safety of law enforcement, obstructs community policing efforts, and destroys the reputation of law enforcement. This makes them lose trust and credibility among the people they swear to serve. Therefore, policies to oversee this matter must be formulated because it is increasing rift among communities with many innocent lives being lost every year and millions of state property getting destroyed.

References

Headley, A. M., & Wright, J. E. (2020). Is representation enough? Racial disparities in levels of force and arrests by police. 
Public Administration Review
80(6), 1051-1062.

Pittman, C. (2020). “Shopping while Black”: Black consumers’ management of racial stigma and racial profiling in retail settings. 
Journal of Consumer Culture
20(1), 3-22.

4

Annotated Bibliography

Brittany Benjamin

02/16/2023

Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Jackson, K. (2018). Representative bureaucracy, race, and policing: A survey experiment. 
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
28(4), 506-518.

The authors are employing a theoretical strategy of symbolic representation to determine whether black police officers within local agencies have the power to influence how white and black citizens judge their performance, fairness and trustworthiness in terms of citizen complaints about police misconduct. The results identify that there is high perceived trust, performance, fairness and trust among black citizens when the agency is made up of many black officers. however, the impact of greater black law enforcement representation in the agency is perceived negatively. This is an indication that symbolic representation in the law enforcement agency have a significant influence to how people judge and view the law enforcement department.

Teasley, M. L., Schiele, J. H., Adams, C., & Okilwa, N. S. (2018). Trayvon Martin: Racial profiling, Black male stigma, and social work practice. 
Social Work
63(1), 37-46.

In their study, Teasley et al., (2018) focus on addressing the gap existing in social literature on the deleterious impacts of racial profiling as it relates to the law enforcers targeting male African-Americans. The authors have used the case of Trayvon Martin to demonstrate how black male stigma and racial profiling can help in dispensing social injustice and inequality for African American men. The author find that the increasing profiling and discrimination of black men can only be resolved by working with social organizations to neutralize the effect.

Kovera, M. B. (2019). Racial disparities in the criminal justice system: Prevalence, causes, and a search for solutions. 
Journal of Social Issues
75(4), 1139-1164
.

Kovera (2019) identify that racial profiling within the criminal justice system is prevalent in key areas such as policing, populations, prison and participation on jury proceedings. The author identify that the issue continues to persist due to the bias existing in the composition of jury making it difficult to eradicate reduce the current racial bias. Therefore, the author proposes that implementation of more general policies that will not be limited to a particular race will be effective in eliminating the current bias.

Pittman, C. (2020). “Shopping while Black”: Black consumers’ management of racial stigma and racial profiling in retail settings. 
Journal of Consumer Culture
20(1), 3-22.

The author is drawing on qualitative data obtained from 55 African-Americans living around the New York area. The goal was to determine their experience with consumer racial profiling. The findings of their study indicate that race has the power to transform the status and meaning attached to products when they are owned or sought out by racial minorities. The examination of Black’s experiences with retail racism and cultural techniques reveal that they tend to adopt different treatment when they are treated in an indiscriminating way.

Gaston, S. (2019). Enforcing race: A neighborhood-level explanation of Black–White differences in drug arrests. 
Crime & Delinquency
65(4), 499-526.

The author aims to investigate the origin of black-white differences when law enforcement officers are performing drug arrest by performing a neighborhood assessment of the differences in police discriminatory scrutiny and policing hypotheses. The author examines arrests made in 78 neighborhoods in St. Louis from 2009 and 2013. The findings identify that neighborhood racial composition widely shapes drug enforcement policing, drug associated calls for service by citizens, property crime and violent rates and social economic disadvantage. Therefore, the author concludes that officers tend to engage in ‘out of place’ profiling when enforcing drug laws as suspects are jailed in terms of race.

Debate this: franchises

Carlos Del Rey decided to open a fast-food Mexican restaurant and signed a franchise contract with a national chain called La Grande Enchilada. Under the franchise agreement, Del Rey purchased the building, and La Grande Enchilada supplied the equipment. The contract required the franchisee to strictly follow the franchisor’s operating manual and stated that failure to do so would be grounds for terminating the franchise contract. The manual set forth detailed operating procedures and safety standards, and provided that a La Grande Enchilada representative would inspect the restaurant monthly to ensure compliance.

Nine months after Del Rey began operating his restaurant, a spark from the grill ignited an oily towel in the kitchen. No one was injured, but by the time firefighters put out the fire, the kitchen had sustained extensive damage. The cook told the fire department that the towel was “about two feet from the grill” when it caught fire, which was in compliance with the franchisor’s manual that required towels to be at least one foot from the grills. Nevertheless, the next day La Grande Enchilada notified Del Rey that his franchise would terminate in thirty days for failure to follow the prescribed safety procedures. Using the information presented in the chapter, answer the following questions.

  1. What type of franchise was Del Rey’s La Grande Enchilada restaurant?
  2. If Del Rey operates the restaurant as a sole proprietorship, who bears the loss for the damaged kitchen? Explain.
  3. Assume that Del Rey files a lawsuit against La Grande Enchilada, claiming that his franchise was wrongfully terminated. What is the main factor a court would consider in determining whether the franchise was wrongfully terminated?
  4. Would a court be likely to rule that La Grande Enchilada had good cause to terminate Del Rey’s franchise in this situation? Why or why not?

Debate This:
All franchisors should be required by law to provide a comprehensive estimate of the profitability of a prospective franchise based on the experiences of their existing franchisees

Notes;

Not more than 2 pages 

Malpractice suits & medication administration

Part 1 Malpractice Suits

In 250 to 300 words, discuss how physician malpractice suits can be decreased. How can a doctor be sued for malpractice? What current practices do doctors perform in order to avoid lawsuits? What are the impacts of these practices? How can one check for any malpractice suit against a doctor? Use at least one scholarly and/or peer-reviewed source that was published within the last five years.

Part 2 Legal Concerns for Medical Administration

In 250 to 300 words, evaluate why prescribing, control, and administration of medications is a major area of legal concern for health care providers. What is the impact of medication errors on the patient and the health care provider? Discuss ways doctors make mistakes in prescribing medication.  What kinds of errors do nurses make regarding the administration of medications? 

Review the documentary Chasing Zero-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtSbgUuXdaw.

What methods or practices do you feel would be most effective in reducing medication/prescribing errors? Use the documentary as a source and at least one additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed source that was published within the last five years.

Taxation homework help

Stuck with you taxation and law assignments? Assignment Help Service provides you with a dedicated team of Ph.D. experts who elaborate on each piece of information in a synchronized fashion while communicating the topic’s aim and objective. As a result, they provide the best law assignment help and taxation assignment help to students worldwide. Our team of committed authors with experience with tax and law tasks are constantly available for students. Our service ensures you have the assistance you need for top scores. Contact us anytime, and we’ll be pleased to assist you.

https://www.assignmenthelpservice.com/service/taxation-assignment-help

6 pg paper needed by 11pm est today

6 pages

APA no plaigarism

Paper on Families of Law

the families of law are civil law, common law, socialist law, and sacred law

This is an informational research paper just discuss the origins of each and how they’ve developed throughout the years

Constitutional conflict

 

This week you will be writing an essay, 2 pages double-spaced in length, on what happens when Constitutional rights collide.  You can find an example from the news or caselaw,  but here are some suggestions:

Religious rights (1st amendment) versus equal protection (14th amendment): https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/05/opinions/masterpiece-cakeshop-supreme-court-opinion-gupta

Freedom of speech (1st amendment) versus equal protection/protected classes (14th amendment) https://djclpp.law.duke.edu/article/the-dynamic-relationship-between-freedom-of-speech-and-equality/

Freedom from Search/seizure (4th amendment) versus right to carry a firearm (2nd amendment: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/04/why-liberals-should-be-alarmed-that-courts-are-eroding-the-second-amendment.html#:~:text=The%20Fourth%20Amendment%20protects%20individuals,he%20is%20carrying%20a%20firearm%3F

If you find something that’s not technically a conflict, but is interesting to you, that’s fine!  Here are some interesting Constitutional issues:

– Can cities impose mask mandates?  Is this even a Constitutional issue, why or why not?

– Can a state make laws that put a greater burden on minority residents (think voting restrictions)?

– Should mandatory draft registration be imposed on both men and women?  

Assignment 2: constitutional rights

  

The constitutional rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights are most highly protected during the trial stage of a criminal proceeding.

law

Description

Assignment 2: Constitutional Rights
Due Week 10 and worth 150 points
 

The constitutional rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights are most highly protected during the trial stage of a criminal proceeding. This is when the adversarial process, which characterizes the U.S. criminal justice process, is at its peak. Use the Strayer Online Library (https://research.strayer.edu) to research, identify, and discuss a criminal case from within the last three years. Analyze and evaluate the steps which brought the individual to trial beginning with the arrest phase of the process.
 

Write a 4- to 6-page paper in which you:

1. Summarize the events leading up to the arrest and identify and discuss the four elements of the arrest related to this case.

2. Identify the four requirements for search and seizure with a warrant and describe how the search and seizure process was carried out for this case.

3. Explain the various aspects of the plain view doctrine and describe how this is relevant to this case.

4. Compare and contrast the various means of identifying suspects and describe the process used in this case.

5. Summarize the basic constitutional rights of the accused during trial.

  1. Use at least      five quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other similar      websites do not qualify as academic resources.      https://homeworkharbour.info/discuss-how-we-can-put-microbes-to-work-to-facilitate-our-lives-from-keeping-ou

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

o This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.

o Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

o Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Critically debate      the constitutional safeguards of key amendments with specific attention to      the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments.      https://homeworkbay.info/2021/06/16/please-rewrite-the-following-objective-introduction-materials-procedure-in/

o Explain and debate fundamental Supreme Court cases associated with criminal procedure.

o Define and describe Constitutional laws and associated court procedures.

o Explain and debate fundamental Supreme Court cases associated with criminal procedure

Week 1 chatt

What impact do drugs have on the human brain and central nervous system? Do you believe addiction is a disease, why or why not?

Be sure that you are using proper APA format and that you have at least one Peer-Reviewed Article in your research.

Jurisdiction case study apa format

Need an APA format paper for case studies regarding jurisdiction. Attatched is the case studies and below are the requirements. 

Part one:

In 250-500 words 

  • Identify the criminal justice agencies that may want to claim jurisdiction in the case study you chose.
  • Explain briefly why each agency would want to claim jurisdiction and what the benefit would be to each agency.
  • Explain briefly why an agency may NOT want to assume jurisdiction.
  • To what degree should ethical considerations, such as what is best for the victim, the community, or even the offender, factor into jurisdictional decisions?

Part two:

In 500-700 words

  • Select one of the case studies discussed in Part 1. Then, choose one of the agencies and imagine that you are going to argue to your superior that your agency deserves jurisdiction.
  • Write a report explaining why your agency deserves—or may not want—jurisdiction. Expand upon and build support for the brief explanation from above.
    • Be sure to state your position and draw upon examples from the case study and learning resources to support your position.

Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law and Prosecution

© 2019 Walden University Page 1 of 4

Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law and Prosecution

For the case studies in this competency, you will revisit case studies used in a previous
competency—but with some details changed.

The Case of the Smith Family Shooting

Re-read the case study below. Imagine that you are the prosecutor and that the
following details are also part of the scenario:

● The son is 19 years old.
● The gun on the upper shelf is the son’s, although it (along with all the other guns)

is not registered.
● The mother denies having been physically abused by the father.
● The son has a prior arrest for assault.
● The father called the police on his son 2 years ago for threatening him with a

knife, but the father did not pursue any legal action.

Mrs. Smith called emergency dispatchers at 3:00 .m. to report a shooting. As the
responding officer, you observe the following:

Mrs. Smith says that she and her husband had been arguing and that at one point her
husband threatened to shoot her and her son. Mrs. Smith says, “He spouts off things
like that, but he never does anything about it. He has a temper. But I’d had enough of
his meanness and coming home late, so I went to the bathroom to put myself together
and get out of there for a while.”

In response to being asked if she planned to take her son, she says, “No. I always come
back.”

Johnny, the Smith’s 12-year-old son, woke up because he heard his parents arguing.
He says that they fight often, “but this time the fighting seemed a lot crazier than usual.”
Johnny says that his father went outside, slamming the door. Johnny then says, “I
picked up the living room gun off the coffee table and went to his bedroom.” He reports
that his father keeps “other guns” around the house, unlocked and in the open. During
the witness interview you observe a second gun on an upper bookshelf in the living
room, in an unlocked case, and a subsequent search of the home uncovers a third gun,
not in a case, on a kitchen counter near the back door.

Johnny continues to say that when Mr. Smith came back in the house, he continued
yelling at Mrs. Smith from the living room. “I fixed the car so you can’t leave!” Mr. Smith
yelled. “Where you going to go at this time, anyway?” Johnny said he took the revolver
he had taken out of the case it had been in, and told his mother to stay in the bathroom.
He then walked into the living room. As Mr. Smith stood up and started walking towards

Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law and Prosecution

© 2019 Walden University Page 2 of 4

Johnny, Johnny fired the gun at his father. Johnny says that he fired the gun because
he was afraid that his father might hurt his mother.

The mother claims that she did not hear Johnny in the hall until the gun was fired. The
father suffered a minor injury on his right hand from grabbing the hot, recently fired gun
from Johnny. The bullet is found lodged in a neighbor’s car parked on the street,
causing damage to the window and interior. The neighbor inquires about how he could
“get those jerks to pay for fixing my car.”

The father, when approached while being tended to by the EMS, smells of alcohol. He
says, “That boy knows better than to touch my guns. I’ve told him to leave them alone a
hundred times. He should know better.”

Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law and Prosecution

© 2019 Walden University Page 3 of 4

The Case of the High School Fight

Re-read the case study below. Imagine that you are a prosecutor and that the following
details are also part of the scenario:

● Jake’s parents want to press charges against Tony.

You are called to the local high school to investigate an altercation between two
students, Scott, and Tony. At the scene, you observe two students injured on the curb
of the parking lot, near a new sports car. One student, named Jake, has blood coming
from his head and is laying on his back. The other student, Scott, is holding his shoulder
and has contusions on his arm and face. Jake, the boy on his back, seems groggy, and
two witnesses say he hit his head hard on the curb. After EMTs arrive, stabilize Jake,
and tend to Scott, you conduct the following interviews.

Tony says, “Scott and me trash talk each other all the time. We’re not friends, really, but
we’re not exactly enemies.” He says that he just received the new sports car a few days
ago. “Scott comes over, after talking his usual trash, and pulls his keys out. Like he’s
going to gouge the paint on my new car.” He claims that Scott made a big show of doing
this—there were many witnesses, but most had dispersed. Tony adds, “So I tackled
him. But he didn’t go down right away. We started trying to get each other down. I
started swinging. He started swinging. Things got out of hand. It’s not like I saw Jake. I
didn’t mean to hit him.”

Scott’s story matches Tony’s, and Tony admits to the taunting. However, he adds, “I
wasn’t going to wreck his car. I like his car. Scott’s a friend. I was just playing. I was just
trying to defend myself. Jake’s a friend, too. Scott didn’t mean to hit him. He was just
swinging wildly. All I saw was that a punch missed me, hit Jake, and Jake fell backward
and hit his head on the cement.”

The EMTs decide to take Jake to the hospital, possibly for an MRI due to the blow to the
head. He shows signs of a possible concussion. He says, “I was just trying to break it
up.”

You interview three witnesses who had remained on the scene, tending to Jake until
help arrived. All three corroborate the story, saying that Jake was trying to break up the
fight.

Criminal Justice Case Studies: Criminal Law and Prosecution

© 2019 Walden University Page 4 of 4

The Case of the Late-Night Robbery

Re-read the case study below. Then, imagine that you are a prosecutor and that the
following details are also part of the scenario:

● Edwin was arrested and charged with unlawful entry and attempted burglary.
● Edwin does not claim to have known anything about the homeowner, including

that he thought he was wealthy.
● In fact, Edwin doesn’t remember much about the night before being arrested.

You respond to the home of an 84-year-old male who called 911 to report an intruder
and another call about gunshots fired. You were just two blocks away and managed to
apprehend an individual climbing a fence adjacent to the home.

The suspect is named Edwin and is described as a 32-year-old male who is 6’2” tall and
weighs 275 pounds. He admits to spending Saturday evening at the local pub. “I left
after the jerk bartender refused to serve me. Said I was too drunk. I wasn’t too drunk to
climb that fence, was I?”

On his way home from the bar, Edwin decided to try robbing the home. “I’ve seen that
old man before. I pass by his house all the time. Looks like he’s got a lot of money,”
says Edwin. He had kicked his way through a back patio door and into the enclosed
porch of the residence. “I figured that guy couldn’t hear—probably had hearing aids. So,
I kept going. Of course, then the crazy old guy’s standing in his robe with his gun
pointing at me. No way was he going to shoot. Then he shoots!”

According to the homeowner, despite being warned away, Edwin continued to break
through the door. The owner says that he heard Edwin break into the home. “I have
good hearing for my age,” says the owner. “But he wasn’t trying to be stealthy, it
seemed. I called 911 from my bedside phone. Then I grabbed my shotgun. I thought I
recognized him from walking by here. I fired that warning shot,” said the owner. “I tried
to fire into the dirt, through the broken window, so as to not harm anyone with a stray
bullet. Then he ran right out the door.”