Discussion: ethics, cyber ethics, and security
We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
In recent years, hackers have targeted medical records, from hospitals and other healthcare institutions, across the country. These records contain personal information, contact information, and most importantly, for the hackers, information that may prove useful in stealing an identity. Thus, healthcare organizations have made it a priority to protect patient records and privacy. However, with the influx of technological advancements and hacker determination, there is no perfect way to ensure that all records are secure and safe.
Photo Credit: Getty Images/Blend Images
In addition to medical records, privacy concerns are relevant with any patient chart in any setting. For example, a chart left open on a computer monitor in a patient room, employee passwords and log-in information, and new employee access and screening all represent other ways in which ethics and security merge in healthcare and nursing practice.
For this Discussion, you will consider the importance of ethics as it relates to security. You will also reflect on how these topics might affect clinical practice and the connection to nursing informatics.
To Prepare
- Review the Learning Resources associated with the topics of ethics, cyber ethics, and security.
- Consider the role of each of these topics for clinical practice, as well as the importance of understanding each of these topics.
- Reflect on how COVID-19 might have impacted each of these topics, which reviewing the article, “The COVID-19 Pandemic Highlights Shortcomings in US Health Care Informatics Infrastructure: A Call to Action.”
By Day 3 of Week 9
Post a cohesive response that addresses the following for each of the topics of ethics, cyber ethics, and security:
- Explain how each of the topics might impact clinical practice. Describe why it is important to understand how ethics applies to clinical practice. Be specific and provide examples.
- How might ethics apply to informatics, e-health records, importance of passwords and security?
- After reviewing the article, “The COVID-19 Pandemic Highlights Shortcomings in US Health Care Informatics Infrastructure: A Call to Action,” describe potential impacts of the pandemic on ethics and security as it applies to clinical practice. Be specific and provide examples.
C
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
2
0
1
5
.
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
N
u
r
s
e
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
.
A
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
M
a
y
n
o
t
b
e
r
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
i
n
a
n
y
f
o
r
m
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
f
a
i
r
u
s
e
s
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
U
.
S
.
o
r
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
c
o
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
l
a
w
.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via
AN: 1021761 ; R2 Library (Online service), American Nurses Association.; Nursing Informatics : Scope and Standards of
Practice
Account: s6527200
Standards of Practice for
Nursing Informatics Nursing
Standard 1. Assessment
The informatics nurse collects comprehensive data,
information, and emerging evidence pertinent to the situation.
Standard 2. Diagnosis, Problems, and
Issues Identification
The informatics nurse analyzes assessment data to
identify diagnoses, problems, issues, and opportunities for
improvement.
Standard 3. Outcomes Identification
The informatics nurse identifies expected outcomes for a plan
individualized to the healthcare consumer or to the situation.
Standard 4. Planning
The informatics nurse develops a plan that prescribes strategies,
alternatives, and recommendations to attain expected outcomes.
Standard 5. Implementation
The informatics nurse implements the individualized plan.
Standard 5A. Coordination of Activities
The informatics nurse coordinates planned activities.
Standard 5B. Health Teaching and Health
Promotion
The informatics nurse employs informatics solutions and
strategies for education and teaching to promote health
and a safe environment.
Standard 5C. Consultation
The informatics nurse provides consultation to influence
the identified plan, enhance the abilities of others, and
effect change.
Standard 6. Evaluation
The informatics nurse evaluates progress toward attainment
of outcomes.
The Standards of
Practice for Nursing
Informatics describe a
competent level of nursing
care as demonstrated
by the critical thinking
model known as the
nursing process. The
nursing process includes
the components of
assessment, diagnosis,
outcomes identification,
planning, implementation,
and evaluation.
Accordingly, the nursing
process encompasses
significant actions taken
by nursing informatics
nurses and forms the
foundation of the nurse’s
decision-making.
source: American Nurses Association (2015). Nursing Informatics: Scope and
Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition. Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
ANA Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice
http://www.Nursingworld.org
© 2015 ANA
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
American Nurses Association
Silver Spring, Maryland
2015
Nursing
Informatics:
Scope and
Standards
of Practice
Second Edition
Nursing Informatics.indd 1 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The American Nurses Association (ANA) is a national professional association. This publication, Nursing
Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, Second Edition, reflects the thinking of the practice
specialty of nursing informatics on various issues and should be reviewed in conjunction with state
board of nursing policies and practices. State law, rules, and regulations govern the practice of nursing,
while Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, Second Edition, guides informatics nurses
in the application of their professional skills and responsibilities.
The American Nurses Association is the only full-service professional organization representing the
interests of the nation’s 3.1 million registered nurses through its constituent/state nurses associations
and its organizational affiliates. The ANA advances the nursing profession by fostering high standards
of nursing practice, promoting the rights of nurses in the workplace, projecting a positive and realistic
view of nursing, and by lobbying the Congress and regulatory agencies on healthcare issues affecting
nurses and the public.
American Nurses Association
8515 Georgia Avenue, Suite 400
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3492
1-800-274-4ANA
http://www.Nursingworld.org
Published by Nursesbooks.org
The Publishing Program of ANA
http://www.Nursesbooks.org/
Copyright © 2015 American Nurses Association. All rights reserved. Reproduction or transmission in
any form is not permitted without written permission of the American Nurses Association (ANA).
This publication may not be translated without written permission of ANA. For inquiries, or to report
unauthorized use, email [email protected]
ISBN-13: 978-1-55810-580-5 SAN: 851-3481 11/2014
First printing: November 2014.
Nursing Informatics.indd 2 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
iii
Contents
Contributors vii
The Scope of Nursing Informatics Practice 1
Introduction 1
Definition of Nursing Informatics 1
Metastructures, Concepts, and Tools of Nursing Informatics 2
Metastructures: Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom 2
Integration of Nursing Informatics into Practice 6
Nursing Informatics Practice 7
Tenets of Nursing Informatics 8
Nursing, the Nursing Process, and Vocabularies 9
Concepts and Tools from Information Science and
Computer Science 14
User Experience and Related Concepts 14
Phenomenon of Nursing 16
Functional Areas of Nursing Informatics 18
Administration, Leadership, and Management 19
Systems Analysis and Design 21
Compliance and Integrity Management 22
Consultation 24
Coordination, Facilitation, and Integration 24
Development of Systems, Products, and Resources 26
Education and Professional Development 27
Genetics and Genomics 29
Information Management and Operational Architecture 30
Policy Development and Advocacy 31
Quality and Performance Improvement 32
Research and Evaluation 32
Nursing Informatics.indd 3 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
iv Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Safety, Security, and Environmental Health 34
Integrated Functional Area Example: Telehealth and Informatics 36
Evolution of Informatics Competencies 37
Informatics Competencies Requisite for All Registered Nurses 37
Research About Nursing Informatics Competencies 39
Professional Organization Discussions on Informatics
Competencies 40
Healthcare Leadership Alliance 40
American Organization of Nurse Executives 40
Quality and Safety Education for Nurses 40
National League for Nursing 41
TIGER Initiative Foundation 41
Informatics Competencies: Spanning Careers and Roles 41
Informatics Competencies for Informatics Nurses and Informatics
Nurse Specialists 43
Informatics Competencies for Nurse Educators 43
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information
Technology 44
Synthesis of Evolution of NI Competencies 46
Preparation for Nursing Informatics Specialty Practice 47
Certification of Informatics Nurses 48
An Advancing Professional Nursing Specialty 48
Ethics in Nursing Informatics 49
The Future of Nursing Informatics 52
Trends in Practice Roles and Competencies for Nurses
and Informatics 52
Trends in Technology 53
Nanotechnology 54
Tools for Managing Population Health Concerns 54
Devices and Hardware 55
Robotics 57
Focus of Emerging Technologies 57
Knowledge Representation 59
Educational Technologies 59
Tools for Patient Access to Health Information 60
Expanded Use of IT in Nursing 60
Implications for Nursing Informatics 62
Trends in Regulatory Changes and Quality Standards 62
Contents
Nursing Informatics.indd 4 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition v
Trends in Care Delivery Models and Innovation 63
Consumer Informatics 64
External Partnerships 65
Implications for Nursing Informatics 65
NI Future and Trends: Summary 66
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 67
Significance of the Standards 67
Standards of Practice for Nursing Informatics 68
Standard 1. Assessment 68
Standard 2. Diagnosis, Problems, and Issues Identification 70
Standard 3. Outcomes Identification 71
Standard 4. Planning 72
Standard 5. Implementation 73
Standard 5a. Coordination of Activities 75
Standard 5b. Health Teaching and Health Promotion 76
Standard 5c. Consultation 77
Standard 6. Evaluation 78
Standards of Professional Performance for Nursing Informatics 79
Standard 7. Ethics 79
Standard 8. Education 81
Standard 9. Evidence-Based Practice and Research 83
Standard 10. Quality of Practice 84
Standard 11. Communication 86
Standard 12. Leadership 87
Standard 13. Collaboration 89
Standard 14. Professional Practice Evaluation 91
Standard 15. Resource Utilization 92
Standard 16. Environmental Health 93
Glossary 95
References 97
Appendix A. An Emerging Model of Wisdom 107
Appendix B. Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
(2008) 109
Contents
Nursing Informatics.indd 5 11/6/14 4:06 PM
Index 205
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
This page intentionally left blank
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
vii
Contributors
Work Group Members
William Donovan, MA, RN, Chairperson
Linda Dietrich, MSN, RN-BC, PMP, CPHQ
Sandra Blair Ekimoto, MBA, BS, RN
Paulette Fraser, MS, RN-BC
Sharon Giarrizzo-Wilson, MS, RN-BC, CNOR
Linda Harrington, PhD, DNP, RN-BC, CNS, CPHQ, CENP, CPHIMS,
FHIMSS
Luann Whittenburg, PhD, RN-BC, FNP-BC, CPHQ, CPHIMS
Kathleen “Katie” Hoy Johnson, DNP, RN-BC, NCSN
Mary Lynn McHugh, PhD, RN
Leigh Ann Chandler Poole, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, CRNP, CTCP, CTC
Cheryl D. Parker, PhD, RN-BC, FHIMSS
Troy Seagondollar, MSN-I, RN-BC
Nadia Sultana, DNP, MBA, RN-BC
Advisory Group Members
Theresa L. Calderone, EdD, Med, MSN, RN-BC
Lory J. Maddox, MSN, MBA, RN
Susan A. Matney, MSN, RN, FAAN
Darla Shehy, MSN, RN
Rhonda Struck, BSN, RN, MS
Nursing Informatics.indd 7 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
viii Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
American Nurses Association Staff
Carol Bickford, PhD, RN-BC, CPHIMS, FAAN
Maureen Cones, Esq.
Eric Wurzbacher, BA
Yvonne Humes, MSA
About the American Nurses Association
The American Nurses Association (ANA) is the only full-service professional
organization representing the interests of the nation’s 3.1 million registered
nurses through its constituent/state nurses associations and its organizational
affiliates. The ANA advances the nursing profession by fostering high standards
of nursing practice, promoting the rights of nurses in the workplace, project-
ing a positive and realistic view of nursing, and by lobbying the Congress and
regulatory agencies on healthcare issues affecting nurses and the public.
About Nursesbooks.org, The Publishing
Program of ANA
Nursesbooks.org publishes books on ANA core issues and programs, including
ethics, leadership, quality, specialty practice, advanced practice, and the pro-
fession’s enduring legacy. Best known for the foundational documents of the
profession on nursing ethics, scope and standards of practice, and social policy,
Nursesbooks.org is the publisher for the professional, career-oriented nurse,
reaching and serving nurse educators, administrators, managers, and research-
ers as well as staff nurses in the course of their professional development.
Contributors
Nursing Informatics.indd 8 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
1
The Scope of Nursing
Informatics Practice
Introduction
The American Nurses Association (ANA) identified nursing informatics as a
nursing specialty in 1992. The first scope of practice statement for this specialty,
Scope of Practice for Nursing Informatics, was published in 1994, followed
by the 1995 release of an accompanying resource, Standards of Practice for
Nursing Informatics. Those early publications were replaced in 2001 by the
Scope and Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice, which combined both the
scope and standards of practice into one document and created an enhanced
and more robust definition of nursing informatics to reflect the contemporary
healthcare informatics environment. The 2008 Nursing Informatics: Scope
and Standards of Practice followed with a slightly revised specialty definition
of nursing informatics and inclusion of an expanded presentation of compe-
tencies for the informatics nurse and informatics nurse specialist.
The publication of this second edition of Nursing Informatics: Scope and
Standards of Practice is the culmination of an 18-month-long intensive pro-
fessional review and revision initiative hosted by ANA. Dedicated workgroup
members with more than 280 person-years of nursing and informatics exper-
tise met at least twice a month via telephone conference calls from April 2013
until the final draft was completed in July 2014. Weekly meetings became the
norm as the workgroup members evaluated every response received from the
30-day public comment period. The final draft completed a two-step ANA
review process with examination by the ANA Committee on Nursing Practice
Standards and final approval by the Board of Directors.
Definition of Nursing Informatics
Nursing informatics (NI) is the specialty that integrates nursing science with
multiple information and analytical sciences* to identify, define, manage, and
* A listing of sciences that integrate with nursing informatics includes, but is
not limited to: computer science, cognitive science, the science of terminolo-
gies and taxonomies (including naming and coding conventions), information
management, library science, heuristics, archival science, and mathematics.
Nursing Informatics.indd 1 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
2 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice.
NI supports nurses, consumers, patients, the interprofessional healthcare team,
and other stakeholders in their decision-making in all roles and settings to
achieve desired outcomes. This support is accomplished through the use of
information structures, information processes, and information technology.
The nursing informatics specialty and its constituent members contribute to
achieving the goal of improving the health of populations, communities, groups,
families, and individuals. Supporting activities include, but are not limited to,
the identification of issues and the design, development, and implementation
of effective informatics solutions and technologies within the clinical, admin-
istrative, educational, and research domains of practice.
Metastructures, Concepts, and
Tools of Nursing Informatics
Metastructures: Data, information, Knowledge,
and Wisdom
In the mid-1980s, Blum (1986) introduced the concepts of data, information, and
knowledge as a framework for understanding clinical information systems and
their impact on health care. Blum classified clinical information systems accord-
ing to the three types of objects that these systems processed: data, information,
and knowledge. Blum noted that the classification was artificial, with no clear
boundaries, although the categories did represent a scale of increasing complexity.
In 1989, Graves and Corcoran built on these ideas in their seminal study
of nursing informatics using the concepts of data, information, and knowl-
edge. They contributed two general principles to NI: a definition of nursing
informatics that has been widely accepted in the field, and an information
management model that identified data, information, and knowledge as key
components of NI practice (Figure 1).
Drawing from Blum’s 1986 work, Graves and Corcoran defined the three
concepts as follows:
■ Data are discrete entities that are described objectively without
interpretation.
■ Information is data that have been interpreted, organized, or structured.
■ Knowledge is information that is synthesized so that relationships are
identified and formalized.
Nursing Informatics.indd 2 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 3
Data, information, and knowledge are of value to nurses in all areas of prac-
tice. Data may be obtained from multiple sources; the data are processed into
information and then into knowledge. For example, data derived from direct
care of an individual can be compiled across disease states and then aggregated
for decision-making by nurses, nurse administrators, or other health profes-
sionals. Further aggregation can encompass geographical populations. Nurse
educators can create case studies using these data, and nurse researchers can
access the aggregated data for systematic study.
The appropriate use of knowledge involves the integration of empirical, ethi-
cal, personal, and aesthetic knowledge into actions. The individual must apply
a high level of empirical knowledge in understanding the current situation,
apply a professional value system in considering possible actions, be able to
predict the potential outcome of these actions with a high level of accuracy, and
then have the means to carry out the selected action in the given environment.
Wisdom is defined as the appropriate use of knowledge to manage and solve
human problems. It consists of knowing when and how to apply knowledge
to deal with complex problems or specific human needs (Nelson & Joos, 1989;
Nelson, 2002; Nelson & Staggers, 2014). Whereas knowledge focuses on what
is known, wisdom focuses on the appropriate application of that knowledge
and an appreciation of the consequences of selected actions. For example, a
knowledge base may include several options for managing an anxious family;
wisdom involves nursing judgment about which of these options is most appro-
priate for a specific family, and use of that option in the care of that family.
An example can help distinguish data, information, knowledge, and wis-
dom. If a nurse receives the list of numbers, 28, 68, 94, 98, and 110, those
raw numbers are certainly data, but they are meaningless. If, however, the
numbers are ordered, structured, and identified as follows: T 98o, P 94,
R 28, and BP 110/68, the nurse recognizes this series as measurements of vital
signs and will regard those numbers as information. Nevertheless, the nurse
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework for the Study of Nursing Knowledge
Source: Graves & Corcoran (1989). Reprinted with permission of the publisher.
Information KnowledgeData
Management
processing
Nursing Informatics.indd 3 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
4 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
must be able to place these measures in the context of a particular patient’s situ-
ation in order to interpret the meaning of those values. If these vital signs were
obtained from a newborn, they mean one thing; if they were obtained from an
adult, they have a very different meaning. The nurse’s knowledge of normal vital
sign values for different types of patients, and the condition of the patient from
whom the numbers were obtained, provide a context within which the nurse can
interpret the information. Then the nurse will know if the numbers represent a
normal, expected result or an abnormal, even pathological result. The numbers
must be placed in a particular context so that the nurse can take appropriate
clinical action, thereby demonstrating “knowledge-in-use” or wisdom.
Figure 2 builds on the work of Graves and Corcoran by depicting the
relationship of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. As data are
Figure 2. The Relationship of Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom
(Copyright 2002 Ramona Nelson, Ramona Nelson Consulting. All rights reserved. Reprinted
with permission.)
Data
Naming, collecting,
and organizing
Information
Organizing and
interpreting
Knowledge
Interpreting,
integrating, and
understanding
Wisdom
Understanding,
applying, and
applying with
compassion
Data
Naming, collecting,
and organizing
Information
Organizing and
interpreting
Knowledge
Interpreting,
integrating, and
understanding
Wisdom
Understanding,
applying, and
applying with
compassion
Constant flux
Increasing interactions and interrelationships
In
cr
e
a
si
n
g
c
o
m
p
le
xi
ty
Nursing Informatics.indd 4 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 5
transformed into information and information into knowledge, each level
increases in complexity and requires greater application of human intellect. The
x-axis represents interactions within and the interrelationships between the
concepts as one moves from data to wisdom; the y-axis represents the increas-
ing complexity of the concepts.
Figure 3 reflects Nelson’s recent evolution of her 2002 model depicting
the dynamic interactivity of the inter- and intra-environmental factors that
influence the movement across and within the data-to-wisdom continuum.
In a newly published model, Nelson identifies how information, decision
support, and expert systems represent and enable the evolution of data to
information to knowledge to wisdom (Figure 4). For some additional details
on an emerging wisdom model, see Appendix A.
Figure 3. Revised Data Information Knowledge Wisdom (DIKW)
Model—2013 Version
(© 2013 Ramona Nelson, Ramona Nelson Consulting. All rights reserved. Reprinted with
permission.)
Data
Naming, collecting,
and organizing
Information
Organizing,
interpreting
Knowledge
Interpreting,
integrating,
understanding
Wisdom
Understanding,
applying,
integrating service
with compassion
Constant flux
Increasing interactions and interrelationships
In
cr
e
a
si
n
g
c
o
m
p
le
xi
ty
Nursing Informatics.indd 5 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
6 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Benner (1984) defined the experiential stages of the nursing professional in
Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice. Englebardt
and Nelson (2002) also integrated wisdom into their model. Benner, Hooper-
Kyriakidis, and Stannard (2011) have contributed Thinking-in-Action as an
approach to administration of care. The addition of wisdom raises new and
important research questions, challenging the profession to develop tools
and processes for classifying, measuring, and encoding wisdom as it relates
to nursing and informatics education. Research in these directions will help
clarify the relationship between wisdom and the intuitive thinking of expert
nurses. Such research will also be invaluable in building information systems
to better support healthcare practitioners in decision-making.
integration of nursing informatics into Practice
Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom are central to effective healthcare
delivery. Nurses are skilled in managing and communicating information and
Figure 4. Moving from Data to Expert Systems Version
(© 2013 Ramona Nelson, Ramona Nelson Consulting. All rights reserved. Reprinted with
permission.)
Data
Naming, collecting,
organizing
Information
Organizing,
interpreting
Information
system
Decision
support
system
Knowledge
Interpreting,
integrating,
understanding
Wisdom
Understanding,
applying, integrating
service with
compassion
Increasing interactions and interrelationships
In
cr
e
a
si
n
g
c
o
m
p
le
xi
ty
Expert
system
Nursing Informatics.indd 6 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 7
are always concerned with content quality. Nursing informatics is also con-
cerned with the creation, structure, storage, delivery, exchange, interoperability,
and reuse of nursing and clinical information along the continuum of care. As
electronic health information systems are integrated into every nursing role
and setting, the use of technology at the point of care delivery; the external
use of clinical information for quality, legal, and regulatory activities; and the
use of analytics of data and metadata contribute to the creation of new nursing
knowledge. Such an evolution in the healthcare environment and ubiquitous
use of data, information, and knowledge resources contribute to the blurring
of the boundaries between the roles of nurses, informatics nurses, and infor-
matics nurse specialists.
The informatics nurse (IN) is a registered nurse with an interest or experi-
ence in an informatics field, most often identified as nursing informatics. The
informatics nurse specialist (INS) is a registered nurse with formal graduate-
level education in informatics or an informatics-related field. The informatics
nurse specialist is often responsible for implementing or coordinating projects
involving multiple professions and specialties. Both INs and INSs employ
their unique informatics knowledge, experience, and skills to support and
enable other registered nurses to best use data, information, knowledge, and
technology in their practice domain. They interact with healthcare consum-
ers and other diverse stakeholders across all care settings and throughout the
entire system life cycle.
nursing informatics Practice
As previously presented, nursing informatics (NI) is the specialty that inte-
grates nursing science with multiple information and analytical sciences to
identify, define, manage, and communicate data, information, knowledge,
and wisdom in nursing practice. NI supports nurses, consumers, patients, the
interprofessional healthcare team, and other stakeholders in their decision-
making in all roles and settings to achieve desired outcomes. This support is
accomplished through the use of information structures, information processes,
and information technology.
Note that information technology does not define NI. The synthesis of
data and information into knowledge and wisdom is a core principle of NI,
while information technology supports a system lifecycle process. Both the
IN and the INS strive to master information management and information
technology in the design, structure, retrieval, presentation, storage, exchange,
and use of data, information, and knowledge. The IN and INS consider the
Nursing Informatics.indd 7 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
8 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
impact of information and applied computer science on healthcare deliv-
ery and the nursing process. Table 1 illustrates the connection between the
different foci of nursing and NI. These occur along a continuum without
distinct boundaries.
table 1. nursing and nursing informatics Foci
nursing Focus nursing informatics Focus
Nurses, patients, health, environment Information user, information recipients,
exchange of data, information, knowl-
edge, and wisdom
Content of information, support for
evidence-based practice
Design, structure, interpretation, and
representation of data, information,
knowledge, and wisdom
Using information applications and
technology
Design, develop, implement, and evaluate
applications and technologies, ensur-
ing their safety, quality, effectiveness,
efficiency, and usability
tenets of nursing informatics
The following tenets of nursing informatics form a framework that character-
izes the thinking and actions of informatics nurses in all aspects of practice
and in every setting. Nursing informatics
■ Has a unique body of knowledge, preparation, and experience that
aligns with the nursing profession. NI incorporates informatics concepts
in specific application to the role of nursing and nurses in the health-
care continuum.
■ Involves the synthesis of data and information into knowledge and
wisdom.
■ Supports the decision-making of healthcare consumers, nurses, and
other professionals in all roles and settings to achieve healthcare
consumer safety and advocacy.
■ Supports data analytics, including quality-of-care measures, to improve
population health outcomes and global health. The IN and INS under-
stand that the real-time application of accurate information by nurses
and other clinicians is a mechanism to change healthcare delivery and
affect patient outcomes.
Nursing Informatics.indd 8 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 9
■ Promotes data integrity and the access and exchange of health data for
all consumers of health information.
■ Supports national and international agendas on interoperability and
the efficient and effective transfer and delivery of data, information, and
knowledge.
■ Ensures that collaboration is an integral characteristic of practice.
■ Interleaves user experience and computer–human interaction concepts
throughout practice.
■ Incorporates key ethical concerns of NI such as advocacy, privacy, and
assurance of the confidentiality and security of data and information.
■ Considers the impact of technological changes on patient safety, health-
care delivery, quality reporting, and the nursing process.
■ Leads in the design and promotion of useful, innovative information
technologies that advance practice and achieve desired outcomes.
nursing, the nursing Process, and Vocabularies
“Nursing is the protection, promotion, and optimization of health and
abilities, prevention of illness and injury, alleviation of suffering through
the diagnosis and treatment of human response, and advocacy in the
care of individuals, families, communities, and populations” (ANA, 2010).
Further explication of nursing practice and its complexity is found in the
established standards of professional nursing practice that incorporate the
nursing process of assessment, diagnosis, outcomes identification, plan-
ning, implementation, and evaluation. Delineated competencies accompany
each standard.
The importance of languages, vocabularies, and terminologies cannot be
overstated when describing nursing practice. Nursing leaders have identified
many different vocabularies and ways of organizing data, information, and
knowledge pertinent to nursing through numerous established research initia-
tives that have spanned decades. In the early 1990s, ANA began to formally
recognize these languages, vocabularies, and terminologies (listed in Table 2)
as valuable representations of nursing practice and to promote the integration
of standardized terminologies into information technology solutions. To date,
none has emerged as the leading standardized resource able to represent all
nursing practice concepts.
Nursing Informatics.indd 9 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
10 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
table 2. AnA recognized terminologies and Data element sets
AnA-recognized informatics
systems
setting Where
Developed
Content
Data Element Sets
nMDs
Nursing Minimum Data Set
All nursing Clinical data elements
nMMDs
Nursing Management Minimum
Data Set
All settings Nursing administrative
data elements
Nursing-Developed Terminologies
CCC system
Clinical Care Classification
System
All nursing care + other
health professionals
Diagnoses, interven-
tions, and outcomes
iCnP®
International Classification for
Nursing Practice
All nursing Diagnoses, interven-
tions, and outcomes
nAnDA
NANDA International
All nursing Diagnoses
niC
Nursing Interventions
Classification
All nursing Interventions
noC
Nursing Outcomes Classification
All nursing Outcomes
omaha system Home care, public
health, and community
Diagnoses, interven-
tions, and outcomes
PnDs
Perioperative Nursing Data Set
Perioperative care
settings
Diagnoses, interven-
tions, and outcomes
Multidisciplinary Terminologies
AbC
ABC Codes
Nursing and other
health professionals
Interventions
LoinC®
Logical Observation Identifiers,
Names, and Codes
Nursing and other
health professionals
Outcomes and
assessments
snoMeD Ct
Systematic Nomenclature of
Medicine Clinical Terms
Nursing and other
health professionals
Diagnoses, interven-
tions, and outcomes
Adapted from ANA, 2012.
Nursing Informatics.indd 10 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 11
Standardized terminologies have become a significant vehicle for facilitat-
ing interoperability between different concepts, nomenclatures, and infor-
mation systems. Continued evolution, mapping, and integration of concepts,
as well as research efforts, characterize today’s terminology environment in
light of passage of the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009. HITECH’s accompanying funding
resources continue to stimulate more rapid movement toward electronic
data capture and health information exchanges (HIEs) (HealthIT.gov, 2009).
Two examples follow.
The International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®), devel-
oped and maintained by the International Council of Nurses (ICN),
provides a global cross-map of nursing terminologies to unite nurs-
ing practice through comparison, new research generation, and to
inform and influence health policy. ICNP® has been harmonized
with SNOMED CT® and offers more than 18 different translations
(ICN, 2013).
The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine, or SNOMED CT® (http://
www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/), is a comprehensive universal health-
care reference terminology and messaging structure. SNOMED CT®
enables multiple nursing terminology systems to be mapped to one
another through harmonized concepts. Released in 2011, the Nursing
Problem List Subset of SNOMED CT® is the primary coding terminol-
ogy for nursing problems used in clinical documentation and based
on nursing concepts found within the National Library of Medicine’s
Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus. The
UMLS Metathesaurus includes more than 100 source vocabularies
and is responsible for managing the nursing terminologies mapped
to SNOMED CT®. Other mapping initiatives are underway.
The U.S. federal government formalized its interest in standardized
terms to describe healthcare practice when the Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) established the
HIT Standards Committee with its role to recommend the clinical vocabu-
laries to be used in the electronic specification process (Table 3). Clinical
vocabularies define the concepts used to measure clinical processes and
patient outcomes. Harmonization between the different vocabularies is
necessary to ensure appropriate implementation of the electronic measures
across all electronic health record (EHR) systems. This table does not
Nursing Informatics.indd 11 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
12 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
table 3. onC Hit standards Committee recommended Clinical
Vocabulary standards
Vocabulary setting Application Content
CVX Codes for Vaccines
Administered
Nursing and other Vaccines
(administered)
CPt
Current Procedural Terminology
Other Medical, surgical, and
diagnostic services
rendered for claims
CDC-PHin/VADs
CDC-Public Health Information
Network/Vocabulary Access and
Distribution System
Nursing and other Patient characteristic
(administrative gender,
date of birth)
HCPCs
Healthcare Common Procedure
Coding System
Other Medical, surgical, and
diagnostic services
rendered for claims
iCD-9 CM
International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and
Related Health Problems—Clinical
Modification (9th ed.)
Nursing and other Diagnoses and
assessments
iCD-9 PCs
International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and
Related Health Problems—
Procedural Coding System (9th ed.)
Nursing and other Diagnoses and
assessments
iCD-10 CM
International Statistical
Classification of Diseases and
Related Health Problems—Clinical
Modification (10th ed.)
Nursing and other Diagnoses and
assessments
iCD-10 PCs
International Statistical Classification
of Diseases and Related Health
Problems—Procedural Coding
System (10th ed.)
Nursing and other Diagnoses and
assessments
iCF
International Classification of
Functioning, Disability, and Health
Nursing and other Functional status
Nursing Informatics.indd 12 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 13
iso-639
International Organization for
Standardization Standard 639
Nursing and other Representation
of languages and
language groups
LoinC®
Logical Observation Identifiers,
Names, and Codes
Nursing and other Outcomes and
assessments
rxnorM Nursing and other Normalized clinical
drug names
snoMeD Ct®
Systematic Nomenclature of
Medicine Clinical Terms
Nursing and other Diagnoses, interven-
tions, and outcomes
uCuM
Unified Code for Units of Measure
Nursing and other Units of measure for
results
include recognition of the important codes reflected in the Fifth Edition
of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)
released in 2013.
Such diversity and disparity confirm that informatics nurses must seek a
broader picture of the implications of their work and the uses of languages
and vocabularies for documentation by end users and in outcomes analysis.
For instance, nurses mapping a home care vocabulary to an intervention
vocabulary must see beyond the technical aspect of the work to understand
how a case manager for a multisystem health organization or a home care
agency may be basing knowledge of nursing acuity and case mix on the dif-
fering vocabularies. By envisioning the varied uses of the terminologies, the
IN and INS promote continuity in the patient care process by harmonizing
concepts across disparate organizations and EHR systems. Success in this
area mandates active informatics nurse participation in associated standards
initiatives, such as the work being done by Health Level Seven International
(HL7) and the International Health Terminology Standards Development
Organisation (IHTSDO).
Adapted from CMS Measures Management System Blueprint v. 11.0, July 2014
(http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/
MMS/MeasuresManagementSystemBlueprint.html).
Nursing Informatics.indd 13 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
14 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Concepts and tools from information science
and Computer science
Tools and methods from information and computer sciences are fundamental
to NI, including:
■ Information management—An elemental process by which one files,
stores, manipulates, and reports data for various uses.
■ Information communication—Enables systems to send data and to
present information in formats that improve understanding.
■ Information structures—Organize data, information, and knowledge for
processing by computers.
■ Information technology—Includes computer hardware, software,
communication, and network technologies, derived primarily from com-
puter science. Its use distinguishes informatics from more traditional
methods of information management.
user experience and related Concepts
Usability, human–computer interaction (HCI), ergonomics, and human factors
have long been overlapping concepts of fundamental interest to the informatics
nurse. Contemporary thinking has identified user experience as the overarch-
ing descriptive term.
Although the 2001 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, Crossing the Quality
Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, publicized the importance
of human factors in health care, the emphasis for attention and action related
to usability goes much further. Many researchers (including Ash, Berg, &
Coiera, 2004; Ash, Sittig, Dykstra, Campbell, & Guappone, 2009; Koppel et
al., 2005; Staggers, Jennings, & Lasome, 2010; and Guo, Irdbarren, Kapsandoy,
Perri, & Staggers, 2011) have reported usability issues. Stead and Lin (2009)
concluded from their evaluation of top U.S. electronic health records that the
major impediment to their effectiveness was usability.
ISO 9241-11 defines usability as the extent to which a product can be used
by specific users in a specific context to achieve specific goals with effective-
ness, efficiency, and satisfaction. Usability in healthcare is fundamentally
about patient safety and human performance with tools and systems. Several
resources provide more details about usability:
■ Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS),
Promoting Usability in Health Organizations: Initial Steps and
Nursing Informatics.indd 14 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 15
Progress Toward a Healthcare Usability Maturity Model (2011),
available at http://www.himss.org/files/HIMSSorg/content/files/
HIMSS_Promoting_Usability_in_Health_Org.pdf
■ National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), “Usability” web
page, available at http://www.nist.gov/healthcare/usability/
■ U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), “General Human Factors
Information and Resource” web page, available at http://www.fda.
gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/humanfactors/
ucm124829.htm
■ Tiger Initiative, Designing Usable Clinical Information Systems:
Recommendations from the TIGER Usability and Clinical Application
Design Collaborative Team, available at http://www.thetigerinitiative.
org/docs/TigerReport_Usability_000.pdf
■ Jakob Nielsen of the Nielsen Norman Group (2012), “Usability 101:
Introduction to Usability,” available at http://www.nngroup.com/articles/
usability-101-introduction-to-usability/
HCI examines how people, software applications, and computer technology
interact and influence each other. Elements of HCI are rooted in psychology,
cognitive science, sociology, computer science, and information science. HCI
addresses the design, development, procurement, implementation, and evalu-
ation of applications as well as other components associated with the system
life cycle. For example, an informatics nurse would assess a bar-code medica-
tion administration system before purchase to determine whether the design
and operation complement the way nurses cognitively process medication
administration and document that action.
The IOM’s 2012 report, Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer
Systems for Better Care, identifies the importance of HCI in the integration
of applications and technology with healthcare delivery. Such integration into
everyday life has contributed to the empowerment of patients, now often
designated as e-patients, and the promotion of interprofessional collabora-
tion through mobile technology (m-health). This requires the IN and INS to
address all environments and all levels of user ability to assure accommodation
of the various devices being developed.
The IN and INS will also have to consider a variety of sociotechnical issues
and their effect on HCI (Sittig & Singh, 2010). These include clinical experience
level (Cho, Staggers, & Park, 2010), user literacy and user physical limitations
Nursing Informatics.indd 15 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
16 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
(Huang, Chen, & Chung, 2005), and aging (Sibley, 2008). In the future, the
convenience of technologies available in commercial products can be expected to
drive similar functionality in healthcare technology and will increase the scope of
HCI factors. Finally, the effect of natural language processing (Zhou, 2007) and
implantable monitoring devices (Topol, 2011) on HCI is yet to be determined.
The term ergonomics refers to attributes of physical equipment or to prin-
ciples of arrangement of equipment in the work environment. For instance,
an informatics nurse may have a role in ensuring that sound ergonomics prin-
ciples are used in clinical settings to guide the selection and arrangement of
various devices to support workflow for interprofessional providers, patients
and their families, and other end users.
In the past, HCI, usability, and ergonomics have typically been subsumed
under the rubric of human factors, or how humans interact with tools, includ-
ing technology. The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) identi-
fies ergonomics (or human factors) as “the scientific discipline concerned with
the understanding of interactions among humans and other elements of a
system, and the profession that applies theory, principles, data and methods
to design in order to optimize human well-being and overall system perfor-
mance” (https://www.hfes.org/web/educationalresources/hfedefinitionsmain.
html#profsoc). The concepts of efficiency, effectiveness, and safety are integral
and apply to the client, consumer, and others.
The term user experience encompasses all aspects of users’ interactions.
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-11 defines
the term as “a person’s perceptions and responses that result from the use
or anticipated use of a product, system or service.” (ISO, 2009) describes it
as a range of experiences, from walking into a healthcare facility to designs
that fit into complex ecosystems with many users interacting. Development
of high-quality user experiences requires the diverse expertise of many pro-
fessions, such as engineering, graphic and industrial design, interface design,
and psychology. Staggers (2014) identified the interrelationship of the user
experience as encompassing human factors, HCI, ergonomics, and usability,
as displayed in Figure 5.
Phenomenon of nursing
The metaparadigm of nursing comprises four key concepts: nurse, person,
health, and environment. The phenomenon of nursing, both art and science,
is supported by the tenets of nursing informatics. The nurse continuously
collects data about persons, their health, and the environmental factors that
Nursing Informatics.indd 16 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 17
influence health maintenance and the healing process. Nurses, using their edu-
cation, intellect, and experiential knowledge, place these data into categories
to create information. Finally, using critical thinking and wisdom, the nurse
is able to formulate a plan and prioritize interventions or actions that effect
the most positive outcome possible for the situation.
Nurses make decisions from their unique perspectives based on their edu-
cation, experience, and specialty. Decision-making is the process of choosing
among alternatives. The decisions that nurses make can be characterized both
by the quality of decisions and by the impact of the actions resulting from
those decisions. As knowledge workers, nurses make numerous decisions that
affect the lives and well-being of individuals, families, groups, communities,
and populations. The process of decision-making in nursing is guided by the
concept of critical thinking. Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined
process of actively and skillfully searching out the best evidence and using
that knowledge to conceptualize, apply, analyze, synthesize, and/or evaluate
data and information as a guide to belief and action (adapted from Scriven
& Paul, 1987).
Figure 5. Relationship of User Experience to Other Concepts
Reference: Staggers, 2014, p. 337.
User Experience
Human Factors
Ergonomics
Usability
Human–computer
Interaction
Nursing Informatics.indd 17 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
18 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
The nursing process of assessment, diagnosis, outcomes identification, plan-
ning, implementation, and evaluation can be enhanced through the utilization
of technology. Technology, when properly developed and applied, has been
shown to enhance the healthcare team’s ability to collect, categorize, interpret,
manage, evaluate, and share relevant information. This also enhances the
team’s ability to manage client care in a more efficient and productive manner.
In most cases, the utilization of technology has decreased the nurse’s workload
associated with collecting and categorizing data, while enabling and enhancing
the sharing of relevant information with other members of the healthcare team.
When the complexity of information sharing is decreased, enhanced sharing of
relevant information within the healthcare team theoretically improves quality
and safety and results in improved patient outcomes. The informatics nurse
is ideally suited to evaluate how technology can assist the nurse and other
members of the care delivery team to manage data and share information to
achieve desired outcomes.
In addition to enhancing the nursing process, data collection, informa-
tion sharing, intervention implementation, and resultant patient outcomes
can be tracked via database queries and processed through research meth-
ods. Evidence-based practice models can be developed through this research.
Models of practice that generate positive patient outcomes can then be rep-
licated and supported by systems optimized to allow seamless data capture,
intuitive data display, and expert system processing.
Nursing is focused on optimizing the health status of individuals, families,
groups, communities, and populations. Each of these entities is affected by the
environment in which it resides. Technology, when properly designed and imple-
mented, enhances the ability to track and trend data to help determine what,
where, when, how, and why resources could be allocated to achieve the greatest
good. Informatics nurses are uniquely qualified to assist in the development and
optimization of systems that capture, categorize, share, and evaluate data and
information while keeping the nursing process as the foundation of practice.
Functional Areas of Nursing Informatics
Informatics nurses, informatics nurse specialists, and other stakeholders are
helping transform health care through the use of informatics processes, tools,
and structures. Across all healthcare environments, INs and INSs most com-
monly practice in interprofessional healthcare environments and interact with
information technology (IT) professionals during all phases of the system
Nursing Informatics.indd 18 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 19
life cycle. INs and INSs use scientific and informatics principles and employ
creative strategies in informatics solutions. They bring the perspectives of
nursing, and very often the patients, to interprofessional work through a solid
understanding of operational processes and the value of consumer advocacy to
informatics functions. INs and INSs may need additional education or other
types of advanced preparation to manage the informatics projects at hand.
Because of the tendency to confuse roles with titles, this section describes
the following dynamic and evolving functional areas of nursing informatics:
■ Administration, leadership, and management
■ Systems analysis and design
■ Compliance and integrity management
■ Consultation
■ Coordination, facilitation, and integration
■ Development of systems, products, and resources
■ Educational and professional development
■ Genetics and genomics
■ Information management/operational architecture
■ Policy development and advocacy
■ Quality and performance improvement
■ Research and evaluation
■ Safety, security, and environmental health
The last discussion in this section describes additional integrated functions,
especially those crossing clinical practice and informatics. INs and INSs may
be in positions that focus primarily on one functional area; more frequently,
though, several functional areas are combined within a particular NI position.
Administration, Leadership, and Management
As is true of administration in general, leadership and management functions in
nursing informatics incorporate both higher-level and mid-level administrative
functions. Increasingly, INSs are attaining senior leadership positions. Positions
may be titled Chief Nursing Informatics Officer (CNIO), Chief Information
Nursing Informatics.indd 19 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
20 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Officer (CIO), director, or similar leadership titles (American Organization of
Nurse Executives [AONE], 2012; Hodges & Wierz, 2012). In this functional
capacity, nursing informatics leaders are expected to be visionary and establish
the direction of large-scale informatics solutions. The nursing informatics
leader often serves as a catalyst for developing strategic plans and creating
national or system policies and procedures, while serving as the champion for
integrated projects and systems.
In mid-level management, INSs may supervise resources and activities for
all phases of the system life cycle. These activities may include needs analysis,
requirements gathering, design, development, selection and purchase, testing,
implementation, and evaluation of systems to support all facets of nursing and
healthcare delivery. At all levels, leadership is characterized by the combination
of superb communication skills, collaboration, change management, risk assess-
ment, and coalition building with political finesse, business acumen, and strategic
application knowledge. INSs serving in this functional area may put most of their
energy into leadership and management. In other positions, administration may
be part of a position merged with other functional areas. Typical examples include:
■ INS at a large hospital system, supervising an implementation and
education team, representing nursing interests on various IT com-
mittees, performing project management for multiple documentation
projects, and having oversight of nursing standards and vocabularies
used in applications.
■ Project director for a clinical software company, managing implementa-
tion teams for various client projects (hospitals to ambulatory facilities)
and consulting with clients on all aspects of systems selection, custom-
ization, adoption, and use of software.
■ Grants administrator for an information science research agency, seek-
ing and writing grants that would fund NI-related projects, designing
budgets, and ensuring optimal allocation of resources.
A crucial responsibility for any nursing informatics leader is fostering inter-
professional collaboration in designing, developing, and deploying technology
in healthcare settings. Interprofessional collaborative practice has been defined
as occurring “when multiple health workers from different professional back-
grounds work together with patients, families, carers [sic], and communities to
deliver the highest quality of care” (World Health Organization [WHO], 2010,
p. 13). Although informatics nurses may lead teams and projects, the output
of these teams rarely has an impact only on nursing care. Most commonly
Nursing Informatics.indd 20 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 21
these efforts reflect concerns and actions of interprofessional stakeholders.
The Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel (2011, p. 14)
described multiple core competencies for interprofessional teamwork that
included “21st-century technologies for communication and coordination (i.e.,
informatics),” emphasizing how vital it is for all informatics nurse leaders to
work collaboratively with all members of the healthcare team.
systems Analysis and Design
Data can be aggregated and analyzed in a number of ways to synthesize knowl-
edge, inform decision support and outcomes management, advance the science
of nursing informatics, and support reimbursement. The IN and INS may use
a number of tools and resources to accomplish these ends, such as data flow
diagrams, entity-relationship modeling, taxonomies, clinical vocabularies, and
quality indicators. Meta-analysis can identify large-scale trends across multiple
groups of data. Systems requirements analysis can track the flow of data in a
process or system to aid in customization for end-user needs.
A major responsibility of the IN or INS is to understand workflow processes,
particular informatics solutions, and how these affect each other. Workflow
analysis (identifying the individual tasks of a work process), coupled with an
understanding of the clinical process, is essential to enhance safety and reduce
inefficiencies in a healthcare environment. Processes must be designed for
successful interactions between users and computers. Competence in formal
systems analysis techniques permits comparison of systems’ capabilities and
limitations and is required to design (or redesign) applications for successful
computer–user interactions or user experiences.
INs and INSs may also engage in the process of knowledge discovery in
databases (KDD). Using sound methodologies and practical evidence-based
recommendations, the INS can discover information and knowledge related to
diverse areas of nursing practice. Knowledge discovery methods (data mining
and machine learning methods) in combination with statistical analysis and
data visualization techniques help identify and understand patterns in very
large data stores, such as enterprise data warehouses.
Analysis is also required for the use of clinical vocabularies, languages, and
taxonomies. Nursing languages must be periodically re-evaluated for their
applicability and currency. Analysis of a meta-database, such as the Unified
Medical Language System (UMLS), requires knowledge of nursing and medical
vocabularies in order to analyze groups of taxonomies and map them to simi-
lar terms. An example is the effort to map SNOMED CT to the International
Nursing Informatics.indd 21 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
22 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)
to aid in meeting and attesting to meaningful use requirements. IN and INS
expertise should be included in these efforts to support the collection, report-
ing, and analysis of nursing-sensitive data.
Outcomes analysis may be related to any domain of nursing practice:
clinical, education, research, or administration. The complexity and levels of
outcomes must be determined for healthcare consumers, populations, and
institutions. Analysis can include the use of humancomputer interaction
principles and methods. In that domain, INs and INSs use HCI tools and
methods, such as heuristics and cognitive walk-through, to evaluate the match
of systems to users, tasks, and contexts.
Analysts use other tools to (1) maintain data integrity and reliability,
(2) facilitate data aggregation and analysis, (3) identify outcomes, (4) identify
organizational barriers, and (5) develop performance measures. These tech-
niques allow nurses to contribute to building a knowledge base consisting of
the data, information, theories, and models used by nurses and other stake-
holders in decision-making that supports quality health care. The following
are examples of analysis activities:
■ A nursing analyst in a hospice setting tracks health consumer data to
establish a weighted case mix to determine nursing personnel allocations.
■ A quality improvement (QI) specialist in a hospital system aggregates
multisite research data related to diagnosis and nursing procedures or
risk mapping.
■ A quality assurance (QA) analyst works with nurse managers to retool
current work processes after examining existing system data in custom-
ized QA reports.
■ An analyst applies knowledge discovery methods to warehoused
electronic data to build a predictive model of patient falls.
■ A behavior analyst identifies organizational barriers or breakdowns to
avoid system failures or risk.
Compliance and integrity Management
Following the report To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System (IOM, 1999),
the downfall of Enron, passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), and
pay-for-performance incentives adopted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), healthcare organizations must have robust reporting systems to
Nursing Informatics.indd 22 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 23
monitor compliance and integrity of their information and reporting activities,
infrastructures, employees, and business partners. Along with developing orga-
nizational cultures that encourage ethical conduct and regulatory compliance,
mechanisms must be in place to prevent and detect criminal conduct.
Computerized information systems must support compliance with the
1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) efforts
by limiting access to personally identifiable health information to only those
who require and are authorized access. Auditing systems that detect red flags,
reporting systems that will preserve confidentiality or anonymity, and enter-
prise risk management (ERM) allow reporting of risks by everyone in an
organization. ERM breaks down silos and provides timely reporting of risks
and opportunities at a high level for immediate attention through risk scoring
and mapping (Carroll & Nakamura, 2011).
The IN and INS must have and maintain the knowledge to effectively apply
current ethical standards and regulatory requirements to help healthcare
organizations to:
■ Revise operational procedures for staff.
■ Establish technical processes to maintain compliance.
■ Meet new regulatory mandates at local, state, national, and global levels.
These standards, directives, guidelines, or mandates may include those from
government agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and accredita-
tion organizations, such as The Joint Commission (TJC), Healthcare Facilities
Accreditation Program (HFAP), Det Norske Veritas Healthcare, Inc. (DNV),
and the World Health Organization (WHO).
Ethical issues surround the use of new products, such as embedded tech-
nologies and radio-frequency identification (RFID), which can be used in car-
ing for persons with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. As the science
matures, some of these issues will be resolved and standards will be established.
Requirements will continue to evolve. The following are examples of compli-
ance and integrity management activities:
■ The security officer for a hospital ensures that HIPAA standards are
met by software vendors within the organization, periodically moni-
tors software audit logs for breaches, and ensures that passwords are
not shared and that backup and disaster procedures are in place and
operational.
Nursing Informatics.indd 23 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
24 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
■ A compliance officer for a state health agency writes and enforces poli-
cies that conform to state and national laws respecting records retention.
■ A care coordinator administrator for a hospital system ensures the confi-
dentiality of data transmitted via telehealth and telemedicine devices.
■ An internal auditor reviews charges to documented care given for
appropriate reimbursement or abnormal billing practices.
Consultation
Informatics nurses and informatics nurse specialists apply informatics knowledge
and skills to serve as transformational leaders and resources for clients, both
formally and informally, in external and internal settings. Informatics nurse
consultants are expected to have solid expertise in clinical nursing and areas
such as process redesign, strategic IT planning, system implementation, writ-
ing for informatics and other publications, evaluating clinical software products,
working with clients to write requests for proposals, performing market research,
and assisting in the planning of conferences, academic courses, and professional
development programs. Expert INSs may serve as internal consultants, work for
a consulting firm, own an independent practice, and be recognized as experts by
writing about NI and speaking at NI-related events. Flexibility, good communica-
tion skills, solid nursing/healthcare delivery background, breadth and depth of
clinical and informatics knowledge, and excellent interpersonal skills are needed
to respond to rapidly changing projects and priorities. Project examples include:
■ Consulting with individuals and groups in defining healthcare informa-
tion problems and identifying methods for implementing, utilizing, and
modifying IT solutions and data structures to support healthcare access,
delivery, and evaluation.
■ Consulting as the project manager to identify strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats; to ensure that team members are performing
duties as assigned; and to complete the project on time and within budget.
■ Consulting with clients in writing requests for proposals to elicit vendor
bids for informatics solutions and in evaluating vendor responses.
Coordination, Facilitation, and integration
One of the most common NI roles is implementing informatics solutions.
Nurses are particularly well suited for IT implementation, as it essentially
Nursing Informatics.indd 24 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 25
follows the nursing process of assessment, diagnosis, outcomes identification,
planning, implementation, and evaluation (ANA, 2010). The IN or INS may
serve as project coordinator, facilitating change management and integrating
the information and technology to transform processes. In this role, project
management knowledge and skills are essential to the success of the project.
Project coordination can range from small, department-centered efforts to
enterprise-wide initiatives. Examples include:
■ Coordinating installations, system upgrades, and optimization of exist-
ing features and functions.
■ Employing research methodologies to disseminate new knowledge and
integrate that knowledge into practice.
■ Developing and defining healthcare policy to advance public health.
■ Serving as a systems administrator of a learning management system
(LMS) for the delivery of e-learning courses or training programs for
healthcare professionals.
The IN and INS frequently serve as a hub for interprofessional communi-
cation and as a bridge and communication liaison between and among infor-
matics solution users, clinical and nonclinical end users, and IT experts and
staff. The IN and INS often serve as translators and integrators addressing
system requirements and impacts.
Informatics nurses frequently serve as the liaison between engineers and
end users. In this capacity, the informatics nurse ensures that necessary test-
ing or research is performed to determine the end user’s needs and that infor-
mation is conveyed appropriately. The informatics nurse will also play a key
role in the development and testing of new applications or enhancements to
existing applications. Once the engineer has created a product, the informat-
ics nurse evaluates the use and usability of the product from the viewpoint
of the end user. This liaison type of facilitation and coordination occurs in
multiple environments. Ensuring the integration of nursing vocabularies and
standardized nomenclatures in applications is another example. In this case
INs and INSs can also act as usability experts and recommend ideal formats
for the utilization of technology. Examples of coordination, facilitation, and
integration include:
■ The project coordinator for a statewide electronic health record imple-
mentation coordinates all aspects of the project and supervises an inter-
disciplinary team to prepare public health personnel to use the application.
Nursing Informatics.indd 25 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
26 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
■ The project manager for a clinical software company (using tools
such as project management software and project plans) manages the
resources and activities for clients whose responsibilities cross inpatient
and ambulatory areas.
■ The clinical liaison for a telehealth software vendor communicates
with providers and consumers to ensure that all parties are agreeable
to development and implementation plans, and ensures that providers
using the system receive adequate technical education.
■ A usability expert on a software development team advises software
engineers on screen design from the standpoint of clinical documenta-
tion needs, performs or coordinates testing of iterative designs, and
validates clinical requirements with the users.
Development of systems, Products, and resources
A developer is responsible for translating user requirements into effective infor-
matics solutions. Informatics nurses are involved in a vast array of development
activities, from conceptualizing models for applications, to software and hard-
ware design, to the design of education manuals and media, to the design of
complex technology networks. As part of this function, INs and INSs participate
in the process of design, iterative development, testing, and dissemination of
quality informatics solutions for nurses, other healthcare professionals, and
consumers. An understanding of the information needs of nurses and the nurs-
ing profession, consumers and consumer care processes, best business practices,
client services, projected market directions, product design and development
methods, market research, contemporary programming, systems design, and
modeling language are essential for practicing in a development environment.
Adherence to national standards and regulatory requirements is also
essential to any development work. To ensure interoperability between sys-
tems, INs and INSs involved in system development must be knowledge-
able about international standards requirements. Existing standards include
Health Level Seven (HL7), International Organization for Standardization
(ISO), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), International Statistical
Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems (ICD), and Digital
Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) group standards, as
well as Section 508 accessibility standards. An understanding of the current
work on standards is mandatory. The following are examples of development
responsibilities:
Nursing Informatics.indd 26 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 27
■ A developer employed by a personal health record software vendor
creates user-friendly screens for consumers to enter information as well
as screens for nurses to display and interpret the data.
■ A database administrator with a large multisite teaching organization
manages an expanded nursing vocabulary set for inpatient, ambulatory,
and home health nursing documentation.
■ A nurse Web content developer for a consortium creates and validates
content for educational handouts, help and tool tips for user interfaces
that display national guidelines, and educational tools. This content
includes new and innovative tools for knowledge dissemination.
■ A programmer in a hospital IT department codes software for docu-
menting diabetic education.
education and Professional Development
Education is a critical component of many NI functions and may directly affect
the success or failure of any new or modified IT solution. Vendors of informa-
tion systems frequently use the term training when referring to client education.
In nursing, however, the broader label of education is used. Adherence to solid
educational principles is a necessary component of education and professional
development. Teaching nurses and nursing students, healthcare consumers
and families, and members of the interprofessional healthcare team about the
effective and ethical uses of information technology, as well as NI concepts and
theories, is essential for the optimal use of informatics solutions in nursing
practice. Ever-changing requirements in health information technology make
continuing education essential as well. INs and INSs in this capacity develop,
implement, and evaluate educational curricula and educational technologies
to meet learners’ needs.
In this role, educators and trainers assess and evaluate informatics skills
and competencies while providing feedback to the learner regarding the effec-
tiveness of the activity and the learner’s ability to demonstrate newly acquired
skills. Educators and trainers manage, evaluate, report, and utilize data and
information related to the specific learner and the educational delivery system.
These informatics nurse innovators define and develop educational technolo-
gies, integrate the solutions into the educational and practice environments,
and challenge organizations to consider and adopt innovative informatics
solutions. The introduction of mobile technologies provides an opportunity
for additional creative learning methodologies.
Nursing Informatics.indd 27 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
28 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
The informatics nurse must evaluate the users’ level of information literacy
as well as their computer literacy. Computer literacy is a core competency
needed in health care and nursing practice, and should be taught in nursing
curricula at all levels. In addition, information literacy must be integrated into
practice and used to support knowledge management. These are the founda-
tions of informatics competencies.
Education and professional development must include INs, INSs, end users,
and consumers. The use of innovative technologies to support telehealth/telemon-
itoring and mobile health (mHealth) has encouraged the use of Internet-based
consumer-accessible applications, especially by older adults. New competencies
are needed to ensure that health information is displayed to consumers at an
appropriate level of understanding for all delivery devices, so that support staff
personnel are rarely needed. Cultural issues, language considerations, and literacy
levels must be assessed and accommodated prior to implementation.
Informatics nurses need to ensure that the content of web-based knowl-
edge portals of both private and government health organizations are reliable,
accurate, and trustworthy. Education and professional development involve
not only education of INs and INSs, but also development of appropriate user
interfaces for the consumer and other healthcare team members. Examples of
education and professional development functions include:
■ An academic role teaching the basic NI principles to all levels of nursing
students or preparing graduate nursing students enrolled in a nursing
informatics degree program to implement, support, and evaluate
clinical applications.
■ A development role creating simulation technology scenarios and
curricula to support traditional learning and clinical placements.
■ A clinical preceptor role orienting newly hired nurses and students to
the use of telehealth, telehealth technology, and mHealth technologies,
integrating these technologies into clinical practice, and then providing
consumer education.
■ A vendor educator role involving international travel to educate nurses
on the operations, capabilities, troubleshooting, limitations, and benefits
of a product.
■ A staff development liaison role for a large hospital educating nurses
and other end users about how to integrate clinical applications into
their work processes.
Nursing Informatics.indd 28 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 29
■ A consultant role assisting a clinician practice with the implementation,
use, and ongoing support of electronic health records and other related
technologies.
■ Working as a help desk team member assisting users with support
during clinical application upgrades/releases, answering clinical user
questions, or trouble-shooting user problems.
■ A patient education coordinator role facilitating electronic consumer
health resources.
■ Web developer responsibilities for development, maintenance, and
presentation of disease content for a hospital web portal.
■ Oversight of social media resources, products, and policies to enhance
this evolving and important communication technology, enabling open
and enhanced communication among healthcare consumers, providers,
vendors, and other stakeholders.
Genetics and Genomics
Advances in mapping the human genome and understanding the character-
istics and influence of individual DNA have had a dramatic impact on what
is known about patients. These data, especially when integrated into EHRs
or personal health records (PHRs), are leading to innovations in patient care
and customized medications and therapies targeted to the individual’s unique
responses. Care and medication can be more precisely individualized to patients
based on their unique DNA profiles. Data about their past response to medica-
tions and other interventions can be documented. This is dramatically chang-
ing how patients are being managed for specific diseases and conditions and
is extending into the prevention of some diseases.
Computerized clinical decision support can help manage the inherent
complexity of customized patient care. Predictive disease models based on
patients’ DNA profiles are emerging as clinicians better understand DNA
mapping. These advances have significant implications for a new model of
care and for the IN’s and INS’s participation in the development of genomic
IT solutions. More than ever, patients will need to be partners in this develop-
ment. Genomics is leading to many specialized advances in care delivery and
must be linked to exact, individualized data within a personal health record.
Subsequently, advanced disease management with the ultimate goal of disease
prevention will be possible. This change has many implications for ethics as
Nursing Informatics.indd 29 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
30 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
well as informatics. In fact, genomics competencies and curricular guidelines
are available online (ANA & ISONG, 2011; http://www.genome.gov/Pages/
Health/HealthCareProvidersInfo/Grad_Gen_Comp.pdf ).
With the increased amount of research regarding the impact of genomic
variation on health and its increasing relevance to clinical practice, infor-
matics nurses need to build their genetics/genomics knowledge base so that
they may support this expanding practice area. This involves developing an
understanding of genomic bioinformatics, the types of genomic information
available, and how such information can be stored and abstracted within the
EHR for genomic clinical decision support.
The Genomic Nursing State of the Science Advisory Panel (Calzone et al.,
2013) calls for informatics nurses to contribute to the infrastructure for infor-
matics support systems that use genomic information. The genomic nursing
science blueprint has specifically targeted innovation supported through nurs-
ing research and technology development as a priority, including:
1. “Data storage and use to facilitate research process and outcomes;
2. Facilitate cross-generational sharing of genomic data (e.g., family
history, laboratory analyses);
3. Managing, analyzing, and interpreting genomic information (e.g.,
sequencing data);
4. Point-of-care decision support for client and healthcare provider;
5. Common terminology and taxonomy, and
6. Common formats for data storage/exchange and queries” (Calzone,
2013, p. 100).
Supporting clinical documentation and information system technologies
are changing to meet the demands created by the evolution of personalized
care and individualized therapies related to an individual’s genomic character-
istics. Informatics nurses have unique opportunities to engage in requirements
definition, design, implementation, and evaluation activities, as well as policy
development and ethics discussions.
information Management and operational Architecture
Information management (IM) acquires, organizes, controls, disseminates,
and uses (reuses) information from any source regardless of origin (internal
or external to the organization). Such management efforts address the quality,
Nursing Informatics.indd 30 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 31
ownership, use, and security of information in the context of organizational
performance to support and achieve the effective operation of an organization
(adapted from Feather & Sturges, 2002).
An organization must manage electronic and physical information through
the information life cycle, regardless of origin source or format (data, paper
documents, electronic documents, wave forms, audio, social media, video, etc.),
for delivery through multiple channels (cable, Internet, and broadcast inter-
faces). Information management includes the capture, management, preserva-
tion, storage, and delivery of the right information to the right people at the
right time. The informatics nurse’s role in information management consists
largely of the organization and control of planning, structure, processing, evalu-
ation, and reporting of information activities to meet objectives and enable
the delivery of information.
Operational architecture (OpArc) can be used throughout the system life
cycle to address the complexity of information exchange through the use of
“views” to describe and interrelate the data elements, tasks, activities, and infor-
mation flows required to accomplish clinical operations. Operational architec-
ture provides a repeatable, standardized, structured, and integrated approach
linking operational concepts to the providing healthcare systems, as well as
technical standards for the objective analysis of information requirements.
Policy Development and Advocacy
Informatics nurses play a key role in formulation of health policy, in particu-
lar bringing expertise in data and information content, data structures, and
IT solutions, care coordination, and advocacy. Policy development may be at
any level: international, national, regional, state, and local. Informatics nurses
are experts in defining the data needed and the structure, management, and
availability of those data for decision-making. This allows them to advocate
for consumers, providers, and the enterprise, and to articulate relevant issues
from a nursing perspective or healthcare consumer viewpoint. Policy-related
activities may include developing, writing, implementing, and evaluating
guidance. Regardless of the level or activity, informatics nurses are partners
in setting health policy, particularly in relation to information management
and communication, infrastructure development, and economics.
The advocacy function of the IN or INS also encompasses consumer
health. Informatics nurses may be part of initiatives such as promoting the
adoption of technology for rural programs to increase access to health ser-
vices, or endorsing government and private initiatives to engage consumers
Nursing Informatics.indd 31 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
32 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
in creating a personal health record. Advocacy may include educating legis-
lators about such topics as increasing telecommunication access, expanding
reimbursement for technology-enabled consumer services, or educating the
public on ways to access health-related materials via the Internet. Examples
of the policy development and advocacy function of the IN or INS include
the following:
■ The president of a health information management organization
represents nursing on a national information standards task force.
■ An informatics nurse lobbyist participates in advocacy efforts on behalf
of consumers for increased government funding of demonstration or
pilot informatics projects.
■ A president of a nursing informatics organization writes letters to
elected officials to obtain their support for reimbursement of services by
remote, technology-enabled providers.
Quality and Performance improvement
At present, emphasis is increasingly focused on ensuring seamless integration
of quality and performance improvement to enhance patient outcomes. All
aspects of healthcare services delivery require access to significant data, infor-
mation, and knowledge resources. Comparative effectiveness, meaningful use,
core quality measures, development of e-clinical measures, and the application
of protocols and critical paths will require further development and refine-
ment. The informatics nurse is uniquely positioned to help identify available
measurable content and generate queries and reports that trend and track
events and actions and respond to specific inquiries, questions, and concerns.
This functional role is closely aligned with development, research, evaluation,
safety, and security activities described in other sections.
research and evaluation
Informatics nurses and informatics nurse specialists may conduct research
into the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of informat-
ics solutions, models, and theories. INS researchers use systematic methods
of inquiry (including traditional and newer techniques) to identify, retrieve,
represent, and evaluate data, information, and knowledge within informatics
solutions and data repositories. Research and evaluation functions include,
but are not limited to:
Nursing Informatics.indd 32 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 33
■ Research in concept or symbolic representation of nursing phenomena.
■ Evaluation of clinical decision-making in nursing.
■ Applied informatics research.
■ Assessment of the use of health information tools and resources by
consumers and interprofessional team members.
■ Evaluation of effective methods for information systems implementa-
tion, acceptance, and utilization.
■ User experience research about the design of systems and their
impact on interprofessional providers, consumers, nurses, and their
interactions.
■ Evaluation research about the effects of systems on the processes and
outcomes of care and customer satisfaction.
■ Usability testing of nursing and consumer applications.
■ Evaluating how consumers use computerized healthcare products.
■ Research concerning clinical vocabularies.
■ Consumer communication and usage of technology-based support groups.
Research in nursing informatics may span a range of activities, including
exploratory research (such as data mining), experimental research, process
improvement, and informal evaluation. An INS working in research and
evaluation might conduct research projects to develop and refine standard-
ized nursing vocabularies, or to link nursing interventions to outcomes in large
data sets. This work may include the evaluation of organizational attributes
for successful adoption of documentation systems or the impact and efficacy
of hardware and software solutions.
Nursing informatics research may also incorporate a consumer orientation,
through the study of effective nurse-consumer interactions and communica-
tions in web-based interactions with older consumers, or the impact of new
applications on nurses’ workflow. Patient reactions to instant messaging from
providers may be studied. The following are examples of the research func-
tion of the INS:
■ The chief of nursing research for a large software company oversees
projects to evaluate the impact of enterprise electronic health records on
patient care outcomes.
Nursing Informatics.indd 33 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
34 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
■ A nursing informatics analyst in a hospital IT department aggregates
data about the incidence of pressure ulcers, creates trend reports and
predictive models for nurse managers, and analyzes outcomes against
quality indicators.
■ A nurse researcher conducts a usability study comparing consumer
entry of information at a clinic-based kiosk to in-person interviews.
safety, security, and environmental Health
The areas of safety and security, as well as environmental health, are rapidly
becoming more important concerns for informatics nurses. Informatics nurses
have multiple opportunities to assist in assuring the safety and security of
health-related IT (HIT) products that support clinicians, as well as patients,
families, and other caregivers. Though intended to reduce safety issues, HIT
can actually create errors. In 2007, sufficient evidence in the literature gave
rise to the term “e-iatrogenesis,” denoting harm resulting in part from HIT
(Weiner, Kfuri, Chan, & Fowles, 2007). The authors stated that e-iatrogenesis
is the most significant unintended consequence of HIT.
The implementation of electronic health records without regard to workflow
analysis and redesign, human–computer interaction, prevention of errors in
medication administration, and prevention of possible missed diagnoses have
increased the concern for patient safety. By 2011, the Institute of Medicine’s
Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology had released
Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care, a 211-page
report describing in detail the issues surrounding HIT safety and security.
The report included recommendations for software vendors and HIT users on
building, integrating, and maintaining safer and more secure systems. It also
addressed opportunities for research and policy development. Poor usability
is the most significant safety issue currently confronting clinicians. A simple
example is the “adjacency error” whereby users mistakenly select an item next
to the one intended in a drop-down menu (IOM, 2012).
The increasing deployment and use of HIT to engage patients in their
own health care will require a unique strategy to support safety and security.
As device and system interoperability expands and “bring your own device”
(BYOD) strategies are increasingly deployed to satisfy clinical users and con-
sumers, the associated security and privacy risks, including the susceptibility
to malware and hacking, will likewise increase. Additional safety topics that
merit attention of informatics nurses include: implementation decisions about
Nursing Informatics.indd 34 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 35
prompts and alerts, role-based security for access, authentication, student-
instructor signature/authentication, patient access to clinical notes and portals,
and impact and opportunities associated with health information exchanges.
See the ONC Health IT Patient Safety Action and Surveillance Plan (available
at http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/safety_plan_master.pdf ).
With regard to environmental health and informatics, there are two tradi-
tional notions of “environment” in nursing practice: internal and external. In
an internal environment, typically some control exists by which the work area
can be modified to create safe and comfortable conditions where the nurse
cares for, or interacts with, clients. This could be a hospital, clinic, school, or a
client’s home. An external environment is characterized as offering no, or lim-
ited, control in manipulating the climate or environmental hazards. Examples
include industrial zones where an occupational health nurse may practice, a
neighborhood or public area where a community health nurse may practice,
or a disaster zone where a mobile intensive care nurse may be stationed. In
both internal and external environments, hazards and/or materials exist that
could cause physical or mental injury, such as that resulting from equipment
that is not ergonomically designed or correctly grounded. Similarly, hostility
and incivility in the work environment must be identified and addressed.
A number of initiatives at the federal (Recordkeeping—The OSHA 300
Log, 2013), state (Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry, 2010),
and community (Community Health Nurses’ Initiatives Group, 2013) levels
actively support the nurse as an integral steward in monitoring and improv-
ing environmental safety for healthcare workers and their clients (individuals,
families, communities, and populations). In addition, a number of programs
are designed to educate nurses in environmental health principles and
even achieve certification as a Registered Environmental Health Specialist
(Registered Environmental Health Specialist Program, 2013).
Although environmental health is not typically considered part of the infor-
matics nurse’s scope of practice, informatics nurses can develop and coordinate
education, communication, and reference materials, as well as design system
tools that are easily accessible and pertinent to the needs of their colleagues.
Some examples of resources are online learning modules, hyperlinks embed-
ded into a clinical documentation tool directing the user to ergonomics infor-
mation and safety data sheets, and expert system alerts within the clinical
documentation system warning the caregiver when the assessment and other
criteria show a threat to health and safety of the patient or the nurse, such as
radioactive exposure, past violent behavior, or infections.
Nursing Informatics.indd 35 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
36 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Creation of a healthy, supportive work environment includes such activities
as noise reduction from the hum of electronic equipment and fans and audible
alerts and alarms; removal of trip and personal hazards, such as exposed elec-
trical cords and cables, heavy movable but unstable work stations; and expo-
sure to electromagnetic frequencies and potential electric shock. Responsible
recycling or disposal of electronic equipment, printer cartridges, and paper
printouts reflect environmental stewardship. Similarly, effective planning, com-
munication, and collaboration strategies help mitigate untoward stress, such
as that associated with unexpected change, software and equipment failure,
and system and communications network downtime.
integrated Functional Area example:
telehealth and informatics
Informatics solutions provide foundational support for healthcare delivery. In
some cases, however, informatics solutions are more closely integrated with
the delivery of care. This is particularly true for health care provided via tele-
health services, where clinical care and informatics intersect in the provision
of healthcare management.
Telehealth services are growing rapidly, with an expanding integration of
health information technology into a variety of products. These products include
tools used to provide direct patient care, but are certainly not limited to health-
care provider services. A variety of health applications (apps), remote monitoring,
contact-free monitoring apps, wearable health technology devices, mHealth, and
other health and fitness devices are available to the consumer and are heavily
marketed by new and developing companies using health information technology.
Such new tools and ideas are intended to provide increased access to
needed health services, improve quality of care, and reduce the cost of associ-
ated healthcare services, all while focusing on the goal of improving patient
outcomes. The explosively expanding use of telehealth services and products
creates a need to develop and amend certain laws, rules, and regulations, espe-
cially related to licensure portability, to allow the full use of telehealth services
by all practitioners for all people. Standards of care and best-practice recom-
mendations for the use of telehealth services in a variety of specialties have
been developed and revised (American Telemedicine Association [ATA], 2013),
and should be incorporated in practices and in policies governing the use of
telehealth services. The interface between nursing informatics and telehealth
nursing is evolving with an increasing emphasis on the appropriate use and
management of information and technology. Nursing informatics is used
Nursing Informatics.indd 36 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 37
primarily to support clinical roles and is an essential component of the provi-
sion of telehealth services.
Nursing informatics supports multiple constituencies and stakeholders,
such as healthcare consumers, interprofessional healthcare team members, IT
professionals, and healthcare agencies and organizations. Informatics nurses
are particularly well suited to work in such interprofessional environments,
because of their preparation in the foundation of professional nursing focused
on holistic patient, family, community, and population care and significant
experience in planning, implementing, and coordinating activities involving
multiple constituencies. With the continued developments in information
science and nursing science, NI functions will continue to expand and evolve
into functional areas not yet envisioned or recognized.
evolution of informatics Competencies
Because of the increased visibility of information and technology in health-
care settings and complementary educational programs, many stakeholders
are faced with a need to define informatics competencies for every registered
nurse, advanced practice registered nurse, and those who specialize in nursing
informatics practice. Managers, human resource managers, and educational
planners are just three examples of stakeholders who have an interest in hav-
ing defined competencies for nursing informatics.
informatics Competencies requisite
for All registered nurses
The increasing complexity of healthcare services and practice, combined with
the evolving mandate for ubiquitous electronic health information systems, has
raised the bar for the nursing professional. Select informatics competencies are
now required in all prelicensure, undergraduate, graduate, and doctoral nursing
curricula. The National League for Nursing (NLN, 2008) advises nursing faculty
to participate in programs to advance informatics development and to incorporate
principles of informatics into each level of nursing curriculum. The American
Association of Colleges of Nurses (AACN) identifies information management
and the application of technology in patient care as an essential element of bac-
calaureate (AACN, 2008), master’s (AACN, 2011), and doctor of nursing practice
level (AACN, 2006) education. The Quality and Safety Education for Nurses
(QSEN Institute, 2012a, 2012b; AACN, 2013) initiative has identified the nursing
informatics competencies vital for the provision of safe, quality care to the public.
Nursing Informatics.indd 37 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
38 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
According to the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform
(TIGER) initiative, all practicing nurses should be equipped with the skills
necessary to practice in the technology-driven world of health care (Hebda &
Calderone, 2010). A reference list of specific competencies needed by all prac-
ticing nurses was developed in 2009 by the Technology Informatics Guiding
Education Reform group (TIGER, 2009). The TIGER initiative is “focused on
using informatics tools, principles, theories and practices to enable nurses to
make healthcare safer, more effective, efficient, patient-centered, timely and
equitable” (TIGER, 2009, p. 2).
The TIGER Nursing Informatics Competencies Model is based on inter-
national standards such as the European Computer Driving License, the
American Library Association Information Literacy Competency Standards;
the Electronic Health Record Functional Model: Clinical Care Components,
and the International Computer Driving License: Health (TIGER, 2009, p. 6).
The TIGER model consists of three parts:
1. basic computer competencies
2. information literacy
3. information management (including use of an electronic health record)
Unlike some other lists of competencies, there are measurable competen-
cies, such as:
■ Know what computer memory is: RAM (random-access memory) and
ROM (read-only memory), and distinguish between them or
■ Use the components of a citation (e.g., currency, reputation of author or
source, format, or elements of a URL) to choose those most suitable for
the information need.
The complete Informatics Competencies for Every Practicing Nurse:
Recommendations from the TIGER Collaborative report can be down-
loaded from http://www.the tigerinitiative.org/docs/TigerRepor t_
InformaticsCompetencies_000.pdf. Additional learning resources include
the TIGER Virtual Learning Environment (available at http://www
.thetigerinitiative.org/virtuallearning.aspx) and the government-funded
Workforce Development Program (available at http://www.healthit.gov/policy
-researchers-implementers/workforce-development-program; see also HealthIT
Help Center Workforce Programs, n.d.).
Accredited graduate-level educational programs for the NI specialty
nursing practice were first offered in 1989. Now graduate, doctoral, and
Nursing Informatics.indd 38 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 39
postdoctoral degrees are more widely available via online and in-person
learning programs. Lifelong learning can easily be accommodated by free
nondegree online courses that offer open, unlimited, global enrollment
massive open online courses (MOOCs) and other distance education and
online programs. The current trend of requiring a graduate-level informat-
ics degree is expected to continue and become the professional specialty
practice standard.
research About nursing informatics Competencies
In their seminal work on informatics competencies for nurses, Staggers, Gassert,
and Curran (2001, 2002) studied the relationships between nursing roles
and informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice: beginning,
experienced, INS, and informatics innovator. This framework aligned with
educational requirements for all nursing specialties at the beginning and
experienced levels, and then identified specific competencies for the specialty
roles of INS and the informatics innovator. The work of these authors not
only promoted the integration of informatics competencies into educational
curricula, but also influenced policy documents.
Since the 2008 publication of Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards
of Practice, research has progressed from determination to validation and
implementation of nursing informatics competencies. Choi (2012) examined
the informatics competencies of students in three undergraduate tracks:
Traditional Pre-Licensure, Registered Nurse (RN) to Bachelor of Science in
Nursing (BSN), and Accelerated BSN. Hsu et al. (2012) looked at the infor-
matics competencies for mid-tier public health practitioners in the public
health sector. Remus and Kennedy (2012) focused on the need for nursing
informatics competencies in Canadian nurse leaders.
Other researchers continue to advance the work of Staggers, Gassert, and
Curran. McGonigle, Hunter, Hebda, and Hill developed “a reliable and valid
instrument for self-assessment of perceived level 3 informatics specialist and
level 4 informatics innovator competencies in selected informatics activities”
(2013, para. 4). Choi and Bakken (2013) reported on the validation of the self-
assessment scale among undergraduate and graduate nursing students. Chang,
Poynton, Gassert, and Staggers (2011) provided insight into the international
use of Staggers, Gassert, and Curran’s 2002 work. The ongoing work has been
foundational in the development of this version of the nursing informatics
scope and standards of practice.
Nursing Informatics.indd 39 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
40 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Professional organization Discussions
on informatics Competencies
Multiple organizations have provided input to the discussion on informatics
competencies. This section provides an overview of several of these discussions.
HeALtHCAre LeADersHiP ALLiAnCe
The Healthcare Leadership Alliance (HLA) announced the creation of the
HLA Competency Directory in the fall of 2005. This directory (HLA, 2005)
identifies 300 competencies across multiple healthcare management roles,
categorized into 5 domains:
■ Leadership
■ Communications and relationship management
■ Professionalism
■ Business knowledge and skills
■ Knowledge of the healthcare environment
According to the web site (HLA, 2013, para. 4), the “directory provides a
comprehensive listing of the competencies managers and leaders need to meet
the challenges of managing the nation’s healthcare organizations,” including
healthcare information management. These competencies may assist in the
development and evaluation of informatics role definitions, including man-
agement roles.
AMeriCAn orGAnizAtion oF nurse exeCutiVes
The American Organization of Nurse Executives, building on the mandate
for informatics competencies for nurse leaders (AONE, 2005), demonstrated
its support for informatics nurse leaders in the 2012 position paper “Nursing
Informatics Executive Leader,” which stated: “The NI Executive leader rep-
resents the bridge between clinical practice and informatics that transforms
patient care delivery for the entire organization” (AONE, 2012, pg. 1).
QuALity AnD sAFety eDuCAtion For nurses
The Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) initiative project began in
2005 with the stated goal to “address the challenge of preparing future nurses
with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) necessary to continuously
improve the quality and safety of the healthcare systems in which they work”
(QSEN Institute, 2012a, para. 1). QSEN has added informatics competences
Nursing Informatics.indd 40 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 41
for prelicensure nursing education, based on work by Cronenwett et al. (2007),
and for graduate nursing programs (QSEN Institute, 2012b).
nAtionAL LeAGue For nursinG
In 2008, the National League for Nursing (NLN) released its position state-
ment on preparing the next generation of nurses to be capable of functioning
in a “technology rich environment” (NLN, 2008). To assist in that effort, NLN
created tool kits for helping educators to assess their own competencies and
provide teaching/learning strategies to assist with implementing informatics
competencies into nursing education programs.
■ NLN Informatics Education Toolkit (http://www.nln.org/
facultyprograms/facultyresources/index.htm)
■ NLN Competencies for Nursing Education (http://www.nln.org/
facultyprograms/facultyresources/informatics.htm)
tiGer initiAtiVe FounDAtion
The work of the original TIGER Initiative has been formalized with the estab-
lishment of a foundation that advances the integration of health informatics
to transform practice, education, and consumer engagement, including the
virtual learning environment (VLE). Ongoing results of the TIGER work can
be found at http://www.thetigerinitiative.org/.
informatics Competencies: spanning Careers
and roles
Very few of today’s nurses have worked in only one role or even one specialty
of nursing throughout their careers, and this will likely hold true for coming
generations of nurses. The need for informatics competencies exists in all nurs-
ing roles and specialties. This section examines the informatics competencies
required for all practicing nurses, regardless of specialty.
The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) has devel-
oped and is studying a Transition to Practice (TTP) (Spector, 2013) nursing
preceptor model that includes “five transition modules” consisting of “com-
munication and teamwork, patient-centered care, evidence-based practice,
quality improvement and informatics” (2013, para. 5). This model incor-
porates many key aspects from the Institute of Medicine’s report on The
Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health (2010) related to
Nursing Informatics.indd 41 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
42 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
competencies for all nurses, and “is an inclusive model, which would take
place in all health care settings that hire newly graduated nurses and for
all educational levels of nurses, including practical nurse, associate degree,
diploma, baccalaureate and other entry-level graduates” (2013, para. 2).
Because informatics and technology are now integral tools used in all aspects
of nursing practice, from entry-level to advanced practice, it is strongly rec-
ommended that the state boards of nursing require that basic informatics
competencies be incorporated into all nursing program curricula, ranging
from licensed practical nurse (LPN) to doctoral levels.
As noted previously, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing
(2008) provided guidance on the educational requirements for the bac-
calaureate education for professional nursing practice. “Essential IV:
Information Management and Application of Patient Care Technology”
identified informatics competencies that all BSN graduates should pos-
sess (pp. 1819). For nurses prepared at the graduate level, the AACN
provided foundational informatics competencies in The Essentials of
Master’s Education in Nursing, “Essential V: Informatics and Healthcare
Technologies” (2011, p. 19).
Nurses who hold a master’s degree in something other than nursing can
gain a postmaster’s certificate in nursing informatics. Many of the numerous
programs available have similar competencies, but in general the curricula
focus on gaining specific knowledge and skills in nursing and healthcare
informatics, thereby supporting evidence-based practice and the improve-
ment of healthcare outcomes.
AACN’s Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice
(2008) lists informatics-based competencies in “Essentials III: Clinical
Scholarship and Analytical Methods for Evidence-Based Practice.” Although
only the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is specifically addressed by the
AACN, this does not imply that informatics education is not important in
PhD programs. In many PhD programs, computer science and biomedical
informatics are required courses. However, because the DNP is considered a
“practice doctorate” and the PhD a “nursing research doctorate,” the emphasis
on informatics and clinical practice impact is reduced, though these areas are
not considered unimportant (AACN, 2011; see also Duke University, 2012).
Thus, it is strongly recommended that PhD curriculum writers incorporate
courses that examine the tenets of nursing informatics and focus on the
methods of data entry, data storage, data retrieval, and data analysis from
EHRs, report writing programs, and database management systems.
Nursing Informatics.indd 42 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 43
informatics Competencies for informatics nurses
and informatics nurse specialists
In addition to the competencies that every registered nurse needs, additional
competencies for the IN and INS are found in the “Standards of Nursing
Informatics Practice” section of this professional resource. As part of its prepara-
tion for the new nursing informatics certification exam test form, the American
Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) completed its Role Delineation Study:
Nursing Informatics—National Survey Results (ANCC, 2013), which reported
the collected information on the work activities that informatics nurses perform
in practice. The final report listed 8 domains and 71 separate tasks, as well as call-
ing out the 20 task statements with the highest and lowest values of initial risk.
The McGonigle, Hunter, Hebda, and Hill (2013) online assessment of nurs-
ing informatics competencies can assist faculty and management to develop
curricula or continuing education that best meets the needs of their students
or employees. While there are obvious concrete informatics competencies that
every nurse must have, there are many other, more progressive, processes that
will likely never be part of an educational curriculum or added to a formal list
of competencies. An example is the ever-changing landscape of meaningful
use criteria. Another example is the numerous ways in which technologies
are enhancing practitioners’ ability to monitor patients and coordinate care
remotely via telehealth methodologies. All of these areas require informatics
nurses and informatics nurse specialists to be involved in defining benefit
versus impact, although it may be difficult to predict how the evolving tech-
nologies will be used in the future.
In addition to numerous researchers, academics, and employers, many
professional organizations are actively working toward validating, creating
resources, and providing education in nursing informatics. These include the:
■ American Nurses Association (ANA)
■ American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA)
■ American Nursing Informatics Association (ANIA)
■ Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS)
Nursing Informatics Working Group
informatics Competencies for nurse educators
Today’s nursing educators are challenged to include information on informatics
in a basic nursing education curriculum that is already full. A second challenge
Nursing Informatics.indd 43 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
44 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
is that many nurse educators themselves lack informatics competencies (AACN,
2013; Flood, Gasiewicz, & Delpier, 2010).
The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation funded a pilot conference to
teach faculty how to teach informatics. The “QSEN Nursing Informatics
Deep Dive Workshop” was co-sponsored by the American Association
of Colleges of Nursing and the Schools of Nursing at the Universities of
Minnesota and Maryland. The presentations and resources are available to
anyone, without charge, on the AACN website (http://www.aacn.nche.edu/
qsen-informatics/2012-workshop).
Additional challenges include (1) continuing to enhance and disseminate
resources and teaching strategies for all faculties across the country; (2) the
lack of requirements for PhD programs in nursing to include informatics
(researchers are going to need advanced informatics skills); and (3) the need
for methods required for “big data” research to be integrated into curricula for
future faculty and nurse researchers (Bickford, 2013, personal communication).
office of the national Coordinator for Health
information technology
In recognition of the need for health information technology specialists to
assist providers in selecting, implementing, maintaining, and utilizing elec-
tronic medical record systems to “improve health care quality, safety, and cost-
effectiveness” (HealthIT Help Center Workforce Programs, n.d., para. 1), and
the need for those professionals to have specific competencies, the Office of the
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) sponsored
four programs using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds. These
four programs were:
■ Curriculum Development Centers
■ Community College Consortia to Educate Health Information
Technology Professionals (Community College Consortia, n.d.)
■ Program of Assistance for University-Based Training
■ Competency Examination Program (HealthIT.gov, 2014)
The purpose of the Curriculum Development Centers Program was to fund
and make resources available for curriculum building in higher education
institutions. Under this program, the Oregon Health and Science Center was
appointed to be the National Training and Dissemination Center (NTDC). Its
task was to create a standard curriculum with competencies for all educators
Nursing Informatics.indd 44 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 45
to use and students to understand and achieve (Curriculum Development
Centers, n.d.).
Subsequently, the materials and curriculum created by the NTDC have
been used by a community college consortium. This consortium consists of 82
member colleges in 5 regions across the United States. The program is focused
on health care and IT professionals who want to become knowledgeable about
and obtain jobs in the health IT sector. The following are key components of
the curriculum:
■ Practice workflow and information management redesign specialists
■ Clinician/practitioner consultants
■ Implementation support specialists
■ Implementation managers
■ Technical/software support
■ Trainers
The materials were only available for download by consortia colleges through
the end of 2012. Even though initial funding for the program has expired, most
have commited to continuing their programs. As of February 2013, 17,523
health IT professionals had successfully completed the program, and 70% are
working in the health IT field (HealthIT, 2013).
In addition to the community college consortium curriculum, funding was
also allocated to develop university-based programs to increase the number
of focused health IT professional roles. The six roles targeted by these pro-
grams are:
1. Clinician/public health leader
2. Health information management and exchange specialist
3. Health information privacy and security specialist
4. Research and development scientist
5. Programmer and software engineer
6. Health IT sub-specialist (Morton, 2011)
Lastly, the ONC funded the development and administration of a nation-
wide program of competency examinations. The purpose was to create “a
mechanism to assess whether examinees have attained a certain set of health
Nursing Informatics.indd 45 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
46 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
IT competencies” (HealthIT.gov, 2014, para. 1). The project funding ended in
April 2013, but the American Health Information Management Association
(AHIMA) continues to administer the Certified in Healthcare Privacy and
Security (CHPS®) and Certified Healthcare Technology Specialist (CHTS)
examinations. To date, 9,527 health IT professionals have taken this examina-
tion (HealthIT.gov, 2014; see also CHPS, 2014; CHTS, 2013). The resources
from these federally funded initiatives remain available in the public domain
and have garnered signficant national and international interest and use.
synthesis of evolution of ni Competencies
After the initial work of Staggers et al. (2002), numerous authors and agen-
cies published work on informatics competencies. The focus of the work on
informatics competencies over the past five years has changed from determin-
ing informatics competencies to validation and implementation. The TIGER
Initiative’s work has provided specific and measureable criteria.
Multiple professional organizations are supporting the call for nursing and
healthcare informatics competencies as a part of professional practice. Figure 6
depicts the need for informatics education in all levels of nursing, from both
Figure 6. Informatics Competencies for All Registered Nurses
Nursing Informatics.indd 46 11/6/14 4:06 PM
:J
0-
3
QI…
;:;’
III
VI
‘t:l
to
n
iii’
;::0
<
5″
0′
3
III….
;:;’
III
Z
~
III
CD
Master’s prepared Informatics Nurses analyze healthcare
information communication technology (leT) strategies to
reduce risks, improve care delivery, change policy, while
providing oversight and guidance in the integration of
technology in practice, 2
‘”!
~
o
tJ
o
o
1 Defined by TIGER (Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform)
2 AAeN Essential for Graduate Education #5
3 Diploma, ADN!ASN, BSN, Second-degree BSN, Pre-licensure MastClrs
4 MSN-Informatics, Masters w!PMC in Informatics Nursing
5 DNP, PhD Copyright 2013 Cheryl D. Parker & Troy Seagondollar
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 47
the clinical and educational points of view, as well as for those nurses who
specialize in informatics. Informatics education must be foundational for all
entry-level nurses. Over time, as their education, knowledge, and skills increase,
nurses grow in their understanding of how to use technology to enable them
to provide better patient care. Finally, as newer and better ways of using tech-
nology (innovation) emerge, nurses who specialize in informatics nursing will
have a leading role.
In the future, the rapid pace of technological change and generation of infor-
mation and knowledge will present challenges for the maintenance of current
and accurate competencies for nursing informatics. Nurses must understand
the need for achieving basic competence in nursing informatics; professional
organizations must continue to embrace informatics as a foundation for pro-
fessional practice; and faculty must make NI an integral part of curricula at
all levels of nursing education, as well as stimulate continued research. It is
the responsibility of informatics nurses to be the resource for these initiatives.
Preparation for Nursing Informatics
Specialty Practice
The following exemplifies one pathway for the novice nurse to move from an
entry-level informatics nurse job to a position deemed to be a true informat-
ics nurse leader, regardless of formal title. At any time in their careers, nurses
interested in health information technology could complete one or all of the
ONC community college consortia programs and pass the associated certifica-
tion exam to become a health information technology specialist, thus becoming
better able to function in and attain positions in academic, clinical practice,
administrative, and technology areas.
Because nursing informatics requires a significant understanding of numer-
ous clinical workflows, it is advisable for an aspiring informatics nurse to spend
at least five years at the bedside or in other clinical practice experiences in
numerous departments and roles. As aspiring informatics nurses continue to
educate themselves through formal programs or through informatics-focused
areas of practice, they will become more comfortable in taking on greater levels
of responsibility and accountability reflective of nursing informatics practice.
Becoming a subject matter expert for a specialty role, whether academic, clini-
cal, or administrative, will further enhance the nurse’s understanding of the
nuances involved in developing, maintaining, and optimizing technology that
impacts nursing in all realms.
Nursing Informatics.indd 47 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
48 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Since 2004, the Health Information and Management Systems Society
(HIMSS) has surveyed the nursing informatics community to gain an understand-
ing of the roles and responsibilities of the informatics nurse professional. The
most recent Nursing Informatics Workforce Survey (HIMSS, 2014), supported by
the HIMSS Nursing Informatics Community, representing 6,000 nurses, builds
on previous HIMSS research from 2004, 2007, and 2011. This survey captures
current professional status and practice trends while identifying changes that
have occurred over the past nine years in the nursing informatics workforce. The
1,047 respondents reported that 60% had completed graduate or higher degree
educational preparation, 58% worked at a hospital, and 13% worked at the cor-
porate offices of a healthcare system; the average salary was $100,717. (Further
details are available at http://www.himss.org/ni-workforce-survey.)
Certification of informatics nurses
Professional certification as an informatics nurse became a reality in late 1995
when the American Nurses Credentialing Center offered the generalist-level
nursing informatics certification exam as its first computer-based examination.
As of December 31, 2013, the ANCC reported that 1,326 nurses have active
credentials of board certification in nursing informatics. Applicants currently
must have at least a BSN or baccalaureate degree in another related area,
have completed the specified continuing education credits, and have worked
in informatics practice for the designated number of hours. (More details are
available at www.nursecredentialing.org.) Informatics nurses and informatics
nurse specialists may elect to pursue other pertinent certifications in areas
such as project management, security and privacy, health information systems
management, network management, and knowledge management. Employers
are beginning to move from a preference to a requirement for certification for
hiring, advancement, and promotion decisions.
An Advancing Professional nursing specialty
The blending of clinical background, on-the-job training, refined and focused
informatics competencies, informatics certification, and the increase in for-
malized informatics education are proof of an advancing professional nursing
specialty that is ideally suited to lead in an informatics-based U.S. healthcare
system. Employers are beginning to recognize the value and contribution of
informatics nurses and are even requiring completion of graduate or higher level
educational preparation for hiring. Similarly, the informatics nurse specialist
Nursing Informatics.indd 48 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 49
title is becoming more familiar. As the importance of nursing informatics con-
tinues to be recognized, the future should see a rise in executive-level or C-Suite
nursing informatics positions, such as “Chief Nursing Informatics Officer,” in
clinical, business, vendor, and IT arenas. In addition, the need for nursing
informatics professionals in governmental roles will be recognized at the local,
state, regional, and national levels. Nurses with an interest in informatics have
many avenues through which to pursue their specialty practice over the years.
Ethics in Nursing Informatics
Code of Ethics for Nurses (ANA, 2001) provides a framework for ethical prac-
tice in nursing informatics. While working in the informatics role, professional
nurses may not provide direct patient care, but do provide support for patient
care through work on the healthcare delivery system infrastructure through
which care is delivered. All provisions of this Code apply to nursing informatics—
some more directly than others, as illustrated in the following examples.
Provision 1: The nurse, in all professional relationships, practices with com-
passion and respect for the inherent dignity, worth and uniqueness of every
individual, unrestricted by considerations of social or economic status, personal
attributes, or the nature of health problems.
The informatics nurse and informatics nurse specialist function as integral
parts of the healthcare team. The nature of this work involves interaction and
collaboration with many different people with various areas of expertise, values,
priorities, and views. The informatics nurse values each of these people as indi-
viduals, with worth and dignity, regardless of status or power in the organiza-
tion, and in spite of some persons’ lack of informatics or nursing knowledge.
The team collaboration that is essential to successful information systems in
health care is created, enhanced, and preserved through the informatics nurse’s
compassion and respect for each person on the team.
Provision 2: The nurse’s primary commitment is to the patient, whether an
individual, family, group or community.
The informatics nurse always works to achieve results that will directly or
indirectly benefit patient care, safety, and well-being. This involves careful
consideration of the probable outcomes of decisions about data collection
Nursing Informatics.indd 49 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
50 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
and protection of the privacy, security, and confidentiality of patient infor-
mation. The informatics nurse avoids participating in the development or
implementation of systems that may be desired by an interested party, but that
would have the effect of causing harm to the patient. For example, counter-
ing such adverse effects may require the development of an effective system
alert that directs a clinician to offer less costly and comparable alternatives
for medications or treatments.
Provision 3: The nurse promotes, advocates for and strives to protect the health,
safety and rights of the patient.
As the patient advocate, the informatics nurse collaborates in the development,
implementation, support, and maintenance of systems with data collection,
storage, retrieval, processing, and analytic features that support: (a) patient
safety, autonomy, and rights; (b) quality improvement efforts; (c) provision of
safe care; (d) appropriate information communication; (e) restriction of access
to patient data by those not authorized to have it; and (f ) use of data and
information to benefit healthcare outcomes and healthcare services delivery.
The informatics nurse is involved in addressing usability factors that support
the rights of the patient.
Provision 4: The nurse is responsible and accountable for individual nursing
practice and determines the appropriate delegation of tasks consistent with
the nurse’s obligation to provide optimum patient care.
The informatics nurse uses best practices in informatics to collaborate in the
development, implementation, support, and maintenance of systems that sup-
port nursing practice. The informatics nurse supports direct care providers in
their efforts to learn about, understand, and use information technology in a
way that supports patient care and promotes the patient’s welfare.
Provision 5: The nurse owes the same duties to self as to others, including the
responsibility to preserve integrity and safety, to maintain competence, and
to continue personal and professional growth.
The informatics nurse is responsible for maintaining currency in informatics
theory and practice through lifelong learning. This can be challenging in a field
with rapidly changing technologies and capabilities and a fiscally constrained
Nursing Informatics.indd 50 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 51
environment that requires self-funding of relevant continuing education
programs and activities. For a more detailed discussion of lifelong learning
and maintenance of competence, see Professional Performance Standard 8,
Education.
Provision 6: The nurse participates in establishing, maintaining, and improv-
ing healthcare environments and conditions of employment conducive to the
provision of quality healthcare and consistent with the values of the profession
through individual and collective action.
The informatics nurse collaborates in the development, implementation, sup-
port, and maintenance of information systems that support and improve the
delivery of care, appropriate communication of health-related information,
data storage, protection of confidential information, and management of the
enterprise. Such behavior provides a model for successful interprofessional
teams.
Provision 7: The nurse participates in the advancement of the profession
through contributions to practice, education, administration, and knowledge
development.
Informatics nurses seek to advance the quality of nursing informatics practice.
As a specialty, nursing informatics offers both master’s and doctoral degrees
in which students can gain the advanced nursing education necessary to add
to the body of informatics knowledge, and the credentials to teach informatics
to the next generations of nurses. Informatics nurse specialists are prepared to
improve administration, education, and research in nursing informatics, and
to enhance dissemination of that knowledge.
Provision 8: The nurse collaborates with other health professionals and the
public in promoting community, national, and international efforts to meet
health needs.
The informatics nurse collaborates in efforts to develop systems that allow
system interoperability and data and information transfer and aggregation.
These efforts allow health data to be used to improve knowledge about indi-
vidual, community, national, and international health and health practices
and outcomes.
Nursing Informatics.indd 51 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
52 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Provision 9: The profession of nursing, as represented by associations and
their members, is responsible for articulating nursing values, for maintaining
the integrity of the profession and its practice, and for shaping social policy.
The informatics nurse participates in the informatics work of professional
nursing associations, in national and international health informatics organi-
zations, and in vendor organizations, to articulate nursing values, to ensure
that patient-centricity is always maintained, and to shape social and health
policy for the benefit of all persons.
the Future of nursing informatics
Five trends will continue to influence the future of nursing informatics:
(1) changing practice roles in nursing, (2) increasing informatics competence
requirements for all nurses, (3) rapidly evolving technology, (4) regulatory
changes and quality standards that include healthcare consumers as partners
in healthcare models, and (5) care delivery models and innovation.
trends in Practice roles and Competencies for nurses
and informatics
The principles of evidence-based practice and application of technologies are
now being integrated into the workplace in all settings. This results in the need
for every nurse to have some level of informatics competence, with the number
and complexity of informatics competencies evolving to meet their changing
practice roles. As discussed earlier, some of the basic informatics competencies
once ascribed to informatics specialists have become mandatory for nurses in
clinical, education, and administration practices. Similarly, the level of compe-
tencies required for INs and INSs has increased to meet the skill-set require-
ments necessary to participate on the development and implementation teams.
In the past several years, nursing specialties have incorporated informatics
into their practice. For example, nurses who rely on information and tech-
nology for telehealth, quality improvement, or product development might
be considered informatics nurses. Other nurses who design, implement, and
evaluate informatics solutions as active members of the interprofessional teams
are acting in very common nursing informatics roles. The scope of nursing
informatics practice will continue to expand as further technologic innova-
tions are developed for healthcare delivery solutions. Nursing informatics has
become a world community.
Nursing Informatics.indd 52 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 53
The role boundaries between other health informatics roles and NI
are less conspicuous than in the past. One of the centerpieces of nursing
informatics practice is its interprofessional nature, with informatics nurse
specialists often leading projects to craft usable informatics solutions for
use by many stakeholders. Although INSs focus on technology and nurs-
ing practice, they work in teams with informatics specialists from other
healthcare professions such as medicine, pharmacy, and respiratory therapy.
These interprofessional teams are using a shared set of functions, skills, and
their knowledge of their respective professions to craft solutions that meet
the needs of all. This trend will likely continue as professional informatics
organizations define a shared set of core knowledge and skills required by
all informatics specialties.
Probably the clearest trend is ongoing change in the functional areas for
informatics nurses and informatics nurse specialists, moving from a generic
set of skills toward a shared set of competencies based on functional areas
required to enact a particular position (e.g., clinical analyst, informatics
executive, futurist, knowledge discovery and data mining [KDD] researcher,
database developer).
trends in technology
Information technology has become commonplace in everyone’s personal
lives, as well as in delivery of healthcare services. For the first time in history,
a generation exists that has never known a world without the Internet, cell
phones, online social networks, blogs, and other electronic media. People who
were raised using this technology (digital natives) are now entering the health-
care field as knowledge workers, as well as consumers of healthcare services.
Implications for nursing informatics include:
■ New models of work and education for technologically sophisticated
users who are less resistant to technology and in fact demand it.
■ Adapting to users with less skill in face-to-face communications.
■ Consumers with even greater expectations of accelerated information
and technology implementation.
Several advances in technology will likely have an impact on nursing
informatics in the future. A number of these are outlined in the following
subsections.
Nursing Informatics.indd 53 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
54 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
nAnoteCHnoLoGy
Nanotechnology is microscopic technology on the order of one-billionth of a
meter. The application of this technology for healthcare delivery uses (nano-
medicine) will have an impact on the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases
and conditions (Jain, 2008; Maojo et al., 2011). For example, these minute
biomedical devices (smaller than molecules) are being developed to provide
a way to deliver therapies (medication and radiation) that will target cancer
cells or that can perform surgery (nanorobots) on specific cells. The imple-
mentation of this technology for patient care applications requires education
in its safe use as well as ethical practices (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015, p. 485;
see also http://www.nano.gov/ and http://www.ihe.ca/publications/library/
2012-publications/exploratory-brief-on-nanomedicine-or-the-appliation-of
-nanotechnology-in-human-health-care/).
tooLs For MAnAGinG PoPuLAtion HeALtH ConCerns
As healthcare delivery moves into the global community setting, there will be
a growing need for informatics support for disease state management and
population health activities (e.g., public health, school health, and occupa-
tional health). Informatics provides tools that allow data collection, analysis,
and reporting of population health specialty data by the use of standardized
variables in interoperable electronic documentation systems (see http://www.
ncqa.org/HEDISQualityMeasurement.aspx and http://www.dartmouthatlas.
org/). Population health specialty data then become a useful tool to support
research, inform policy, and identify best practices to enhance treatment of
national population health concerns.
Syndromic surveillance of communicable disease using school absenteeism
records (Baer, Rodriguez, & Duchin, 2011), and management of immuniza-
tion data (Hinman & Ross, 2010), each provide insight into the potential of
population-level data. School health and public health nurses are leading move-
ments to standardize variables and data collection processes that will enhance
this ability. This potential for research and analysis is exemplified in the data
collected by school nurses on more than 95% of the school-aged population.
Other examples of this potential will be driven by business globalization and
the threat of bioterrorism. The desire for improved disease management across
traditional boundaries will lead to a demand for new population health tools
and solutions.
The need for population management tools and early disease detection has
led to partnerships with population health professionals and the emergence
Nursing Informatics.indd 54 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 55
of public health informatics (Public Health Informatics Institute [PHII],
2009). MappyHealth and other geographic information system (GIS) applica-
tions are being implemented as strategies to support syndromic surveillance,
emergency preparedness, and disaster recovery efforts. Health information
exchanges and disease and immunization registries help identify and address
public health concerns.
DeViCes AnD HArDWAre
The miniaturization of devices has changed where and how IT solutions can
be deployed. No perfect hardware solution exists. However, technological inno-
vations are making headway in meeting changing healthcare delivery models,
particularly the caregiver needs for the older adult population. An increasing
focus on ergonomics, human–computer interaction, and user experience is
leading to new solutions to support diverse workflow requirements.
New integrated technologies, such as smartphones, tablets, and multifunc-
tional devices, have increased common access to health information. These
solutions are becoming ubiquitous in daily life. They have changed clinicians’
and patients’ expectations and their interactions with technology. In particular,
providers are being challenged to know as much about new disease treatments
and research findings as patients.
Some of the pending technologies that will affect INs, INSs, clinicians,
patients, and healthcare consumers include:
New methods for medication administration
■ Sensing a patient’s internal drug levels with miniature medical diagnos-
tic tools circulating in the patient’s bloodstream.
■ Chemotherapy delivered directly to a tumor site, reducing systemic side
effects.
New monitoring devices and miniaturization for the home that move content
to hardware and devices
■ A talking pill bottle that lets patients push a button to hear prescription
information.
■ Bathroom counters that announce whether it is safe to mix two
medications.
■ A shower with built-in scales to calculate body mass index (Hong Kong
Polytechnic University).
Nursing Informatics.indd 55 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
56 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
■ Measuring devices in the bathroom to track urination frequency and
output and upload these data to a system or care manager.
■ Noninvasive blood glucose monitors to eliminate fingersticks; sensors to
compute blood sugar levels using a multi-wavelength reflective disper-
sion photometer (Hong Kong Polytechnic University).
Body area network (wearable computing)
■ Wearable computing, or body-borne computing, will continue to evolve
in the next several years and have an impact similar to that of mobile
computing on our daily lives. Innovations in development involve
eyeglasses or clothing that interact with the user based on the context of
the situation. With heads-up displays, sensors embedded in fabrics, unob-
trusive input devices, personal wireless local area networks, and a host of
other context-sensing and communication tools, wearable computers can
act as intelligent assistants or data collection and analysis devices.
Many of these devices are available now. Smart fabrics with embedded sen-
sors have been on the commercial market since 2000 and are being used in
shirts, gloves, and other clothing. These wearable computer and remote moni-
toring systems are intertwined with the user’s activity so that the technology
becomes transparent. Sensors and devices can gather data during the patient’s
daily routine, providing healthcare providers or researchers with periodic or
continuous data on the subject’s health at work, school, exercise, and sleep,
rather than the current snapshot captured during a typical hospital or clinic
visit. A few applications for wearable computing include:
■ Monitoring rescue workers’ vital signs, heat stress, and dehydration
■ Activity level of poststroke patients
■ Assessment of stress in individuals
■ Arrhythmia detection and control of selected cardiac conditions
■ Daily activity monitors
■ Proximity badges and RFID (radio-frequency identification) to track
providers for workflow or allow logon to systems.
■ Glasses with a heads-up display that can superimpose images (e.g.,
chest x-ray) in a display over a patient, without losing focus on the
patient (MIT Media Lab, 2012).
■ Bar-code scanners that fit on a finger, or wrist-activated input devices.
Nursing Informatics.indd 56 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 57
Developments for input methods also apply to the healthcare market. For
example, an “interface-free,” touch-driven computer screen, manipulated
intuitively with the fingertips, responds to varying levels of pressure. Another
example is virtual keyboards using Bluetooth technology, in which a keyboard
can be displayed and used on any surface (ThinkGeek, 2014).
robotiCs
The use of robotics in patient care has also revolutionized health care. Robots
continue to be used to deliver supplies to patient care areas, enable remote
surgeries and virtual-reality surgical procedure training, and are being used
as translators for patients. Hand-assist devices help patients regain strength
after a stroke, and robotic technology is being used for immediate patient
assessments (Leventhal, 2010).
Robots are providing a remote presence by allowing clinicians to virtually
examine patients by manipulating remote cameras. Robotics are also being
used in direct patient care: for instance, to help lift morbidly obese patients,
to assist patients who have had traumatic injuries, and in other innovative
applications (Robotics Technology-Healthcare Robotics, n.d.). A notable use
is the research underway for using robotics to assist paralyzed patients to walk
(Houlihan, n.d.).
FoCus oF eMerGinG teCHnoLoGies
Clinicians are using new and evolving technologies to deliver care that results
in decreased barriers, increased access, improved outcomes, and increased
patient engagement in their own health. Telehealth tools and emerging tech-
nologies are positioned to change the face and practice of health care. Nurses
using informatics, telehealth tools, and new, transformative technologies will
be well positioned to interact with and care for their patients virtually. There
will be a decreasing number of brick-and-mortar practices and an increasing
number of clinicians and specialists available—for a fraction of traditional
costs—at the click of a button.
Gaming technology has entered the healthcare arena as well. Health and
fitness apps and devices are being marketed to consumers as products that can
be used to monitor actions and activities that affect health status. The use of
creative health-related technology with social media integration may increase
patient engagement and improve wellness.
Virtual worlds are being created (e.g., Second Life©) that allow consumers to
interact with providers to seek care at a distance. The Department of Defense
Nursing Informatics.indd 57 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
58 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
is using avatars to help veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
(Hemmerly-Brown, 2011). Practices are being developed completely online in
the virtual world that allow patients to create an avatar and seek health care
while concealing their physical identity. Nursing informatics involvement is
needed to bridge solutions that support virtual health worlds as well as comple-
ment face-to-face care with virtual care.
Healthcare education and research can be conducted within a virtual world
(Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, n.d.). Software programs have been devel-
oped to assist nursing and medical students to learn physical assessment via
simulated practice with a digital patient, document in an electronic medical
records system, and explore medical concepts in three dimensions in a virtual
world (Shadow Health, 2014).
Remote monitoring, mHealth devices and hardware, other devices creating
“smart” homes, and other digital solutions will continue to be developed and
improved. Healthcare professionals who use these emerging technologies will
need to be equipped with knowledge of rules, regulations, and responsibilities
surrounding the use of these technologies. Patients and clinicians alike will
need education on how to use, share, and benefit from the “big data” that are
produced and gathered by these devices.
Health-related education will move online with more frequency as providers
learn to interact with their patients virtually. Holograms are being utilized to
provide health education and serve as virtual coaches (Bassendowski, 2013).
Software has been developed that allows providers to choose a diagnosis and
allows the computer to provide structured educational programs for the patient.
Technology is also moving more toward a semantic web, in which technologi-
cal programs will actually interact with patients, learn their needs, and adjust
education based upon the patients’ responses.
New technology is being used to provide telecommunication connectivity
where broadband is not available. This allows specialists and other healthcare
providers to interact with those in need in rural communities, decreases barri-
ers related to transportation, and facilitates implementation of best practices
for vulnerable populations where access to health care was previously limited
or unavailable.
Goals related to care will remain the same in regard to decreasing hospital
admissions, improving outcomes, and keeping patients healthy at home and
in their local community. However, the methods for accomplishing these goals
may change as an understanding of the use and benefits of telehealth and
emerging technologies becomes more widespread.
Nursing Informatics.indd 58 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 59
KnoWLeDGe rePresentAtion
Electronic data are now available for and about patients over their lifetime.
Clinicians need tools to help locate and synthesize these data remotely and
securely. Innovative technology is being used to allow the wireless display (via
smartphones, tablets, laptops, etc.) of data to clinicians to optimize patient care
and enhance patient and clinician efficiencies, while avoiding medical errors.
NI practice now requires that more nurses be educated about knowledge rep-
resentation, semantic representation, and other knowledge areas, including use
of standardized language that supports nursing practice and decision-making.
This also has implications for knowledge discovery in databases, data quality,
and a continued emphasis on data standards and data quality.
Nurses constantly make complex and diverse decisions in their daily practice.
Decision-making must consider relevant evidence-based and patient-specific
information. As nurse decision-making becomes more complex, the need for
computerized clinical decision support will increase. In the absence of explicit
evidence-based guidelines for nursing decisions, novel technologies will be neces-
sary to synthesize evidence from the literature or induce models from clinical data.
Knowledge discovery in databases could play an important role in the
induction of clinical knowledge models. Informatics nurses must partner in
the planning of and forward thinking about maintenance and evaluation of
legacy data, mandates for interoperability, and data conversion and retention,
as well as accessibility for future use.
eDuCAtionAL teCHnoLoGies
Evolving teaching technologies are changing the education techniques used
in the classroom, the lab, and the clinical setting. For example, patient care
simulation activities allow students to run programmed care scenarios in a
safe environment and provide innovative options for teaching and fostering
critical thinking skills (Sternberger, 2012). Group learning tools, such as elec-
tronic reminders and group scoring used in interactive teaching, can change
how students engage with class content, as well as how they learn to function
as members of a team (Michaelsen, n.d.).
Distance education technologies, and web-based and cloud-based col-
laboration (such as web-based course management systems and the related
student support services), are challenging basic education concepts such as
what academic resources must be included in a library collection or how a
university defines a credit hour of education. This automation is forcing insti-
tutions to review, and in many cases to revise, their educational policies and
Nursing Informatics.indd 59 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
60 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
procedures. These technologies require a paradigm shift in knowledge delivery,
which affects students, instructors, and course content, and create significant
opportunities for innovative informatics nurses.
The traditional tuition models are no longer a barrier to the globalization
of education. New educational models are being created, such as global uni-
versities that reach students beyond their walls by offering courses on loca-
tion or by creating virtual educational experiences (e.g., partnering with other
institutions to deliver classes to students across a region). Universities are
also partnering with business entities and vendors to create other innovative
models of education (Emory University, 2011).
Curriculum design will change. The traditional classroom is also changing
to the concept of the flipped classroom model, which permits interactive col-
laboration in the classroom (Brame, 2013). Information is now generated and
made available so quickly that baseline knowledge for students will evolve away
from specific content to methods of finding accurate, current information and
knowledge. Future students may not be evaluated on specific knowledge for
one area or course, but instead be evaluated on their growth over time. The
INS will be at the center of this union of informatics and new educational
models because of the INS role’s focus on managing information.
tooLs For PAtient ACCess to HeALtH inForMAtion
Much emphasis is being placed on assisting healthcare consumers to become
partners with their providers, thereby increasing consumers’ accountability
for their own care. The healthcare consumers may be known as e-patients
(e-Patients.net, 2013). This type of healthcare model will require clinical nurses
and informatics nurses to devise personalized solutions and the best methods
of care and patient education, as well as solutions to monitor and maintain
patients’ health. Patient engagement is expected to include easy access to per-
sonal health information via the view, download, and transmit (VDT) capabili-
ties being mandated by the ONC for meaningful use compliance. Surrounding
issues that must be addressed include: healthcare consumer-centered care/
patient-centered care, patient accountability for care activities and data integ-
rity, interoperable data transfer, education about data protection and security,
and medical identity theft and encryption tools that monitor and protect.
exPAnDeD use oF it in nursinG
Technologic innovation has had an enormous impact on the scope of nurs-
ing practice in traditional work settings, in the home, and globally. Two
Nursing Informatics.indd 60 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 61
implications are outlined here. One is a concern about students relying on
available, structured information, computerized alerts, and reminders in
EHRs and decision-support systems (DSSs). Some educators and adminis-
trators are concerned that students will rely only on this structured informa-
tion rather than applying their critical thinking skills, and that those skills
may thus diminish. INSs and educators are developing and testing new
academic and practice models that address this issue. One solution involves
the development of case studies that can be used in simulated settings and
include the integrated use of EHRs with DSSs. System designers may need
to modify systems to promote a different cognitive engagement by practi-
tioners. Educators may teach a new level of human information processing
to enhance thoughtful decision-making. The traditional model involves stu-
dents memorizing structures for a physical examination and similar static
information stored in an EHR. In the new model, information technology
serves as an aid to, not a replacement for, human thinking and judgment,
to promote collaborative patient management.
Reliability is the other implication of the increasing pervasiveness of IT.
As applications are increasingly integrated into health care, the impact of
downtime or system unavailability becomes more severe and quick recovery
methods become imperative. Especially with order management in place, insti-
tutions must ensure continuous business operations with uninterrupted access
to applications and data. Strategies and technologies to support continuous
uptime are available, and the INS is typically involved in defining, designing,
and installing them. Requirements for current and future systems will focus
more on proactive risk mitigation rather than reactive recovery efforts; these
may include:
■ 24/7 operation and performance with redundancies throughout the
system, failovers, and tested high reliability.
■ Tools to assist in monitoring and managing the IT environment,
monitor system use, and identify technology issues before system failure
occurs.
■ Scalable IT solutions as more clinical applications come online.
■ Solutions that IT departments can manage without in-depth technology
expertise.
■ Implementation of health information exchanges (HIEs) to facilitate
the sharing of patient information.
Nursing Informatics.indd 61 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
62 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
iMPLiCAtions For nursinG inForMAtiCs
Informatics nurses will need a systematic method for becoming aware of
emerging technologies and tools and then evaluating their usability for and
projected impact(s) on health care and informatics. INs and INSs can be
essential leaders and partners for the safe and intelligent incorporation of new
technology and techniques into health informatics solutions and health care in
general. Because the content or information on devices is still the most critical
component, informatics nurses can serve as content designers. Areas such as
genomics have significant ethical ramifications, and informatics nurses must
ensure that attention is given to these issues. All of these areas have implica-
tions for curricular design and educational programming as well.
The expansion of technology amplifies the need for continuous availability
of systems. Nevertheless, the “digital divide” remains, as significant numbers
of people have little access to or experience with information technology.
Informatics nurses can also take the lead in eliminating the digital divide
between those with access to information and those without. In all situations,
informatics nurses can advocate and apply methods so that users can learn
and use new technologies effectively and safely.
trends in regulatory Changes
and Quality standards
Technologies cannot remain the primary focus when addressing the future of
nursing informatics and health care. The design and evolution of healthcare
systems, organizations, and enterprises, as well as the regulatory environment
and actual models of care delivery, must be integral and primary considerations.
The 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and Health
Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act have
driven information technology and EHR installations in the United States to
a new national level, emphasizing the use of technology for patient safety and
error reduction in healthcare delivery. Organizations such as the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Institute for Healthcare
Improvement (IHI), as well as nonhealth organizations like Leapfrog, pro-
vide incentives for health institutions to implement informatics solutions.
The continuing requirement to meet meaningful use standards is supporting
the increasing pace of adoption. Mandates now direct organizations to use
value-based rather than return-on-investment models to justify health IT, and
the pay-for-performance models are accelerating EHR installations. Online
Nursing Informatics.indd 62 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 63
quality data and reported metrics are more visible to both consumers and hos-
pital and organizational boards. Organizations will continue to increase the
transparency of data and, more importantly, improve the care being delivered.
Regulatory requirements and standards will continue to shape the future.
INSs are involved in defining these and future standards, and in designing,
building, implementing, using, and certifying products that comply. A number
of projects have been implemented; among them are the following:
■ HL7 continues to define interoperability standards for systems.
■ The IEEE P2407 working group has developed standards for personal-
ized health informatics.
■ The Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) is
harmonizing industry-wide health IT standards.
■ The Nationwide Health Information Network (NwHIN) initiative is
creating prototype architectures for widespread health information
exchange.
■ The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiatives related to (a) bar-
code label requirements for human drug products and biological products,
(b) guidelines for the safe and effective use of radio frequency devices, and
(c) nanotechnology development and potential expansion of products
covered (e.g., advanced decision support tools and similar informatics
applications).
■ Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology’s
Connecting Health and Care for the Nation concept paper (HealthIT.
gov, n.d.).
trends in Care Delivery Models and innovation
Using technologies in new ways and inventing new technologies to enable
better care delivery models to achieve quality outcomes and safety are part
of the evolution to accountable care organizations (ACOs), a population
focus rather than individual focus, and pay-for-performance rather than fee-
for-service reimbursement. Care is no longer a local phenomenon. Patients
in rural ICUs can be monitored remotely by intensivists and ICU nurses.
Less experienced critical care nurses can be remotely mentored by expe-
rienced nurses. Pharmacists can provide remote pharmacologic assistance
Nursing Informatics.indd 63 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
64 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
to rural areas. Radiologists can read images in real time from anywhere
in the world. Physicians are assisted by robots as they examine patients in
distant locations.
Care is no longer limited to traditional healthcare settings, even when it is
delivered locally. Clinicians are now available in retail stores, work settings, and
other nontraditional places. These new settings require new design, deploy-
ment, and support models that will challenge the informatics nurse specialist.
Involvement in the development of a robust health information infrastructure
includes, but is not limited to:
■ Continued innovation in systems and expansion into less traditional
settings, such as long-term care and rural communities.
■ ACOs, medical home, home health expansion, and patient-aligned
care teams (interprofessional team completing care coordination/
management).
■ Growth of personal health records. PHRs are more numerous and
the use of the patient portal (PP) is being implemented along with
electronic medical record (EMR) activations. Informatics nurses will
increasingly advocate for and assist patients with developing these
individually maintained records. These can include the patient’s own
electronic vaccination history, past medical history, medications, aller-
gies, condition, status, and visit history in an easily accessible online
format. Patients’ online communication with healthcare providers
through PPs will continue to increase as well.
■ Clinical data repositories and regional health information organizations/
exchanges. These structures will support accurate, timely, and secure
transfer of patient data across care settings (ultimately across hospitals,
clinics, pharmacies, laboratories, clinician office, long-term care facilities,
and others).
Consumer informatics
Healthcare consumers have become stronger partners with providers, embrac-
ing increased accountability for their own care and taking greater interest
in data accuracy and access to their own electronic health information. As
consumers become more technically adept, they will consider their electronic
healthcare data as necessary and accessible as their online banking informa-
tion or stock transactions. Likewise, consumers will begin monitoring and
Nursing Informatics.indd 64 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 65
managing the health of younger and older family members for whom they
are responsible.
In response to the increasing technology capabilities of healthcare consum-
ers, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services created Physician Compare
(https://data.medicare.gov/data/physician-compare) and Hospital Compare
(http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/) to help healthcare consumers
select appropriate care delivery resources.
external Partnerships
Nontraditional organizations are now entering the healthcare arena, and their
contributions and innovations should be welcomed. For example, companies
with an online application for individual, secure financial records may expand
their apps to include personal health records. Partnerships with the video-
gaming industry yield ideas for optimal user interfaces and contribute to the
development of healthcare and clinician educational media, products, and
systems. Nurses need to be participants in this space, ideally as information
and facility architects.
implications for nursing informatics
New care delivery models will require development of informatics solutions
for care in multiple, remote locations. Informatics nurses will have a key role
in informatics solutions that emphasize quality care metrics developed as
e-measures. New models to shorten the time from design to installation in the
system life cycle are being used. An 18- to 24-month build-and-implementation
cycle is not tenable in an era of rapidly changing technology, care delivery, and
expanding information access.
With the increasing number of information technology installations and
the need to respond to burgeoning regulatory requirements, informatics
nurses are on center stage for all phases of the system life cycle. They are
developing and implementing new informatics solutions, ensuring data
quality for implemented solutions, and evaluating the impact of solutions.
The new model of consumer informatics requires technical solutions and
patient education jointly from clinical nurses and INSs. INSs will need
to devise the best methods of care and also design solutions that enable
patients to monitor and maintain their own health. INSs will play a key
role in designing new tools for data capture and analyses to comply with
regulatory guidelines.
Nursing Informatics.indd 65 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
66 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The Scope of NurSiNg iNformaTicS pracTice
ni Future and trends: summary
The practice of nursing, expanding competencies, technologic innovations,
and new trends in healthcare delivery models and regulation will continue
to influence the future of nursing informatics. Important concepts will be
essential to these trends:
■ Preparing for technology innovations, evidence-based practice compe-
tencies, and data quality evaluation.
■ Introducing and delivering new educational models to teach both new
and existing nursing professionals.
■ Designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating solutions for
innovative information technologies across all areas of nursing and
health settings.
■ Incorporating telehealth and newer technologies and methods to facili-
tate access and care provision, research, and administrative processes.
■ Designing and facilitating changes in care models in response to
evidence-based practice outcomes as they evolve away from episodic
care toward more predictive and preventive models with collaborative
interprofessional care teams.
■ Focusing on usability, designing and evaluating how information is
presented to promote ease of use and adoption (human-computer
interaction).
■ Participating in global public and private initiatives to evaluate disease
patterns and trends.
In the future, care models and data will continue to be shared even more
widely. New technologies will create wider access to information and the need
for a new generation of data and information management skills, analytic tools,
educational models, and cognitive skills. Traditional boundaries of institutions,
care delivery, and education will continue to shift and evolve. New positions
and functional areas are emerging. Increased collaboration among nursing
informatics colleagues and a shared scope and standards of practice will con-
tinue to be a characteristic of the future.
Nursing Informatics.indd 66 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
67
Standards of Nursing
Informatics Practice
Significance of the Standards
The Standards of Professional Nursing Practice, on which the Standards of
Nursing Informatics Practice are based, are authoritative statements of the
duties that all registered nurses, regardless of role, population, or specialty,
are expected to perform competently. The standards published herein may
be utilized as evidence of the standard of care, with the understanding that
application of the standards is context dependent. The standards are subject
to change with the dynamics of the nursing profession, as new patterns of
professional practice are developed and accepted by the nursing profession
and the public. In addition, specific conditions and clinical circumstances may
affect the application of the standards at a given time (e.g., during a natural
disaster). The standards are subject to formal, periodic review and revision.
The competencies that accompany each standard may be evidence of
compliance with the corresponding standard. The list of competencies is not
exhaustive. Whether a particular standard or competency applies depends on
the circumstances.
Nursing Informatics.indd 67 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
68 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Standards of Practice for
Nursing Informatics
Standard 1. Assessment
The informatics nurse collects comprehensive data, information,
and emerging evidence pertinent to the situation.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Uses evidence-based assessment techniques, instruments, tools, and
effective communication strategies in collecting pertinent data to define
the issue or problem.
■ Uses workflow analyses to examine current practice, workflow, and the
potential impact of an informatics solution on that workflow.
■ Conducts a needs analysis to refine the issue or problem when necessary.
■ Involves the healthcare consumer, family, interprofessional team, and
key stakeholders, as appropriate, in relevant data collection.
■ Prioritizes data collection activities.
■ Uses analytical models, algorithms, and tools that facilitate assessment.
One example of an assessment algorithm is PIECES:
■ Performance—throughput or response time;
■ Information—outputs, inputs, and/or stored data;
■ Economics—costs versus profits;
■ Control—too little security or control or too much control or
security;
■ Efficiency—people, machines, or computers waste time, and;
■ Service—inaccurate, inconsistent, unreliable, hard to learn, difficult
to use, inflexible, incompatible, not coordinated with other systems
(Wetherbe, 1994).
Nursing Informatics.indd 68 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 69
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
■ Synthesizes available data, information, evidence, and knowledge
relevant to the situation to identify patterns and variances.
■ Applies ethical, legal, and privacy regulations and policies for the collec-
tion, maintenance, use, and dissemination of data and information.
■ Documents relevant data in a retrievable format.
Nursing Informatics.indd 69 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
70 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Standard 2. Diagnosis, Problems, and Issues
Identification
The informatics nurse analyzes assessment data to identify
diagnoses, problems, issues, and opportunities for improvement.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Derives diagnoses, problems, needs, issues, and opportunities for
improvement based on assessment data.
■ Validates the diagnoses, problems, needs, issues, and opportunities for
improvement with the healthcare consumer, family, interprofessional
team, and key stakeholders when possible and appropriate.
■ Identifies actual or potential risks to the healthcare consumer’s health
and safety, or barriers to health, which may include, but are not limited
to, interpersonal, systematic, or environmental circumstances.
■ Uses standardized clinical terminologies, taxonomies, and decision
support tools, when available, to identify problems, needs, issues, and
opportunities for improvement.
■ Documents problems, needs, issues, and opportunities for improvement
in a manner that facilitates the discovery of expected outcomes and
development of a plan.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 70 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 71
Standard 3. Outcomes Identification
The informatics nurse identifies expected outcomes for a plan
individualized to the healthcare consumer or the situation.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Involves the healthcare consumer, family, healthcare providers, and
key stakeholders in formulating expected outcomes when possible and
appropriate.
■ Defines expected outcomes in terms of the healthcare consumer, health-
care worker, and other stakeholders; their values; ethical considerations;
and environmental, organizational, or situational considerations.
■ Formulates expected outcomes after considering associated risks,
benefits, costs, available expertise, evidence-based knowledge, and
environmental factors.
■ Develops expected outcomes that provide direction for project team
members, the healthcare team, and key stakeholders.
■ Includes a time estimate for the attainment of expected outcomes.
■ Modifies expected outcomes based on changes in the status or evalua-
tion of the situation.
■ Documents expected outcomes as measurable goals.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Identifies expected outcomes that incorporate scientific evidence and
are achievable through implementation of evidence-based practices.
■ Identifies expected outcomes that maximize quality, efficiency, and
effectiveness balanced with economy.
■ Differentiates outcomes requiring care process interventions from those
requiring system-level interventions.
■ Supports the use and integration of clinical guidelines into practice,
information management system solutions, and knowledge bases.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 71 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
72 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Standard 4. Planning
The informatics nurse develops a plan that prescribes strategies,
alternatives, and recommendations to attain expected outcomes.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Develops a customized plan considering clinical and business character-
istics of the environment and situation.
■ Develops the plan in collaboration with the healthcare consumer, family,
healthcare team, key stakeholders, and others, as appropriate.
■ Establishes the plan priorities with key stakeholders and others as
appropriate.
■ Incorporates strategies in the plan to address each of the identified
diagnoses, problems, needs, and issues.
■ Incorporates planned strategies addressing health and wholeness across
the life span.
■ Incorporates an implementation pathway or timeline within the plan.
■ Considers the clinical, financial, social, and economic impact of the plan
on the stakeholders.
■ Integrates current scientific evidence, trends, and research into the
planning process.
■ Utilizes the plan to provide direction for the healthcare team and other
stakeholders.
■ Integrates current statutes, rules and regulations, and standards within
the planning process and plan.
■ Modifies the plan according to the ongoing assessment of the healthcare
consumer’s response and other outcome indicators.
■ Integrates informatics principles in the design of interprofessional
processes to address identified situations or issues.
■ Documents the plan in a manner that uses standardized terminologies
and taxonomies.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 72 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 73
Standard 5. Implementation
The informatics nurse implements the identified plan.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Partners with the healthcare consumer, healthcare team, and others, as
appropriate, to implement the plan on time, within budget, and within
plan requirements.
■ Utilizes health information technology to measure, record, and retrieve
healthcare consumer data, implement and support the nursing process,
and improve overall healthcare outcomes.
■ Uses specific evidence-based actions and processes to resolve diagnoses,
problems, or issues to achieve the defined outcomes.
■ Advocates for health care that is sensitive to the needs of healthcare
consumers, with emphasis on the needs of diverse populations and use
of self-care theory.
■ Applies available healthcare technologies to maximize access and
optimize outcomes for healthcare consumers.
■ Uses community and organizational resources systematically to imple-
ment the plan.
■ Collaborates with the healthcare team and other stakeholders from
diverse backgrounds to implement and integrate the plan.
■ Accommodates different styles of communication used by healthcare
consumers, families, healthcare providers, and others.
■ Implements the plan using principles and concepts of enterprise
management, project management, and systems change theory.
■ Promotes the healthcare consumer’s capacity for the optimal level of
participation and problem-solving.
■ Fosters an organizational culture that supports implementation of the
plan.
■ Incorporates new information and strategies to initiate change if desired
outcomes are not achieved.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 73 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
74 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
■ Documents implementation and any modifications, including changes
or omissions, of the identified plan.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Facilitates utilization of systems, organizations, and community
resources to implement the plan.
■ Supports collaboration with nursing and other colleagues to implement
the plan.
■ Uses advanced communication skills to promote relationships between
healthcare teams and healthcare consumers by providing open discus-
sion of shared experiences using information technologies.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 74 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 75
Standard 5a. Coordination of Activities
The informatics nurse coordinates planned activities.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Organizes the components of the plan.
■ Coordinates the implementation of the plan, including activities and
resources necessary to achieve desired outcomes.
■ Synthesizes data and information to prescribe necessary system and
environmental support measures.
■ Documents the coordination of delivery activities to have a successful
implementation.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Provides leadership in the coordination of information technology and
healthcare activities for integrated delivery of efficient and cost-effective
healthcare services.
■ Coordinates system and community resources that enhance delivery of
health care across continuums.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 75 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
76 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Standard 5b. Health Teaching and Health Promotion
The informatics nurse employs informatics solutions and
strategies for education and teaching to promote health and a
safe environment.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Integrates informatics solutions, resources, ergonomics, and disability
adaptations into clinical practice workflow and patient care routines.
■ Applies technology to support the dissemination of evidence-based
information to promote healthy lifestyle choices, risk reduction behav-
iors, disability and developmental adaptations, and preventive self-care.
■ Introduces technology to facilitate healthcare consumer, staff, commu-
nity, and population learning.
■ Seeks opportunities for feedback and evaluation of the effectiveness of
the strategies used.
■ Evaluates health information resources for accuracy, readability, and
comprehensibility to help healthcare consumers, families, clinicians,
staff, and others needing access to quality health information. An
example is obtaining shared data through credible organizations
(e.g., the Net Foundation [http://www.hon.ch/], HealthIT.gov
Policy Researchers & Implementers [http://www.healthit.gov/policy
-researchers-implementers], and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
E.H.R. Incentive Programs [http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and
-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html]).
■ Assists consumer alliances and advocacy groups in the proper utilization
of technology to perform health promotion activities.
■ Creates informatics solutions for feedback and evaluation of the
effectiveness of the educational content and teaching strategies used
for continuing education and professional development programs.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 76 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 77
Standard 5c. Consultation
The informatics nurse provides consultation to influence the
identified plan, enhance the abilities of others, and effect change.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Synthesizes data, information, knowledge, theoretical frameworks, and
evidence when providing consultation.
■ Facilitates the effectiveness of a consultation by involving healthcare
consumers, healthcare team members, and stakeholders in decision-
making processes.
■ Communicates consultation recommendations that influence the identi-
fied plan, facilitate understanding by involved stakeholders, enhance the
work of others, and effect change.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Develops recommendations and strategies to address and resolve
complex informatics issues and problems.
■ Uses risk management techniques to mitigate risks and take advantage
of opportunities.
■ Establishes formal and informal consultative relationships that provide
professional informatics development and mentorship opportunities.
■ Promotes collaborative relationships for consultation with thought lead-
ers to expand the influence of health information solutions in enhancing
population health at local, regional, national, and international levels.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 77 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
78 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Standard 6. Evaluation
The informatics nurse evaluates progress toward attainment of
outcomes.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Conducts a systematic, ongoing, and criterion-based evaluation of the
outcomes in relation to the structures and processes prescribed by the
project plan and indicated timeline.
■ Collaborates with the healthcare consumer, healthcare team members,
and other key stakeholders involved in the plan or situation in the
evaluation process.
■ Evaluates, in partnership with the key stakeholders, the effectiveness
of the planned strategies in relation to attainment of the expected
outcomes.
■ Evaluates the link between outcomes and evidence-based methods,
tools, and guidelines.
■ Evaluates the effectiveness of planned strategies in relation to attain-
ment of the expected outcomes.
■ Documents the results of the evaluation.
■ Disseminates the results to key stakeholders and others involved, in
accordance with organizational requirements and federal and state
regulations.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Synthesizes the results of the evaluation analyses to determine the
impact of the plan on healthcare consumers, families, communities,
resources, networks, and healthcare organizations.
■ Uses the results of the evaluation analyses to make or recommend
process or structural changes, including policy, procedure, or protocol
development, as appropriate.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 78 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 79
Standards of Professional
Performance for Nursing Informatics
Standard 7. Ethics
The informatics nurse practices ethically.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Uses Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements (ANA,
2001) to guide practice.
■ Recognizes the centrality of the healthcare consumer and family as core
members of any healthcare team.
■ Uses nursing and informatics principles, standards, and methodologies
in a manner that preserves and protects healthcare consumer autonomy,
dignity, and rights.
■ Employs informatics principles, standards, and methodologies to
establish and maintain healthcare consumer confidentiality within legal
and regulatory parameters.
■ Evaluates factors related to privacy, security, and confidentiality in the
use and handling of data, information, and knowledge.
■ Contributes to resolving ethical issues involving healthcare consumers,
colleagues, community groups, systems, and other stakeholders.
■ Takes appropriate action regarding instances of illegal, unethical, or
inappropriate behavior that could endanger or jeopardize the best
interests of the healthcare consumer, others, or the organization.
■ Reports illegal, incompetent, or impaired practices.
■ Speaks up when appropriate to question healthcare practice when
necessary for safety and quality improvement.
■ Advocates for systems conducive to staff workflow.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 79 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
80 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
■ Advocates for healthcare consumer access to electronic healthcare
records and mobile health technologies, and for the reduction of associ-
ated disparities.
■ Seeks available resources as needed when formulating ethical decisions.
■ Demonstrates a commitment to practicing self-care, managing stress,
and connecting with self and others.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Participates in interprofessional teams that address ethical risks, ben-
efits, and outcomes.
■ Informs administrators or others of the risks, benefits, and outcomes of
programs and decisions that affect healthcare delivery.
■ Promotes active engagement of stakeholders in the oversight and
management of the exchange of data, information, and knowledge.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 80 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 81
Standard 8. Education
The informatics nurse attains knowledge and competence that
reflect current nursing and informatics practice.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Participates in ongoing education to advance his or her knowledge base
and professional practice.
■ Demonstrates a commitment to lifelong learning through self-reflection
and inquiry to address learning and personal growth needs.
■ Seeks experiences that reflect current practice to maintain knowledge,
skills, abilities, and judgment in informatics practice and role performance.
■ Acquires knowledge and skills appropriate to the role, population, specialty
area, setting, or situation.
■ Seeks formal and independent learning experiences to develop and
maintain professional skills and knowledge.
■ Identifies individual learning needs based on nursing knowledge, nursing
roles, and the changing needs of target populations.
■ Participates in knowledge acquisition to support the evolution and
continuous improvement of enterprise management in support of plan
implementation.
■ Participates in formal and informal consultations to address issues in
nursing practice to improve education and knowledge bases, as well as to
contribute evidence for best practice.
■ Continues to examine and review clinical care issues and new practice
modalities for implications related to informatics solutions and practice.
■ Shares educational findings, experiences, and ideas with peers.
■ Develops skills to contribute to a work environment conducive to the
education of healthcare professionals.
■ Promotes educational opportunities and programs related to informatics.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 81 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
82 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
■ Contributes to educational opportunities and programs related to
informatics.
■ Maintains professional records that provide evidence of competence and
lifelong learning.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Uses current research findings and other evidence to expand knowledge,
skills, abilities, and judgment; to enhance role performance; and to
increase knowledge of professional issues.
■ Creates educational opportunities and programs related to informatics.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 82 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 83
Standard 9. Evidence-Based Practice and Research
The informatics nurse integrates evidence and research findings
into practice.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Uses data to communicate evidence to promote effective care processes
and decisions.
■ Utilizes current evidence-based nursing knowledge, including research
findings, to guide practice.
■ Incorporates current evidence when initiating changes in nursing
practice.
■ Participates in the formulation of evidence-based practice as appropri-
ate to her or his education level, background, and position.
■ Shares personal or third-party research findings with colleagues and peers.
■ Uses the skills and tools available to the informatics nurse for research
studies.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Supports nursing knowledge by conducting or synthesizing research
and other evidence to promote the discovery, examination, and evalu-
ation of current practice, knowledge, theories, criteria, and creative
approaches to improve healthcare outcomes.
■ Promotes a climate of research and clinical inquiry.
■ Promotes the efficient, effective, and secure use of electronic health
record data.
■ Identifies and promotes documentation standards that facilitate the
development of clinical databases that will allow research (e.g., standard
data sets and formatting of reports).
■ Formally disseminates research findings through activities such as
presentations, publications, consultation, and journal clubs.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 83 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
84 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Standard 10. Quality of Practice
The informatics nurse contributes to quality and effectiveness of
nursing and informatics practice.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Demonstrates quality by documenting the application of the nursing pro-
cess in a responsible, accountable, and ethical manner, and by facilitating a
unified or defined level of documentation by nurses in clinical practice.
■ Uses the results of quality improvement activities to initiate changes in
nursing and informatics practice and in the healthcare delivery system.
■ Contributes to the development and continuous improvement of organi-
zational systems that support the planning process.
■ Uses creativity and innovation to enhance nursing and informatics practice
to improve care delivery and client satisfaction, and reduce healthcare costs.
■ Uses nursing informatics principles to utilize electronic health record
data to analyze outcomes of nursing practice.
■ Incorporates new knowledge to initiate changes in nursing and informat-
ics practice if desired outcomes are not achieved.
■ Uses informatics principles to participate in quality improvement.
Activities may include:
■ Identifying aspects of practice important for quality monitoring.
■ Using appropriate indicators to monitor quality and effectiveness of
nursing and informatics practice.
■ Collecting data to monitor quality and effectiveness of nursing and
informatics practice.
■ Analyzing quality data to identify opportunities to improve nursing
and informatics practice.
■ Formulating recommendations to improve nursing and informatics
practice or outcomes.
■ Implementing activities to enhance the quality of nursing and
informatics practice.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 84 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 85
■ Developing, implementing, and/or evaluating policies, procedures,
and guidelines to improve the quality of practice.
■ Participating on and/or leading interprofessional teams to evaluate
clinical care or health services.
■ Participating in and/or leading efforts to minimize costs and
unnecessary duplication.
■ Integrating human–computer interaction (HCI) principles to
improve nursing workflow, delivery of care, and client access to
health information.
■ Analyzing factors to improve quality, user and client safety, and
effectiveness.
■ Analyzing organizational systems for barriers to quality healthcare
consumer outcomes.
■ Implementing processes to remove or weaken barriers within
organizational systems.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Provides leadership in the design and implementation of quality
improvements.
■ Designs innovations in data collection and management to effect
change in practice and improve health outcomes.
■ Evaluates the practice environment and quality of nursing care rendered
in relation to existing evidence.
■ Identifies opportunities for the generation and use of research and
evidence.
■ Obtains and maintains professional informatics certification.
■ Uses the results of quality improvement studies to initiate changes in
nursing practice and the healthcare delivery system.
■ Promotes the ability of nursing personnel to use electronic documenta-
tion systems to effectively describe the nursing process.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 85 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
86 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Standard 11. Communication
The informatics nurse communicates effectively in a variety of
formats in all areas of practice.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Assesses communication preferences of healthcare consumers, families,
and colleagues.
■ Supports communication preferences of healthcare consumers, families,
and colleagues.
■ Assesses her or his own communication skills in encounters with
healthcare consumers, families, and colleagues to identify gaps, areas for
improvement, and opportunities for education.
■ Seeks continuous improvement of communication skills and
technologies.
■ Seeks continuous improvement of conflict resolution skills.
■ Conveys information to healthcare consumers, families, the interprofes-
sional team, and others using communication formats that promote
accuracy and accessibility.
■ Communicates strategies to improve and enhance the value of
documentation.
■ Problem-solves to report, address, and resolve hazards and errors in
care or the practice environment.
■ Identifies strategies and technologies to enhance communication among
healthcare clinicians and consumers to minimize risks, especially those
associated with transitions in care.
■ Contributes the informatics professional perspective in discussions with
the interprofessional team.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 86 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 87
Standard 12. Leadership
The informatics nurse demonstrates leadership in the
professional practice setting and the profession.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Promotes the organization’s vision, the associated goals, and the
strategic plan.
■ Demonstrates a commitment to continuous education and lifelong
learning for self and others, especially related to informatics content.
■ Mentors colleagues for the advancement of nursing informatics practice,
the profession, and quality health care.
■ Treats colleagues with respect, trust, and dignity.*
■ Demonstrates advanced communication and conflict resolution skills.
■ Participates in professional and informatics organizations.
■ Seeks ways to advance nursing autonomy and accountability.*
■ Influences the development and implementation of healthcare policy
involving healthcare consumers and the profession.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Influences decision-making bodies to improve the professional practice
environment and healthcare consumer outcomes.
■ Provides direction to enhance the effectiveness of the interprofessional
team.
■ Promotes and develops nursing informatics by interpreting its role for
healthcare consumers, families, and others.
* Board of Higher Education & Massachusetts Organization of Nurse Executives
[BHE/MONE], 2006.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 87 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
88 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
■ Models expert nursing informatics practice to interprofessional team
members and healthcare consumers.
■ Mentors colleagues in the acquisition of clinical knowledge, skills, abili-
ties, and judgment.
■ Promotes the use of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom to improve
healthcare delivery and support effective nursing practice.
■ Identifies opportunities to share innovative practice.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 88 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 89
Standard 13. Collaboration
The informatics nurse collaborates with the healthcare
consumer, family, and others in the conduct of nursing and
informatics practice.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Partners with others to effect change and produce positive outcomes
through the sharing of data, information, and knowledge of the health-
care consumer and/or situation.
■ Communicates with the healthcare consumer, family, and others regard-
ing provision of care and the role of technology in that care.
■ Implements strategies to increase healthcare consumer use of personal
health records (PHRs) and similar health information technology (IT)
tools to engage more fully in their health and health care.
■ Implements strategies to increase healthcare consumers’ participation
and ownership in their care process and to take greater ownership of
their own outcomes and safety in all healthcare venues.
■ Participates in building consensus or resolving conflict in the context of
patient care and the application of technology to support that care.
■ Applies group process and negotiation techniques with healthcare
consumers and colleagues.
■ Adheres to standards and applicable codes of conduct that govern
behavior among peers and colleagues to create a work environment that
promotes cooperation, respect, and trust.
■ Promotes the development and use of electronic health records that are
focused on patient-centered outcomes and decision-making.
■ Engages in teamwork and team-building processes.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 89 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
90 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Partners with others, within and outside of health care, to enhance
healthcare consumer outcomes through interprofessional activities, such
as education, consultation, management, technological development,
or research opportunities to create technologies that support consumer
engagement.
■ Invites the contribution of the healthcare consumer, family, and team
members in order to achieve optimal outcomes.
■ Leads in establishing, improving, and sustaining collaborative relation-
ships to design and implement technologies to achieve safe, quality
health care.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 90 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 91
Standard 14. Professional Practice Evaluation
The informatics nurse evaluates his or her own nursing practice
in relation to professional practice standards and guidelines,
relevant statutes, rules, and regulations.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Supports delivery of appropriate care and services in a culturally, ethnically,
and developmentally sensitive manner.
■ Engages in self-evaluation of practice on a regular basis, identifying
areas of strength as well as areas in which professional growth would be
beneficial.
■ Obtains informal feedback regarding her or his own practice from health-
care consumers, peers, professional colleagues, and others.
■ Participates in peer review as appropriate.
■ Takes action to achieve goals identified during the evaluation process.
■ Provides the evidence for practice decisions and actions as part of the
informal and formal evaluation processes.
■ Interacts with peers and colleagues to enhance his or her own profes-
sional nursing practice or role performance.
■ Provides peers with formal or informal constructive feedback regarding
their practice or role performance.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Engages in a formal process seeking feedback regarding her or his own
practice from healthcare consumers, peers, professional colleagues, and
others.
■ Provides mentorship to informatics nurses and those studying to
become informatics nurses.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 91 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
92 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Standard 15. Resource Utilization
The informatics nurse employs appropriate resources to plan
and implement informatics and associated services that are safe,
effective, and fiscally responsible.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Monitors the healthcare information needs of individual consumers and
communities, as well as the available operational and technical enterprise
resources to achieve desired outcomes.
■ Identifies opportunities, potential for harm/risk, complexity of the task,
and desired outcomes when considering resource allocation.
■ Identifies best practices and evidence for safety and care outcomes when
evaluating the allocation of resources.
■ Supports the integration of clinical, human, financial, and technical
resources to enhance and facilitate the healthcare decision-making process.
■ Advocates for resources, including technology, that enhance nursing
practice.
■ Modifies practice as technologies and resources emerge and evolve.
■ Assists the healthcare consumer and family in researching and securing
appropriate and affordable information and technology resources to
address care needs across the healthcare continuum.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Uses organizational and community resources and information tech-
nologies to empower the interprofessional team and enhance planning
initiatives.
■ Formulates solutions that address the requirements of informatics
projects, such as project plan, software specification documents, and
request for proposal (RFP).
■ Designs evaluation strategies that measure fiscal outcomes, user satis-
faction, and project effectiveness.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 92 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 93
Standard 16. Environmental Health
The informatics nurse supports practice in a safe and healthy
environment.
CoMPetenCies
The informatics nurse:
■ Attains knowledge of environmental health concepts, such as imple-
mentation of environmental health strategies.
■ Promotes a practice environment that reduces ergonomic and environ-
mental health risks for workers and healthcare consumers.
■ Assesses the practice environment for factors that threaten health, such
as sound, odor, noise, electromagnetic forces, and light.
■ Advocates for the judicious and appropriate use of ergonomic and
environmentally safe products in health care.
■ Communicates environmental health risks and exposure reduc-
tion strategies to healthcare consumers, families, colleagues, and
communities.
■ Employs scientific evidence to determine if a product or treatment is an
environmental or ergonomic risk.
■ Participates in strategies to promote healthy communities.
■ Assists in the development of health and safety alerts within the clinical
documentation and technology solutions.
■ Advocates for convenient electronic resources that allow quick and easy
access to information.
ADDitionAL CoMPetenCies For tHe
inForMAtiCs nurse sPeCiAList
The informatics nurse specialist:
■ Creates partnerships that promote sustainable environmental health
policies and conditions.
■ Analyzes the impact of social, political, and economic influences on the
environment and human health exposures.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 93 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
94 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
■ Critically evaluates the manner in which environmental health issues
are presented by the popular media.
■ Advocates for implementation of environmental principles in nursing
practice.
■ Supports nurses in advocating for and implementing environmental
principles in nursing practice.
stAnDArDs oF nursinG inForMAtiCs PrACtiCe
Nursing Informatics.indd 94 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
95
Glossary
Data. Discrete entities that are described objectively without interpretation.
Human–computer interaction (HCi). The study of how people design, imple-
ment, and evaluate interactive computer systems in the context of users’
tasks and work (Nelson & Staggers, 2014, pp. 511–512).
informatics nurse (in). A registered nurse with an interest or experience in an
informatics field, most often identified as nursing informatics.
informatics nurse specialist (ins). A registered nurse with formal, graduate-
level education in informatics or a related field.
information. Data that are interpreted, organized, or structured.
Knowledge. Information that is synthesized so that relationships are identi-
fied and formalized.
Meaningful use. Delineated sets of specific objectives associated with purchase
and use of health information technology solutions and quality reporting
that must be met to qualify for federal incentive payments.
Metadata. Data about data. Metadata describes how, when, and by whom a
particular set of data was collected, and how the data are formatted (http://
www.webopedia.com/TERM/M/metadata.html).
operational architecture. A data management process that enables a respon-
sive end-to-end healthcare information environment in which: (1) informa-
tion exchange processes are transparent and actionable; (2) the means to
produce, exchange, and use information are protected; and (3) resources
are allocated based on operational requirements and implemented through
the use of precedence, priority, and resource allocation techniques.
Nursing Informatics.indd 95 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
96 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Glossary
system life cycle. Conceptual model or framework used to formally describe
each stage of a living or nonliving system, such as an information system.
usability. Extent to which a product can be used by specific users in a spe-
cific context to achieve specific goals with effectiveness, efficiency, and
satisfaction.
Wisdom. The appropriate use of knowledge to manage and solve human
problems.
Nursing Informatics.indd 96 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
97
References
Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. (2010). Environmental
health nursing initiative. Retrieved from http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/EHN/
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2006). The essentials
of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/DNPEssentials.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2008). The essentials
of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/baccessentials08.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2011). The essentials
of master’s education in nursing. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.
edu/education-resources/MastersEssentials11.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2013). QSEN
informatics initiative: Background & overview. Retrieved from http://
www.aacn.nche.edu/qsen-informatics/background-overview
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2014). Key differences
between DNP and PhD/DNS programs. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.
nche.edu/dnp/ContrastGrid.pdf
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2001). Code of ethics for nurses with
interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2010). Nursing: Scope and standards
of practice (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2012, June 4). ANA recognized
terminologies that support nursing practice. Retrieved from http://www.
nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/
NursingStandards/Recognized-Nursing-Practice-Terminologies.pdf
Nursing Informatics.indd 97 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
98 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
RefeRences
American Nurses Association (ANA) & International Society of Nurses in
Genetics (ISONG). (2011). Essential genetic and genomic competencies
for nurses with graduate degrees. http://www.nursingworld.org/
MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/Genetics-1/ANA-and-ISONG-
Announce-New-Publication.html
American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC). (2013). 2013 role delineation
study: Nursing informatics—National survey results. Retrieved from
http://www.nursecredentialing.org/Certification/NurseSpecialties/
Informatics/RELATED-LINKS/Informatics-2013RDS.pdf
American Organization of Nurse Executives. (2005). The AONE nurse
executive competencies. Retrieved from http://www.aone.org/resources/
leadership%20tools/PDFs/AONE_NEC.pdf
American Organization of Nurse Executives (AONE). (2012). Position
paper: Nursing informatics executive leader. Retrieved from http://www.
aone.org/resources/leadership%20tools/PDFs/AONE_Technology_
Committee_CNIO_Position_Paper.pdf
American Telemedicine Association (ATA). (n.d.). What is telemedicine?
Retrieved from http://www.americantelemed.org/about-telemedicine/
what-is-telemedicine#.U7m7n7GmU1I
American Telemedicine Association (ATA). (2013). Standards and guidelines.
Retrieved from http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/
community-college-consortia
Ash, J. S., Berg, M., & Coiera, E. (2004). Some unintended consequences
of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care
information system-related errors. Journal of American Medical
Informatics Association, 11(2), 104–112. doi:10.1197/jamia.M1471
Ash, J. S., Sittig, D. F., Dykstra, R., Campbell, E., & Guappone, K. (2009). The
unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: Findings
from a mixed methods exploration. International Journal of Medical
Informatics, 78(suppl. 1), S69–S76. doi:10.1016/jmedinf.2008.07.015
Baer, A., Rodriguez, C. V., & Duchin, J. S. (2011). An automated system for
public health surveillance of school absenteeism. Journal of Public Health
Management Practice, 17, 59–64.
Nursing Informatics.indd 98 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
RefeRences
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 99
Bassendowski, S. (2013). Holograms in healthcare [Technology in Education
column]. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 8(3). Retrieved from
Benner, P. E. (1984). Novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical
nursing practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Benner, P. E., Hooper-Kyriakidis, P. L., & Stannard, D. (2011). Clinical
wisdom and interventions in acute and critical care: A thinking-in-action
approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Blum, B. (1986). Clinical information systems. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Board of Higher Education & Massachusetts Organization of Nurse Executives
(BHE/MONE). (2006). Creativity and connections: Building the framework
for the future of nursing education. Report from the Invitational Working
Session, March 23–24, 2006. Burlington, MA: MONE. Retrieved from www.
mass.edu/currentinit/documents/NursingCreativityAndConnections.pdf
Brame, C. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Retrieved from http://cft.
vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/
Calzone, K., et al. (Genomic Nursing State of the Science Advisory Panel).
(2013). A blueprint for genomic nursing science. Journal of Nursing
Scholarship, 45(1), 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.ninr.nih.gov/sites/www.
ninr.nih.gov/files/jnu_12007_Rev_EV.pdf
Carroll, R., & Nakamura, P. (2011). Risk management handbook for healthcare
organizations, volume 1: The essentials. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chang, J., Poynton, M. R., Gassert, C. A., & Staggers, N. (2011). Nursing
informatics competencies required of nurses in Taiwan. International
Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(5), 332–340. doi:http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.01.011
Cho, I., Staggers, N., & Park, I. (2010). Nurses’ responses to differing amounts
and information content in a diagnostic computer-based decision support
application. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 28(2), 95–102.
Choi, J. (2012). Comparative assessment of informatics competencies in three
undergraduate programs. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 6(2).
http://ojni.org/issues/?p=1700
Nursing Informatics.indd 99 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
100 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
RefeRences
Choi, J., & Bakken, S. (2013). Validation of the Self-Assessment of Nursing
Informatics Competencies Scale among undergraduate and graduate
nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(5), 275–282.
doi:10.3928/01484834-20130412-01
CHPS®. (2014). Certified in healthcare privacy and security. Retrieved from
http://www.ahima.org/certification/chps
CHTS. (2013). Certified healthcare technology specialist. Retrieved from
http://www.ahima.org/certification/chts
Community College Consortia. (n.d.). Participating community colleges.
Retrieved from http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/
participating-community-colleges
Community Health Nurses’ Initiatives Group. (2013). Retrieved from http://
www.chnig.org/
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell,
P., & Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses. Nursing
Outlook, 55(3), 122–131.
Duke University. (2012). DNP-PhD comparison. Retrieved from http://
nursing.duke.edu/academics/programs/dnp/dnp-phd-comparison
Emory University. (2011, September 16). University-industry partnerships drive
economic impact, improvements in health care. Retrieved from http://
shared.web.emory.edu/whsc/news/releases/2011/09/university-industry-
partnerships-drive-economic-impact,-improvements-in-health-care.html
Englebardt, S., & Nelson, R. (2002). Health care informatics: An
interdisciplinary approach. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book.
e-Patients.net. (2013). Retrieved from http://e-patients.net/
Feather, J., & Sturges, P. (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of
information and library science (2nd ed.), s.v. “Information management”
263–278. London, UK: Routledge, 2002. Retrieved from http://
informationr.net/tdw/publ/papers/encyclopedia_entry.html
Flood, L. S., Gasiewicz, N., & Delpier, T. (2010). Integrating information
literacy across a BSN curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(2),
101–104. doi:10.3928/01484834-20091023-01
Nursing Informatics.indd 100 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
RefeRences
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 101
Graves, J., & Corcoran, S. (1989). The study of nursing informatics. Image,
21(4), 227–230.
Guo, J., Irdbarren, S., Kapsandoy, S., Perri, S., & Staggers, N. (2011). eMAR
user interfaces: A call for ubiquitous usability evaluations and product
redesign. Applied Clinical Informatics, 2(2), 202–204.
Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). (2014).
2014 nursing informatics workforce survey. Chicago, IL: Author.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (n.d.). Telehealth.
Retrieved from http://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/about/telehealth/
Healthcare Leadership Alliance (HLA). (2005). HLA competency directory,
2.0. Retrieved from http://www.healthcareleadershipalliance.org/
Healthcare Leadership Alliance (HLA). (2013). Introducing the HLA
Competency Directory, version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.
healthcareleadershipalliance.org/directory.htm
HealthIT.gov. (n.d.). Connecting health and care for the nation: A
10-year vision to achieve an interoperable health IT infrastructure.
Retrieved from http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/
ONC10yearInteroperabilityConceptPaper.pdf
HealthIT.gov (2009.). HITECH Act. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/
privacy/hipaa/understanding/coveredentities/hitechact.pdf
HealthIT.gov (2013.). Health IT curriculum resources for educators.
Retrieved from http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/
health-it-curriculum-resources-educators
HealthIT.gov. (2014). Competency examination program. Retrieved
from http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/
competency-examination-program
HealthIT Help Center Workforce Programs. (n.d.). Workforce programs.
Retrieved from http://www.healthit.gov/providers-professionals/
workforce-development-programs
Hebda, T., & Calderone, T. (2010). What nurse educators need to know about
the TIGER initiative. Nurse Educator, 35(2), 56–60.
Nursing Informatics.indd 101 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
102 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
RefeRences
Hemmerly-Brown, A. (2011). DoD gives PTSD help “second life” in
virtual reality. Retrieved from http://www.army.mil/article/50751/
dod-gives-ptsd-help-second-life-in-virtual-reality/
Hinman, A. R., & Ross, D. A. (2010, April). Immunization registries can be
building blocks for national health information. Health Affairs, 29(4),
676–682. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2007.0594
Hodges, L. & Wierz, C. (2012). The emerging role of the chief nursing
information officer: What is the current state? (Presented at HIMSS12
Nursing Informatics Symposium, Feb. 20.) Healthcare Information
and Management Systems Society: Chicago. Retrieved from
http://69.59.162.218/HIMSS2012/Venetian%20Sands%20Expo%20
Center/2.20.12_Mon/Marcello%204404/Mon_1030/NI7-11_Chris_
Wierz_Marcello%204404/NI7Wierz.pdf
Houlihan, P. (n.d.). RIC researchers explore promising new robotic technology.
Retrieved from http://lifecenter.ric.org/index.php?tray=content&tid=top
103&cid=6676
Hsu, C. E., Dunn, K., Juo, H.-H., Danko, R., Johnson, D., Mas, F. S., & Sheu,
J.-J. (2012). Understanding public health informatics competencies
for mid-tier public health practitioners: A web-based survey. Health
Informatics Journal, 18(1), 66–76. doi:10.1177/1460458211424000
Huang, C., Chen, C., & Chung, H. (2005). Application of facial
electromyography in computer mouse access for people with disabilities.
Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(4), 231–237.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health
system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new
health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change,
advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2012). Health IT and patient safety: Building
safer systems for better care. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press.
Nursing Informatics.indd 102 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
RefeRences
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 103
International Council of Nurses (ICN). (2013). ICNP®. Retrieved from http://
www.icn.ch/pillarsprograms/international-classification-for-nursing
-practice-icnpr/
International Organization for Standardization (2009). Ergonomics of
human system interaction – Part 210: Human-centered design for
interactive systems ( formerly known as 13407). ISO FDIS 9241-210:2009
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core
competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an
expert panel. Washington, D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative.
Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/
ipecreport.pdf
Jain, K. K. (2008). Nanomedicine: Application of nanobiotechnology in
medical practice. Medical Principles and Practice. 17(2):89–101. doi:
10.1159/000112961. Epub 2008 Feb 19. Retrieved from http://www.
futuremedicine.com/doi/pdf/10.2217/nnm.09.12
Koppel, R., Metlay, J. P., Cohen, A., et al. (2005). Role of computerized physician
order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 293(10), 1197–1203. doi:10:1001/jama.293.10.1197
Leventhal, R. (2010, May 8). California hospitals to utilize robot
technology to treat stroke patients. Healthcare Informatics
Retrieved from http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/news-item/
california-hospitals-utilize-robot-technology-treat-stroke-patients
Maojo, V., García-Remesal, M., Iglesia, D. D., Crespo, J., Pérez-Rey, D., Chiesa,
S., & Kulikowski, C. A. (2011). Nanoinformatics: Developing advanced
informatics applications for nanomedicine. Fundamental Biomedical
Technologies, 5, 847–860. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1248-5_26
McGonigle, D., Hunter, K. M., Hebda, T., & Hill, T. (2013). Assessment of
level 3 and level 4 nursing informatics (NI) competencies tool development.
Poster presented at the Summer Institute in Nursing Informatics (SINI),
“Beyond Stage 7 and Meaningful Use: What’s Next?”
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2015). Emerging technologies and the
generation of knowledge. In Nursing informatics and the foundation
of knowledge (3rd ed., pp. 485–537). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett
Learning.
Nursing Informatics.indd 103 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
104 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
RefeRences
Michaelsen, L. K. (n.d.). Getting started with team-based learning. Retrieved
from http://faculty.ucmo.edu/teambasedlearning/docs/Getting%20
Started%20with%20TBL.pdf
Morton, A. (2011, May 12). UBT Program: Preparing the health IT
leaders of tomorrow, today. Retrieved from http://www.healthit.
gov/buzz-blog/university-based-training/ubt-program-preparing-
health-leaders-tomorrow-today/
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2008). Preparing the next
generation of nurses to practice in a technology-rich environment: An
informatics agenda. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/
PositionStatements/informatics_052808.pdf
Nelson, R. (2002). Major theories supporting health care informatics.
In: Englebardt, S., & Nelson, R., eds., Health Care Informatics: An
Interdisciplinary Approach. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, 3–2.7.
Nelson, R., & Joos, I. (1989). On language in nursing: From data to wisdom.
PLN Vision, 6.
Nelson, R., & Staggers, N. (Eds.) (2014). Health informatics: An
interprofessional approach. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
Nielsen, J. (2012, January 4). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved
from www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability
Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII). (2009). The value of health IT
in improving population health and transforming public health practice.
Retrieved from http://www.phii.org/resources/view/151/The%20
Value%20of%20Health%20IT%20in%20Improving%20Population%20
Health%20and%20Transforming%20Public%20Health%20Practice
QSEN Institute. (2012a). The evolution of the Quality and Safety Education
for Nurses (QSEN) initiative. Retrieved from http://qsen.org/about-qsen/
project-overview/
QSEN Institute. (2012b). Graduate-level QSEN competencies, knowledge,
skills and attitudes. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/faculty/
qsen/competencies.pdf
Registered Environmental Health Specialist Program. (2013). Retrieved from
http://www.neha.org/credential/index.shtml#rehsrs_cred
Nursing Informatics.indd 104 11/6/14 6:31 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
RefeRences
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 105
Remus, S., & Kennedy, M. A. (2012). Innovation in transformative nursing
leadership: Nursing informatics competencies and roles. Canadian
Journal of Nursing Leadership, 25(4), 14–26.
Robotics Technology—Healthcare Robotics. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.
robotxworld.com/channels/healthcare-robotics/
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (1987). Critical thinking as defined by the National
Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking, 1987. Presentation at the 8th
Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking and Education
Reform, Summer 1987. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org
Shadow Health. (2014). Physical Assessment [Digital Clinical
Experience].Retrieved from http://www.shadowhealth.com/health-
assessment.html.
Sibley, C. (2008). Web usability and aging. Retrieved from http://www.
usability.gov/get-involved/blog/2008/12/aging-and-usability.html
Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A new sociotechnical model for studying
health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems.
Quality & Safety in Heath Care, 19, i68–i74.
Spector, N. (2013, May 9). Description of NCSBN’s Transition to
Practice® (TTP) model. Retrieved from https://www.ncsbn.org/13_
TransitiontoPractice_modeldescription.pdf
Staggers, N. (2014). Improving the user experience for health information
technology products. In R. Nelson & N. Staggers (Eds.), Health informatics:
An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 337–350). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Staggers, N., Gassert, C. A., & Curran, C. (2001). Informatics competencies
for nurses at four levels of practice. Journal of Nursing Education, 40(7),
303–316.
Staggers, N., Gassert, C. A., & Curran, C. (2002). A Delphi study to determine
informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice. Nursing
Research, 51(6) 383–391.
Staggers, N., Jennings, B. M., & Lasome, C. E. (2010). A usability assessment
of AHLTA in ambulatory clinics at a military medical center. Military
Medicine, 175(7), 518–524.
Nursing Informatics.indd 105 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
106 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
RefeRences
Stead, W., & Lin, H. (2009). Computational technology for effective health
care: Immediate steps and strategic directions. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press.
Sternberger, C. S. (2012, March). Interactive learning environment: Engaging
students using clickers. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(2), 121–124.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-33.2.121
Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER). (2009).
Informatics competencies for every practicing nurse: Recommendations
from the TIGER collaborative. Retrieved from http://www.
thetigerinitiative.org/docs/TigerReport_InformaticsCompetencies.pdf
ThinkGeek. (2014). Virtual keyboard. Retrieved from http://www.thinkgeek.
com/brain/whereisit.cgi?t=virtual+keyboard
Topol, E. (2011). The creative destruction of medicine: How the digital
revolution will create better health care. New York, NY: Perseus Books
Group.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) General Human Factors
Information and Resource. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/
medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/humanfactors/ucm124829.
htm
Weiner, J. P., Kfuri, T., Chan, K., & Fowles, J. B. (2007, May–June).
“e-iatrogenesis”: The most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and
other HIT. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,
14(3), 387–388; discussion 389.
Wisconsin Institute for Discovery. (n.d.). Living environments laboratory.
Retrieved from http://wid.wisc.edu/research/lel/
World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Framework for action on
interprofessional education and collaborative practice. (WHO/HRH/
HPN/10.3) Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://
whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf?ua=1
Zhou, L. (2007). Natural language interface for information management on
mobile devices. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(3), 197–207.
Nursing Informatics.indd 106 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
107
Appendix A.
An emerging Model of Wisdom
Susan Matney describes the development of wisdom through the use of
knowledge in her model, Wisdom-in-Action for Clinical Nursing©. This model
denotes that knowledge encompasses:
■ The center core of clinical judgment;
■ Values, relativism, and tolerance;
■ Life span contextualism;
■ Rich procedural knowledge; and
■ Rich factual knowledge.
Antecedents to this knowledge are the person-related factors and the envi-
ronmental factors of setting and systems. When nurses are put into a stressful
situation that has a degree of uncertainty, their specialized knowledge mastery
produces insight and intuition into the decision-making needed for action.
This learning, reflection, and discovery of meaning for the situation become
integrated into their inherent knowledge base or “wisdom” for future actions.
Figure 1. Matney Model of Wisdom-in-Action for Clinical Nursing©
(Work in progress; Permission to use granted by Susan Matney)
Wisdom-in-Action
Decision
Application
Increasing
complexity
Knowledge
Antecedents
System-related
factors
Life span contextualism
Rich procedural
knowledge
Rich factual knowledge
Person-related
factors
(Nurse/Patient/
Family) Experience-speci�c factorsMentors/role models
Life experiences
Clinical experiences
Clinical training
Context-related factors
Age
Education
Social interaction
Culture/religion
Cognition
Openness to learning
Setting-related
factors
Setting type
Setting culture
Nurse familiarity with setting
Nurse expertise with setting specialty
Data Information
Logic
or rules Integration into
Produces
insight and
intuition
Stressful
situation or
management of
uncertainty
Specialized
knowledge
mastery
Discovery of
meaning
Re�ection
Learning
Clinical judgment
Values, relativism, and
tolerance
Structured
in context
Nursing Informatics.indd 107 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
This page intentionally left blank
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
109
Appendix B.
Nursing Informatics: Scope and
Standards of Practice (2008)
Nursing Informatics.indd 109 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
110 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
APPenDix b. nursinG inForMAtiCs: sCoPe & stAnDArDs oF PrACtiCe (2008)
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Work Group Members (2007)
Nancy Staggers, PhD, RN, FAAN, Chairperson
Michele Calogero, MSN, RN
Margaret F. Budnik, DM, RN
Diane Castelli, RN
Melissa Christensen
Mary F. Clarke, PhD, RN, BC
Tina Dieckhaus, BSN, RN-BC, Leader, Integration and Tenets
Paulette Fraser, MS, RN-BC, Co-leader Metastructures
Josette Jones, PhD, RN-BC, Co-leader Competencies
Sally Kellum, MSN, RN-C
Rosemary Kennedy, MBA, RN, Co-leader NI Standards
Kathleen Krichbaum, RN, PhD
Sheryl LaCoursiere, PhD, RN-BC, Leader, Functional Areas
Angela Lewis, BSN, RN-BC
Teresa McCasky, MBA, BSN, RN-BC
Ramona Nelson, PhD, RN, FAAN, Co-leader, Metastructures
Agnes Padernal, PhD, RN
Amy Peck, RN
Mollie R. Poynton PhD, APRN
Loretta Schlachta-Fairchild, PhD, RN, CHE
Norma Street, MSN, RN
Sharon Sweeney Fee, PhD, RN, Leader, Ethics section
Dawn Weathersby, MS, RN, Co-leader NI Standards
Jill Winters, PhD, RN
Seth Wolpin PhD MPH RN, Co-leader Competencies
Lisa Wynn, MA, RN-BC
ANA Staff
Carol J. Bickford, PhD, RN-BC—Content editor
Yvonne D. Humes, MSA—Project coordinator
Therese Myers, JD—Legal counsel
iii
Informatics Nursing_FM_Pgs_i-viii.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM3
v
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments iii
The Scope of Nursing Informatics Practice 1
Introduction 1
Metastructures, Concepts, and Tools of Nursing Informatics 3
Metastructures: Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom 3
Sciences Underpinning Nursing Informatics 7
Language as a Tool for Nursing Informatics 7
Concepts and Tools from Information Science 9
and Computer Science
Human–Computer Interaction and Related Concepts 10
Phenomena of Nursing 11
References: Introduction, Metastructures, Concepts, 13
and Tools
Functional Areas for Nursing Informatics 16
Administration, Leadership, and Management 18
Analysis 19
Compliance and Integrity Management 21
Consultation 22
Coordination, Facilitation, and Integration 23
Development 24
Education and Professional Development 25
Policy Development and Advocacy 27
Research and Evaluation 28
Integrated Functional Areas: Telehealth and 29
Telenursing as Exemplar
NI Functional Areas: Conclusions 30
References: Functional Areas 31
Informatics Competencies 33
The Intersection of Informatics Competencies 34
and NI Functional Areas
A New Competencies Matrix 36
Competencies and Metastructures 37
Work in Progress 40
NI Competencies: Conclusion 40
References: NI Competencies 40
Informatics Nursing_FM_Pgs_i-viii.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM5
Nursing Informatics.indd 110 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 111
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Work Group Members (2007)
Nancy Staggers, PhD, RN, FAAN, Chairperson
Michele Calogero, MSN, RN
Margaret F. Budnik, DM, RN
Diane Castelli, RN
Melissa Christensen
Mary F. Clarke, PhD, RN, BC
Tina Dieckhaus, BSN, RN-BC, Leader, Integration and Tenets
Paulette Fraser, MS, RN-BC, Co-leader Metastructures
Josette Jones, PhD, RN-BC, Co-leader Competencies
Sally Kellum, MSN, RN-C
Rosemary Kennedy, MBA, RN, Co-leader NI Standards
Kathleen Krichbaum, RN, PhD
Sheryl LaCoursiere, PhD, RN-BC, Leader, Functional Areas
Angela Lewis, BSN, RN-BC
Teresa McCasky, MBA, BSN, RN-BC
Ramona Nelson, PhD, RN, FAAN, Co-leader, Metastructures
Agnes Padernal, PhD, RN
Amy Peck, RN
Mollie R. Poynton PhD, APRN
Loretta Schlachta-Fairchild, PhD, RN, CHE
Norma Street, MSN, RN
Sharon Sweeney Fee, PhD, RN, Leader, Ethics section
Dawn Weathersby, MS, RN, Co-leader NI Standards
Jill Winters, PhD, RN
Seth Wolpin PhD MPH RN, Co-leader Competencies
Lisa Wynn, MA, RN-BC
ANA Staff
Carol J. Bickford, PhD, RN-BC—Content editor
Yvonne D. Humes, MSA—Project coordinator
Therese Myers, JD—Legal counsel
iii
Informatics Nursing_FM_Pgs_i-viii.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM3
v
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments iii
The Scope of Nursing Informatics Practice 1
Introduction 1
Metastructures, Concepts, and Tools of Nursing Informatics 3
Metastructures: Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom 3
Sciences Underpinning Nursing Informatics 7
Language as a Tool for Nursing Informatics 7
Concepts and Tools from Information Science 9
and Computer Science
Human–Computer Interaction and Related Concepts 10
Phenomena of Nursing 11
References: Introduction, Metastructures, Concepts, 13
and Tools
Functional Areas for Nursing Informatics 16
Administration, Leadership, and Management 18
Analysis 19
Compliance and Integrity Management 21
Consultation 22
Coordination, Facilitation, and Integration 23
Development 24
Education and Professional Development 25
Policy Development and Advocacy 27
Research and Evaluation 28
Integrated Functional Areas: Telehealth and 29
Telenursing as Exemplar
NI Functional Areas: Conclusions 30
References: Functional Areas 31
Informatics Competencies 33
The Intersection of Informatics Competencies 34
and NI Functional Areas
A New Competencies Matrix 36
Competencies and Metastructures 37
Work in Progress 40
NI Competencies: Conclusion 40
References: NI Competencies 40
Informatics Nursing_FM_Pgs_i-viii.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM5
Nursing Informatics.indd 111 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
112 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
vi
The Integration of Nursing Informatics 43
The Boundaries of Nursing Informatics 45
Tenets of Nursing Informatics 46
Ethics in Nursing Informatics 47
The Future of Nursing Informatics 49
Trends in Positions and Competencies for Nurses 50
and Informatics
Trends in Technology 51
Trends in Healthcare Delivery and Regulation 58
NI Future and Trends: Conclusions 61
References (Future and Trends) 62
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 65
Standards of Practice 67
Standard 1. Assessment 67
Standard 2. Problem and Issues Identification 68
Standard 3. Outcomes Identification 69
Standard 4. Planning 70
Standard 5. Implementation 71
Standard 5a. Coordination of Activities 72
Standard 5b. Health Teaching and Health Promotion, 73
and Education
Standard 5c. Consultation 75
Standard 6. Evaluation 76
Standards of Professional Performance 77
Standard 7. Education 77
Standard 8. Professional Practice Evaluation 78
Standard 9. Quality of Practice 79
Standard 10. Collegiality 81
Standard 11. Collaboration 82
Standard 12. Ethics 83
Standard 13. Research 85
Standard 14. Resource Utilization 86
Standard 15. Advocacy 87
Standard 16. Leadership 89
Glossary 91
Informatics Nursing_FM_Pgs_i-viii.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM6
vii
Appendix A. Scope and Standards of Nursing Informatics 93
Practice (2001)
Appendix B. Standards of Practice for Nursing Informatics 154
(1995)
Appendix C. Scope of Practice for Nursing Informatics (1994) 175
Index 191
Informatics Nursing_FM_Pgs_i-viii.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM7
Nursing Informatics.indd 112 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 113
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
vi
The Integration of Nursing Informatics 43
The Boundaries of Nursing Informatics 45
Tenets of Nursing Informatics 46
Ethics in Nursing Informatics 47
The Future of Nursing Informatics 49
Trends in Positions and Competencies for Nurses 50
and Informatics
Trends in Technology 51
Trends in Healthcare Delivery and Regulation 58
NI Future and Trends: Conclusions 61
References (Future and Trends) 62
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 65
Standards of Practice 67
Standard 1. Assessment 67
Standard 2. Problem and Issues Identification 68
Standard 3. Outcomes Identification 69
Standard 4. Planning 70
Standard 5. Implementation 71
Standard 5a. Coordination of Activities 72
Standard 5b. Health Teaching and Health Promotion, 73
and Education
Standard 5c. Consultation 75
Standard 6. Evaluation 76
Standards of Professional Performance 77
Standard 7. Education 77
Standard 8. Professional Practice Evaluation 78
Standard 9. Quality of Practice 79
Standard 10. Collegiality 81
Standard 11. Collaboration 82
Standard 12. Ethics 83
Standard 13. Research 85
Standard 14. Resource Utilization 86
Standard 15. Advocacy 87
Standard 16. Leadership 89
Glossary 91
Informatics Nursing_FM_Pgs_i-viii.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM6
vii
Appendix A. Scope and Standards of Nursing Informatics 93
Practice (2001)
Appendix B. Standards of Practice for Nursing Informatics 154
(1995)
Appendix C. Scope of Practice for Nursing Informatics (1994) 175
Index 191
Informatics Nursing_FM_Pgs_i-viii.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM7
Nursing Informatics.indd 113 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
114 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
1
THE SCOPE OF NURSING INFORMATICS PRACTICE
Introduction
Nursing informatics (NI) is a specialty that integrates nursing science,
computer science, and information science to manage and communi-
cate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice. NI
supports consumers, patients, nurses, and other providers in their deci-
sion-making in all roles and settings. This support is accomplished
through the use of information structures, information processes, and
information technology.
The goal of NI is to improve the health of populations, communities,
families, and individuals by optimizing information management and
communication. These activities include the design and use of informatics
solutions and technology to support all areas of nursing, including, but
not limited to, the direct provision of care, establishing effective admin-
istrative systems, designing useful decision support systems, managing
and delivering educational experiences, enhancing lifelong learning, and
supporting nursing research (Staggers & Thompson, 2002).
The NI definition remains essentially that found in Scope and Standards
of Nursing Informatics (2001), but now includes the additional concept of
wisdom. The term individuals refers to patients, healthcare consumers, and
any other recipients of nursing care or informatics solutions. The term
patient refers to consumers in both a wellness and illness model. The dis-
cussion of the definition and goal of nursing informatics evolved from
work by Staggers and Thompson (2002).
Nursing informatics is one example of a discipline-specific informatics
practice within the broader category of health informatics. NI has be-
come well established within nursing since its recognition as a specialty
for registered nurses by the American Nurses Association (ANA) in 1992.
It focuses on the representation of nursing data, information, knowledge
(Graves & Corcoran, 1989) and wisdom (Nelson & Loos, 1989; Nelson,
2002) as well as the management and communication of nursing infor-
mation within the broader context of health informatics. Nursing
informatics (per Brennan, 2002):
• provides a nursing perspective,
• illuminates nursing values and beliefs,
Nursing informatics is one example of a discipline-specifi c informat-
ics practice within the broader category of health informatics. NI has
become well established within nursing since its recognition as a spe-
cialty for registered nurses by the American Nurses Association (ANA)
in 1992. It focuses on the representation of nursing data, information,
knowledge (Graves & Corcoran, 1989) and wisdom (Nelson & Loos, 1989;
Englebardt & Nelson, 2002) as well as the management and commu-
nication of nursing information within the broader context of health
informatics. Nursing informatics (per Brennan, 2002):
• provides a nursing perspective,
• illuminates nursing values and beliefs,
2 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• denotes a practice base for nurses in nursing informatics,
• produces unique knowledge,
• distinguishes groups of practitioners,
• focuses on the phenomena of interest for nursing, and
• provides needed nursing language and word context to health
informatics.
The scope and standards of practice address both informatics nurse
specialists (INSs), those formally prepared at the graduate level in
informatics or a related field, and informatics nurses (INs), generalists
who have experience but are not educated at the graduate level. How-
ever, informatics practice is highly complex and in the near future all
nurses working in this specialty will have studied at the graduate level.
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice expands on earlier
work in NI, builds on historical knowledge (ANA, 1994, 1995, 2001), and
includes new, state-of-the-art material for the specialty. Because of rapid
changes in related sciences, NI roles, and advances in the science of
informatics, a new document was needed. New material in this revision
includes: a) the concept of wisdom in NI metastructures, b) redirecting the
discussion of roles from job titles to functions that may be integrated into
various NI roles and subspecializations, c) identifying commonalities be-
tween INSs and other informatics specialists, d) distinguishing between
INs and INSs, e) expanding the coverage of NI competencies to describe
typical NI competencies for typical NI functional areas, f ) expanding the
discussion of ethics, human-computer interaction, and the future of NI, g)
integrating new functions across clinical practice and NI, and h) chang-
ing the section titled “Boundaries of Nursing Informatics” to a discussion
of the cross-disciplinary nature of NI that acknowledges the blurred
boundaries of other informatics and nursing specialties.
This revised scope and standards document serves in several functions:
• An outline of the attributes and definition of the specialty.
• A reference and guide for educators and NI practitioners.
• A reference for employers and regulatory agencies to assist with
developing position descriptions, determining required informatics
competencies, and initiating NI positions in health organizations.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM2
Nursing Informatics.indd 114 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 115
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
1
THE SCOPE OF NURSING INFORMATICS PRACTICE
Introduction
Nursing informatics (NI) is a specialty that integrates nursing science,
computer science, and information science to manage and communi-
cate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice. NI
supports consumers, patients, nurses, and other providers in their deci-
sion-making in all roles and settings. This support is accomplished
through the use of information structures, information processes, and
information technology.
The goal of NI is to improve the health of populations, communities,
families, and individuals by optimizing information management and
communication. These activities include the design and use of informatics
solutions and technology to support all areas of nursing, including, but
not limited to, the direct provision of care, establishing effective admin-
istrative systems, designing useful decision support systems, managing
and delivering educational experiences, enhancing lifelong learning, and
supporting nursing research (Staggers & Thompson, 2002).
The NI definition remains essentially that found in Scope and Standards
of Nursing Informatics (2001), but now includes the additional concept of
wisdom. The term individuals refers to patients, healthcare consumers, and
any other recipients of nursing care or informatics solutions. The term
patient refers to consumers in both a wellness and illness model. The dis-
cussion of the definition and goal of nursing informatics evolved from
work by Staggers and Thompson (2002).
Nursing informatics is one example of a discipline-specific informatics
practice within the broader category of health informatics. NI has be-
come well established within nursing since its recognition as a specialty
for registered nurses by the American Nurses Association (ANA) in 1992.
It focuses on the representation of nursing data, information, knowledge
(Graves & Corcoran, 1989) and wisdom (Nelson & Loos, 1989; Nelson,
2002) as well as the management and communication of nursing infor-
mation within the broader context of health informatics. Nursing
informatics (per Brennan, 2002):
• provides a nursing perspective,
• illuminates nursing values and beliefs,
Nursing informatics is one example of a discipline-specifi c informat-
ics practice within the broader category of health informatics. NI has
become well established within nursing since its recognition as a spe-
cialty for registered nurses by the American Nurses Association (ANA)
in 1992. It focuses on the representation of nursing data, information,
knowledge (Graves & Corcoran, 1989) and wisdom (Nelson & Loos, 1989;
Englebardt & Nelson, 2002) as well as the management and commu-
nication of nursing information within the broader context of health
informatics. Nursing informatics (per Brennan, 2002):
• provides a nursing perspective,
• illuminates nursing values and beliefs,
2 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• denotes a practice base for nurses in nursing informatics,
• produces unique knowledge,
• distinguishes groups of practitioners,
• focuses on the phenomena of interest for nursing, and
• provides needed nursing language and word context to health
informatics.
The scope and standards of practice address both informatics nurse
specialists (INSs), those formally prepared at the graduate level in
informatics or a related field, and informatics nurses (INs), generalists
who have experience but are not educated at the graduate level. How-
ever, informatics practice is highly complex and in the near future all
nurses working in this specialty will have studied at the graduate level.
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice expands on earlier
work in NI, builds on historical knowledge (ANA, 1994, 1995, 2001), and
includes new, state-of-the-art material for the specialty. Because of rapid
changes in related sciences, NI roles, and advances in the science of
informatics, a new document was needed. New material in this revision
includes: a) the concept of wisdom in NI metastructures, b) redirecting the
discussion of roles from job titles to functions that may be integrated into
various NI roles and subspecializations, c) identifying commonalities be-
tween INSs and other informatics specialists, d) distinguishing between
INs and INSs, e) expanding the coverage of NI competencies to describe
typical NI competencies for typical NI functional areas, f ) expanding the
discussion of ethics, human-computer interaction, and the future of NI, g)
integrating new functions across clinical practice and NI, and h) chang-
ing the section titled “Boundaries of Nursing Informatics” to a discussion
of the cross-disciplinary nature of NI that acknowledges the blurred
boundaries of other informatics and nursing specialties.
This revised scope and standards document serves in several functions:
• An outline of the attributes and definition of the specialty.
• A reference and guide for educators and NI practitioners.
• A reference for employers and regulatory agencies to assist with
developing position descriptions, determining required informatics
competencies, and initiating NI positions in health organizations.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM2
Nursing Informatics.indd 115 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
116 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 3
• A source document for legal opinions, funding agencies, and others
seeking to improve health through nursing informatics.
Metastructures, Concepts, and Tools of Nursing Informatics
To understand NI, first its metastructures, sciences, concepts, and tools
should be explained. Metastructures are overarching concepts used in
theory and science. Also of interest are the sciences underpinning NI,
concepts and tools from information science and computer science,
human–computer interaction and ergonomics concepts, and the phe-
nomena of nursing.
Metastructures: Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom
In the mid-1980s Blum (1986) introduced the concepts of data, informa-
tion, and knowledge as a framework for understanding clinical informa-
tion systems and their impact on health care. He classified the then
current clinical information systems according to the three types of
objects that these systems processed: data, information, and knowledge.
He noted that the classification was artificial, with no clear boundaries,
although it did represent a scale of increasing complexity. In 1989,
Graves and Corcoran built on these ideas in their seminal study of nurs-
ing informatics using the concepts of data, information, and knowledge.
They contributed two general principles to NI. The first was a definition
of nursing informatics that has been widely accepted in the field. The
second contribution of their 1989 contribution was an information
model that identified data, information, and knowledge as key compo-
nents of NI practice (Figure 1).
Drawing from Blum (1986), Graves and Corcoran defined the three
concepts as follows:
• Data are discrete entities that are described objectively without
interpretation.
• Information is data that are interpreted, organized, or structured.
• Knowledge is information that is synthesized so that relationships
are identified and formalized.
Data, which are processed into information and then knowledge, may
be obtained from individuals, families, communities, and populations.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM3
4 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Data, information, and knowledge are of value to nurses in all areas of
practice. For example, data derived from direct care of an individual can
then be compiled across persons and aggregated for decision-making
by nurses, nurse administrators, or other health professionals. Further
aggregation can encompass communities and populations. Nurse-edu-
cators can create case studies using these data, and nurse-researchers
can access aggregated data for systematic study
The vital signs for an individual at a single moment—heart rate, res-
piration, temperature, and blood pressure—are an example of data. A
chronological set of vital signs, placed into a context and used for lon-
gitudinal comparisons, is considered information. That is, a dropping
blood pressure, increasing heart rate, respiratory rate, and fever in an
elderly, catheterized person are recognized as abnormal. The recogni-
tion that the person may be septic and therefore may need certain nurs-
ing interventions reflects information synthesis (knowledge) based on
nursing knowledge and experience.
Figure 2 builds on the work of Graves and Corcoran by depicting the
relationship of data, information, knowledge, and a fourth level, wisdom.
As data are transformed into information and information into knowl-
edge, each level increases in complexity and requires greater application
of human intellect. The X-axis represents interactions within and between
the concepts as one moves from data to wisdom; the Y-axis represents the
increasing complexity of the concepts and interrelationships.
Source: Graves and Corcoran (1989) Reprinted with permission of the publisher.
Management
Processing
Data Information Knowledge
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework for the Study of Nursing Knowledge.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM4
Nursing Informatics.indd 116 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 117
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 3
• A source document for legal opinions, funding agencies, and others
seeking to improve health through nursing informatics.
Metastructures, Concepts, and Tools of Nursing Informatics
To understand NI, first its metastructures, sciences, concepts, and tools
should be explained. Metastructures are overarching concepts used in
theory and science. Also of interest are the sciences underpinning NI,
concepts and tools from information science and computer science,
human–computer interaction and ergonomics concepts, and the phe-
nomena of nursing.
Metastructures: Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom
In the mid-1980s Blum (1986) introduced the concepts of data, informa-
tion, and knowledge as a framework for understanding clinical informa-
tion systems and their impact on health care. He classified the then
current clinical information systems according to the three types of
objects that these systems processed: data, information, and knowledge.
He noted that the classification was artificial, with no clear boundaries,
although it did represent a scale of increasing complexity. In 1989,
Graves and Corcoran built on these ideas in their seminal study of nurs-
ing informatics using the concepts of data, information, and knowledge.
They contributed two general principles to NI. The first was a definition
of nursing informatics that has been widely accepted in the field. The
second contribution of their 1989 contribution was an information
model that identified data, information, and knowledge as key compo-
nents of NI practice (Figure 1).
Drawing from Blum (1986), Graves and Corcoran defined the three
concepts as follows:
• Data are discrete entities that are described objectively without
interpretation.
• Information is data that are interpreted, organized, or structured.
• Knowledge is information that is synthesized so that relationships
are identified and formalized.
Data, which are processed into information and then knowledge, may
be obtained from individuals, families, communities, and populations.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM3
4 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Data, information, and knowledge are of value to nurses in all areas of
practice. For example, data derived from direct care of an individual can
then be compiled across persons and aggregated for decision-making
by nurses, nurse administrators, or other health professionals. Further
aggregation can encompass communities and populations. Nurse-edu-
cators can create case studies using these data, and nurse-researchers
can access aggregated data for systematic study
The vital signs for an individual at a single moment—heart rate, res-
piration, temperature, and blood pressure—are an example of data. A
chronological set of vital signs, placed into a context and used for lon-
gitudinal comparisons, is considered information. That is, a dropping
blood pressure, increasing heart rate, respiratory rate, and fever in an
elderly, catheterized person are recognized as abnormal. The recogni-
tion that the person may be septic and therefore may need certain nurs-
ing interventions reflects information synthesis (knowledge) based on
nursing knowledge and experience.
Figure 2 builds on the work of Graves and Corcoran by depicting the
relationship of data, information, knowledge, and a fourth level, wisdom.
As data are transformed into information and information into knowl-
edge, each level increases in complexity and requires greater application
of human intellect. The X-axis represents interactions within and between
the concepts as one moves from data to wisdom; the Y-axis represents the
increasing complexity of the concepts and interrelationships.
Source: Graves and Corcoran (1989) Reprinted with permission of the publisher.
Management
Processing
Data Information Knowledge
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework for the Study of Nursing Knowledge.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM4
Nursing Informatics.indd 117 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
118 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 5
Wisdom is defined as the appropriate use of knowledge to manage
and solve human problems. It is knowing when and how to apply knowl-
edge to deal with complex problems or specific human needs (Nelson,
1989; Nelson, 2002). While knowledge focuses on what is known, wis-
dom focuses on the appropriate application of that knowledge. For ex-
ample, a knowledge base may include several options for managing an
anxious family, while wisdom would help decide which option is most
appropriate for a specific family. The scope of NI is commensurate with
the scope of nursing practice and nursing science, with a concentration
on data, information, and knowledge. It is not limited by current tech-
nologies. If NI were limited to what a computer can process, the disci-
pline of informatics could not fully appreciate the relationships between
nursing science and practice and information science and technology.
Nursing informatics must take into consideration how nurses influence
technology and how technology influences nursing. Understanding this
Reprinted with modification from Englebardt & Nelson, 2002, Figure 1-4, page 13 with
permission from Elsevier.
Figure 2. The Relationship of Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom
Increasing
complexity
Data
Naming,
collecting, and
organizing
Information
Organizing and
interpreting
Knowledge
Interpreting,
integrating,
and understanding
Wisdom
Understanding,
applying, and
applying with
compassion
Constant Flux
Wisdom is defi ned as the appropriate use of knowledge to manage and
solve human problems. It is knowing when and how to apply knowl- edge
to deal with complex problems or specifi c human needs (Nelson, 1989;
Englebardt & Nelson, 2002). While knowledge focuses on what is known,
wis- dom focuses on the appropriate application of that knowledge. For
ex- ample, a knowledge base may include several options for managing
an anxious family, while wisdom would help decide which option is most
appropriate for a specifi c family. The scope of NI is commensurate with
the scope of nursing practice and nursing science, with a concentration
on data, information, and knowledge. It is not limited by current tech-
nologies. If NI were limited to what a computer can process, the disci-
pline of informatics could not fully appreciate the relationships between
nursing science and practice and information science and technology.
Nursing informatics must take into consideration how nurses infl uence
technology and how technology infl uences nursing. Understanding this
6 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
interaction makes it possible to understand how nurses create knowl-
edge and how they use that knowledge in their practice.
The appropriate use of knowledge involves the integration of empiri-
cal, ethical, personal, and aesthetic knowledge into actions. The indi-
vidual must apply a high level of empirical knowledge in understanding
the current situation, apply a professional value system in considering
possible actions, be able to predict the potential outcome of these ac-
tions with a high level of accuracy, and then have the will power to carry
out the selected action in the given environment. An example of applied
wisdom integrating these attributes in NI is the appropriate use of in-
formation management and technological tools to support effective
nursing practice.
The addition of wisdom raises new and important research questions.
It challenges the discipline to develop tools and processes for classify-
ing, measuring, and encoding wisdom as it relates to nursing, NI, and
informatics education. Research in these directions will help clarify the
relationship between wisdom and the intuitive thinking of expert
nurses. Such research will be invaluable in building information systems
to support expert healthcare practitioners as well as support the less
experienced in decision-making.
Two related forces are behind the expansion of the NI model to in-
clude wisdom. First, the initial work was limited to the types of objects
processed by automated systems in the mid-1980s. However, NI is now
concerned with the use of information technology to improve the ac-
cess and quality of health care that is delivered to individuals, families,
and communities. The addition of the concept of wisdom expands the
model beyond technology and the processing of objects to include the
interaction of the human with the technology and the resultant out-
comes.
Second, nurses have been recognized as primary users and proces-
sors of information for over 40 years (Jydstrup & Gross, 1966; Zielstroff,
1981). Other authors have focused on the amount of time nurses actu-
ally spend administering direct care to patients or the time involved in
documentation (Norrie, 1999; Jinks, 2000; Harrison, 2002). In fact,
Jydstrup and Gross estimated in the 1960s that nurses in acute care
spent 30% to 40% of their time in information processing activities.
Hendrickson (1990) determined that nurses spent only 31% of their time
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM6
Nursing Informatics.indd 118 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 119
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 5
Wisdom is defined as the appropriate use of knowledge to manage
and solve human problems. It is knowing when and how to apply knowl-
edge to deal with complex problems or specific human needs (Nelson,
1989; Nelson, 2002). While knowledge focuses on what is known, wis-
dom focuses on the appropriate application of that knowledge. For ex-
ample, a knowledge base may include several options for managing an
anxious family, while wisdom would help decide which option is most
appropriate for a specific family. The scope of NI is commensurate with
the scope of nursing practice and nursing science, with a concentration
on data, information, and knowledge. It is not limited by current tech-
nologies. If NI were limited to what a computer can process, the disci-
pline of informatics could not fully appreciate the relationships between
nursing science and practice and information science and technology.
Nursing informatics must take into consideration how nurses influence
technology and how technology influences nursing. Understanding this
Reprinted with modification from Englebardt & Nelson, 2002, Figure 1-4, page 13 with
permission from Elsevier.
Figure 2. The Relationship of Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom
Increasing
complexity
Data
Naming,
collecting, and
organizing
Information
Organizing and
interpreting
Knowledge
Interpreting,
integrating,
and understanding
Wisdom
Understanding,
applying, and
applying with
compassion
Constant Flux
Wisdom is defi ned as the appropriate use of knowledge to manage and
solve human problems. It is knowing when and how to apply knowl- edge
to deal with complex problems or specifi c human needs (Nelson, 1989;
Englebardt & Nelson, 2002). While knowledge focuses on what is known,
wis- dom focuses on the appropriate application of that knowledge. For
ex- ample, a knowledge base may include several options for managing
an anxious family, while wisdom would help decide which option is most
appropriate for a specifi c family. The scope of NI is commensurate with
the scope of nursing practice and nursing science, with a concentration
on data, information, and knowledge. It is not limited by current tech-
nologies. If NI were limited to what a computer can process, the disci-
pline of informatics could not fully appreciate the relationships between
nursing science and practice and information science and technology.
Nursing informatics must take into consideration how nurses infl uence
technology and how technology infl uences nursing. Understanding this
6 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
interaction makes it possible to understand how nurses create knowl-
edge and how they use that knowledge in their practice.
The appropriate use of knowledge involves the integration of empiri-
cal, ethical, personal, and aesthetic knowledge into actions. The indi-
vidual must apply a high level of empirical knowledge in understanding
the current situation, apply a professional value system in considering
possible actions, be able to predict the potential outcome of these ac-
tions with a high level of accuracy, and then have the will power to carry
out the selected action in the given environment. An example of applied
wisdom integrating these attributes in NI is the appropriate use of in-
formation management and technological tools to support effective
nursing practice.
The addition of wisdom raises new and important research questions.
It challenges the discipline to develop tools and processes for classify-
ing, measuring, and encoding wisdom as it relates to nursing, NI, and
informatics education. Research in these directions will help clarify the
relationship between wisdom and the intuitive thinking of expert
nurses. Such research will be invaluable in building information systems
to support expert healthcare practitioners as well as support the less
experienced in decision-making.
Two related forces are behind the expansion of the NI model to in-
clude wisdom. First, the initial work was limited to the types of objects
processed by automated systems in the mid-1980s. However, NI is now
concerned with the use of information technology to improve the ac-
cess and quality of health care that is delivered to individuals, families,
and communities. The addition of the concept of wisdom expands the
model beyond technology and the processing of objects to include the
interaction of the human with the technology and the resultant out-
comes.
Second, nurses have been recognized as primary users and proces-
sors of information for over 40 years (Jydstrup & Gross, 1966; Zielstroff,
1981). Other authors have focused on the amount of time nurses actu-
ally spend administering direct care to patients or the time involved in
documentation (Norrie, 1999; Jinks, 2000; Harrison, 2002). In fact,
Jydstrup and Gross estimated in the 1960s that nurses in acute care
spent 30% to 40% of their time in information processing activities.
Hendrickson (1990) determined that nurses spent only 31% of their time
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM6
Nursing Informatics.indd 119 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
120 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
8 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Setting Where Developed Content
Data Element Sets
NMDS
Nursing Minimum Data Set All Nursing Clinical Data Elements
NMMDS
Nursing Management Minimum Data Set All Settings Nursing Administrative Data Elements
Nursing-Developed Terminologies*
CCC
Clinical Care Classification All Nursing Care Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
ICNP®
International Classification of Nursing Practice All Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
NANDA
NANDA International All Nursing Diagnoses
NIC
Nursing Interventions Classification All Nursing Interventions
NOC
Nursing Outcomes Classification All Nursing Outcomes
Omaha System
Omaha System Home Care, Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
Public Health,
and Community
PCDS
Patient Care Data Set* (retired) Acute Care Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
10. PNDS
Perioperative Nursing Data Set Perioperative Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes
Multidisciplinary Terminologies
ABC
ABC Codes Nursing and Other Interventions
LOINC®
Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes Nursing and Other Outcomes and Assessments
SNOMED CT
Systematic Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms Nursing and Other Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
Source: ANA 2006a. (* Except for the retired PCDS, all nursing-developed terminologies are still
currently in use.)
Table 1. ANA Recognized Terminologies and Data Element Sets
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM8
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 7
with patients. Other aspects of the nursing role included information
management with ancillary services.
Sciences Underpinning Nursing Informatics
The work of Graves and Corcoran (1989) was a significant contribution to
the NI definition of that was widely accepted in the field in the 1990s—
that nursing informatics combines nursing science, information science,
and computer science to manage and process nursing data, information,
and knowledge to facilitate the delivery of health care. The central notion
was that the application of these three core sciences was what made NI
unique and differentiated it from other informatics specialties.
Other sciences may be required to solve informatics issues. Turley
expanded the model of NI to include cognitive science (1996). Certainly
the cognitive aspect of humans is a critical piece for INSs and INs to
understand. However, other sciences may be equally critical. If the INS
is implementing a system in an institution, for instance, an understand-
ing of organizational theory may be germane (Staggers & Thompson,
2002). As science in general evolves, other sciences may emerge that
need to be included in NI models.
Although the core sciences are foundational to the work in NI, the
practice of the specialty can be considered an applied science rather
than a basic science. The combination creates a unique blend that de-
fines the NI specialty. Further, informatics realizes its full potential in
health care when it is grounded in an established discipline; in this case,
nursing. Computer and information science will have less impact ap-
plied in isolation and outside of a disciplinary framework.
Language as a Tool for Nursing Informatics
Many of the tools used by the informatics nurse and informatics nurse
specialist are based on metastructures and concepts that incorporate
knowledge from nursing and other health and information sciences. Nurs-
ing knowledge is refined by extracting, synthesizing, and analyzing data
that defines nursing phenomena. The many different languages and ways
of organizing data, information, and knowledge are built on nursing tax-
onomies and nomenclatures created over decades. ANA (2006a) has for-
malized these languages and vocabularies (listed in Table 1) after review
by the Committee on Nursing Practice Information Infrastructure (CNPII).
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM7
Nursing Informatics.indd 120 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 121
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
8 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Setting Where Developed Content
Data Element Sets
NMDS
Nursing Minimum Data Set All Nursing Clinical Data Elements
NMMDS
Nursing Management Minimum Data Set All Settings Nursing Administrative Data Elements
Nursing-Developed Terminologies*
CCC
Clinical Care Classification All Nursing Care Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
ICNP®
International Classification of Nursing Practice All Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
NANDA
NANDA International All Nursing Diagnoses
NIC
Nursing Interventions Classification All Nursing Interventions
NOC
Nursing Outcomes Classification All Nursing Outcomes
Omaha System
Omaha System Home Care, Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
Public Health,
and Community
PCDS
Patient Care Data Set* (retired) Acute Care Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
10. PNDS
Perioperative Nursing Data Set Perioperative Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes
Multidisciplinary Terminologies
ABC
ABC Codes Nursing and Other Interventions
LOINC®
Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes Nursing and Other Outcomes and Assessments
SNOMED CT
Systematic Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms Nursing and Other Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes
Source: ANA 2006a. (* Except for the retired PCDS, all nursing-developed terminologies are still
currently in use.)
Table 1. ANA Recognized Terminologies and Data Element Sets
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM8
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 7
with patients. Other aspects of the nursing role included information
management with ancillary services.
Sciences Underpinning Nursing Informatics
The work of Graves and Corcoran (1989) was a significant contribution to
the NI definition of that was widely accepted in the field in the 1990s—
that nursing informatics combines nursing science, information science,
and computer science to manage and process nursing data, information,
and knowledge to facilitate the delivery of health care. The central notion
was that the application of these three core sciences was what made NI
unique and differentiated it from other informatics specialties.
Other sciences may be required to solve informatics issues. Turley
expanded the model of NI to include cognitive science (1996). Certainly
the cognitive aspect of humans is a critical piece for INSs and INs to
understand. However, other sciences may be equally critical. If the INS
is implementing a system in an institution, for instance, an understand-
ing of organizational theory may be germane (Staggers & Thompson,
2002). As science in general evolves, other sciences may emerge that
need to be included in NI models.
Although the core sciences are foundational to the work in NI, the
practice of the specialty can be considered an applied science rather
than a basic science. The combination creates a unique blend that de-
fines the NI specialty. Further, informatics realizes its full potential in
health care when it is grounded in an established discipline; in this case,
nursing. Computer and information science will have less impact ap-
plied in isolation and outside of a disciplinary framework.
Language as a Tool for Nursing Informatics
Many of the tools used by the informatics nurse and informatics nurse
specialist are based on metastructures and concepts that incorporate
knowledge from nursing and other health and information sciences. Nurs-
ing knowledge is refined by extracting, synthesizing, and analyzing data
that defines nursing phenomena. The many different languages and ways
of organizing data, information, and knowledge are built on nursing tax-
onomies and nomenclatures created over decades. ANA (2006a) has for-
malized these languages and vocabularies (listed in Table 1) after review
by the Committee on Nursing Practice Information Infrastructure (CNPII).
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM7
Nursing Informatics.indd 121 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
122 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 9
To promote the integration of standardized terminologies into informa-
tion technology solutions, ANA’s Nursing Information and Data Set Evalu-
ation Center (NIDSEC) develops and disseminates standards pertaining to
information systems that support the documentation of nursing practice,
and evaluates voluntarily submitted information systems against these
standards.
At a higher level of structure, several resources facilitate inter-
operability between different systems of concepts and nomenclature.
For instance, the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine, or SNOMED
CT (IHTSDO, 2007), is considered a universal healthcare reference termi-
nology and messaging structure. SNOMED CT enables one nursing ter-
minology system to be mapped to another, e.g., Omaha System with
North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA), Nursing Inter-
ventions Classification (NIC), and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).
On a larger scale, the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) of the
National Library of Medicine (NLM, 2006) incorporates the work of over
one hundred vocabularies, including SNOMED CT. The informatics nurse
and informatics nurse specialist must be aware of these tools, and may
be called upon to understand the concepts of one or more languages,
the relationships between concepts, and integration into existing
vocabularies for a given organization.
The importance of languages and vocabularies cannot be overstated.
Informatics nurses must seek a broader picture of the implications of
their work, and the uses and outcomes of languages and vocabularies
for end users. For instance, nurses mapping a home care vocabulary to
an intervention vocabulary must see beyond the technical aspect of the
work. They must understand that a case manager for a multi-system
health organization or a home care agency may be basing knowledge
of nursing acuity and case mix on the differing vocabularies that they
have integrated. The INS must attempt to envision the varied uses of the
data, information, and knowledge that have been created.
Concepts and Tools from Information Science and Computer Science
Tools and methods from computer and information sciences are funda-
mental to NI, including:
• Information technology
• Information structures
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM9
10 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Information management
• Information communication
Information technology includes computer hardware, software, com-
munication, and network technologies, derived primarily from computer
science. The other three elements are derived primarily from informa-
tion science. Information structures organize data, information, and
knowledge for processing by computers. Information management is an
elemental process by which one files, stores, and manipulates data for
various uses. Information communication enables systems to send data
and to present information in a format that improves understanding.
The use of information technology distinguishes informatics from more
traditional methods of information management.
Human–Computer Interaction and Related Concepts
Human–computer interaction (HCI), usability, and ergonomics are con-
cepts of fundamental interest to the INS. Essentially, HCI deals with
people, software applications, computer technology, and the ways they
influence each other (Dix, Finlay, Abowd, & Beale, 2004). Elements of HCI
are rooted in psychology, social psychology, and cognitive science. How-
ever, the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of ap-
plications derive from applied work in computer science, a specific
discipline (in this case nursing), and information science. For example,
an INS would assess a medication ordering application before purchase
to determine whether the design complements the way nurses
cognitively process orders.
A related concept is usability, which deals with human performance
during computer interactions for specific tasks in a specific context.
Usability means the efficiency and effectiveness of an application. An
INS might study the ease of learning an application, the ease of using
it, the speed of task completion, or errors that occur during use when
determining which system or application would best fit a nursing unit.
In the United States, the term ergonomics typically is used to describe
the design and implementation of equipment, tools, and machines re-
lated to human safety, comfort, and convenience. Commonly, the term
ergonomics refers to attributes of physical equipment or to principles
of arrangement of equipment in the work environment. For instance, an
INS may have a role in ensuring that sound ergonomics principles are
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM10
Nursing Informatics.indd 122 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 123
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 9
To promote the integration of standardized terminologies into informa-
tion technology solutions, ANA’s Nursing Information and Data Set Evalu-
ation Center (NIDSEC) develops and disseminates standards pertaining to
information systems that support the documentation of nursing practice,
and evaluates voluntarily submitted information systems against these
standards.
At a higher level of structure, several resources facilitate inter-
operability between different systems of concepts and nomenclature.
For instance, the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine, or SNOMED
CT (IHTSDO, 2007), is considered a universal healthcare reference termi-
nology and messaging structure. SNOMED CT enables one nursing ter-
minology system to be mapped to another, e.g., Omaha System with
North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA), Nursing Inter-
ventions Classification (NIC), and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).
On a larger scale, the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) of the
National Library of Medicine (NLM, 2006) incorporates the work of over
one hundred vocabularies, including SNOMED CT. The informatics nurse
and informatics nurse specialist must be aware of these tools, and may
be called upon to understand the concepts of one or more languages,
the relationships between concepts, and integration into existing
vocabularies for a given organization.
The importance of languages and vocabularies cannot be overstated.
Informatics nurses must seek a broader picture of the implications of
their work, and the uses and outcomes of languages and vocabularies
for end users. For instance, nurses mapping a home care vocabulary to
an intervention vocabulary must see beyond the technical aspect of the
work. They must understand that a case manager for a multi-system
health organization or a home care agency may be basing knowledge
of nursing acuity and case mix on the differing vocabularies that they
have integrated. The INS must attempt to envision the varied uses of the
data, information, and knowledge that have been created.
Concepts and Tools from Information Science and Computer Science
Tools and methods from computer and information sciences are funda-
mental to NI, including:
• Information technology
• Information structures
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM9
10 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Information management
• Information communication
Information technology includes computer hardware, software, com-
munication, and network technologies, derived primarily from computer
science. The other three elements are derived primarily from informa-
tion science. Information structures organize data, information, and
knowledge for processing by computers. Information management is an
elemental process by which one files, stores, and manipulates data for
various uses. Information communication enables systems to send data
and to present information in a format that improves understanding.
The use of information technology distinguishes informatics from more
traditional methods of information management.
Human–Computer Interaction and Related Concepts
Human–computer interaction (HCI), usability, and ergonomics are con-
cepts of fundamental interest to the INS. Essentially, HCI deals with
people, software applications, computer technology, and the ways they
influence each other (Dix, Finlay, Abowd, & Beale, 2004). Elements of HCI
are rooted in psychology, social psychology, and cognitive science. How-
ever, the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of ap-
plications derive from applied work in computer science, a specific
discipline (in this case nursing), and information science. For example,
an INS would assess a medication ordering application before purchase
to determine whether the design complements the way nurses
cognitively process orders.
A related concept is usability, which deals with human performance
during computer interactions for specific tasks in a specific context.
Usability means the efficiency and effectiveness of an application. An
INS might study the ease of learning an application, the ease of using
it, the speed of task completion, or errors that occur during use when
determining which system or application would best fit a nursing unit.
In the United States, the term ergonomics typically is used to describe
the design and implementation of equipment, tools, and machines re-
lated to human safety, comfort, and convenience. Commonly, the term
ergonomics refers to attributes of physical equipment or to principles
of arrangement of equipment in the work environment. For instance, an
INS may have a role in ensuring that sound ergonomics principles are
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM10
Nursing Informatics.indd 123 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
124 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 11
used in an intensive care unit to select and arrange various devices to
support workflow for cross-disciplinary providers as well as patients’
families.
HCI, usability, and ergonomics are typically subsumed under the ru-
bric of human factors, or how humans and technology relate to each
other. The overall goal is to design software, devices, and equipment to
promote optimal task completion. Optimal task completion includes the
concepts of efficiency and effectiveness; it also considers the safety of
the user. The INS and IN must understand all these concepts to success-
fully develop, select, implement, and evaluate information structures
and informatics solutions.
The importance of human factors in healthcare was elevated with the
Institute of Medicine’s 2001 report. Before this, HCI and usability assess-
ments and methods were being incorporated into health at a glacial
speed. In the past five years the number of HCI and usability publica-
tions in healthcare has increased substantially. Vendors have installed
usability laboratories and incorporated usability testing of their prod-
ucts into their systems life cycles. The FDA has mandated usability test-
ing as part of their approval process for new devices (FDA, 2007a). Thus,
HCI and usability are critical concepts for INs and INSs to understand.
Numerous usability methods and tools are available, e.g., heuristics
(rules of thumb), naturalistic observation, and think-aloud protocols.
Phenomena of Nursing
The metaparadigm of nursing comprises four key concepts: nurse, per-
son, health, and environment. Nurses make decisions about interven-
tions from their unique perspectives. Nursing actions are based upon
the inter-relationships between the concepts and are related to the val-
ues nurses hold relative to them. Decision-making is the process of
choosing among alternatives. The decisions that nurses make can be
characterized by both the quality of decisions and the impact of the
actions resulting from those decisions. As knowledge workers, nurses
make numerous decisions that affect the life and well-being of individu-
als, families, and communities. The process of decision-making in nurs-
ing is guided by the concept of critical thinking. “Critical thinking is the
intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully using knowl-
edge to conceptualize, apply, analyze, synthesize, and/or evaluate data
and information as a guide to belief and action.” (Scriven & Paul, 2003)
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM11
12 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Clinical wisdom is the ability of the nurse to add experience and in-
tuition to a situation involving the care of a person (Benner, Hooper-
Kyriakidis, & Stannard, 1999). Wisdom in informatics is the ability of the
informatics nurse specialist to evaluate the documentation drawn from
a health information system (HIS) and the ability to adapt or change the
system settings or parameters to improve the workflow of the clinical
nurse.
Nurses’ decision-making can be described as an array of choices that
include specific behaviors, as well as cognitive processing of one or
more issues. For example, nurses use data transformed into information
to determine interventions for persons, families, and communities.
Nurses make decisions about potential problems presented by an indi-
vidual and about recommendations to address those problems. They
also make decisions in collaboration with other healthcare profession-
als such as physicians, pharmacists, or social workers. Decisions also may
occur outside the practice environment, as in executive offices, class-
rooms, and research laboratories.
An information system collects and processes data and information.
Decision support systems are computer applications designed to facili-
tate human decision-making. Decision support systems are typically
rule-based: they use a knowledge base and a set of rules to analyze data
and information and provide recommendations. Other decision support
systems are based on knowledge models induced directly from data,
regression, or classification models that predict characteristics or out-
comes.
An expert system is a decision support system that implements the
knowledge of human experts. Recommendations take the form of alerts,
such as calling user attention to abnormal lab results or potential ad-
verse drug events, or suggestions, e.g., appropriate medications, thera-
pies, or other actions (Haug, Gardner, & Evans, 1999). Whereas control
systems implement decisions without involvement of a user, decision
support systems merely provide recommendations and rely on the wis-
dom of the user to apply them. As Blum (1986) demonstrated, the con-
cepts of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom exemplify different
levels of automated systems. The relationships between these concepts
and information, decision support, and expert systems are represented
in Figure 3.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM12
Nursing Informatics.indd 124 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 125
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 11
used in an intensive care unit to select and arrange various devices to
support workflow for cross-disciplinary providers as well as patients’
families.
HCI, usability, and ergonomics are typically subsumed under the ru-
bric of human factors, or how humans and technology relate to each
other. The overall goal is to design software, devices, and equipment to
promote optimal task completion. Optimal task completion includes the
concepts of efficiency and effectiveness; it also considers the safety of
the user. The INS and IN must understand all these concepts to success-
fully develop, select, implement, and evaluate information structures
and informatics solutions.
The importance of human factors in healthcare was elevated with the
Institute of Medicine’s 2001 report. Before this, HCI and usability assess-
ments and methods were being incorporated into health at a glacial
speed. In the past five years the number of HCI and usability publica-
tions in healthcare has increased substantially. Vendors have installed
usability laboratories and incorporated usability testing of their prod-
ucts into their systems life cycles. The FDA has mandated usability test-
ing as part of their approval process for new devices (FDA, 2007a). Thus,
HCI and usability are critical concepts for INs and INSs to understand.
Numerous usability methods and tools are available, e.g., heuristics
(rules of thumb), naturalistic observation, and think-aloud protocols.
Phenomena of Nursing
The metaparadigm of nursing comprises four key concepts: nurse, per-
son, health, and environment. Nurses make decisions about interven-
tions from their unique perspectives. Nursing actions are based upon
the inter-relationships between the concepts and are related to the val-
ues nurses hold relative to them. Decision-making is the process of
choosing among alternatives. The decisions that nurses make can be
characterized by both the quality of decisions and the impact of the
actions resulting from those decisions. As knowledge workers, nurses
make numerous decisions that affect the life and well-being of individu-
als, families, and communities. The process of decision-making in nurs-
ing is guided by the concept of critical thinking. “Critical thinking is the
intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully using knowl-
edge to conceptualize, apply, analyze, synthesize, and/or evaluate data
and information as a guide to belief and action.” (Scriven & Paul, 2003)
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM11
12 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Clinical wisdom is the ability of the nurse to add experience and in-
tuition to a situation involving the care of a person (Benner, Hooper-
Kyriakidis, & Stannard, 1999). Wisdom in informatics is the ability of the
informatics nurse specialist to evaluate the documentation drawn from
a health information system (HIS) and the ability to adapt or change the
system settings or parameters to improve the workflow of the clinical
nurse.
Nurses’ decision-making can be described as an array of choices that
include specific behaviors, as well as cognitive processing of one or
more issues. For example, nurses use data transformed into information
to determine interventions for persons, families, and communities.
Nurses make decisions about potential problems presented by an indi-
vidual and about recommendations to address those problems. They
also make decisions in collaboration with other healthcare profession-
als such as physicians, pharmacists, or social workers. Decisions also may
occur outside the practice environment, as in executive offices, class-
rooms, and research laboratories.
An information system collects and processes data and information.
Decision support systems are computer applications designed to facili-
tate human decision-making. Decision support systems are typically
rule-based: they use a knowledge base and a set of rules to analyze data
and information and provide recommendations. Other decision support
systems are based on knowledge models induced directly from data,
regression, or classification models that predict characteristics or out-
comes.
An expert system is a decision support system that implements the
knowledge of human experts. Recommendations take the form of alerts,
such as calling user attention to abnormal lab results or potential ad-
verse drug events, or suggestions, e.g., appropriate medications, thera-
pies, or other actions (Haug, Gardner, & Evans, 1999). Whereas control
systems implement decisions without involvement of a user, decision
support systems merely provide recommendations and rely on the wis-
dom of the user to apply them. As Blum (1986) demonstrated, the con-
cepts of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom exemplify different
levels of automated systems. The relationships between these concepts
and information, decision support, and expert systems are represented
in Figure 3.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM12
Nursing Informatics.indd 125 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
126 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 13
In summary, the INS must navigate the complex relationships be-
tween the following elements and understand how they facilitate de-
cision-making:
• Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom
• Nursing science, information science, computer science, cognitive
science and other sciences of interest
• Nurse, person, health, and environment
• Information structures, information technology, management and
communication of information
References: Introduction, Metastructures, Concepts, and Tools
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2006a). ANA Recognized Terminolo-
gies and Data Element Sets. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
nursingworld.org/npii/terminologies.htm
Reprinted from Englebardt & Nelson, 2002, Figure 1-5, page 14 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3. Levels and Types of Automated Systems
Wisdom
Knowledge
Information
Data
Decision
Support
System
Information
System
Expert
System
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM13
14 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Benner, P.E., Hooper-Kyriakidis, P.L., & Stannard, D. (1999). Clinical wisdom
and interventions in critical care: A thinking-in-action approach. Philadel-
phia: W.B. Saunders.
Bellinger, G., Castro, D., & Mills, A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge,
and wisdom. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.systems-
thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm
Blum, B. (1986). Clinical information systems. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Clark, D. (2004) The continuum of understanding. From The way of
systems. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.nwlink.com/
~donclark/performance/understanding.html.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (2004). Human-computer inter-
action. Harlow, England: Pearson, Prentice Hall.
Englebardt, S. & Nelson, R. (2002) Health care informatics: An interdiscipli-
nary approach. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.
Graves, J., & Corcoran, S. (1989). The study of nursing informatics. Image,
21(4), 227–230.
Harrison, L. (2002). Nursing activity in general intensive care. Journal of
Clinical Nursing, 11(2), 158–67.
Haug, P., Gardner, R., & Evans, S. (1999). Hospital-based decision support.
In E.S. Berner (Ed.), Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Prac-
tice, pp. 77–104. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hendrickson, G. (1990). How do nurses use their time? Journal of Nurs-
ing Administration, 20(3), 31–38.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health
system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
International Health Terminology Standards Development Organization
(IHTSDO). (2007). SNOMED-CT. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http:/
/www.ihtsdo.org/.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM14
Nursing Informatics.indd 126 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 127
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 13
In summary, the INS must navigate the complex relationships be-
tween the following elements and understand how they facilitate de-
cision-making:
• Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom
• Nursing science, information science, computer science, cognitive
science and other sciences of interest
• Nurse, person, health, and environment
• Information structures, information technology, management and
communication of information
References: Introduction, Metastructures, Concepts, and Tools
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2006a). ANA Recognized Terminolo-
gies and Data Element Sets. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
nursingworld.org/npii/terminologies.htm
Reprinted from Englebardt & Nelson, 2002, Figure 1-5, page 14 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3. Levels and Types of Automated Systems
Wisdom
Knowledge
Information
Data
Decision
Support
System
Information
System
Expert
System
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM13
14 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Benner, P.E., Hooper-Kyriakidis, P.L., & Stannard, D. (1999). Clinical wisdom
and interventions in critical care: A thinking-in-action approach. Philadel-
phia: W.B. Saunders.
Bellinger, G., Castro, D., & Mills, A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge,
and wisdom. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.systems-
thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm
Blum, B. (1986). Clinical information systems. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Clark, D. (2004) The continuum of understanding. From The way of
systems. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.nwlink.com/
~donclark/performance/understanding.html.
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R. (2004). Human-computer inter-
action. Harlow, England: Pearson, Prentice Hall.
Englebardt, S. & Nelson, R. (2002) Health care informatics: An interdiscipli-
nary approach. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.
Graves, J., & Corcoran, S. (1989). The study of nursing informatics. Image,
21(4), 227–230.
Harrison, L. (2002). Nursing activity in general intensive care. Journal of
Clinical Nursing, 11(2), 158–67.
Haug, P., Gardner, R., & Evans, S. (1999). Hospital-based decision support.
In E.S. Berner (Ed.), Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Prac-
tice, pp. 77–104. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hendrickson, G. (1990). How do nurses use their time? Journal of Nurs-
ing Administration, 20(3), 31–38.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health
system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
International Health Terminology Standards Development Organization
(IHTSDO). (2007). SNOMED-CT. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http:/
/www.ihtsdo.org/.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM14
Nursing Informatics.indd 127 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
128 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 15
Jinks, A.M. (2000) What do nurses do? An observational survey of the
activities of nurses on acute surgical and rehabilitative wards. Journal
of Nursing Management 8(5), 273–279.
Jydstrup, R.A., & J.J.Gross. (1966) Cost of information handling in hospitals.
Health Services Research 1(3): 235–271.
Nelson, R. (2002). A placeholder for a missing ref item for a citation in this
section. Nursing Miscellany: A Catch-all Journal of the Fourth Kind, 42(4),
656–666.
Nelson, R., & Joos, I. (1989). On language in nursing: From data to wisdom.
PLN Vision. p. 6.
Norrie, P. (1997). Nurses’ time management in intensive care. Nursing
Critical Care, 2(3), 121–125.
Norrie, P. (1999) The parameters that cardiothoracic intensive care nurses
use to assess the progress or deterioration of their patients. Nursing
Critical Care, 4(3), 133–137.
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2003). Defining critical thinking. Santa Rosa, CA.:
Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved December 13, 2007 from
http://www.criticalthinking.org
Staggers, N., & Thompson, C.B. (2002). The evolution of definitions for
nursing informatics: A critical analysis and revised definition. Journal
of the American Medical Informatics Association, 33(1), 75–81.
Turley, J.P. (1996). Toward a model for nursing informatics. Image: Journal
of Nursing Scholarship, 28(4), 309–313.
Zielstroff, Z. Z. (1981). Yet another placeholder for a missing ref item for
a citation in this section. Nursing Miscellany: A Catch-all Journal of the
Fourth Kind, 42(4), 666–669.
Nelson, R., & Joos, I. (1989). On language in nursing: From data to wisdom.
PLN Vision. p. 6.
Norrie, P. (1997). Nurses’ time management in intensive care. Nursing Criti-
cal Care, 2(3), 121–125.
Norrie, P. (1999) The parameters that cardiothoracic intensive care nurses
use to assess the progress or deterioration of their patients. Nursing
Critical Care, 4(3), 133–137.
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2003). Defi ning critical thinking. Santa Rosa, CA.:
Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved December 13, 2007 from
http://www.criticalthinking.org
Staggers, N., & Thompson, C.B. (2002). The evolution of defi nitions for nurs-
ing informatics: A critical analysis and revised defi nition. Journal of the
American Medical Informatics Association, 33(1), 75–81.
Turley, J.P. (1996). Toward a model for nursing informatics. Image: Journal of
Nursing Scholarship, 28(4), 309–313.
Zielstorff, R.D. (1981). How computer systems infl uence nursing activities
in hospitals. In The Proceedings of the First National Conference: Comput-
er Technology and Nursing, pp. 1–6. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of
Health.
16 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Functional Areas for Nursing Informatics
Two recent studies illuminate the current work of INs. Newbold (per-
sonal communication, January 17, 2006) created a database of job titles
for nurses working in informatics beginning in the early 1980s. As of
early 2006, the database included titles for 6338 members of nursing
and informatics organizations, conference attendees and participants on
NI electronic discussion lists. However, the top 50 job titles did not con-
sistently map to their responsibilities and activities. INs with different
titles may actually be performing the same functions, and INs with the
same titles may perform very different functions.
A 2007 Health Information Management and Systems Society (HIMSS)
survey of 776 informatics nurses categorized NI work into job respon-
sibilities as opposed to job titles (HIMSS, 2007). The top job responsibil-
ity of respondents was systems implementation (45%), down from 67%
in 2004. The second and third top job responsibilities reported by HIMSS
respondents were system development (41%) and liaison (35%).
Not only are there assorted titles and activities within nursing
informatics, the environments in which INSs and INs practice are many
and evolving. Initially, NI focused nearly exclusively on the hospital set-
ting. Now INs work in such diverse settings as home health and hos-
pice agencies, nursing homes, public and community health agencies,
physician offices, and ambulatory care centers. They are employed by
medical device vendors, large and small software companies, web con-
tent providers, disease management companies, and government
agencies, in numerous settings (Sensmeier, West, & Horowicz, 2004).
Across environments , INSs and INs commonly practice in interdisci-
plinary healthcare environments and are often expected to interact
with information technology (IT ) professionals during all phases of the
systems life cycle. And more commonly than in the past, INs may be
the IT professionals themselves.
Nursing informatics supports multiple constituencies and stakehold-
ers such as cross-disciplinary team members, healthcare consumers,
information technology professionals, and healthcare agencies and or-
ganizations. INSs are particularly well suited to work in multidisciplinary
and interdisciplinary environments. After all, nurses have planned, imple-
mented, and coordinated activities involving multiple constituencies in
a consumer-centered fashion from their earliest days.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM16
Nursing Informatics.indd 128 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 129
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 15
Jinks, A.M. (2000) What do nurses do? An observational survey of the
activities of nurses on acute surgical and rehabilitative wards. Journal
of Nursing Management 8(5), 273–279.
Jydstrup, R.A., & J.J.Gross. (1966) Cost of information handling in hospitals.
Health Services Research 1(3): 235–271.
Nelson, R. (2002). A placeholder for a missing ref item for a citation in this
section. Nursing Miscellany: A Catch-all Journal of the Fourth Kind, 42(4),
656–666.
Nelson, R., & Joos, I. (1989). On language in nursing: From data to wisdom.
PLN Vision. p. 6.
Norrie, P. (1997). Nurses’ time management in intensive care. Nursing
Critical Care, 2(3), 121–125.
Norrie, P. (1999) The parameters that cardiothoracic intensive care nurses
use to assess the progress or deterioration of their patients. Nursing
Critical Care, 4(3), 133–137.
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2003). Defining critical thinking. Santa Rosa, CA.:
Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved December 13, 2007 from
http://www.criticalthinking.org
Staggers, N., & Thompson, C.B. (2002). The evolution of definitions for
nursing informatics: A critical analysis and revised definition. Journal
of the American Medical Informatics Association, 33(1), 75–81.
Turley, J.P. (1996). Toward a model for nursing informatics. Image: Journal
of Nursing Scholarship, 28(4), 309–313.
Zielstroff, Z. Z. (1981). Yet another placeholder for a missing ref item for
a citation in this section. Nursing Miscellany: A Catch-all Journal of the
Fourth Kind, 42(4), 666–669.
Nelson, R., & Joos, I. (1989). On language in nursing: From data to wisdom.
PLN Vision. p. 6.
Norrie, P. (1997). Nurses’ time management in intensive care. Nursing Criti-
cal Care, 2(3), 121–125.
Norrie, P. (1999) The parameters that cardiothoracic intensive care nurses
use to assess the progress or deterioration of their patients. Nursing
Critical Care, 4(3), 133–137.
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2003). Defi ning critical thinking. Santa Rosa, CA.:
Foundation for Critical Thinking. Retrieved December 13, 2007 from
http://www.criticalthinking.org
Staggers, N., & Thompson, C.B. (2002). The evolution of defi nitions for nurs-
ing informatics: A critical analysis and revised defi nition. Journal of the
American Medical Informatics Association, 33(1), 75–81.
Turley, J.P. (1996). Toward a model for nursing informatics. Image: Journal of
Nursing Scholarship, 28(4), 309–313.
Zielstorff, R.D. (1981). How computer systems infl uence nursing activities
in hospitals. In The Proceedings of the First National Conference: Comput-
er Technology and Nursing, pp. 1–6. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of
Health.
16 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Functional Areas for Nursing Informatics
Two recent studies illuminate the current work of INs. Newbold (per-
sonal communication, January 17, 2006) created a database of job titles
for nurses working in informatics beginning in the early 1980s. As of
early 2006, the database included titles for 6338 members of nursing
and informatics organizations, conference attendees and participants on
NI electronic discussion lists. However, the top 50 job titles did not con-
sistently map to their responsibilities and activities. INs with different
titles may actually be performing the same functions, and INs with the
same titles may perform very different functions.
A 2007 Health Information Management and Systems Society (HIMSS)
survey of 776 informatics nurses categorized NI work into job respon-
sibilities as opposed to job titles (HIMSS, 2007). The top job responsibil-
ity of respondents was systems implementation (45%), down from 67%
in 2004. The second and third top job responsibilities reported by HIMSS
respondents were system development (41%) and liaison (35%).
Not only are there assorted titles and activities within nursing
informatics, the environments in which INSs and INs practice are many
and evolving. Initially, NI focused nearly exclusively on the hospital set-
ting. Now INs work in such diverse settings as home health and hos-
pice agencies, nursing homes, public and community health agencies,
physician offices, and ambulatory care centers. They are employed by
medical device vendors, large and small software companies, web con-
tent providers, disease management companies, and government
agencies, in numerous settings (Sensmeier, West, & Horowicz, 2004).
Across environments , INSs and INs commonly practice in interdisci-
plinary healthcare environments and are often expected to interact
with information technology (IT ) professionals during all phases of the
systems life cycle. And more commonly than in the past, INs may be
the IT professionals themselves.
Nursing informatics supports multiple constituencies and stakehold-
ers such as cross-disciplinary team members, healthcare consumers,
information technology professionals, and healthcare agencies and or-
ganizations. INSs are particularly well suited to work in multidisciplinary
and interdisciplinary environments. After all, nurses have planned, imple-
mented, and coordinated activities involving multiple constituencies in
a consumer-centered fashion from their earliest days.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM16
Nursing Informatics.indd 129 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
130 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 17
INSs use scientific and informatics principles. More importantly, they
employ creative strategies in meaningful informatics solutions. INSs also
bring unique perspectives of cross-disciplinary work, solid understand-
ing of operational processes, and the value of consumer advocacy to
informatics functions. INs and INSs may find that they need varying
kinds of advanced preparation to match the informatics project at hand.
For instance, an INS coordinating the implementation of a learning
management system may benefit from advanced preparation in adult
education.
Many registered nurses have worked on informatics initiatives for
many years and have built their knowledge base and expertise from on-
the-job experience. The evolving mandate for electronic information
systems and the increasing complexity of healthcare services and prac-
tice have raised the bar for the nursing professional. Select informatics
competencies will soon be required in all undergraduate and graduate
nursing curricula. Accredited graduate level educational programs for
this specialty nursing practice were first offered in 1989 and are now
more widely available, especially through distance education and online
programs. Rather than offer discipline-specific informatics programs,
some universities have elected to embrace an interdisciplinary approach
and offer graduate studies in health informatics or bioinformatics. A
graduate level informatics degree is becoming the standard.
Professional certification as an informatics nurse became a reality in
late 1995 when the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) of-
fered the nursing informatics certification exam as its first computer-
based examination. Informatics nurses and informatics nurse specialists
may elect to pursue other pertinent certifications in areas such as
project management, security and privacy, network management, and
knowledge management. Employers are beginning to use certification
as a preferred characteristic during the hiring process.
Because of the tendency to confuse roles with titles and the vast num-
ber of position titles and lack of standardization among them, this
section describes the functional areas for INSs and INs. The following
present overall functional areas of nursing informatics:
• Administration, leadership, and management
• Analysis
• Compliance and integrity management
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM17
18 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Consultation
• Coordination, facilitation, and integration
• Development
• Educational and professional development
• Policy development and advocacy
• Research and evaluation
The last discussion in this section describes integrated functions, es-
pecially those crossing clinical practice and informatics. INSs may be in
positions that focus primarily in one functional area, or, more frequently,
several functional areas are combined within a particular NI position.
Administration, Leadership, and Management
As is true of administration in general, leadership and management
functions in nursing informatics consist of both higher-level and mid-
level administrative functions (ANA, 2004b). Increasingly, INSs are attain-
ing senior leadership positions. Positions may be titled President,
Director, Chief Information Officer (CIO), or similar leadership titles
(AMIA, 2006a; Staggers & Lasome, 2005; Greene, 2004). In this functional
capacity, nursing informatics leaders are expected to be visionary and
establish the direction of large-scale informatics solutions. The nursing
informatics leader often serves as a catalyst for developing strategic
plans, creating national or system policies and procedures, and serving
as champion for complex projects and disparate system users.
In mid-level management, INSs may supervise resources and activi-
ties for all phases of the systems life cycle. These activities may include
needs analysis, requirements gathering, design, development, selection
and purchase, testing, implementation, and evaluation of systems to
support all facets of nursing and healthcare delivery. In all levels, leader-
ship combines the skills of superb communication, change manage-
ment, risk assessment, and coalition building with political finesse,
business acumen, and strategic application knowledge.
INSs serving in this functional area may put most of their energy into
leadership and management. In other positions, administration may be
part of a position merged with other functional areas. Examples might
include:
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM18
Nursing Informatics.indd 130 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 131
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 17
INSs use scientific and informatics principles. More importantly, they
employ creative strategies in meaningful informatics solutions. INSs also
bring unique perspectives of cross-disciplinary work, solid understand-
ing of operational processes, and the value of consumer advocacy to
informatics functions. INs and INSs may find that they need varying
kinds of advanced preparation to match the informatics project at hand.
For instance, an INS coordinating the implementation of a learning
management system may benefit from advanced preparation in adult
education.
Many registered nurses have worked on informatics initiatives for
many years and have built their knowledge base and expertise from on-
the-job experience. The evolving mandate for electronic information
systems and the increasing complexity of healthcare services and prac-
tice have raised the bar for the nursing professional. Select informatics
competencies will soon be required in all undergraduate and graduate
nursing curricula. Accredited graduate level educational programs for
this specialty nursing practice were first offered in 1989 and are now
more widely available, especially through distance education and online
programs. Rather than offer discipline-specific informatics programs,
some universities have elected to embrace an interdisciplinary approach
and offer graduate studies in health informatics or bioinformatics. A
graduate level informatics degree is becoming the standard.
Professional certification as an informatics nurse became a reality in
late 1995 when the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) of-
fered the nursing informatics certification exam as its first computer-
based examination. Informatics nurses and informatics nurse specialists
may elect to pursue other pertinent certifications in areas such as
project management, security and privacy, network management, and
knowledge management. Employers are beginning to use certification
as a preferred characteristic during the hiring process.
Because of the tendency to confuse roles with titles and the vast num-
ber of position titles and lack of standardization among them, this
section describes the functional areas for INSs and INs. The following
present overall functional areas of nursing informatics:
• Administration, leadership, and management
• Analysis
• Compliance and integrity management
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM17
18 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Consultation
• Coordination, facilitation, and integration
• Development
• Educational and professional development
• Policy development and advocacy
• Research and evaluation
The last discussion in this section describes integrated functions, es-
pecially those crossing clinical practice and informatics. INSs may be in
positions that focus primarily in one functional area, or, more frequently,
several functional areas are combined within a particular NI position.
Administration, Leadership, and Management
As is true of administration in general, leadership and management
functions in nursing informatics consist of both higher-level and mid-
level administrative functions (ANA, 2004b). Increasingly, INSs are attain-
ing senior leadership positions. Positions may be titled President,
Director, Chief Information Officer (CIO), or similar leadership titles
(AMIA, 2006a; Staggers & Lasome, 2005; Greene, 2004). In this functional
capacity, nursing informatics leaders are expected to be visionary and
establish the direction of large-scale informatics solutions. The nursing
informatics leader often serves as a catalyst for developing strategic
plans, creating national or system policies and procedures, and serving
as champion for complex projects and disparate system users.
In mid-level management, INSs may supervise resources and activi-
ties for all phases of the systems life cycle. These activities may include
needs analysis, requirements gathering, design, development, selection
and purchase, testing, implementation, and evaluation of systems to
support all facets of nursing and healthcare delivery. In all levels, leader-
ship combines the skills of superb communication, change manage-
ment, risk assessment, and coalition building with political finesse,
business acumen, and strategic application knowledge.
INSs serving in this functional area may put most of their energy into
leadership and management. In other positions, administration may be
part of a position merged with other functional areas. Examples might
include:
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM18
Nursing Informatics.indd 131 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
132 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 19
• INS at a large hospital system, supervising an implementation and
education team, representing nursing interests on various IT com-
mittees, performing project management for multiple documen-
tation projects, and having oversight of nursing standards and
vocabularies used in applications.
• Project director for a clinical software company, managing imple-
mentation teams for various client projects (hospitals to ambula-
tory facilities) and consulting with clients on all aspects of systems
selection, customization, adoption, and use of software.
• Grants administrator for an information science research agency
seeking and writing grants that would fund NI-related projects,
designing budgets, and ensuring optimal allocation of resources.
Analysis
Data can be aggregated and analyzed in an infinite number of ways to
synthesize knowledge, inform decision support and outcomes manage-
ment, and advance the science of nursing informatics. The INS may use
a number of tools to accomplish these ends. Taxonomies and clinical
vocabularies can be used to tag consumer data for higher-level analy-
sis. Meta-analysis can identify large-scale trends across multiple groups
of data. Systems and requirements analysis can track the flow of data
in a system, customized to end-user needs. Workflow analysis can de-
tail steps taken for a number of tasks.
A major responsibility of the INS is to understand work process flows,
the particular informatics solution, and how these affect each other. Pro-
cesses must be designed for successful interactions between users and
computers. Competency in formal systems analysis techniques and use
of statistical software may be required. These techniques compare the
capabilities and limitations of systems to be installed, and where
changes must be designed. Discrepancies between the current and ideal
systems must be identified and redundancies removed. The clinical
analysis process also may include tools and systematic methods, such
as process redesign, to enhance safety and reduce inefficiencies.
INSs may also engage in the process of knowledge discovery in data-
bases (KDD). Using sound methodologies and practical evidence-based
recommendations, the INS can discover information and knowledge
related to diverse areas of nursing practice. Knowledge discovery
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM19
20 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
methods, including data mining and machine learning methods, can be
applied along with statistical analysis and data visualization techniques,
to identify and understand patterns in very large data stores, such as
enterprise data warehouses (Fayyad, 1996).
Analysis is also required with languages and taxonomies. Nursing
languages such as Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), Nursing
Outcomes Classification (NOC), and medical vocabularies must be peri-
odically re-evaluated for their applicability and currency (CNCCE, 2004).
Analysis of a meta-database such as the Unified Medical Language
System or UMLS (NLM, 2006) requires knowledge of nursing as well as
medical vocabularies in order to analyze groups of taxonomies, a task
ideally suited to the expertise of an INS.
Analysis of outcomes may be related to any domain of nursing prac-
tice—clinical, education, research, or administration. The complexity and
levels of outcomes must be determined for healthcare consumers,
populations, and institutions. Analysis can include the use of Human-
Computer Interaction (HCI) principles and methods. In that domain, INSs
use HCI tools and methods such as heuristics and cognitive walk-
through to analyze the fit of users, tasks, and contexts. Other tools are
also available. Analysts use system tools to maintain data integrity and
reliability, facilitate data aggregation and analysis, identify outcomes,
and develop performance measurements. These techniques allow
nurses to contribute to building a knowledge base consisting of the
data, information, theories, and models used by nurses and other stake-
holders in decision-making and support of healthcare. Analysis activi-
ties may include:
• A nursing analyst in a hospice setting tracks health consumer data
to establish a weighted case mix to determine nursing personnel
allocations.
• A quality improvement (QI) specialist in a hospital system aggre-
gates multi-site research data related to diagnosis and nursing pro-
cedures.
• A quality assurance (QA) analyst works with nurse managers to re-
tool current work processes after examining existing system data
in customized QA reports.
• An analyst applies knowledge discovery methods to warehoused
electronic data to build a predictive model of patient falls.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM20
Nursing Informatics.indd 132 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 133
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 19
• INS at a large hospital system, supervising an implementation and
education team, representing nursing interests on various IT com-
mittees, performing project management for multiple documen-
tation projects, and having oversight of nursing standards and
vocabularies used in applications.
• Project director for a clinical software company, managing imple-
mentation teams for various client projects (hospitals to ambula-
tory facilities) and consulting with clients on all aspects of systems
selection, customization, adoption, and use of software.
• Grants administrator for an information science research agency
seeking and writing grants that would fund NI-related projects,
designing budgets, and ensuring optimal allocation of resources.
Analysis
Data can be aggregated and analyzed in an infinite number of ways to
synthesize knowledge, inform decision support and outcomes manage-
ment, and advance the science of nursing informatics. The INS may use
a number of tools to accomplish these ends. Taxonomies and clinical
vocabularies can be used to tag consumer data for higher-level analy-
sis. Meta-analysis can identify large-scale trends across multiple groups
of data. Systems and requirements analysis can track the flow of data
in a system, customized to end-user needs. Workflow analysis can de-
tail steps taken for a number of tasks.
A major responsibility of the INS is to understand work process flows,
the particular informatics solution, and how these affect each other. Pro-
cesses must be designed for successful interactions between users and
computers. Competency in formal systems analysis techniques and use
of statistical software may be required. These techniques compare the
capabilities and limitations of systems to be installed, and where
changes must be designed. Discrepancies between the current and ideal
systems must be identified and redundancies removed. The clinical
analysis process also may include tools and systematic methods, such
as process redesign, to enhance safety and reduce inefficiencies.
INSs may also engage in the process of knowledge discovery in data-
bases (KDD). Using sound methodologies and practical evidence-based
recommendations, the INS can discover information and knowledge
related to diverse areas of nursing practice. Knowledge discovery
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM19
20 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
methods, including data mining and machine learning methods, can be
applied along with statistical analysis and data visualization techniques,
to identify and understand patterns in very large data stores, such as
enterprise data warehouses (Fayyad, 1996).
Analysis is also required with languages and taxonomies. Nursing
languages such as Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), Nursing
Outcomes Classification (NOC), and medical vocabularies must be peri-
odically re-evaluated for their applicability and currency (CNCCE, 2004).
Analysis of a meta-database such as the Unified Medical Language
System or UMLS (NLM, 2006) requires knowledge of nursing as well as
medical vocabularies in order to analyze groups of taxonomies, a task
ideally suited to the expertise of an INS.
Analysis of outcomes may be related to any domain of nursing prac-
tice—clinical, education, research, or administration. The complexity and
levels of outcomes must be determined for healthcare consumers,
populations, and institutions. Analysis can include the use of Human-
Computer Interaction (HCI) principles and methods. In that domain, INSs
use HCI tools and methods such as heuristics and cognitive walk-
through to analyze the fit of users, tasks, and contexts. Other tools are
also available. Analysts use system tools to maintain data integrity and
reliability, facilitate data aggregation and analysis, identify outcomes,
and develop performance measurements. These techniques allow
nurses to contribute to building a knowledge base consisting of the
data, information, theories, and models used by nurses and other stake-
holders in decision-making and support of healthcare. Analysis activi-
ties may include:
• A nursing analyst in a hospice setting tracks health consumer data
to establish a weighted case mix to determine nursing personnel
allocations.
• A quality improvement (QI) specialist in a hospital system aggre-
gates multi-site research data related to diagnosis and nursing pro-
cedures.
• A quality assurance (QA) analyst works with nurse managers to re-
tool current work processes after examining existing system data
in customized QA reports.
• An analyst applies knowledge discovery methods to warehoused
electronic data to build a predictive model of patient falls.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM20
Nursing Informatics.indd 133 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
134 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 21
Compliance and Integrity Management
With the advent of national laws advocating for the protection of health
information, INSs are responsible for ensuring the ethical use of data, as
well as data integrity, security, and confidentiality of protected health
information. One function of the INS is knowledge and application of
ethical standards. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA) of 1996 has obliged healthcare organizations to revise op-
erational procedures for staff, as well as technical processes, to maintain
compliance. INSs must be fluent in these new requirements; they are
involved in creating, implementing, and assuring organizational change
to meet new legislative mandates. Compliance also includes adherence
to national and international standards. These standards may include
those from government agencies, such as the Food and Drug Adminis-
tration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH), as well as accredi-
tation organizations such as the Joint Commission.
Ethical issues related to consumer privacy abound. One arises from
knowledge discovery in databases (KDD), where prediction of outcomes
based on individual characteristics, behavior, or usage may be used to
stratify groups of people. Although used in a variety of industries, KDD
remains controversial in health care. Adequate HIPAA protections must
be in place, and relevant ethical issues must be considered in all phases
of data retrieval and analysis. For example, analysis of genomic data may
result in sensitive predictions of susceptibility to disease. Given the ex-
plosive growth of large data stores and enterprise data warehouses, KDD
is important for extraction of useful information and knowledge; never-
theless, protecting consumer privacy is vital. The INS can help ensure a
balance between access and privacy.
The emerging sciences of genomics and bioinformatics could be used
to predict risk for certain diseases, and thus insurability risk. Ethical is-
sues surround the use of new products, such as embedded technolo-
gies and radio-frequency identification (RFID) and their application in
caring for persons with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. As the
profession matures, some of these issues will be resolved and standards
will be established. Requirements will continue to evolve; see the sec-
tion, Future of NI, on page 61. Examples of compliance and integrity
management activities include:
• The security officer for a hospital ensures that HIPAA standards are
met by software vendors within the organization, periodically
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM21
22 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
monitors software audit logs for breaches, and ensures that pass-
words are not shared and backup and disaster procedures are in
place and operational.
• A compliance officer for a state health agency writes and enforces
policies that conform to state and national laws respecting records
retention.
• A care coordinator administrator for a hospital system ensures the
confidentiality of data transmitted via telehealth and telemedicine
devices
Consultation
Informatics nurses and informatics nurse specialists apply informatics
knowledge and skills to serve as a resource to clients, both formally and
informally, in external and internal settings. Consultants are experts in
the areas of process redesign, strategic IT planning, system implemen-
tation, writing informatics publications, evaluating clinical software
products, working with clients to write requests for proposals, perform-
ing market research, and assisting in the planning of conferences, aca-
demic courses, and professional development programs. These expert
INSs may work for a consulting firm, be employed as staff of the orga-
nization where they consult, own an independent practice, or be recog-
nized as an expert by writing about NI and speaking at NI-related events.
Flexibility, good communication skills, breadth and depth of clinical and
informatics knowledge, and excellent interpersonal skills are needed to
respond to rapidly changing projects and demands. Examples include:
• Consulting with individuals and groups in defining healthcare in-
formation problems and identifying methods for implementing,
utilizing, and modifying IT solutions and data structures to support
healthcare access, delivery, and evaluation.
• Consulting as the project manager, ensuring that team members
are performing duties as assigned and the project is completed
within budget.
• Consulting with clients in writing requests for proposals to elicit
vendor bids for informatics solutions and in evaluating vendor
responses.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM22
Nursing Informatics.indd 134 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 135
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 21
Compliance and Integrity Management
With the advent of national laws advocating for the protection of health
information, INSs are responsible for ensuring the ethical use of data, as
well as data integrity, security, and confidentiality of protected health
information. One function of the INS is knowledge and application of
ethical standards. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA) of 1996 has obliged healthcare organizations to revise op-
erational procedures for staff, as well as technical processes, to maintain
compliance. INSs must be fluent in these new requirements; they are
involved in creating, implementing, and assuring organizational change
to meet new legislative mandates. Compliance also includes adherence
to national and international standards. These standards may include
those from government agencies, such as the Food and Drug Adminis-
tration (FDA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH), as well as accredi-
tation organizations such as the Joint Commission.
Ethical issues related to consumer privacy abound. One arises from
knowledge discovery in databases (KDD), where prediction of outcomes
based on individual characteristics, behavior, or usage may be used to
stratify groups of people. Although used in a variety of industries, KDD
remains controversial in health care. Adequate HIPAA protections must
be in place, and relevant ethical issues must be considered in all phases
of data retrieval and analysis. For example, analysis of genomic data may
result in sensitive predictions of susceptibility to disease. Given the ex-
plosive growth of large data stores and enterprise data warehouses, KDD
is important for extraction of useful information and knowledge; never-
theless, protecting consumer privacy is vital. The INS can help ensure a
balance between access and privacy.
The emerging sciences of genomics and bioinformatics could be used
to predict risk for certain diseases, and thus insurability risk. Ethical is-
sues surround the use of new products, such as embedded technolo-
gies and radio-frequency identification (RFID) and their application in
caring for persons with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. As the
profession matures, some of these issues will be resolved and standards
will be established. Requirements will continue to evolve; see the sec-
tion, Future of NI, on page 61. Examples of compliance and integrity
management activities include:
• The security officer for a hospital ensures that HIPAA standards are
met by software vendors within the organization, periodically
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM21
22 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
monitors software audit logs for breaches, and ensures that pass-
words are not shared and backup and disaster procedures are in
place and operational.
• A compliance officer for a state health agency writes and enforces
policies that conform to state and national laws respecting records
retention.
• A care coordinator administrator for a hospital system ensures the
confidentiality of data transmitted via telehealth and telemedicine
devices
Consultation
Informatics nurses and informatics nurse specialists apply informatics
knowledge and skills to serve as a resource to clients, both formally and
informally, in external and internal settings. Consultants are experts in
the areas of process redesign, strategic IT planning, system implemen-
tation, writing informatics publications, evaluating clinical software
products, working with clients to write requests for proposals, perform-
ing market research, and assisting in the planning of conferences, aca-
demic courses, and professional development programs. These expert
INSs may work for a consulting firm, be employed as staff of the orga-
nization where they consult, own an independent practice, or be recog-
nized as an expert by writing about NI and speaking at NI-related events.
Flexibility, good communication skills, breadth and depth of clinical and
informatics knowledge, and excellent interpersonal skills are needed to
respond to rapidly changing projects and demands. Examples include:
• Consulting with individuals and groups in defining healthcare in-
formation problems and identifying methods for implementing,
utilizing, and modifying IT solutions and data structures to support
healthcare access, delivery, and evaluation.
• Consulting as the project manager, ensuring that team members
are performing duties as assigned and the project is completed
within budget.
• Consulting with clients in writing requests for proposals to elicit
vendor bids for informatics solutions and in evaluating vendor
responses.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM22
Nursing Informatics.indd 135 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
136 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 23
Coordination, Facilitation, and Integration
One of the most common NI roles is implementing informatics solu-
tions. Nurses are particularly well suited for IT implementation, as it es-
sentially follows the nursing process of assessment, planning,
implementation, and evaluation (ANA, 2004a). Also, the INS frequently
serves as a bridge between informatics solution users and IT experts.
The IN or INS serves as project coordinator, facilitating change man-
agement and integrating the information and technology to transform
processes. In this role, project management knowledge and skills are
essential to the successful outcome of the project. Project coordination
can range from small, department-centered applications to enterprise-
wide electronic health record (EHR) installations, from coordinating a
rehabilitation module in the rehabilitation unit to installing a com-
plete EHR in 42 hospitals.
Of particular note, effective communication is an inherent part of
many NI functions, but especially related to coordination, facilitation,
and integration. The IN and INS are at the hub of cross-disciplinary com-
munication among professional disciplines and IT, serving as translators
and integrators for system requirements and impacts.
In another instance, informatics nurses serve as the liaison between
software engineers and end users. In this capacity, the informatics nurse
ensures that the necessary testing or research is performed to deter-
mine the end user’s needs, and that this information is conveyed to the
software engineers in terms they can understand. Once the engineer has
created a product, the INS evaluates the utility of the product from the
viewpoint of the end user. This liaison type of facilitation and coordina-
tion occurs in multiple environments. Ensuring the integration of nurs-
ing vocabularies and standardized nomenclatures in applications is
another example. In this case INSs also act as usability experts and rec-
ommend ideal formats for the utilization of technology. Examples of
coordination, facilitation, and integration might include:
• The project coordinator for a statewide electronic medical record
implementation coordinates all aspects of the project and super-
vises a cross-disciplinary team to train public health personnel to
use the application.
• The project manager for a clinical software company manages the
resources and activities using tools such as project management
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM23
24 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
software and project plans for clients whose responsibilities cross
inpatient and ambulatory areas
• The clinical liaison for a telehealth software vendor communicates
with providers and consumers to ensure that all parties are agree-
able to development and implementation plans, and ensures that
providers using the system receive adequate technical education.
• A usability expert on a software development team advises soft-
ware engineers on screen design from the standpoint of clinical
documentation needs, performs or coordinates testing of iterative
designs, and validates clinical requirements with the users.
Development
Development was listed as the second most common responsibility of
HIMSS NI respondents in 2007 (HIMSS, 2007). A developer is responsible
for translating user requirements into effective informatics solutions.
INSs are involved in a vast array of development activities, from concep-
tualizing models for applications, to software and hardware design, to
the design of education manuals, to the design of complex technology
networks. As part of this function, INSs and INs participate in the pro-
cess of design, iterative development, testing, and dissemination of qual-
ity informatics solutions for nurses, interdisciplinary providers, and
consumers. An understanding of the information needs of nurses and
the nursing profession, consumers and consumer care processes, as well
as knowledge of business, client services, projected market directions,
product design, product development methods, market research, con-
temporary programming, systems design, and modeling language are
essential for practicing in a development environment.
Adherence to national standards and regulatory requirements is also
essential to any development work. In order to ensure interoperability
between systems, INSs and INs involved in system development must
be knowledgeable about international standards requirements. Existing
standards include Health Level Seven (HL-7), International Organization
for Standardization (ISO), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT ), Inter-
national Classification of Disease (ICD), and Digital Image Communica-
tion (DICOM) group standards, as well as Section 508 accessibility
standards (Hammond, 1995; GSA, 2006). An understanding of the cur-
rent work on standards is mandatory. Development responsibilities
might include:
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM24
Nursing Informatics.indd 136 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 137
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 23
Coordination, Facilitation, and Integration
One of the most common NI roles is implementing informatics solu-
tions. Nurses are particularly well suited for IT implementation, as it es-
sentially follows the nursing process of assessment, planning,
implementation, and evaluation (ANA, 2004a). Also, the INS frequently
serves as a bridge between informatics solution users and IT experts.
The IN or INS serves as project coordinator, facilitating change man-
agement and integrating the information and technology to transform
processes. In this role, project management knowledge and skills are
essential to the successful outcome of the project. Project coordination
can range from small, department-centered applications to enterprise-
wide electronic health record (EHR) installations, from coordinating a
rehabilitation module in the rehabilitation unit to installing a com-
plete EHR in 42 hospitals.
Of particular note, effective communication is an inherent part of
many NI functions, but especially related to coordination, facilitation,
and integration. The IN and INS are at the hub of cross-disciplinary com-
munication among professional disciplines and IT, serving as translators
and integrators for system requirements and impacts.
In another instance, informatics nurses serve as the liaison between
software engineers and end users. In this capacity, the informatics nurse
ensures that the necessary testing or research is performed to deter-
mine the end user’s needs, and that this information is conveyed to the
software engineers in terms they can understand. Once the engineer has
created a product, the INS evaluates the utility of the product from the
viewpoint of the end user. This liaison type of facilitation and coordina-
tion occurs in multiple environments. Ensuring the integration of nurs-
ing vocabularies and standardized nomenclatures in applications is
another example. In this case INSs also act as usability experts and rec-
ommend ideal formats for the utilization of technology. Examples of
coordination, facilitation, and integration might include:
• The project coordinator for a statewide electronic medical record
implementation coordinates all aspects of the project and super-
vises a cross-disciplinary team to train public health personnel to
use the application.
• The project manager for a clinical software company manages the
resources and activities using tools such as project management
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM23
24 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
software and project plans for clients whose responsibilities cross
inpatient and ambulatory areas
• The clinical liaison for a telehealth software vendor communicates
with providers and consumers to ensure that all parties are agree-
able to development and implementation plans, and ensures that
providers using the system receive adequate technical education.
• A usability expert on a software development team advises soft-
ware engineers on screen design from the standpoint of clinical
documentation needs, performs or coordinates testing of iterative
designs, and validates clinical requirements with the users.
Development
Development was listed as the second most common responsibility of
HIMSS NI respondents in 2007 (HIMSS, 2007). A developer is responsible
for translating user requirements into effective informatics solutions.
INSs are involved in a vast array of development activities, from concep-
tualizing models for applications, to software and hardware design, to
the design of education manuals, to the design of complex technology
networks. As part of this function, INSs and INs participate in the pro-
cess of design, iterative development, testing, and dissemination of qual-
ity informatics solutions for nurses, interdisciplinary providers, and
consumers. An understanding of the information needs of nurses and
the nursing profession, consumers and consumer care processes, as well
as knowledge of business, client services, projected market directions,
product design, product development methods, market research, con-
temporary programming, systems design, and modeling language are
essential for practicing in a development environment.
Adherence to national standards and regulatory requirements is also
essential to any development work. In order to ensure interoperability
between systems, INSs and INs involved in system development must
be knowledgeable about international standards requirements. Existing
standards include Health Level Seven (HL-7), International Organization
for Standardization (ISO), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT ), Inter-
national Classification of Disease (ICD), and Digital Image Communica-
tion (DICOM) group standards, as well as Section 508 accessibility
standards (Hammond, 1995; GSA, 2006). An understanding of the cur-
rent work on standards is mandatory. Development responsibilities
might include:
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM24
Nursing Informatics.indd 137 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
138 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 25
• A developer with a personal health record software vendor creates
user-friendly screens for consumers to enter information as well as
screens for nurses to display and interpret the data.
• A database administrator with a large multi-site teaching organi-
zation manages an expanded nursing vocabulary set for inpatient,
ambulatory, and home health nursing documentation.
• A nurse web content developer for a consortium creates and vali-
dates content for educational handouts, help and tool tips for user
interfaces that display national guidelines, and educational tools.
This would include new and innovative tools for knowledge
dissemination.
• A programmer in a hospital IT department codes software for docu-
menting diabetic education.
Education and Professional Development
Education is a critical component of many NI functions and may directly
affect the success or failure of any new or modified IT solution. Vendors
of information systems frequently use the term training when referring
to client education. In nursing, however, the broader label of education
is used. Adherence to solid educational principles is a component of
education and professional development (ANA, 2000). Teaching nurses
and nursing students, healthcare consumers, and other interdisciplinary
health team members about the effective and ethical uses of informa-
tion technology, as well as NI concepts and theories, is essential for the
optimal use of informatics solutions in nursing practice. Ever-changing
requirements in health information technology make continuing edu-
cation essential as well. INSs and INs in this capacity develop, implement,
and evaluate educational curricula and educational technologies that
meet the needs of students.
In this role, educators and trainers assess and evaluate informatics
skills and competencies while providing feedback to students regard-
ing the effectiveness of the learning activity and the students’ ability to
demonstrate newly acquired skills. Educators and trainers manage,
evaluate, report, and utilize data and information related to students and
the educational delivery system. These INSs are innovators in defining
and developing educational technologies, integrating the solutions into
the educational and practice environments, and challenging organiza-
tions to consider and adopt innovative informatics solutions.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM25
26 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
The INS must consider information competency as well as literacy.
Computer literacy is a core competency needed in health care, and
should be taught in nursing curricula at all levels. In addition, informa-
tion literacy must be integrated into practice and used to support
knowledge management. These are the foundations of informatics
competencies.
Education and professional development includes not only INSs, INs,
and end users, but also consumers. With the advent of distance tech-
nologies such as telehealth and Internet-based consumer-accessible
applications, new competencies are needed to ensure that health infor-
mation is displayed to consumers at an appropriate level of under-
standing; support staff may not be available in person. Cultural issues,
language considerations, and literacy of consumers may not be appar-
ent, and materials may need to be more fully assessed for appropriate
presentation and understanding.
INSs may need to ensure presentation of content for web-based
knowledge portals of private and government health organizations that
may exist in multiple locations, or only virtually. Health information may
need to be distilled for consumer consumption. Thus education and
professional development involve not only educating INs and INSs, but
also developing appropriate interfaces for the consumer. Education and
professional development might include:
• A professor of nursing at a major university teaches graduate nurs-
ing students enrolled in a nursing informatics degree program or
teaches nursing students at all levels the basic NI principles and
foundations.
• A clinical preceptor for newly hired nurses and students provides
orientation about telehealth, engages them in using telehealth
technology, and role models the telehealth nurse responsibilities
of monitoring physiologic parameters and providing consumer
education.
• An educator for a vendor travels internationally to train nurses on
the product’s operations, capabilities, troubleshooting, limitations,
and benefits.
• A staff development liaison for a large hospital educates nurses and
other end users about how to integrate clinical applications into
their work processes.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM26
Nursing Informatics.indd 138 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 139
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 25
• A developer with a personal health record software vendor creates
user-friendly screens for consumers to enter information as well as
screens for nurses to display and interpret the data.
• A database administrator with a large multi-site teaching organi-
zation manages an expanded nursing vocabulary set for inpatient,
ambulatory, and home health nursing documentation.
• A nurse web content developer for a consortium creates and vali-
dates content for educational handouts, help and tool tips for user
interfaces that display national guidelines, and educational tools.
This would include new and innovative tools for knowledge
dissemination.
• A programmer in a hospital IT department codes software for docu-
menting diabetic education.
Education and Professional Development
Education is a critical component of many NI functions and may directly
affect the success or failure of any new or modified IT solution. Vendors
of information systems frequently use the term training when referring
to client education. In nursing, however, the broader label of education
is used. Adherence to solid educational principles is a component of
education and professional development (ANA, 2000). Teaching nurses
and nursing students, healthcare consumers, and other interdisciplinary
health team members about the effective and ethical uses of informa-
tion technology, as well as NI concepts and theories, is essential for the
optimal use of informatics solutions in nursing practice. Ever-changing
requirements in health information technology make continuing edu-
cation essential as well. INSs and INs in this capacity develop, implement,
and evaluate educational curricula and educational technologies that
meet the needs of students.
In this role, educators and trainers assess and evaluate informatics
skills and competencies while providing feedback to students regard-
ing the effectiveness of the learning activity and the students’ ability to
demonstrate newly acquired skills. Educators and trainers manage,
evaluate, report, and utilize data and information related to students and
the educational delivery system. These INSs are innovators in defining
and developing educational technologies, integrating the solutions into
the educational and practice environments, and challenging organiza-
tions to consider and adopt innovative informatics solutions.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM25
26 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
The INS must consider information competency as well as literacy.
Computer literacy is a core competency needed in health care, and
should be taught in nursing curricula at all levels. In addition, informa-
tion literacy must be integrated into practice and used to support
knowledge management. These are the foundations of informatics
competencies.
Education and professional development includes not only INSs, INs,
and end users, but also consumers. With the advent of distance tech-
nologies such as telehealth and Internet-based consumer-accessible
applications, new competencies are needed to ensure that health infor-
mation is displayed to consumers at an appropriate level of under-
standing; support staff may not be available in person. Cultural issues,
language considerations, and literacy of consumers may not be appar-
ent, and materials may need to be more fully assessed for appropriate
presentation and understanding.
INSs may need to ensure presentation of content for web-based
knowledge portals of private and government health organizations that
may exist in multiple locations, or only virtually. Health information may
need to be distilled for consumer consumption. Thus education and
professional development involve not only educating INs and INSs, but
also developing appropriate interfaces for the consumer. Education and
professional development might include:
• A professor of nursing at a major university teaches graduate nurs-
ing students enrolled in a nursing informatics degree program or
teaches nursing students at all levels the basic NI principles and
foundations.
• A clinical preceptor for newly hired nurses and students provides
orientation about telehealth, engages them in using telehealth
technology, and role models the telehealth nurse responsibilities
of monitoring physiologic parameters and providing consumer
education.
• An educator for a vendor travels internationally to train nurses on
the product’s operations, capabilities, troubleshooting, limitations,
and benefits.
• A staff development liaison for a large hospital educates nurses and
other end users about how to integrate clinical applications into
their work processes.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM26
Nursing Informatics.indd 139 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
140 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 27
• A help desk team member for a large oncology center works with
users as product upgrades are released, answers clinical user ques-
tions on the phone or in person, and trouble-shoots user problems.
• A patient education coordinator facilitates electronic consumer
health resources.
• A web developer is responsible for development, maintenance, and
presentation of disease content for a hospital web portal.
Policy Development and Advocacy
INSs play a key role in formulation of health policy, particularly bring-
ing expertise in data and information content, data structures, and IT
solutions with those attributes. Policy development may be at any
level—international, national, state, professional specialty, institution or
a work unit. INSs are experts in defining the data needed and the struc-
ture, management, and availability of those data for decision-making. As
such, they advocate for consumers, providers, and the enterprise, and
articulate relevant issues from a nursing perspective. Policy-related ac-
tivities may include developing, writing, implementing, and evaluating
guidance. Regardless of the level or activity, INSs are partners in setting
health policy, particularly related to information management and com-
munication, infrastructure development, and economics.
The advocacy function of the INS or IN also encompasses consumer
health. INs may be part of initiatives such as promoting the adoption of
technology for rural programs to increase access to health services.
Advocacy may include educating legislators about increasing telecom-
munication access, expanding reimbursement for technology-enabled
consumer services, or educating the public on ways to access health-
related materials via the Internet. Examples of policy development and
advocacy function of the INS or IN might include:
• The president of a health information management organization
represents nursing on a national information standards task force.
• A lobbyist participates in advocacy efforts on behalf of consumers
for increased government funding of demonstration or pilot
informatics projects.
• A president of a nursing informatics organization writes letters to
elected officials to obtain their support for reimbursement of ser-
vices by remote, technology-enabled providers.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM27
28 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Research and Evaluation
INSs conduct research into the design, development, and implementa-
tion of informatics solutions, and their impact on users, such as health-
care organizations, providers, consumers, and payers. INS researchers use
systematic methods of inquiry (including traditional and newer tech-
niques) to identify and evaluate data, information, knowledge, and
wisdom in informatics solutions and data repositories. Research and
evaluation functions include, but are not limited to:
• Research in concept or symbolic representation of nursing
phenomena
• Evaluation of clinical decision-making in nursing
• Applied research in development, implementation, usability, and
outcome implications of solutions
• Consumers’ and interdisciplinary providers’ use of health informa-
tion tools and resources
• Evaluation of effective methods for information systems implemen-
tation, acceptance, and utilization
• Human factors or ergonomics research into the design of systems
and their impact on interdisciplinary providers, consumers, nurses,
and their interactions
• Evaluation research on the effects of systems on the processes and
outcomes of consumer care
• Usability testing of nursing and consumer applications
• Evaluating how consumers utilize computerized healthcare products
• Research in clinical vocabularies
• Interaction of consumers, providers, and technology
• Consumer communication and usage of technology-based support
groups
Research in nursing informatics can span a range of activities, from
experimental research to process improvement and informal evaluation
to evidence-based practice. Much of the work is innovative and may be
initiated by INSs or conducted at the request of an organization or
agency. INSs working in research and evaluation might conduct research
projects to develop and refine standardized nursing vocabularies, or link
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM28
Nursing Informatics.indd 140 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 141
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 27
• A help desk team member for a large oncology center works with
users as product upgrades are released, answers clinical user ques-
tions on the phone or in person, and trouble-shoots user problems.
• A patient education coordinator facilitates electronic consumer
health resources.
• A web developer is responsible for development, maintenance, and
presentation of disease content for a hospital web portal.
Policy Development and Advocacy
INSs play a key role in formulation of health policy, particularly bring-
ing expertise in data and information content, data structures, and IT
solutions with those attributes. Policy development may be at any
level—international, national, state, professional specialty, institution or
a work unit. INSs are experts in defining the data needed and the struc-
ture, management, and availability of those data for decision-making. As
such, they advocate for consumers, providers, and the enterprise, and
articulate relevant issues from a nursing perspective. Policy-related ac-
tivities may include developing, writing, implementing, and evaluating
guidance. Regardless of the level or activity, INSs are partners in setting
health policy, particularly related to information management and com-
munication, infrastructure development, and economics.
The advocacy function of the INS or IN also encompasses consumer
health. INs may be part of initiatives such as promoting the adoption of
technology for rural programs to increase access to health services.
Advocacy may include educating legislators about increasing telecom-
munication access, expanding reimbursement for technology-enabled
consumer services, or educating the public on ways to access health-
related materials via the Internet. Examples of policy development and
advocacy function of the INS or IN might include:
• The president of a health information management organization
represents nursing on a national information standards task force.
• A lobbyist participates in advocacy efforts on behalf of consumers
for increased government funding of demonstration or pilot
informatics projects.
• A president of a nursing informatics organization writes letters to
elected officials to obtain their support for reimbursement of ser-
vices by remote, technology-enabled providers.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM27
28 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Research and Evaluation
INSs conduct research into the design, development, and implementa-
tion of informatics solutions, and their impact on users, such as health-
care organizations, providers, consumers, and payers. INS researchers use
systematic methods of inquiry (including traditional and newer tech-
niques) to identify and evaluate data, information, knowledge, and
wisdom in informatics solutions and data repositories. Research and
evaluation functions include, but are not limited to:
• Research in concept or symbolic representation of nursing
phenomena
• Evaluation of clinical decision-making in nursing
• Applied research in development, implementation, usability, and
outcome implications of solutions
• Consumers’ and interdisciplinary providers’ use of health informa-
tion tools and resources
• Evaluation of effective methods for information systems implemen-
tation, acceptance, and utilization
• Human factors or ergonomics research into the design of systems
and their impact on interdisciplinary providers, consumers, nurses,
and their interactions
• Evaluation research on the effects of systems on the processes and
outcomes of consumer care
• Usability testing of nursing and consumer applications
• Evaluating how consumers utilize computerized healthcare products
• Research in clinical vocabularies
• Interaction of consumers, providers, and technology
• Consumer communication and usage of technology-based support
groups
Research in nursing informatics can span a range of activities, from
experimental research to process improvement and informal evaluation
to evidence-based practice. Much of the work is innovative and may be
initiated by INSs or conducted at the request of an organization or
agency. INSs working in research and evaluation might conduct research
projects to develop and refine standardized nursing vocabularies, or link
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM28
Nursing Informatics.indd 141 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
142 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 29
nursing interventions to outcomes in large data sets. This work is essen-
tial in defining, describing, and evaluating data, information, knowledge,
and wisdom. It may include the evaluation of organizational attributes
for successful adoption of documentation systems or the impact and
efficacy of hardware and software solutions.
Nursing informatics research may also incorporate a consumer orien-
tation. It may study effective nurse-consumer interactions in web-based
interactions with older consumers, or the impact of new applications on
nurses’ workflow. Patient reactions to instant messaging from providers
may be studied. Examples of the research function of the INS include:
• The chief for nursing research for a large software company over-
sees projects to evaluate the impact of enterprise electronic health
records on patient care outcomes.
• A nursing informatics analyst in a hospital IT department aggre-
gates data about the incidence of decubiti, creates trend reports
and predictive models for nurse managers, and analyzes outcomes
against quality indicators.
• A nurse researcher conducts a usability study comparing consumer
entry of information at a clinic-based kiosk to in-person interviews.
Integrated Functional Areas: Telehealth and Telenursing as Exemplar
Informatics solutions are foundational support for healthcare delivery.
In some cases, however, informatics solutions are more tightly integrated
with care delivery. Clinical care and informatics intersect in areas such
as telehealth and radiation oncology and serve as examples of inte-
grated functional areas. In the discussion below, telehealth serves as the
exemplar.
Telehealth, as defined by the U.S. Office for the Advancement of
Telehealth, is “the use of electronic information and telecommunications
technologies to support long-distance clinical healthcare, patient and
professional health-related education, public health and health admin-
istration” (HRSA, 2001). Telenursing is the use of distance or telecommu-
nications technologies by nurses to monitor consumer and public
health and administrative functions, as well as deliver healthcare edu-
cation (Milholland, 2000; NCSNB, 2003). With the widespread expansion
of telehealth technologies, standards have been developed that take
into account differing countries’ cultures and governance standards
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM29
30 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
(Milholland-Hunter, 2001). Standards may pertain to the transmission of
data and information as well as protocols for providing care.
Nursing informatics primarily fulfills a clinical support role, as opposed
to a direct clinical practice role. Telehealth is primarily a clinical practice
role, with technical aspects required to deliver care. The 2004 Interna-
tional Telenursing Survey (Grady, Schlachta-Fairchild, & Elfrink, 2005)
surveyed international telenurses worldwide. Of the 719 participants,
only 18 had informatics in their job titles. Within this group, over half
were advanced practice clinicians. Ten of the clinicians had the term
informatics in their titles. Thus, the interface between nursing infor-
matics and telehealth nursing today primarily occurs at the technical or
support level. In the future, telehealth may evolve toward an emphasis
on information (versus technology), and informatics principles, methods,
and tools may expand in the future.
Standards for telehealth nursing clinical practice are outlined in ANA’s
Core Principles on Telehealth (1998) and Competencies for Telehealth Tech-
nologies in Nursing (1999). These describe the interface between tele-
health and informatics, referring to the technical aspects of telehealth
as clinical support and telehealth as clinical practice. Examples of the
telehealth role of the IN or INS might be:
• A telehealth network coordinator for a rural telehealth program en-
sures the appropriate deployment of technology, and customization
for distance-related needs.
• A program manager for telehealth in a home health agency orga-
nizes the integration of telehealth into the agency’s operations,
supports the alignment of telehealth technology with the overall
technology strategy of the agency, leads the adoption and imple-
mentation of the program, and evaluates and maintains telehealth
outcomes and accountability for those outcomes (Starren et al., 2005).
• A nurse researcher conducting a program evaluation compares the
impact of an online, telehealth cardiac education program to that
of an in-person support group on level of depression and adher-
ence to diet.
NI Functional Areas: Conclusions
With the continued miniaturization of technology, as well as develop-
ments in information science and nursing science, NI functions will
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM30
Nursing Informatics.indd 142 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 143
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 29
nursing interventions to outcomes in large data sets. This work is essen-
tial in defining, describing, and evaluating data, information, knowledge,
and wisdom. It may include the evaluation of organizational attributes
for successful adoption of documentation systems or the impact and
efficacy of hardware and software solutions.
Nursing informatics research may also incorporate a consumer orien-
tation. It may study effective nurse-consumer interactions in web-based
interactions with older consumers, or the impact of new applications on
nurses’ workflow. Patient reactions to instant messaging from providers
may be studied. Examples of the research function of the INS include:
• The chief for nursing research for a large software company over-
sees projects to evaluate the impact of enterprise electronic health
records on patient care outcomes.
• A nursing informatics analyst in a hospital IT department aggre-
gates data about the incidence of decubiti, creates trend reports
and predictive models for nurse managers, and analyzes outcomes
against quality indicators.
• A nurse researcher conducts a usability study comparing consumer
entry of information at a clinic-based kiosk to in-person interviews.
Integrated Functional Areas: Telehealth and Telenursing as Exemplar
Informatics solutions are foundational support for healthcare delivery.
In some cases, however, informatics solutions are more tightly integrated
with care delivery. Clinical care and informatics intersect in areas such
as telehealth and radiation oncology and serve as examples of inte-
grated functional areas. In the discussion below, telehealth serves as the
exemplar.
Telehealth, as defined by the U.S. Office for the Advancement of
Telehealth, is “the use of electronic information and telecommunications
technologies to support long-distance clinical healthcare, patient and
professional health-related education, public health and health admin-
istration” (HRSA, 2001). Telenursing is the use of distance or telecommu-
nications technologies by nurses to monitor consumer and public
health and administrative functions, as well as deliver healthcare edu-
cation (Milholland, 2000; NCSNB, 2003). With the widespread expansion
of telehealth technologies, standards have been developed that take
into account differing countries’ cultures and governance standards
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM29
30 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
(Milholland-Hunter, 2001). Standards may pertain to the transmission of
data and information as well as protocols for providing care.
Nursing informatics primarily fulfills a clinical support role, as opposed
to a direct clinical practice role. Telehealth is primarily a clinical practice
role, with technical aspects required to deliver care. The 2004 Interna-
tional Telenursing Survey (Grady, Schlachta-Fairchild, & Elfrink, 2005)
surveyed international telenurses worldwide. Of the 719 participants,
only 18 had informatics in their job titles. Within this group, over half
were advanced practice clinicians. Ten of the clinicians had the term
informatics in their titles. Thus, the interface between nursing infor-
matics and telehealth nursing today primarily occurs at the technical or
support level. In the future, telehealth may evolve toward an emphasis
on information (versus technology), and informatics principles, methods,
and tools may expand in the future.
Standards for telehealth nursing clinical practice are outlined in ANA’s
Core Principles on Telehealth (1998) and Competencies for Telehealth Tech-
nologies in Nursing (1999). These describe the interface between tele-
health and informatics, referring to the technical aspects of telehealth
as clinical support and telehealth as clinical practice. Examples of the
telehealth role of the IN or INS might be:
• A telehealth network coordinator for a rural telehealth program en-
sures the appropriate deployment of technology, and customization
for distance-related needs.
• A program manager for telehealth in a home health agency orga-
nizes the integration of telehealth into the agency’s operations,
supports the alignment of telehealth technology with the overall
technology strategy of the agency, leads the adoption and imple-
mentation of the program, and evaluates and maintains telehealth
outcomes and accountability for those outcomes (Starren et al., 2005).
• A nurse researcher conducting a program evaluation compares the
impact of an online, telehealth cardiac education program to that
of an in-person support group on level of depression and adher-
ence to diet.
NI Functional Areas: Conclusions
With the continued miniaturization of technology, as well as develop-
ments in information science and nursing science, NI functions will
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM30
Nursing Informatics.indd 143 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
144 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 31
continue to expand, evolving into functions not yet envisioned. INSs and
INs will need to continually assess new knowledge management and
technology trends and incorporate them into their own practices. Inte-
grated functional areas will continue to expand. The functional areas
listed here will be combined with new areas to create innovative posi-
tions of the future.
References: Functional Areas
American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). (2006a). Nursing
Informatics Working Group. Roles in nursing informatics. Retrieved
October 10, 2007 from http://www.amia.org/mbrcenter/wg/ni/roles/
inf_nrs.asp
American Nurses Association (ANA). (1998). Core principles on telehealth.
Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (1999). Competencies for telehealth
technologies in nursing. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2000). Scope and standards of prac-
tice for nursing professional development. Washington, DC: American
Nurses Publishing.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2004a). Nursing scope and standards
of practice. Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2004b). Scope and standards for
nurse administrators (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
Bellinger, G., Castro, D., & Mills, A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge,
and wisdom. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.systems-
thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm
Center for Nursing Classification and Clinical Effectiveness (CNCCE).
(2004). Overview of NIC/NOC. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
w w w. n u r s i n g . u i o w a . e d u / e x c e l l e n c e / n u r s i n g _ k n o w l e d g e /
clinical_effectiveness/index.htm
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM31
32 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
General Services Administration (GSA). (2006). Office of Government-
wide Policy, IT Accessibility & Workforce Division (ITAW). Section 508.
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.section508.gov.
Fayyad, U. (1996). Data mining and knowledge discovery: Making
sense out of data. IEEE Expert 11(5), 220–225. Retrieved December 13,
2007, from http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/assets/PDF/AIMag17-03-2-
article.pdf.
Grady, J., Schlachta-Fairchild, L. & Elfrink, V. (2005). Results of the 2004
International Telenursing Survey. Telemedicine and e-Health, 11(2), 197.
Greene, J. (2004). RN to CIO: High-tech nurses bridge hospitals’ cultural
divide. Hospitals and Health Networks 78(2):40–46.
Hammond, W.E. (1995). Glossary for healthcare standards. Retrieved
February 28, 2006 from http://dmi-www.mc.duke.edu/dukemi/
acronyms.htm.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/
pl104191.htm.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2001). Office for
the Advancement of Telehealth. Report to Congress on telemedicine.
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.hrsa.gov/telehealth/
pubs/report2001.htm.
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS).
(2007). 2007 HIMSS nursing informatics sur vey. Retrieved October
10, 2007 from http://www.himss.org/content/files/surveyresults/
2007NursingInformatics.pdf.
Milholland, K. (2000). Telenursing, telehealth. Nursing and technology ad-
vance together. Geneva: International Council of Nurses.
Milholland-Hunter, K. (2001). International professional standards for
telenursing programmes. Geneva: International Council of Nurses.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM32
Nursing Informatics.indd 144 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 145
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 31
continue to expand, evolving into functions not yet envisioned. INSs and
INs will need to continually assess new knowledge management and
technology trends and incorporate them into their own practices. Inte-
grated functional areas will continue to expand. The functional areas
listed here will be combined with new areas to create innovative posi-
tions of the future.
References: Functional Areas
American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). (2006a). Nursing
Informatics Working Group. Roles in nursing informatics. Retrieved
October 10, 2007 from http://www.amia.org/mbrcenter/wg/ni/roles/
inf_nrs.asp
American Nurses Association (ANA). (1998). Core principles on telehealth.
Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (1999). Competencies for telehealth
technologies in nursing. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2000). Scope and standards of prac-
tice for nursing professional development. Washington, DC: American
Nurses Publishing.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2004a). Nursing scope and standards
of practice. Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2004b). Scope and standards for
nurse administrators (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
Bellinger, G., Castro, D., & Mills, A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge,
and wisdom. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.systems-
thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm
Center for Nursing Classification and Clinical Effectiveness (CNCCE).
(2004). Overview of NIC/NOC. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
w w w. n u r s i n g . u i o w a . e d u / e x c e l l e n c e / n u r s i n g _ k n o w l e d g e /
clinical_effectiveness/index.htm
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM31
32 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
General Services Administration (GSA). (2006). Office of Government-
wide Policy, IT Accessibility & Workforce Division (ITAW). Section 508.
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.section508.gov.
Fayyad, U. (1996). Data mining and knowledge discovery: Making
sense out of data. IEEE Expert 11(5), 220–225. Retrieved December 13,
2007, from http://www.aaai.org/AITopics/assets/PDF/AIMag17-03-2-
article.pdf.
Grady, J., Schlachta-Fairchild, L. & Elfrink, V. (2005). Results of the 2004
International Telenursing Survey. Telemedicine and e-Health, 11(2), 197.
Greene, J. (2004). RN to CIO: High-tech nurses bridge hospitals’ cultural
divide. Hospitals and Health Networks 78(2):40–46.
Hammond, W.E. (1995). Glossary for healthcare standards. Retrieved
February 28, 2006 from http://dmi-www.mc.duke.edu/dukemi/
acronyms.htm.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/
pl104191.htm.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2001). Office for
the Advancement of Telehealth. Report to Congress on telemedicine.
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.hrsa.gov/telehealth/
pubs/report2001.htm.
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS).
(2007). 2007 HIMSS nursing informatics sur vey. Retrieved October
10, 2007 from http://www.himss.org/content/files/surveyresults/
2007NursingInformatics.pdf.
Milholland, K. (2000). Telenursing, telehealth. Nursing and technology ad-
vance together. Geneva: International Council of Nurses.
Milholland-Hunter, K. (2001). International professional standards for
telenursing programmes. Geneva: International Council of Nurses.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM32
Nursing Informatics.indd 145 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
146 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 33
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (2003). Position
paper on telenursing: A challenge to regulation. Retrieved October 10,
2007 from http://www.ncsbn.org/pdfs/TelenursingPaper.pdf
National Library of Medicine (NLM). (2006). Unified Medical Language
System. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/
research/umls.
Newbold, S. K. (2006). Nursing informatics database—Job titles as
of January 17, 2006. Electronic correspondence. Email to
[email protected]
Sensmeier, J., West, L., & Horowicz, J.K. (2004). Survey reveals, role,
compensation of nurse informaticists. Computers, Informatics, Nurs-
ing 22(3), 171, 178–181.
Staggers, N, & Lasome, C. F. (2005). RN, CIO: An executive informatics
career. Computer, Informatics, Nursing 23(4), 201–206.
Starren, J., Tsai, C., Bakken, S., Aidala, A., Morin, P., Hilliman, C., et al. (2005).
The role of nurses installing telehealth technology in the home. Com-
puters, Informatics, Nursing, 23(4), 181–189.
Willson, D., Bjornstad, G., Lussier, J., Matney, S., Miller, S., Nelson, N., et al.
(2000). Nursing informatics career opportunities. In B. Carty (ed.),
Nursing informatics: education for practice. New York: Springer.
Informatics Competencies
Because of the increased visibility of information and technology in
healthcare settings and complementary educational programs, many
stakeholders are faced with a need to define informatics competencies
for nurses. Human resource managers and educational planners are just
two examples of stakeholders who have an interest in competencies for
nursing informatics.
Since 2000, researchers and professional organizations have com-
pleted substantial work in defining nursing informatics competencies
(Androwich et al., 2003; Curran, 2003; Desjardins et al., 2003; HIMSS, 2005;
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM33
34 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Jiang, Chen, & Chen, 2004; Staggers, Gassert, & Curran, 2000, 2001, 2002).
Several lists of informatics competencies are available, especially those
geared toward nurses’ educational levels.
Stakeholders such as employers and educators are keenly interested
in identifying informatics competencies for various nursing roles. For the
discussion here, competencies for typical nursing informatics roles are
especially pertinent. To this end, a matrix has been developed, based
upon a thorough literature review and the work from a consensus panel.
This text and accompanying matrix ( Table 2) suggests competencies for
typical nursing informatics functional areas discussed in the previous
section.
The Intersection of Informatics Competencies and NI Functional Areas
Staggers, Gassert, and Curran (2000, 2001, 2002) studied the relation-
ships between nursing roles and informatics competencies for nurses
at four levels of practice: beginning, experienced, INS, and informatics
innovator. This framework aligns with educational requirements for all
nursing specialties at the beginning and experienced levels, and then
identifies specific competencies for the specialty roles of INS and the
informatics innovator. Their work not only promoted the integration of
informatics competencies into educational curricula, but also influenced
policy documents.
To date, the majority of authors have focused on the competencies
needed for nursing curricula. Curran (2003) identified informatics com-
petencies for nurse practitioners at Columbia University School of Nurs-
ing. Desjardins, Cook, Jenkins, and Bakken (2005) focused on beginning
nurse competencies, expanding them to include the knowledge and
skills for information literacy to support evidenced-based practice. Like
Staggers et al. (2002), this study also linked competencies to four levels
of nursing practice. Barton (2005) presented a similar view of informatics
competencies for the beginning nurse, identifying a need for competen-
cies in technology or computer literacy as well as information literacy
for undergraduate nursing programs.
McNeil, Elfrink, Pierce, Beyea, Bickford, and Averill (2005) examined
educational content for required informatics competencies. They asked
the deans and directors of 672 baccalaureate and above education pro-
grams to describe informatics content taught in their undergraduate
and graduate programs. Twenty-five unique content areas were identi-
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM34
Nursing Informatics.indd 146 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 147
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 33
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (2003). Position
paper on telenursing: A challenge to regulation. Retrieved October 10,
2007 from http://www.ncsbn.org/pdfs/TelenursingPaper.pdf
National Library of Medicine (NLM). (2006). Unified Medical Language
System. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/
research/umls.
Newbold, S. K. (2006). Nursing informatics database—Job titles as
of January 17, 2006. Electronic correspondence. Email to
[email protected]
Sensmeier, J., West, L., & Horowicz, J.K. (2004). Survey reveals, role,
compensation of nurse informaticists. Computers, Informatics, Nurs-
ing 22(3), 171, 178–181.
Staggers, N, & Lasome, C. F. (2005). RN, CIO: An executive informatics
career. Computer, Informatics, Nursing 23(4), 201–206.
Starren, J., Tsai, C., Bakken, S., Aidala, A., Morin, P., Hilliman, C., et al. (2005).
The role of nurses installing telehealth technology in the home. Com-
puters, Informatics, Nursing, 23(4), 181–189.
Willson, D., Bjornstad, G., Lussier, J., Matney, S., Miller, S., Nelson, N., et al.
(2000). Nursing informatics career opportunities. In B. Carty (ed.),
Nursing informatics: education for practice. New York: Springer.
Informatics Competencies
Because of the increased visibility of information and technology in
healthcare settings and complementary educational programs, many
stakeholders are faced with a need to define informatics competencies
for nurses. Human resource managers and educational planners are just
two examples of stakeholders who have an interest in competencies for
nursing informatics.
Since 2000, researchers and professional organizations have com-
pleted substantial work in defining nursing informatics competencies
(Androwich et al., 2003; Curran, 2003; Desjardins et al., 2003; HIMSS, 2005;
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM33
34 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Jiang, Chen, & Chen, 2004; Staggers, Gassert, & Curran, 2000, 2001, 2002).
Several lists of informatics competencies are available, especially those
geared toward nurses’ educational levels.
Stakeholders such as employers and educators are keenly interested
in identifying informatics competencies for various nursing roles. For the
discussion here, competencies for typical nursing informatics roles are
especially pertinent. To this end, a matrix has been developed, based
upon a thorough literature review and the work from a consensus panel.
This text and accompanying matrix ( Table 2) suggests competencies for
typical nursing informatics functional areas discussed in the previous
section.
The Intersection of Informatics Competencies and NI Functional Areas
Staggers, Gassert, and Curran (2000, 2001, 2002) studied the relation-
ships between nursing roles and informatics competencies for nurses
at four levels of practice: beginning, experienced, INS, and informatics
innovator. This framework aligns with educational requirements for all
nursing specialties at the beginning and experienced levels, and then
identifies specific competencies for the specialty roles of INS and the
informatics innovator. Their work not only promoted the integration of
informatics competencies into educational curricula, but also influenced
policy documents.
To date, the majority of authors have focused on the competencies
needed for nursing curricula. Curran (2003) identified informatics com-
petencies for nurse practitioners at Columbia University School of Nurs-
ing. Desjardins, Cook, Jenkins, and Bakken (2005) focused on beginning
nurse competencies, expanding them to include the knowledge and
skills for information literacy to support evidenced-based practice. Like
Staggers et al. (2002), this study also linked competencies to four levels
of nursing practice. Barton (2005) presented a similar view of informatics
competencies for the beginning nurse, identifying a need for competen-
cies in technology or computer literacy as well as information literacy
for undergraduate nursing programs.
McNeil, Elfrink, Pierce, Beyea, Bickford, and Averill (2005) examined
educational content for required informatics competencies. They asked
the deans and directors of 672 baccalaureate and above education pro-
grams to describe informatics content taught in their undergraduate
and graduate programs. Twenty-five unique content areas were identi-
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM34
Nursing Informatics.indd 147 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
148 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 35
fied for undergraduate (i.e., beginning nurse) and graduate (i.e., experi-
enced nurse) levels of practice. Among the top-ranked competencies for
both programs were: a) accessing electronic resources, b) ethical use of
information systems, c) evidence-based practice skills, and d) skills for
computer-based patient records. The undergraduate program respon-
dents more often identified basic hardware and software skills, whereas
the graduate program respondents included competencies related to
innovation and change theory, national health database knowledge, and
general systems theory.
Jiang, Chen, and Chen (2004) surveyed Taiwanese nursing education
programs ranging from non-vocational and vocational nursing pro-
grams to collegiate programs for two-, four-, five-year, and graduate-level
programs. The authors identified seven domains of competencies and
linked them to differing levels of nursing education in Taiwan. In con-
trast to work in the United States, they identified domains mostly related
to computer versus information literacy, including hardware, software,
and network concepts; principles of computer application; skills in com-
puter usage; program design; limitations of the computer; personal and
social issues; and attitudes toward the computer.
New categories and concomitant competencies for education, as
well as practice, are also available. Androwich et al. (2003) described
NI competencies needed to improve patient safety and expand nurs-
ing practice. Garde, Harrison, and Hovenga (2005) reported specific
competencies for:
• Nursing informatics knowledge and skills (e.g., health information
systems, electronic patient records, telehealth).
• Information technology knowledge and skills (e.g., programming
principles, software development, methodologies and processes,
system analysis and design, database design and management).
• Knowledge and skills in organizational and human behavior (e.g.,
project management, inter-professional communication, risk man-
agement, policies and procedures).
• Clinical and health-related knowledge and skills (e.g., evidence
based practice, clinical guidelines, care pathways).
The Healthcare Leadership Alliance (HLA) announced the creation of
the HLA Competency Directory in the fall of 2005. This directory (HLA,
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM35
36 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
2005) identifies 300 competencies across multiple healthcare manage-
ment roles, categorized into five domains:
• Leadership
• Communications and relationship management
• Professionalism
• Business knowledge and skills
• Knowledge of the healthcare environment
This directory may be especially pertinent for interdisciplinary settings.
A New Competencies Matrix
The competencies matrix in Table 2 (on page 38 and 39) is derived from
Staggers, Gassert, and Curran (2002) and other authors mentioned
earlier, and from the ANCC NI Certification exam (ANCC, 2007). These
competencies are categorized in three overall areas: Computer Literacy,
Information Literacy, and Professional Development/Leadership. Com-
puter literacy competencies relate to the psychomotor use of comput-
ers and other technological equipment (Barton, 2005). Information
literacy competencies deal with information retrieval knowledge and
skills: knowing when there is a need for information; identifying the in-
formation needed to address a given problem or issue; finding the
needed information and evaluating it; organizing the information; and
using the information effectively to address the problem or issue. (ALA,
2006). Professional development and leadership competencies refer to
the ethical, procedural, safety, and management issues for informatics
solutions in nursing practice, education, research, and administration.
The horizontal axis of the matrix is based on the four educational lev-
els as well as the NI functional areas defined earlier. It is important to
recognize that informatics competencies need to be integrated into all
educational levels. The panel identified competency foci for each func-
tional area indicated by an X. Competencies cross the different nursing
informatics functional areas. Although each sub-heading includes more
granular competencies beneath it, nurses would not necessarily be ex-
pected to achieve every competency within a sub-heading. The areas
identified by the X merely indicate an area of emphasis.
The absence of an X does not mean that the skill is completely irrel-
evant to that role; rather it means that the skill may not be emphasized
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM36
Nursing Informatics.indd 148 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 149
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 35
fied for undergraduate (i.e., beginning nurse) and graduate (i.e., experi-
enced nurse) levels of practice. Among the top-ranked competencies for
both programs were: a) accessing electronic resources, b) ethical use of
information systems, c) evidence-based practice skills, and d) skills for
computer-based patient records. The undergraduate program respon-
dents more often identified basic hardware and software skills, whereas
the graduate program respondents included competencies related to
innovation and change theory, national health database knowledge, and
general systems theory.
Jiang, Chen, and Chen (2004) surveyed Taiwanese nursing education
programs ranging from non-vocational and vocational nursing pro-
grams to collegiate programs for two-, four-, five-year, and graduate-level
programs. The authors identified seven domains of competencies and
linked them to differing levels of nursing education in Taiwan. In con-
trast to work in the United States, they identified domains mostly related
to computer versus information literacy, including hardware, software,
and network concepts; principles of computer application; skills in com-
puter usage; program design; limitations of the computer; personal and
social issues; and attitudes toward the computer.
New categories and concomitant competencies for education, as
well as practice, are also available. Androwich et al. (2003) described
NI competencies needed to improve patient safety and expand nurs-
ing practice. Garde, Harrison, and Hovenga (2005) reported specific
competencies for:
• Nursing informatics knowledge and skills (e.g., health information
systems, electronic patient records, telehealth).
• Information technology knowledge and skills (e.g., programming
principles, software development, methodologies and processes,
system analysis and design, database design and management).
• Knowledge and skills in organizational and human behavior (e.g.,
project management, inter-professional communication, risk man-
agement, policies and procedures).
• Clinical and health-related knowledge and skills (e.g., evidence
based practice, clinical guidelines, care pathways).
The Healthcare Leadership Alliance (HLA) announced the creation of
the HLA Competency Directory in the fall of 2005. This directory (HLA,
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM35
36 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
2005) identifies 300 competencies across multiple healthcare manage-
ment roles, categorized into five domains:
• Leadership
• Communications and relationship management
• Professionalism
• Business knowledge and skills
• Knowledge of the healthcare environment
This directory may be especially pertinent for interdisciplinary settings.
A New Competencies Matrix
The competencies matrix in Table 2 (on page 38 and 39) is derived from
Staggers, Gassert, and Curran (2002) and other authors mentioned
earlier, and from the ANCC NI Certification exam (ANCC, 2007). These
competencies are categorized in three overall areas: Computer Literacy,
Information Literacy, and Professional Development/Leadership. Com-
puter literacy competencies relate to the psychomotor use of comput-
ers and other technological equipment (Barton, 2005). Information
literacy competencies deal with information retrieval knowledge and
skills: knowing when there is a need for information; identifying the in-
formation needed to address a given problem or issue; finding the
needed information and evaluating it; organizing the information; and
using the information effectively to address the problem or issue. (ALA,
2006). Professional development and leadership competencies refer to
the ethical, procedural, safety, and management issues for informatics
solutions in nursing practice, education, research, and administration.
The horizontal axis of the matrix is based on the four educational lev-
els as well as the NI functional areas defined earlier. It is important to
recognize that informatics competencies need to be integrated into all
educational levels. The panel identified competency foci for each func-
tional area indicated by an X. Competencies cross the different nursing
informatics functional areas. Although each sub-heading includes more
granular competencies beneath it, nurses would not necessarily be ex-
pected to achieve every competency within a sub-heading. The areas
identified by the X merely indicate an area of emphasis.
The absence of an X does not mean that the skill is completely irrel-
evant to that role; rather it means that the skill may not be emphasized
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM36
Nursing Informatics.indd 149 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
150 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 37
in a particular functional area or NI role. Nor is someone in a given role
required to have every skill indicated. For example, a quality improve-
ment (QI) specialist is an NI role that would stress the Analysis functional
area. An Informatics Nurse Specialist working in a quality improvement
area would require competency in many of the indicated computer lit-
eracy skills including administration, communication, desktop, systems,
and quality improvement, but would not likely need the simulation skills
identified in the matrix. However, a quality assurance specialist, listed in
the same functional area, would need knowledge and skills about simu-
lations, especially if the NI in this role worked in an institution using
simulation for staff development or for a vendor using this product.
The Functional Area-Competency Framework provides an example of
the nursing informatics competencies for different functional areas
within NI roles. Telehealth, which may be seen as more of an integrative
area rather than a stand-alone functional role, is included to reflect in-
tersections with various competencies. The list is not exhaustive, but
presents beginning guidance to the essential NI competencies across
computer literacy, information literacy, and professional development
skills and knowledge. Currently the competencies are at different lev-
els. In the future they may be re-evaluated, expanded, or collapsed.
Competencies and Metastructures
The components of metastructures—data, information, knowledge, and
wisdom—can be compared to the elements in the competencies ma-
trix. Using a patient care example, the beginning nurse uses skills that
rely on the ability to obtain data. Computer skills, data entry, and the use
of the patient’s electronic medical record are the major focus of their
practice. The experienced nurse builds on this and applies basic com-
puter skills to information.
The INS has expertise in nursing, as well as higher levels of computer
literacy, information literacy, and professional development and leader-
ship. This increased level represents knowledge in nursing informatics. The
INS analyzes systems and processes in order to apply knowledge to
patient care, administration, research, or education. Last, the informatics
innovator has achieved a level of knowledge coupled with experience,
a combination that exemplifies wisdom. Wisdom in informatics may be
the creation of unique methods for system design or evaluation, or the
political finesse to justify purchase of a system.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM37
38 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
(continues)
ycaretiLretupmoC
noitartsinimdA—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × ×
noitacinummoC—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × ×
sseccAataD—sllikSretupmoC × ×
noitatnemucoD—sllikSretupmoC × × × × ×
noitacudE—sllikSretupmoC × × × ×
gnirotinoM—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × ×
erawtfoSpotkseDcisaB—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × × × ×
smetsyS—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × × ×
tnemevorpmIytilauQ—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × ×
hcraeseR—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × ×
tnemeganaMtcejorP—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × ×
noitalumiS—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × × × ×
ycaretiLnoitamrofnI
noitaulavE—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × ×
eloR—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × ×
ecnanetniaMmetsyS—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
sisylanA—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
erutcurtSataD/ataD—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
tnempoleveD&ngiseD—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × ×
tnemeganaMlacsiF—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
noitatnemelpmI—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × ×
tnemeganaM—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
gnimmargorP—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × ×
stnemeriuqeR—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
Table 2. Informatics Competencies by NI Functional Areas
Competency Categories Knowledge and Skills Be
gi
nn
in
g
Nu
rs
e
Ex
pe
rie
nc
ed
N
ur
se
In
fo
rm
at
ic
s
Sp
ec
ia
lis
t
In
fo
rm
at
ic
s
In
no
va
to
r
Ad
m
in
is
tr
at
io
n
An
al
ys
is
Co
m
pl
ia
nc
e
&
In
te
gr
ity
M
an
ag
em
en
t
Co
ns
ul
ta
tio
n
Co
or
di
na
tio
n,
F
ac
ili
ta
tio
n,
&
In
te
gr
at
io
n
De
ve
lo
pm
en
t
Ed
uc
at
io
n
&
P
ro
fe
ss
io
na
l D
ev
el
op
m
en
t
Po
lic
y
De
ve
lo
pm
en
t &
A
dv
oc
ac
y
In
te
gr
at
ed
A
re
as
Re
se
ar
ch
&
E
va
lu
at
io
n
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM38
Nursing Informatics.indd 150 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 151
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 37
in a particular functional area or NI role. Nor is someone in a given role
required to have every skill indicated. For example, a quality improve-
ment (QI) specialist is an NI role that would stress the Analysis functional
area. An Informatics Nurse Specialist working in a quality improvement
area would require competency in many of the indicated computer lit-
eracy skills including administration, communication, desktop, systems,
and quality improvement, but would not likely need the simulation skills
identified in the matrix. However, a quality assurance specialist, listed in
the same functional area, would need knowledge and skills about simu-
lations, especially if the NI in this role worked in an institution using
simulation for staff development or for a vendor using this product.
The Functional Area-Competency Framework provides an example of
the nursing informatics competencies for different functional areas
within NI roles. Telehealth, which may be seen as more of an integrative
area rather than a stand-alone functional role, is included to reflect in-
tersections with various competencies. The list is not exhaustive, but
presents beginning guidance to the essential NI competencies across
computer literacy, information literacy, and professional development
skills and knowledge. Currently the competencies are at different lev-
els. In the future they may be re-evaluated, expanded, or collapsed.
Competencies and Metastructures
The components of metastructures—data, information, knowledge, and
wisdom—can be compared to the elements in the competencies ma-
trix. Using a patient care example, the beginning nurse uses skills that
rely on the ability to obtain data. Computer skills, data entry, and the use
of the patient’s electronic medical record are the major focus of their
practice. The experienced nurse builds on this and applies basic com-
puter skills to information.
The INS has expertise in nursing, as well as higher levels of computer
literacy, information literacy, and professional development and leader-
ship. This increased level represents knowledge in nursing informatics. The
INS analyzes systems and processes in order to apply knowledge to
patient care, administration, research, or education. Last, the informatics
innovator has achieved a level of knowledge coupled with experience,
a combination that exemplifies wisdom. Wisdom in informatics may be
the creation of unique methods for system design or evaluation, or the
political finesse to justify purchase of a system.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM37
38 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
(continues)
ycaretiLretupmoC
noitartsinimdA—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × ×
noitacinummoC—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × ×
sseccAataD—sllikSretupmoC × ×
noitatnemucoD—sllikSretupmoC × × × × ×
noitacudE—sllikSretupmoC × × × ×
gnirotinoM—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × ×
erawtfoSpotkseDcisaB—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × × × ×
smetsyS—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × × ×
tnemevorpmIytilauQ—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × ×
hcraeseR—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × ×
tnemeganaMtcejorP—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × ×
noitalumiS—sllikSretupmoC × × × × × × × × × ×
ycaretiLnoitamrofnI
noitaulavE—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × ×
eloR—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × ×
ecnanetniaMmetsyS—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
sisylanA—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
erutcurtSataD/ataD—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
tnempoleveD&ngiseD—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × ×
tnemeganaMlacsiF—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
noitatnemelpmI—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × ×
tnemeganaM—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
gnimmargorP—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × ×
stnemeriuqeR—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
Table 2. Informatics Competencies by NI Functional Areas
Competency Categories Knowledge and Skills Be
gi
nn
in
g
Nu
rs
e
Ex
pe
rie
nc
ed
N
ur
se
In
fo
rm
at
ic
s
Sp
ec
ia
lis
t
In
fo
rm
at
ic
s
In
no
va
to
r
Ad
m
in
is
tr
at
io
n
An
al
ys
is
Co
m
pl
ia
nc
e
&
In
te
gr
ity
M
an
ag
em
en
t
Co
ns
ul
ta
tio
n
Co
or
di
na
tio
n,
F
ac
ili
ta
tio
n,
&
In
te
gr
at
io
n
De
ve
lo
pm
en
t
Ed
uc
at
io
n
&
P
ro
fe
ss
io
na
l D
ev
el
op
m
en
t
Po
lic
y
De
ve
lo
pm
en
t &
A
dv
oc
ac
y
In
te
gr
at
ed
A
re
as
Re
se
ar
ch
&
E
va
lu
at
io
n
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM38
Nursing Informatics.indd 151 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
152 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 39
ycaretiLnoitamrofnI
noitceleSmetsyS—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
gnitseT—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × ×
gniniarT—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × ×
tcapmI—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
ytiruces/ycavirP—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
smetsyS—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × ×
hcraeseR—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
snoitalugeR—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
srotcaFnamuH/ytilibasU—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
noitacudE—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
seiroehT&sledoM—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
,noitacifissalCgnisruN—egdelwonKscitamrofnI
erutalcnemoN&,seimonoxaT
× × × × × × × × × × × ×
elcycefiLmetsyS × × ×
tnemeganaMegnahCnoitazinagrO × × × × × × × × × × × ×
yroehTsmetsyS × × × × × × × × ×
ecneicStnemeganaM × × × × × × ×
ytiruceS&ycavirProfsdradnatS × × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
ecafretnIretupmoCnamuH × × × × × × × × ×
noitcutsnIdetsissAretupmoC ×
sisylanAlacitsitatS × × × × × × ×
yramirpasaygolonhcetnoitamrofnignitpadA
ytefastneitapfosnaem
× × × × × × × × × × × × ×
Competenc y Categories Knowledge and Skills Be
gi
nn
in
g
Nu
rs
e
Ex
pe
rie
nc
ed
N
ur
se
In
fo
rm
at
ic
s
Sp
ec
ia
lis
t
In
fo
rm
at
ic
s
In
no
va
to
r
Ad
m
in
is
tr
at
io
n
An
al
ys
is
Co
m
pl
ia
nc
e
&
In
te
gr
ity
M
an
ag
em
en
t
Co
ns
ul
ta
tio
n
Co
or
di
na
tio
n,
F
ac
ili
ta
tio
n,
&
In
te
gr
at
io
n
De
ve
lo
pm
en
t
Ed
uc
at
io
n
&
P
ro
fe
ss
io
na
l D
ev
el
op
m
en
t
Po
lic
y
De
ve
lo
pm
en
t &
A
dv
oc
ac
y
In
te
gr
at
ed
A
re
as
Re
se
ar
ch
&
E
va
lu
at
io
n
Table 2. Continued
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM39
40 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Work in Progress
Work in NI competencies is evolving. There is no single consolidated list
of competencies across educational levels, or a reference list of compe-
tencies for employers. Perhaps it is premature to cease all innovation, but
the proliferation of lists can be confusing to the uninitiated.
In addition to numerous researchers, academics, and employers, many
professional organizations are actively working toward identifying com-
petencies for nursing informatics, such as:
• The American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA)’s 10×10 pro-
gram (AMIA, 2006b).
• The AMIA Educational Workgroup.
• The HIMSS nursing informatics working group.
• An NLN Task Group on Informatics Competencies and subsequent
initiatives (NLN, 2005a, 2005b).
• Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform ( TIGER, 2006).
NI Competencies: Conclusion
The work on informatics competencies has expanded greatly in the
last five years. After the initial work of Staggers, et al (2001, 2002),
numerous authors and agencies have now developed informatics
competencies. The new competencies matrix ( Table 2) matches com-
petencies with typical NI functional areas. In the future, the rapid pace
of technological change and generation of information and knowl-
edge will present challenges for maintaining current and accurate
competencies for nursing informatics. Faculty must understand
competencies for nursing informatics to make NI an integral part of
curricula and to stimulate research. Besides the educational arena, em-
ployers show a growing interest in competencies. More important,
within the next few years, the multiple lists of NI competencies will
benefit from consensus and consolidation.
References: NI Competencies
Alliance for Nursing Informatics (ANI). (2005). Member organization re-
port. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.allianceni.org/doc/
ANI_MemberOrgReport2005-06.pdf.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM40
Nursing Informatics.indd 152 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 153
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 39
ycaretiLnoitamrofnI
noitceleSmetsyS—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
gnitseT—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × × ×
gniniarT—sllikSscitamrofnI × × × × × × ×
tcapmI—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
ytiruces/ycavirP—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
smetsyS—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × × ×
hcraeseR—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
snoitalugeR—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
srotcaFnamuH/ytilibasU—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
noitacudE—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × ×
seiroehT&sledoM—egdelwonKscitamrofnI × × × × × × × × × × ×
,noitacifissalCgnisruN—egdelwonKscitamrofnI
erutalcnemoN&,seimonoxaT
× × × × × × × × × × × ×
elcycefiLmetsyS × × ×
tnemeganaMegnahCnoitazinagrO × × × × × × × × × × × ×
yroehTsmetsyS × × × × × × × × ×
ecneicStnemeganaM × × × × × × ×
ytiruceS&ycavirProfsdradnatS × × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
ecafretnIretupmoCnamuH × × × × × × × × ×
noitcutsnIdetsissAretupmoC ×
sisylanAlacitsitatS × × × × × × ×
yramirpasaygolonhcetnoitamrofnignitpadA
ytefastneitapfosnaem
× × × × × × × × × × × × ×
Competenc y Categories Knowledge and Skills Be
gi
nn
in
g
Nu
rs
e
Ex
pe
rie
nc
ed
N
ur
se
In
fo
rm
at
ic
s
Sp
ec
ia
lis
t
In
fo
rm
at
ic
s
In
no
va
to
r
Ad
m
in
is
tr
at
io
n
An
al
ys
is
Co
m
pl
ia
nc
e
&
In
te
gr
ity
M
an
ag
em
en
t
Co
ns
ul
ta
tio
n
Co
or
di
na
tio
n,
F
ac
ili
ta
tio
n,
&
In
te
gr
at
io
n
De
ve
lo
pm
en
t
Ed
uc
at
io
n
&
P
ro
fe
ss
io
na
l D
ev
el
op
m
en
t
Po
lic
y
De
ve
lo
pm
en
t &
A
dv
oc
ac
y
In
te
gr
at
ed
A
re
as
Re
se
ar
ch
&
E
va
lu
at
io
n
Table 2. Continued
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM39
40 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Work in Progress
Work in NI competencies is evolving. There is no single consolidated list
of competencies across educational levels, or a reference list of compe-
tencies for employers. Perhaps it is premature to cease all innovation, but
the proliferation of lists can be confusing to the uninitiated.
In addition to numerous researchers, academics, and employers, many
professional organizations are actively working toward identifying com-
petencies for nursing informatics, such as:
• The American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA)’s 10×10 pro-
gram (AMIA, 2006b).
• The AMIA Educational Workgroup.
• The HIMSS nursing informatics working group.
• An NLN Task Group on Informatics Competencies and subsequent
initiatives (NLN, 2005a, 2005b).
• Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform ( TIGER, 2006).
NI Competencies: Conclusion
The work on informatics competencies has expanded greatly in the
last five years. After the initial work of Staggers, et al (2001, 2002),
numerous authors and agencies have now developed informatics
competencies. The new competencies matrix ( Table 2) matches com-
petencies with typical NI functional areas. In the future, the rapid pace
of technological change and generation of information and knowl-
edge will present challenges for maintaining current and accurate
competencies for nursing informatics. Faculty must understand
competencies for nursing informatics to make NI an integral part of
curricula and to stimulate research. Besides the educational arena, em-
ployers show a growing interest in competencies. More important,
within the next few years, the multiple lists of NI competencies will
benefit from consensus and consolidation.
References: NI Competencies
Alliance for Nursing Informatics (ANI). (2005). Member organization re-
port. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.allianceni.org/doc/
ANI_MemberOrgReport2005-06.pdf.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM40
Nursing Informatics.indd 153 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
154 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 41
Androwich, I.M., Bickford, C.J., Button, P.J., Hunter, K.M., Murphy, J., &
Sensmeier, J. (2003). Clinical information systems: A framework for
reaching the vision. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.
American Library Association (ALA). (2006). Information literacy compe-
tency standards for higher education. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilcomstan.html.
American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). (2006b). Oregon
health & science university biomedical informatics distance learning
course. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.amia.org/10×10/
partners/ohsu.
American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC). (2007). Informatics
Nurse Certification. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
www.nursecredentialing.org/ancc/cert/eligibility/informatics.html.
Barton, A.J. (2005). Cultivating informatics competencies in a community
of practice. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 323–328.
Curran, C.R. (2003). Informatics competencies for nurse practitioners.
American Association of Critical Care Nurses Clinical Issues, 14(3), 320–
330.
Desjardins, K.S., Cook, S.S., Jenkins, M., & Bakken, S. (2005). Effect of
an informatics for evidence-based practice curriculum on nursing
informatics competencies. International Journal of Medical Informatics,
74(11–12), 1012–1020.
Garde, S., Harrison, D., & Hovenga, E. (2005). Skill needs for nurses in their
role as health informatics professionals: A survey in the context of
global health informatics education. International Journal of Medical
Informatics, 74(11–12), 899–907.
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS).
(2005). HLA competency directory: ensuring future leaders meet the
challenges of managing the nation’s healthcare organizations.
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.himss.org/asp/
ContentRedirector.asp?ContentId=65250.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM41
42 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Healthcare Leadership Alliance (HLA). (2005). Competency directory.
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.healthcare leadership
alliance.org/directory.htm.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2003). Health professions education: A bridge
to quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Jiang, W., Chen, W., & Chen, Y. (2004). Important computer competencies
for the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing Research, 12(3), 213–225.
Marin, H.F. (2005). Nursing informatics: Current issues around the world.
International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 857–860.
McNeil, B.J., Elfrink, V.L., Pierce, S.T., Beyea, S.C., Bickford, C.J., & Averill, C.
(2005). Nursing informatics knowledge and competencies: A national
survey of nursing education programs in the United States. Interna-
tional Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(11–12), 1021–1030.
McNeil, B.J., & Odom, S.K. (2000). Nursing informatics education in the
United States: Proposed undergraduate curriculum. Health Informatics
Journal, 6, 32–38.
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2005a). Core competencies of nurse
educators with task statements. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http:/
/www.nln.org/profdev/corecompetencies.pdf.
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2005b). Task group on informatics
competencies. Retrieved December 4, 2006 from http://www.nln.org/
aboutnln/AdvisoryCouncils_TaskGroups/informatics.htm
Saranto, K., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (1997). Computer literacy in nursing; devel-
oping the information technology syllabus in nursing education. Jour-
nal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 377–385.
Staggers, N., & Gassert, C. (2000). Competencies for nursing informatics.
In B. Carty (Ed.), Nursing informatics: Education for practice (pp. 17–34).
New York: Springer-Verlag.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM42
Nursing Informatics.indd 154 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 155
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 41
Androwich, I.M., Bickford, C.J., Button, P.J., Hunter, K.M., Murphy, J., &
Sensmeier, J. (2003). Clinical information systems: A framework for
reaching the vision. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.
American Library Association (ALA). (2006). Information literacy compe-
tency standards for higher education. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilcomstan.html.
American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). (2006b). Oregon
health & science university biomedical informatics distance learning
course. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.amia.org/10×10/
partners/ohsu.
American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC). (2007). Informatics
Nurse Certification. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
www.nursecredentialing.org/ancc/cert/eligibility/informatics.html.
Barton, A.J. (2005). Cultivating informatics competencies in a community
of practice. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 323–328.
Curran, C.R. (2003). Informatics competencies for nurse practitioners.
American Association of Critical Care Nurses Clinical Issues, 14(3), 320–
330.
Desjardins, K.S., Cook, S.S., Jenkins, M., & Bakken, S. (2005). Effect of
an informatics for evidence-based practice curriculum on nursing
informatics competencies. International Journal of Medical Informatics,
74(11–12), 1012–1020.
Garde, S., Harrison, D., & Hovenga, E. (2005). Skill needs for nurses in their
role as health informatics professionals: A survey in the context of
global health informatics education. International Journal of Medical
Informatics, 74(11–12), 899–907.
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS).
(2005). HLA competency directory: ensuring future leaders meet the
challenges of managing the nation’s healthcare organizations.
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.himss.org/asp/
ContentRedirector.asp?ContentId=65250.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM41
42 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Healthcare Leadership Alliance (HLA). (2005). Competency directory.
Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.healthcare leadership
alliance.org/directory.htm.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2003). Health professions education: A bridge
to quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Jiang, W., Chen, W., & Chen, Y. (2004). Important computer competencies
for the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing Research, 12(3), 213–225.
Marin, H.F. (2005). Nursing informatics: Current issues around the world.
International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 857–860.
McNeil, B.J., Elfrink, V.L., Pierce, S.T., Beyea, S.C., Bickford, C.J., & Averill, C.
(2005). Nursing informatics knowledge and competencies: A national
survey of nursing education programs in the United States. Interna-
tional Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(11–12), 1021–1030.
McNeil, B.J., & Odom, S.K. (2000). Nursing informatics education in the
United States: Proposed undergraduate curriculum. Health Informatics
Journal, 6, 32–38.
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2005a). Core competencies of nurse
educators with task statements. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http:/
/www.nln.org/profdev/corecompetencies.pdf.
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2005b). Task group on informatics
competencies. Retrieved December 4, 2006 from http://www.nln.org/
aboutnln/AdvisoryCouncils_TaskGroups/informatics.htm
Saranto, K., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (1997). Computer literacy in nursing; devel-
oping the information technology syllabus in nursing education. Jour-
nal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 377–385.
Staggers, N., & Gassert, C. (2000). Competencies for nursing informatics.
In B. Carty (Ed.), Nursing informatics: Education for practice (pp. 17–34).
New York: Springer-Verlag.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM42
Nursing Informatics.indd 155 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
156 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 43
Staggers, N., Gassert, C., & Curran, C. (2001). Informatics competencies for
nurses at four levels of practice. Journal of Nursing Education, 4(7), 303–
316.
Staggers, N., Gassert, C., & Curran, C. (2002). A Delphi study to determine
informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice. Nurs-
ing Research, 51(6), 383–390.
Technology Informatics Guiding Educational Reform ( TIGER).
(2006). TIGER Summit. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
www.tigersummit.com/
The Integration of Nursing Informatics
As the use of technology increasingly becomes integrated into nursing
and every nursing role, the boundaries between the roles of nurses and
informatics nurses are becoming even more blurred. It becomes impor-
tant to identify the commonalities along the practice continuum for
nurses in all levels and specialties, and also the functions that make the
practice of nursing informatics unique among nursing specialties. Infor-
mation is central to healthcare delivery. All nurses must be skilled in
managing and communicating information and are primarily concerned
with the content of that information, but nursing informatics is espe-
cially concerned with the creation, structure, and delivery of that infor-
mation: from the use of technology at the bedside to provide direct care,
to giving the healthcare consumer point-of-need access to healthcare
information, through exploiting the data underlying this information to
create new nursing knowledge. This range in the use of information and
technology can be visualized on a continuum as seen in Figure 4.
Nurses use information and
technology to support a specific
domain of practice.
Informatics nurses support, change,
expand, and transform practice by
the design and implementation of
information technology.
Figure 4. A Continuum of Integrating Information and Technology
into Nursing Practice.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM43
44 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Nursing informatics is also integrated into other healthcare
informatics specialties. The INS is often responsible for implementing
or coordinating projects involving multiple disciplines. The INS is
expected to interact with professionals involved in all phases of the
information systems lifecycle and with professionals in all aspects of
system utilization. NI can be conceptualized either as an integral part
of healthcare informatics or as a specialty within healthcare
informatics. Core concepts are common to multiple informatics disci-
plines. There are also individual concepts and methods that are unique
to one discipline. Two concept diagrams from Englebardt and Nelson
(2002) demonstrate the different views of the role of NI in relation to
other healthcare informatics specialties (see Figure 5).
NI is also integrated into all aspects of the healthcare continuum.
This integration provides access to healthcare information at the
point of need, such as at the bedside in acute healthcare settings,
ambulatory care settings, at home, or even when traveling locally or
globally.
Figure 5. The Healthcare Informatics Specialist: Two Models
Reprinted with permission (Englebardt & Nelson, 2002)
Umbrella Model Overlapping Model
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM44
Nursing Informatics.indd 156 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 157
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 43
Staggers, N., Gassert, C., & Curran, C. (2001). Informatics competencies for
nurses at four levels of practice. Journal of Nursing Education, 4(7), 303–
316.
Staggers, N., Gassert, C., & Curran, C. (2002). A Delphi study to determine
informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice. Nurs-
ing Research, 51(6), 383–390.
Technology Informatics Guiding Educational Reform ( TIGER).
(2006). TIGER Summit. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
www.tigersummit.com/
The Integration of Nursing Informatics
As the use of technology increasingly becomes integrated into nursing
and every nursing role, the boundaries between the roles of nurses and
informatics nurses are becoming even more blurred. It becomes impor-
tant to identify the commonalities along the practice continuum for
nurses in all levels and specialties, and also the functions that make the
practice of nursing informatics unique among nursing specialties. Infor-
mation is central to healthcare delivery. All nurses must be skilled in
managing and communicating information and are primarily concerned
with the content of that information, but nursing informatics is espe-
cially concerned with the creation, structure, and delivery of that infor-
mation: from the use of technology at the bedside to provide direct care,
to giving the healthcare consumer point-of-need access to healthcare
information, through exploiting the data underlying this information to
create new nursing knowledge. This range in the use of information and
technology can be visualized on a continuum as seen in Figure 4.
Nurses use information and
technology to support a specific
domain of practice.
Informatics nurses support, change,
expand, and transform practice by
the design and implementation of
information technology.
Figure 4. A Continuum of Integrating Information and Technology
into Nursing Practice.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM43
44 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Nursing informatics is also integrated into other healthcare
informatics specialties. The INS is often responsible for implementing
or coordinating projects involving multiple disciplines. The INS is
expected to interact with professionals involved in all phases of the
information systems lifecycle and with professionals in all aspects of
system utilization. NI can be conceptualized either as an integral part
of healthcare informatics or as a specialty within healthcare
informatics. Core concepts are common to multiple informatics disci-
plines. There are also individual concepts and methods that are unique
to one discipline. Two concept diagrams from Englebardt and Nelson
(2002) demonstrate the different views of the role of NI in relation to
other healthcare informatics specialties (see Figure 5).
NI is also integrated into all aspects of the healthcare continuum.
This integration provides access to healthcare information at the
point of need, such as at the bedside in acute healthcare settings,
ambulatory care settings, at home, or even when traveling locally or
globally.
Figure 5. The Healthcare Informatics Specialist: Two Models
Reprinted with permission (Englebardt & Nelson, 2002)
Umbrella Model Overlapping Model
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM44
Nursing Informatics.indd 157 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
158 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 45
The Boundaries of Nursing Informatics
This section summarizes the differences between NI and other special-
ties in nursing, and between NI and other informatics specialties. To re-
iterate, NI is a specialty that integrates nursing science, computer
science, and information science to manage and communicate data, in-
formation, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice. Critical thinking
is a requirement of all nursing practice, and NI facilitates this critical
thinking through the integration of data, information, knowledge, and
wisdom to support patients, nurses, and other practitioners in their de-
cision-making in all roles and settings. The difference between NI and
other nursing specialties is the emphasis on informatics concepts, tools,
and methods to facilitate nursing practice.
Although some outside the specialty might consider NI synonymous
with information technology, technology alone does not define NI. The
synthesis of data and information into knowledge and wisdom is central
to NI, and information technology merely supports this process. INSs
have adopted the anticipatory proactive stance characterized by
Hannah, Ball, and Edwards (1994), and continuously strive to exploit
technology in the design, structure, and presentation of information.
They also consider the impact on healthcare delivery in general, and the
nursing process specifically. Figure 6 illustrates the connection between
the different foci of nursing and NI. These occur along a continuum with-
out distinct boundaries.
tnemnorivne,htlaeh,stneitap,sesruN ,stneipicernoitamrofni,resunoitamrofnI
egnahcxenoitamrofni
-ecnediveroftroppus,noitamrofnifotnetnoC
segnahcecitcarpdesab
saatadfonoitatneserperdna,erutcurts,ngiseD
noitamrofni
ygolonhcetdnasnoitacilppanoitamrofnignisU snoitacilppaetaulavedna,tnemelpmi,poleveD
,ytilauqehtgnirusne,ygolonhcetdna
foytilibasudna,ycneiciffe,ssenevitceffe
ygolonhcetdnasnoitacilppa
Figure 6. Nursing and Nursing Informatics Foci
Nursing Focus Nursing Informatics Focus
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM45
46 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
NI is also differentiated from other informatics specialties. Each
informatics specialty is aligned uniquely with its primary role, requiring
that INSs augment their base of nursing knowledge with unique
informatics skills. Nursing informatics is recognized both as a compo-
nent of the broad field of healthcare informatics and as a specialty
within nursing (Brennan, 2002). This results in a unique body of knowl-
edge and demonstrates the need for advanced preparation unique to
nursing. NI incorporates informatics concepts used by others, but applies
them to a foundation of nursing. What differentiates an INS or an IN from
other informatics specialists is the knowledge of nursing content and pro-
cess. The synthesis of informatics and nursing results in an integrated
whole that is greater than its parts. Thus, an understanding of how
informatics can support patient care in the context of the nursing process
is fundamental to NI. Core components of informatics knowledge and
skills underpin all informatics specialties, such as the use of technology,
computer literacy, and data management structures. There are also com-
ponents unique to each discipline such as their taxonomy.
Tenets of Nursing Informatics
• Nursing informatics contains a unique body of knowledge, prepara-
tion, and experience, and uses identifiable techniques and methods.
• Nursing informatics supports the clinical and non-clinical efforts of
nurses and other providers to improve the quality of care and the
welfare of healthcare consumers. Information or informatics meth-
ods alone do not improve patient care; rather, this information is
used by clinicians and managers to improve care, information man-
agement, and patient outcomes.
• Nursing informatics collaborates with and is closely linked to other
health-related informatics specialties.
• Although concerned with information technology, nursing infor-
matics focuses on efficient and effective delivery of complete and
accurate information in order to achieve quality outcomes.
• Human factors, human–computer interaction, ergonomics, and
usability concepts are interwoven throughout the practice of NI.
• Nursing informatics promotes established, emerging, and innova-
tive information technologies.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM46
Nursing Informatics.indd 158 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 159
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 45
The Boundaries of Nursing Informatics
This section summarizes the differences between NI and other special-
ties in nursing, and between NI and other informatics specialties. To re-
iterate, NI is a specialty that integrates nursing science, computer
science, and information science to manage and communicate data, in-
formation, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice. Critical thinking
is a requirement of all nursing practice, and NI facilitates this critical
thinking through the integration of data, information, knowledge, and
wisdom to support patients, nurses, and other practitioners in their de-
cision-making in all roles and settings. The difference between NI and
other nursing specialties is the emphasis on informatics concepts, tools,
and methods to facilitate nursing practice.
Although some outside the specialty might consider NI synonymous
with information technology, technology alone does not define NI. The
synthesis of data and information into knowledge and wisdom is central
to NI, and information technology merely supports this process. INSs
have adopted the anticipatory proactive stance characterized by
Hannah, Ball, and Edwards (1994), and continuously strive to exploit
technology in the design, structure, and presentation of information.
They also consider the impact on healthcare delivery in general, and the
nursing process specifically. Figure 6 illustrates the connection between
the different foci of nursing and NI. These occur along a continuum with-
out distinct boundaries.
tnemnorivne,htlaeh,stneitap,sesruN ,stneipicernoitamrofni,resunoitamrofnI
egnahcxenoitamrofni
-ecnediveroftroppus,noitamrofnifotnetnoC
segnahcecitcarpdesab
saatadfonoitatneserperdna,erutcurts,ngiseD
noitamrofni
ygolonhcetdnasnoitacilppanoitamrofnignisU snoitacilppaetaulavedna,tnemelpmi,poleveD
,ytilauqehtgnirusne,ygolonhcetdna
foytilibasudna,ycneiciffe,ssenevitceffe
ygolonhcetdnasnoitacilppa
Figure 6. Nursing and Nursing Informatics Foci
Nursing Focus Nursing Informatics Focus
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM45
46 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
NI is also differentiated from other informatics specialties. Each
informatics specialty is aligned uniquely with its primary role, requiring
that INSs augment their base of nursing knowledge with unique
informatics skills. Nursing informatics is recognized both as a compo-
nent of the broad field of healthcare informatics and as a specialty
within nursing (Brennan, 2002). This results in a unique body of knowl-
edge and demonstrates the need for advanced preparation unique to
nursing. NI incorporates informatics concepts used by others, but applies
them to a foundation of nursing. What differentiates an INS or an IN from
other informatics specialists is the knowledge of nursing content and pro-
cess. The synthesis of informatics and nursing results in an integrated
whole that is greater than its parts. Thus, an understanding of how
informatics can support patient care in the context of the nursing process
is fundamental to NI. Core components of informatics knowledge and
skills underpin all informatics specialties, such as the use of technology,
computer literacy, and data management structures. There are also com-
ponents unique to each discipline such as their taxonomy.
Tenets of Nursing Informatics
• Nursing informatics contains a unique body of knowledge, prepara-
tion, and experience, and uses identifiable techniques and methods.
• Nursing informatics supports the clinical and non-clinical efforts of
nurses and other providers to improve the quality of care and the
welfare of healthcare consumers. Information or informatics meth-
ods alone do not improve patient care; rather, this information is
used by clinicians and managers to improve care, information man-
agement, and patient outcomes.
• Nursing informatics collaborates with and is closely linked to other
health-related informatics specialties.
• Although concerned with information technology, nursing infor-
matics focuses on efficient and effective delivery of complete and
accurate information in order to achieve quality outcomes.
• Human factors, human–computer interaction, ergonomics, and
usability concepts are interwoven throughout the practice of NI.
• Nursing informatics promotes established, emerging, and innova-
tive information technologies.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM46
Nursing Informatics.indd 159 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
160 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 47
• The key ethical concerns of nursing informatics include advocat-
ing privacy and ensuring the confidentiality and security of health-
care data and information.
Ethics in Nursing Informatics
Nursing has a long history of applying ethical principles to nursing prac-
tice, with a primary concern for the patient and a commitment to the pro-
fessional code of ethics for nurses. Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive
Statements (ANA, 2001) serves as a guide for the informatics nurse facing
ethical issues, dilemmas, and decisions. The ANA policy on privacy and
confidentiality (ANA, 2006b) addresses HIPAA legislation and the ethics
of protecting information in a changing healthcare environment. Addi-
tionally, with the increase in electronic health records (EHRs) across mul-
tiple systems, decisions related to the use of information in the EHR must
strike a balance between “ethically justified ends and otherwise appropri-
ate means” (IMIA, 2006). The primacy of concern for patients and the com-
mitment to this code of nursing ethics form a foundation for considering
ethical issues in nursing, including nursing informatics. However, the prac-
tice of nursing informatics, a highly specialized and non-traditional nurs-
ing practice, also needs its own specialty-specific ethical guidelines.
Ethical questions often arise when common corporate business prac-
tices conflict with the ethical mandates of healthcare professionals. The
INS brings an integrated, systems perspective to discussions of ethical
issues, such as:
• Is a code of ethics integrated into the expanding distributed envi-
ronment of electronic health information and healthcare service
delivery?
• Is the individual responding to a healthcare related e-mail or web
site inquiry appropriately licensed and qualified?
• In healthcare-related electronic communication, are appropriate
safeguards in place to protect the sender’s identity and privacy, the
content and integrity of messages, and the respondent’s identity?
The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) has pub-
lished a detailed code of ethics for health information professionals. The
IMIA code is meant to guide decision-making for “gathering, processing,
storing, communicating, using, manipulating, and accessing health
information” (IMIA, 2006). It offers ethical guidance uniquely applicable
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM47
48 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
to nursing informatics. Among its general principles, two are of special
interest to nursing informatics: information privacy and disposition, and
legitimate infringement. The principle of information privacy and dispo-
sition states that all persons have a fundamental right to privacy, and
hence control over the collection, storage, access, use, communication,
manipulation, and disposition of data about themselves. However, the
principle of legitimate infringement states that this fundamental right
is tempered by the legitimate, appropriate, and relevant data needs of
a free, responsible, and democratic society, and by the equal and com-
peting rights of other persons.
Furthermore, INSs should understand and apply the basic principles
of autonomy, beneficence, non-malfeasance, and justice as they relate
to the practice of informatics (ANA, 2001). The INS encounters questions
of biomedical ethics throughout systems development, implementation,
and administration. For example, informatics professionals including
nurse specialists must determine whether patients see all of their lab
results online, perhaps before a clinician has seen them. This decision
may be less a technical question than an ethical one concerning the
principle of patient autonomy. Security standards respond to the prin-
ciples of autonomy and non-malfeasance. In the United States, decisions
concerning the appropriate access and use of data may be guided by
both HIPAA rules and the ethical principle of justice.
The general principles described by the IMIA and ANA codes provide
a solid ethical foundation for INSs. The INS has a responsibility to advo-
cate for data confidentiality, integrity, and security, quality management
of information, and legitimate data use. These needs must be balanced
with users’ timely access to accurate data for decision-making in all set-
tings. The role of ethics in informatics practice is expanding, and INSs are
in a unique position to make or share in decisions of informatics policy
and operations. INSs can reconcile organizational risk with users’ needs
for timely data access. They can serve as the voice of wisdom—as trans-
lators and advocates for users who also understand the relevant ethical,
political, and technological considerations.
New computing approaches such as knowledge discovery, clinical
data repositories (CDR), and data warehouses have already created new
opportunities for the INS to apply ethical principles. Vast electronic
stores of digitized personal data already exist. Contemporary organiza-
tions are grappling with complex issues like regulation of data access
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM48
Nursing Informatics.indd 160 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 161
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 47
• The key ethical concerns of nursing informatics include advocat-
ing privacy and ensuring the confidentiality and security of health-
care data and information.
Ethics in Nursing Informatics
Nursing has a long history of applying ethical principles to nursing prac-
tice, with a primary concern for the patient and a commitment to the pro-
fessional code of ethics for nurses. Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive
Statements (ANA, 2001) serves as a guide for the informatics nurse facing
ethical issues, dilemmas, and decisions. The ANA policy on privacy and
confidentiality (ANA, 2006b) addresses HIPAA legislation and the ethics
of protecting information in a changing healthcare environment. Addi-
tionally, with the increase in electronic health records (EHRs) across mul-
tiple systems, decisions related to the use of information in the EHR must
strike a balance between “ethically justified ends and otherwise appropri-
ate means” (IMIA, 2006). The primacy of concern for patients and the com-
mitment to this code of nursing ethics form a foundation for considering
ethical issues in nursing, including nursing informatics. However, the prac-
tice of nursing informatics, a highly specialized and non-traditional nurs-
ing practice, also needs its own specialty-specific ethical guidelines.
Ethical questions often arise when common corporate business prac-
tices conflict with the ethical mandates of healthcare professionals. The
INS brings an integrated, systems perspective to discussions of ethical
issues, such as:
• Is a code of ethics integrated into the expanding distributed envi-
ronment of electronic health information and healthcare service
delivery?
• Is the individual responding to a healthcare related e-mail or web
site inquiry appropriately licensed and qualified?
• In healthcare-related electronic communication, are appropriate
safeguards in place to protect the sender’s identity and privacy, the
content and integrity of messages, and the respondent’s identity?
The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) has pub-
lished a detailed code of ethics for health information professionals. The
IMIA code is meant to guide decision-making for “gathering, processing,
storing, communicating, using, manipulating, and accessing health
information” (IMIA, 2006). It offers ethical guidance uniquely applicable
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM47
48 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
to nursing informatics. Among its general principles, two are of special
interest to nursing informatics: information privacy and disposition, and
legitimate infringement. The principle of information privacy and dispo-
sition states that all persons have a fundamental right to privacy, and
hence control over the collection, storage, access, use, communication,
manipulation, and disposition of data about themselves. However, the
principle of legitimate infringement states that this fundamental right
is tempered by the legitimate, appropriate, and relevant data needs of
a free, responsible, and democratic society, and by the equal and com-
peting rights of other persons.
Furthermore, INSs should understand and apply the basic principles
of autonomy, beneficence, non-malfeasance, and justice as they relate
to the practice of informatics (ANA, 2001). The INS encounters questions
of biomedical ethics throughout systems development, implementation,
and administration. For example, informatics professionals including
nurse specialists must determine whether patients see all of their lab
results online, perhaps before a clinician has seen them. This decision
may be less a technical question than an ethical one concerning the
principle of patient autonomy. Security standards respond to the prin-
ciples of autonomy and non-malfeasance. In the United States, decisions
concerning the appropriate access and use of data may be guided by
both HIPAA rules and the ethical principle of justice.
The general principles described by the IMIA and ANA codes provide
a solid ethical foundation for INSs. The INS has a responsibility to advo-
cate for data confidentiality, integrity, and security, quality management
of information, and legitimate data use. These needs must be balanced
with users’ timely access to accurate data for decision-making in all set-
tings. The role of ethics in informatics practice is expanding, and INSs are
in a unique position to make or share in decisions of informatics policy
and operations. INSs can reconcile organizational risk with users’ needs
for timely data access. They can serve as the voice of wisdom—as trans-
lators and advocates for users who also understand the relevant ethical,
political, and technological considerations.
New computing approaches such as knowledge discovery, clinical
data repositories (CDR), and data warehouses have already created new
opportunities for the INS to apply ethical principles. Vast electronic
stores of digitized personal data already exist. Contemporary organiza-
tions are grappling with complex issues like regulation of data access
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM48
Nursing Informatics.indd 161 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
162 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 49
such that only appropriate data is visible only to appropriate users. As
technologies evolve and data stores increase, the ethics of data use and
protection will become increasingly intricate, requiring continual evalu-
ation and monitoring. Informatics professionals must consider the fol-
lowing ethical responsibilities (IMIA, 2006):
• To ensure personal competence, integrity, diligence, and responsi-
bility for all actions performed.
• To ensure that an electronic record, or the data contained in it, are
used only for the stated purposes for which the data was collected
or for purposes that are otherwise ethically defensible.
• To ensure that appropriate structures are in place to evaluate the
technical, legal, and ethical acceptability of the data collection, stor-
age, retrieval, processing, accessing, communication, and utilization
of data in the settings in which they carry out their work.
• To ensure that healthcare professionals are informed about the sta-
tus of the information services upon which users rely and must im-
mediately advise users of any problems or difficulties that might
be associated with or could reasonably be expected to arise in con-
nection with these informatics services (IMIA 2006, p 6). (For ex-
ample, processes such as phone trees for notification of system
difficulties need to be addressed in both the planning and imple-
mentation of those services. )
In conclusion, the INS has the opportunity and responsibility to face
the ethical ramifications of design, implementation, and utilization of
healthcare information systems and data obtained through reporting
mechanisms. The INS is challenged to balance the improvement of
health care with individual privacy, security, and safety. Balancing the
autonomy of patients and their health information against the just use
of health information to benefit others requires thoughtful consider-
ation across multiple levels. Given the complexity and challenge of
making ethical decisions related to healthcare information systems, the
INS must contribute to and act in accordance with a general under-
standing of the applicable ethical principles.
The Future of Nursing Informatics
Our discipline is rapidly changing: it will change even while this docu-
ment is being printed. Three trends will likely influence the direction of
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM49
50 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
this change: positions and competencies for nurses and informatics,
technological aspects of the field, and changes in healthcare delivery
and regulatory requirements.
Trends in Positions and Competencies for Nurses and Informatics
The boundaries between INSs, other nurses, and associated health
informatics disciplines are blurring. As information and technology are
further integrated into the workplace, nurses in all settings will gain
informatics knowledge and skills. The number and complexity of
informatics competencies for nurses will continue to escalate. Some
informatics competencies ascribed to informatics specialists will likely
transfer to mainstream nurses, and the level of competencies required
for INSs will continue to expand. Thus, the baseline set of NI competen-
cies required of nurses at all levels will rise.
In the last few years, new areas of nursing have been incorporated
into nursing informatics. For example, nurses who heavily use informa-
tion and technology, such as telehealth nurses, may be considered one
type of IN. As others in nursing design, implement, and evaluate
informatics solutions, the scope of nursing informatics will expand still
more. Nursing informatics is becoming a world community with fewer
distinctions and more commonalities among INSs everywhere.
The role boundaries between other health informatics roles and NI are
less conspicuous than in the past. One of the centerpieces of NI practice
is its cross-disciplinary nature, with INSs often leading cross-disciplinary
projects to craft usable informatics solutions for use by many disciplines.
INSs have assumed executive positions in the health informatics arena.
INSs and their health informatics colleagues serve in many of the same
positions, blurring boundaries while using a shared set of functions,
skills, and knowledge. This trend will likely continue as professional
informatics organizations define a shared set of core knowledge and
skills required by all informatics specialties. Probably the clearest trend
is evolving change in the functional areas for INSs, a continual move
from a generic set of skills for any one discipline toward a shared set of
competencies based on functional areas required to enact a particular
position (i.e., clinical analyst, informatics executive, futurist, KDD re-
searcher, or database developer).
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM50
Nursing Informatics.indd 162 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 163
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 49
such that only appropriate data is visible only to appropriate users. As
technologies evolve and data stores increase, the ethics of data use and
protection will become increasingly intricate, requiring continual evalu-
ation and monitoring. Informatics professionals must consider the fol-
lowing ethical responsibilities (IMIA, 2006):
• To ensure personal competence, integrity, diligence, and responsi-
bility for all actions performed.
• To ensure that an electronic record, or the data contained in it, are
used only for the stated purposes for which the data was collected
or for purposes that are otherwise ethically defensible.
• To ensure that appropriate structures are in place to evaluate the
technical, legal, and ethical acceptability of the data collection, stor-
age, retrieval, processing, accessing, communication, and utilization
of data in the settings in which they carry out their work.
• To ensure that healthcare professionals are informed about the sta-
tus of the information services upon which users rely and must im-
mediately advise users of any problems or difficulties that might
be associated with or could reasonably be expected to arise in con-
nection with these informatics services (IMIA 2006, p 6). (For ex-
ample, processes such as phone trees for notification of system
difficulties need to be addressed in both the planning and imple-
mentation of those services. )
In conclusion, the INS has the opportunity and responsibility to face
the ethical ramifications of design, implementation, and utilization of
healthcare information systems and data obtained through reporting
mechanisms. The INS is challenged to balance the improvement of
health care with individual privacy, security, and safety. Balancing the
autonomy of patients and their health information against the just use
of health information to benefit others requires thoughtful consider-
ation across multiple levels. Given the complexity and challenge of
making ethical decisions related to healthcare information systems, the
INS must contribute to and act in accordance with a general under-
standing of the applicable ethical principles.
The Future of Nursing Informatics
Our discipline is rapidly changing: it will change even while this docu-
ment is being printed. Three trends will likely influence the direction of
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM49
50 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
this change: positions and competencies for nurses and informatics,
technological aspects of the field, and changes in healthcare delivery
and regulatory requirements.
Trends in Positions and Competencies for Nurses and Informatics
The boundaries between INSs, other nurses, and associated health
informatics disciplines are blurring. As information and technology are
further integrated into the workplace, nurses in all settings will gain
informatics knowledge and skills. The number and complexity of
informatics competencies for nurses will continue to escalate. Some
informatics competencies ascribed to informatics specialists will likely
transfer to mainstream nurses, and the level of competencies required
for INSs will continue to expand. Thus, the baseline set of NI competen-
cies required of nurses at all levels will rise.
In the last few years, new areas of nursing have been incorporated
into nursing informatics. For example, nurses who heavily use informa-
tion and technology, such as telehealth nurses, may be considered one
type of IN. As others in nursing design, implement, and evaluate
informatics solutions, the scope of nursing informatics will expand still
more. Nursing informatics is becoming a world community with fewer
distinctions and more commonalities among INSs everywhere.
The role boundaries between other health informatics roles and NI are
less conspicuous than in the past. One of the centerpieces of NI practice
is its cross-disciplinary nature, with INSs often leading cross-disciplinary
projects to craft usable informatics solutions for use by many disciplines.
INSs have assumed executive positions in the health informatics arena.
INSs and their health informatics colleagues serve in many of the same
positions, blurring boundaries while using a shared set of functions,
skills, and knowledge. This trend will likely continue as professional
informatics organizations define a shared set of core knowledge and
skills required by all informatics specialties. Probably the clearest trend
is evolving change in the functional areas for INSs, a continual move
from a generic set of skills for any one discipline toward a shared set of
competencies based on functional areas required to enact a particular
position (i.e., clinical analyst, informatics executive, futurist, KDD re-
searcher, or database developer).
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM50
Nursing Informatics.indd 163 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
164 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 51
Trends in Technology
Information technology is becoming commonplace in our daily lives as
well as in health care. For the first time in history, a generation exists
never having known a world without the Internet, cell phones, online
social networks, blogs, and other electronic media. People raised on this
technology will be entering the healthcare field as knowledge workers
as well as consumers of healthcare delivery. Implications for NI are:
• New models of work and education for technologically sophisticated
users who are less resistant to technology and in fact demand it.
• Adapting to users with less skill in face-to-face communications.
• Consumers with even greater expectations of accelerated informa-
tion and technology implementation.
Several advances in technology will likely impact nursing informatics
in the future. A number of these are outlined in the following sections.
Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology—microscopic technology on the order of one-
billionth of a meter—will likely impact the diagnosis and treatment of
many diseases and conditions (Gordon, Lutz, Boninger & Cooper, 2007).
Some of the pending technologies that will affect INSs, clinicians, and
patients may include:
• New methods for medication administration
• Sensing patient’s internal drug levels with miniature medical
diagnostic tools circulating in patients’ bloodstreams.
• Chemotherapy delivered directly to a tumor site, reducing
systemic side-effects.
• New monitoring devices for the home:
• A talking pill bottle that lets patients push a button to hear pre-
scription information.
• Bathroom counters that announce whether it is safe to mix two
medications.
• A shower with built-in scales to calculate body mass index (Hong
Kong Polytechnic University).
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM51
52 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Measuring devices in the bathroom to track urine frequency and
output and upload these data to a system or care manager.
• Non-invasive blood glucose monitors to eliminate sticks; sensors
to compute blood. sugar levels using a multi-wavelength reflec-
tive dispersion photometer (Hong Kong Polytechnic University).
Tools for managing public health concerns
The threat of terrorism and bioterrorism, and the need for improved dis-
ease management across traditional boundaries, drive the demand for
new tools and solutions that will concern the INS. Partnership with pub-
lic health professionals and the emergence of public health informatics
is a response to the need for population management tools and early
disease detection.
Devices and hardware
The increased miniaturization of devices will change where and how IT
solutions will be deployed. No perfect hardware solution exists in the
market today to address all diverse nursing workflows and mobile
caregiver demands. An emphasis on ergonomics and human-computer
interaction will lead to new solutions to support diverse workflow
requirements.
New integrated technologies—cell phones, smart phones, PDA’s, and
multi-functional devices—will increase common access to health infor-
mation. These solutions are becoming ubiquitous in daily life. They will
change clinicians’ and patients’ expectations and their interactions with
technology. In particular, providers will be challenged to know as much
about new disease treatments and research findings as patients with
these devices are.
Wearable computing
Wearable computing is a revolutionary paradigm that shatters myths
about what computers are and how they should be used. A computer
can be worn, much as eyeglasses or clothing are worn, and interactions
with the user based on the context of the situation. With heads-up dis-
plays, embedded sensors in fabrics, unobtrusive input devices, personal
wireless local area networks, and a host of other context sensing and
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM52
Nursing Informatics.indd 164 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 165
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 51
Trends in Technology
Information technology is becoming commonplace in our daily lives as
well as in health care. For the first time in history, a generation exists
never having known a world without the Internet, cell phones, online
social networks, blogs, and other electronic media. People raised on this
technology will be entering the healthcare field as knowledge workers
as well as consumers of healthcare delivery. Implications for NI are:
• New models of work and education for technologically sophisticated
users who are less resistant to technology and in fact demand it.
• Adapting to users with less skill in face-to-face communications.
• Consumers with even greater expectations of accelerated informa-
tion and technology implementation.
Several advances in technology will likely impact nursing informatics
in the future. A number of these are outlined in the following sections.
Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology—microscopic technology on the order of one-
billionth of a meter—will likely impact the diagnosis and treatment of
many diseases and conditions (Gordon, Lutz, Boninger & Cooper, 2007).
Some of the pending technologies that will affect INSs, clinicians, and
patients may include:
• New methods for medication administration
• Sensing patient’s internal drug levels with miniature medical
diagnostic tools circulating in patients’ bloodstreams.
• Chemotherapy delivered directly to a tumor site, reducing
systemic side-effects.
• New monitoring devices for the home:
• A talking pill bottle that lets patients push a button to hear pre-
scription information.
• Bathroom counters that announce whether it is safe to mix two
medications.
• A shower with built-in scales to calculate body mass index (Hong
Kong Polytechnic University).
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM51
52 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Measuring devices in the bathroom to track urine frequency and
output and upload these data to a system or care manager.
• Non-invasive blood glucose monitors to eliminate sticks; sensors
to compute blood. sugar levels using a multi-wavelength reflec-
tive dispersion photometer (Hong Kong Polytechnic University).
Tools for managing public health concerns
The threat of terrorism and bioterrorism, and the need for improved dis-
ease management across traditional boundaries, drive the demand for
new tools and solutions that will concern the INS. Partnership with pub-
lic health professionals and the emergence of public health informatics
is a response to the need for population management tools and early
disease detection.
Devices and hardware
The increased miniaturization of devices will change where and how IT
solutions will be deployed. No perfect hardware solution exists in the
market today to address all diverse nursing workflows and mobile
caregiver demands. An emphasis on ergonomics and human-computer
interaction will lead to new solutions to support diverse workflow
requirements.
New integrated technologies—cell phones, smart phones, PDA’s, and
multi-functional devices—will increase common access to health infor-
mation. These solutions are becoming ubiquitous in daily life. They will
change clinicians’ and patients’ expectations and their interactions with
technology. In particular, providers will be challenged to know as much
about new disease treatments and research findings as patients with
these devices are.
Wearable computing
Wearable computing is a revolutionary paradigm that shatters myths
about what computers are and how they should be used. A computer
can be worn, much as eyeglasses or clothing are worn, and interactions
with the user based on the context of the situation. With heads-up dis-
plays, embedded sensors in fabrics, unobtrusive input devices, personal
wireless local area networks, and a host of other context sensing and
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM52
Nursing Informatics.indd 165 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
166 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 53
communication tools, wearable computers can act as intelligent assis-
tants or data collection and analysis devices.
Many of these devices are available now. Smart fabrics with embed-
ded sensors have been on the commercial market since 2000 and are
being used in shirts, gloves, and other clothing. These wearable com-
puter and remote monitoring systems are intertwined with the user’s
activity so that the technology becomes transparent. Sensors and
devices can gather data during the patient’s daily routine, providing
healthcare providers or researchers periodic or continuous data on the
subject’s health at work, school, exercise, and sleep, rather than the cur-
rent snapshot captured during a typical hospital or clinic visit. A few
applications for wearable computing include (OSNF, 2007):
• Sudden Infant Death Syndrome monitoring for infants
• Ambulatory cardiac and respiratory monitoring
• Monitoring of ventilation during exercise
• Monitoring rescue worker’s vital signs
• Activity level of post-stroke patients
• Patterns of breathing in asthma
• Assessment of stress in individuals
• Arrhythmia detection and control of selected cardiac conditions
• Daily activity monitors
• Monitoring heat stress and dehydration
Wearable computing is applicable to workers as well as consumers or
patients:
• Proximity badges and RFID (radio frequency identification) to track
providers for workflow or allow log on to systems.
• Glasses with a heads-up display of vital signs or images without
losing focus on the patient (MIT Media Lab, 2007).
• Bar code scanners that fit on a finger, or wrist-activated input devices.
Future developments for input methods may also apply to the health-
care market. For example, an “interface-free,” touch-driven computer
screen, manipulated intuitively with the fingertips, responds to varying
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM53
54 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
levels of pressure. Another example is virtual keyboards using Bluetooth
technology, in which a keyboard can be displayed and used on any
surface (ThinkGeek, 2007).
Robotics
The use of robotics in patient care will expand. Robots have been used
for many years to deliver supplies to patient care areas. Robotics enable
remote surgeries and virtual reality surgical procedures. At Johns
Hopkins, robots are being used as translators for patients (Greenback,
2007). Hand-assist devices help patients regain strength after a stroke
(Science Daily, 2007). Robots are providing a remote presence to allow
physicians to virtually examine patients by manipulating remote
cameras (Cisco Systems, 2007). In the future, robots may also be used in
direct patient care, for instance, to help lift morbidly obese patients.
Knowledge representation
As more and more electronic data become available for and about pa-
tients over their lifetime, clinicians will need advanced tools to help lo-
cate and synthesize this vast volume of data. New research will yield
advances in displaying vast amounts of data to clinicians to optimize
patient care and patient and clinician efficiencies while avoiding medi-
cal errors. NI may need more nurses trained in knowledge representa-
tion, semantic representation, and other knowledge areas. This also has
implications for knowledge discovery in databases, data quality, and a
continued emphasis on data standards and data quality
Nurses constantly make complex and diverse decisions in their daily
practice. Decision-making must consider relevant evidence-based and
patient-specific information. As nurse decision-making becomes more
complex, the need for computerized clinical decision support will in-
crease. In the absence of explicit evidence-based guidelines for nursing
decisions, novel technologies will be necessary to synthesize evidence
from the literature or induce models from clinical data. Knowledge dis-
covery in databases could play an important role in the induction of
clinical knowledge models.
Genomics
Advances in mapping the human genome and understanding indi-
vidual DNA will have a dramatic impact on what we know about pa-
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM54
Nursing Informatics.indd 166 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 167
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 53
communication tools, wearable computers can act as intelligent assis-
tants or data collection and analysis devices.
Many of these devices are available now. Smart fabrics with embed-
ded sensors have been on the commercial market since 2000 and are
being used in shirts, gloves, and other clothing. These wearable com-
puter and remote monitoring systems are intertwined with the user’s
activity so that the technology becomes transparent. Sensors and
devices can gather data during the patient’s daily routine, providing
healthcare providers or researchers periodic or continuous data on the
subject’s health at work, school, exercise, and sleep, rather than the cur-
rent snapshot captured during a typical hospital or clinic visit. A few
applications for wearable computing include (OSNF, 2007):
• Sudden Infant Death Syndrome monitoring for infants
• Ambulatory cardiac and respiratory monitoring
• Monitoring of ventilation during exercise
• Monitoring rescue worker’s vital signs
• Activity level of post-stroke patients
• Patterns of breathing in asthma
• Assessment of stress in individuals
• Arrhythmia detection and control of selected cardiac conditions
• Daily activity monitors
• Monitoring heat stress and dehydration
Wearable computing is applicable to workers as well as consumers or
patients:
• Proximity badges and RFID (radio frequency identification) to track
providers for workflow or allow log on to systems.
• Glasses with a heads-up display of vital signs or images without
losing focus on the patient (MIT Media Lab, 2007).
• Bar code scanners that fit on a finger, or wrist-activated input devices.
Future developments for input methods may also apply to the health-
care market. For example, an “interface-free,” touch-driven computer
screen, manipulated intuitively with the fingertips, responds to varying
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM53
54 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
levels of pressure. Another example is virtual keyboards using Bluetooth
technology, in which a keyboard can be displayed and used on any
surface (ThinkGeek, 2007).
Robotics
The use of robotics in patient care will expand. Robots have been used
for many years to deliver supplies to patient care areas. Robotics enable
remote surgeries and virtual reality surgical procedures. At Johns
Hopkins, robots are being used as translators for patients (Greenback,
2007). Hand-assist devices help patients regain strength after a stroke
(Science Daily, 2007). Robots are providing a remote presence to allow
physicians to virtually examine patients by manipulating remote
cameras (Cisco Systems, 2007). In the future, robots may also be used in
direct patient care, for instance, to help lift morbidly obese patients.
Knowledge representation
As more and more electronic data become available for and about pa-
tients over their lifetime, clinicians will need advanced tools to help lo-
cate and synthesize this vast volume of data. New research will yield
advances in displaying vast amounts of data to clinicians to optimize
patient care and patient and clinician efficiencies while avoiding medi-
cal errors. NI may need more nurses trained in knowledge representa-
tion, semantic representation, and other knowledge areas. This also has
implications for knowledge discovery in databases, data quality, and a
continued emphasis on data standards and data quality
Nurses constantly make complex and diverse decisions in their daily
practice. Decision-making must consider relevant evidence-based and
patient-specific information. As nurse decision-making becomes more
complex, the need for computerized clinical decision support will in-
crease. In the absence of explicit evidence-based guidelines for nursing
decisions, novel technologies will be necessary to synthesize evidence
from the literature or induce models from clinical data. Knowledge dis-
covery in databases could play an important role in the induction of
clinical knowledge models.
Genomics
Advances in mapping the human genome and understanding indi-
vidual DNA will have a dramatic impact on what we know about pa-
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM54
Nursing Informatics.indd 167 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
168 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 55
tients. These data, especially once they are integrated into EHRs or per-
sonal health records (PHRs), will lead to advances in customized patient
care and customized medications targeted to individual responses to
medications. Care and medication can be precisely customized to pa-
tients based on their unique DNA profile and how they have responded
to medications and other interventions in the past. This will dramatically
change how patients are managed for specific diseases and conditions,
and extend into the prevention of some diseases.
The inherent complexity of customized patient care will demand
computerized clinical decision support. Predictive disease models based
on patients’ DNA profiles will emerge as clinicians better understand
DNA mapping. These advances have implications for a new model of
care and for the INS’s participation in the development of genomic IT
solutions. More than ever, patients will need to be partners in this de-
velopment. Genomics will lead to many specialized advances in care
delivery and be linked to exact, individualized data within a personal
health record (PHR). Subsequently, advanced disease management with
the ultimate goal of disease prevention will be possible. This change has
many implications for ethics as well as informatics. In fact, genomics
competencies and curricular guidelines are available online (ANA, 2007)..
Educational technologies
Evolving teaching technologies are changing the education techniques
used in the classroom, the lab, and the clinical setting. For example, pa-
tient care simulators allow students to run programmed care scenarios
in a safe environment and provide innovative options for teaching
critical thinking skills. Group learning tools such as clickers, used in inter-
active teaching, can change how students engage with class content as
well as how they learn to function as members of a team (Michaelsen,
Fink, & Knight, 2007). Distance education technologies such as web-
based course management systems and the related student support
services are challenging basic education concepts such as what aca-
demic resources must be included in a library collection or how a uni-
versity defines a credit hour of education. Administrative information
systems are automating basic university functions like admissions, reg-
istration, student record management, grant management, and finan-
cial aid, for example (Nelson et al., 2006). This automation is forcing
institutions to review and in many cases to revise their educational
policies and procedures. These technologies require a paradigm shift in
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM55
56 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
knowledge delivery, which affects students, instructors, and course
content.
In these modern educational settings, faculty, with little more than
office applications for support, continue to manage large amounts of
data about individual students, curricula, and accreditation. Comprehen-
sive, enterprise-wide educational information systems that integrate
administrative and academic functions are just beginning to provide
educators with tools to manage all aspects of the educator role. As nurs-
ing informatics faculty become actively involved in the design, monitor-
ing, and evaluation of these comprehensive systems, they will create the
healthcare educational institutions of the future.
Traditional tuition models are a barrier to the globalization of educa-
tion, but they are being slowly eroded. New educational models are
already being created as universities reach students beyond their walls
or create virtual educational experiences, e.g., partnering with other in-
stitutions to deliver classes to students across a region. Perhaps in the
future, universities will partner with business entities and vendors to
create other innovative models of education.
Curriculum design will change. Information is now generated and made
available so quickly that baseline knowledge for students will evolve away
from specific content to methods of finding accurate, current information
and knowledge. Future students may not be evaluated on specific knowl-
edge for one area or course, but instead be evaluated on their growth over
time. The INS will be at the center of this union of informatics and new
educational models because of its focus on managing information.
Tools for patient access to health information
Patients will continue to become stronger partners with providers, with
increased accountability for their own care. This type of model will re-
quire solutions and patient education by clinical nurses and INSs to
devise the best methods of care as well as solutions to monitor and
maintain patients’ health.
Expanded use of IT in nursing
Technology use will increase everywhere in our work and home settings,
perhaps even constantly traveling with us as wearable devices. Two
implications are outlined here.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM56
Nursing Informatics.indd 168 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 169
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 55
tients. These data, especially once they are integrated into EHRs or per-
sonal health records (PHRs), will lead to advances in customized patient
care and customized medications targeted to individual responses to
medications. Care and medication can be precisely customized to pa-
tients based on their unique DNA profile and how they have responded
to medications and other interventions in the past. This will dramatically
change how patients are managed for specific diseases and conditions,
and extend into the prevention of some diseases.
The inherent complexity of customized patient care will demand
computerized clinical decision support. Predictive disease models based
on patients’ DNA profiles will emerge as clinicians better understand
DNA mapping. These advances have implications for a new model of
care and for the INS’s participation in the development of genomic IT
solutions. More than ever, patients will need to be partners in this de-
velopment. Genomics will lead to many specialized advances in care
delivery and be linked to exact, individualized data within a personal
health record (PHR). Subsequently, advanced disease management with
the ultimate goal of disease prevention will be possible. This change has
many implications for ethics as well as informatics. In fact, genomics
competencies and curricular guidelines are available online (ANA, 2007)..
Educational technologies
Evolving teaching technologies are changing the education techniques
used in the classroom, the lab, and the clinical setting. For example, pa-
tient care simulators allow students to run programmed care scenarios
in a safe environment and provide innovative options for teaching
critical thinking skills. Group learning tools such as clickers, used in inter-
active teaching, can change how students engage with class content as
well as how they learn to function as members of a team (Michaelsen,
Fink, & Knight, 2007). Distance education technologies such as web-
based course management systems and the related student support
services are challenging basic education concepts such as what aca-
demic resources must be included in a library collection or how a uni-
versity defines a credit hour of education. Administrative information
systems are automating basic university functions like admissions, reg-
istration, student record management, grant management, and finan-
cial aid, for example (Nelson et al., 2006). This automation is forcing
institutions to review and in many cases to revise their educational
policies and procedures. These technologies require a paradigm shift in
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM55
56 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
knowledge delivery, which affects students, instructors, and course
content.
In these modern educational settings, faculty, with little more than
office applications for support, continue to manage large amounts of
data about individual students, curricula, and accreditation. Comprehen-
sive, enterprise-wide educational information systems that integrate
administrative and academic functions are just beginning to provide
educators with tools to manage all aspects of the educator role. As nurs-
ing informatics faculty become actively involved in the design, monitor-
ing, and evaluation of these comprehensive systems, they will create the
healthcare educational institutions of the future.
Traditional tuition models are a barrier to the globalization of educa-
tion, but they are being slowly eroded. New educational models are
already being created as universities reach students beyond their walls
or create virtual educational experiences, e.g., partnering with other in-
stitutions to deliver classes to students across a region. Perhaps in the
future, universities will partner with business entities and vendors to
create other innovative models of education.
Curriculum design will change. Information is now generated and made
available so quickly that baseline knowledge for students will evolve away
from specific content to methods of finding accurate, current information
and knowledge. Future students may not be evaluated on specific knowl-
edge for one area or course, but instead be evaluated on their growth over
time. The INS will be at the center of this union of informatics and new
educational models because of its focus on managing information.
Tools for patient access to health information
Patients will continue to become stronger partners with providers, with
increased accountability for their own care. This type of model will re-
quire solutions and patient education by clinical nurses and INSs to
devise the best methods of care as well as solutions to monitor and
maintain patients’ health.
Expanded use of IT in nursing
Technology use will increase everywhere in our work and home settings,
perhaps even constantly traveling with us as wearable devices. Two
implications are outlined here.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM56
Nursing Informatics.indd 169 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
170 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 57
One is a current concern about students relying on available, struc-
tured information, computerized alerts, and reminders in systems such
as EHRs and DSSs. Some educators and administrators now are con-
cerned that if students rely on available, structured information, com-
puterized alerts, and reminders in systems such as EHRs and DSSs, their
critical thinking skills may diminish. Future INSs and educators will de-
termine and test new academic and practice models. Perhaps academic
applications will be designed differently than practice applications de-
signed to encourage questioning and active cognitive engagement. Or
system designers may need to modify systems to promote a different
cognitive engagement by practitioners. Or educators may teach a new
level of human information processing to maximize human capabilities,
one beyond students needing to memorize structures for a physical
examination and similar static information stored in an EHR. In this
model, information technology serves as an aid to, not a replacement
for, human thinking and judgment.
Reliability is the other implication of the increasing pervasiveness of
IT. As applications are increasingly integrated into healthcare, the impact
of downtime becomes more severe and quick recovery methods im-
perative. Especially with order management in place, institutions must
ensure continuous business operations with uninterrupted access to
applications and data. Strategies and technologies to support continu-
ous uptime are available, and the INS is typically involved in defining,
designing, and installing them. Pervasive computing creates a new stan-
dard for information access even when there is no power supply, like a
laptop powered by a hand crank (OLPC, 2007). Thus, INSs must be strong
advocates for systems to be continuously available. Likewise, they can
be intimately involved in disaster recovery, including being an advocate
for funding allocations for recovery methods.
In 2005, Hurricane Katrina emphasized the importance of redundant
systems and effective disaster recovery procedures. Requirements for
current and future systems will focus on prevention rather include re-
action as well as these features:
• 24×7 operation and performance with redundancies throughout
the system, failovers, and tested high reliability.
• Tools to assist in monitoring and managing the IT environment,
monitor system use, and identify technology issues before system
failure occurs.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM57
58 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Scalable IT solutions as more clinical applications come online.
• Solutions that IT departments can manage without in-depth tech-
nology expertise.
Implications for INSs
INSs will need to have a systematic method for becoming aware of
emerging technologies and their projected impact(s) to healthcare and
informatics. INSs can be essential leaders and partners for the safe and
intelligent incorporation of new technology and techniques into health
informatics solutions. The content or information on devices is still the
most critical component, and INSs can serve as content designers. Areas
such as genomics may have ethical ramifications, and INSs must en-
sure that they are respected. Sub-specialization within NI will continue,
and INSs may find themselves specializing in the safe use of particular
technologies.
All of these areas have implications for curricular design and educa-
tion. The expansion of technology amplifies the need for continuous
availability of systems. On the other hand, the “digital divide” in large
remains: a significant number of people have little access to information
technology. INSs can also take the lead in eliminating the digital divide
between those with access to information and those without. In all situ-
ations, INSs can advocate and apply methods for users to learn and use
new technologies effectively and safely.
Trends in Healthcare Delivery and Regulation
One force that has driven information technology and EHR installations
in the United States is a national emphasis on patient safety, including
technology installation as a focal point for reducing errors in healthcare.
Also responsible is the fact that health organizations such as AHRQ and
IHI, as well as non-health organizations like Leapfrog, are impatient with
slow progress, to the point that they are providing incentives for health
institutions to implement informatics solutions. Other forces will likely
escalate the pace of adoption. Organizations are using value-versus-re-
turn-on-investment models to justify health IT and pay-for-performance
models will likely accelerate EHR installations. Data are becoming more
visible to consumers and hospital boards. Organizations will continue
to increase the transparency of data and, more importantly, improve the
care being delivered.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM58
Nursing Informatics.indd 170 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 171
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 57
One is a current concern about students relying on available, struc-
tured information, computerized alerts, and reminders in systems such
as EHRs and DSSs. Some educators and administrators now are con-
cerned that if students rely on available, structured information, com-
puterized alerts, and reminders in systems such as EHRs and DSSs, their
critical thinking skills may diminish. Future INSs and educators will de-
termine and test new academic and practice models. Perhaps academic
applications will be designed differently than practice applications de-
signed to encourage questioning and active cognitive engagement. Or
system designers may need to modify systems to promote a different
cognitive engagement by practitioners. Or educators may teach a new
level of human information processing to maximize human capabilities,
one beyond students needing to memorize structures for a physical
examination and similar static information stored in an EHR. In this
model, information technology serves as an aid to, not a replacement
for, human thinking and judgment.
Reliability is the other implication of the increasing pervasiveness of
IT. As applications are increasingly integrated into healthcare, the impact
of downtime becomes more severe and quick recovery methods im-
perative. Especially with order management in place, institutions must
ensure continuous business operations with uninterrupted access to
applications and data. Strategies and technologies to support continu-
ous uptime are available, and the INS is typically involved in defining,
designing, and installing them. Pervasive computing creates a new stan-
dard for information access even when there is no power supply, like a
laptop powered by a hand crank (OLPC, 2007). Thus, INSs must be strong
advocates for systems to be continuously available. Likewise, they can
be intimately involved in disaster recovery, including being an advocate
for funding allocations for recovery methods.
In 2005, Hurricane Katrina emphasized the importance of redundant
systems and effective disaster recovery procedures. Requirements for
current and future systems will focus on prevention rather include re-
action as well as these features:
• 24×7 operation and performance with redundancies throughout
the system, failovers, and tested high reliability.
• Tools to assist in monitoring and managing the IT environment,
monitor system use, and identify technology issues before system
failure occurs.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM57
58 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Scalable IT solutions as more clinical applications come online.
• Solutions that IT departments can manage without in-depth tech-
nology expertise.
Implications for INSs
INSs will need to have a systematic method for becoming aware of
emerging technologies and their projected impact(s) to healthcare and
informatics. INSs can be essential leaders and partners for the safe and
intelligent incorporation of new technology and techniques into health
informatics solutions. The content or information on devices is still the
most critical component, and INSs can serve as content designers. Areas
such as genomics may have ethical ramifications, and INSs must en-
sure that they are respected. Sub-specialization within NI will continue,
and INSs may find themselves specializing in the safe use of particular
technologies.
All of these areas have implications for curricular design and educa-
tion. The expansion of technology amplifies the need for continuous
availability of systems. On the other hand, the “digital divide” in large
remains: a significant number of people have little access to information
technology. INSs can also take the lead in eliminating the digital divide
between those with access to information and those without. In all situ-
ations, INSs can advocate and apply methods for users to learn and use
new technologies effectively and safely.
Trends in Healthcare Delivery and Regulation
One force that has driven information technology and EHR installations
in the United States is a national emphasis on patient safety, including
technology installation as a focal point for reducing errors in healthcare.
Also responsible is the fact that health organizations such as AHRQ and
IHI, as well as non-health organizations like Leapfrog, are impatient with
slow progress, to the point that they are providing incentives for health
institutions to implement informatics solutions. Other forces will likely
escalate the pace of adoption. Organizations are using value-versus-re-
turn-on-investment models to justify health IT and pay-for-performance
models will likely accelerate EHR installations. Data are becoming more
visible to consumers and hospital boards. Organizations will continue
to increase the transparency of data and, more importantly, improve the
care being delivered.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM58
Nursing Informatics.indd 171 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
172 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 59
Regulatory requirements and standards will shape the future. INSs will
be involved in defining these and future standards, and in designing,
building, implementing, using, and certifying products that comply. A
number of projects are underway, among them:
• Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology
(CCHIT ). “CCHIT is a recognized certification body (RCB) for electronic
health records and their networks, and an independent, voluntary,
private-sector initiative.” Their mission is “to accelerate the adoption
of health information technology by creating an efficient, credible,
and sustainable product certification program.” (CCHIT, 2007)
• HL7 is defining interoperability standards for systems.
• The IEEEP2407 working group is developing standards for person-
alized health informatics.
• The Joint Commission continues to expand regulatory compliance
for patient safety, e.g., national patient safety goals, medication rec-
onciliation, and other requirements with implications for the INS.
• The Health Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) is har-
monizing industry-wide health IT standards.
• The Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) initiative is
creating prototype architectures for widespread health information
exchange.
• The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has several initiatives
underway:
• Bar code label requirements for human drug products and bio-
logical products (FDA, 2007a).
• Draft guidelines for the safe and effective use of radio frequency
devices.
• Nanotechnology development (FDA, 2007b) and potential ex-
pansion of products covered, e.g., advanced decision support
tools and similar informatics applications.
Care delivery models
Care is no longer a local phenomenon. Patients in rural ICUs can be
monitored remotely by intensivists and ICU nurses. Pharmacists can
provide remote pharmacological assistance to rural areas. Radiologists
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM59
60 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
can read images in real time from anywhere in the world. Physicians
are assisted by robots as they examine patients in distant locations.
Care is no longer limited to traditional healthcare settings, even
when it is delivered locally. Clinicians are now available in retail
stores, work settings, and other non-traditional places. These new
settings will require new design, deployment, and support models
that will challenge the NI specialist. INS involvement in the develop-
ment of the robust health information infrastructure includes but is
not limited to:
• Continued innovation of systems and expansion into less tradi-
tional settings such as long-term care and rural communities
• Personal health records will become more numerous. INSs will
increasingly advocate for and assist patients with developing
such individually maintained records. These can include one’s
own electronic vaccination history, past medical history, medica-
tions, allergies, condition, status, and visit history in an easily
accessible online format. Patients’ online communication with
healthcare providers will continue to increase, as well.
• Clinical data repositories and regional health information organi-
zations will support accurate, timely, and secure transfer of patient
data across care settings (ultimately across hospitals, clinics, phar-
macies, laboratories, clinician office, long-term care facilities, and
others).
Consumer informatics
Patients will become stronger partners with providers, with increased
accountability for their own care and greater interest in access to their
own EMR data. As consumers become more technically adept, they will
consider their electronic healthcare data as necessary and accessible as
their online banking information or stock transactions. Likewise, con-
sumers will begin monitoring and managing the health of younger and
older family members for whom they are responsible.
External partnerships
Healthcare will likely see non-traditional organizations entering the
healthcare arena. For example, one company with an online application
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM60
Nursing Informatics.indd 172 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 173
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 59
Regulatory requirements and standards will shape the future. INSs will
be involved in defining these and future standards, and in designing,
building, implementing, using, and certifying products that comply. A
number of projects are underway, among them:
• Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology
(CCHIT ). “CCHIT is a recognized certification body (RCB) for electronic
health records and their networks, and an independent, voluntary,
private-sector initiative.” Their mission is “to accelerate the adoption
of health information technology by creating an efficient, credible,
and sustainable product certification program.” (CCHIT, 2007)
• HL7 is defining interoperability standards for systems.
• The IEEEP2407 working group is developing standards for person-
alized health informatics.
• The Joint Commission continues to expand regulatory compliance
for patient safety, e.g., national patient safety goals, medication rec-
onciliation, and other requirements with implications for the INS.
• The Health Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) is har-
monizing industry-wide health IT standards.
• The Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) initiative is
creating prototype architectures for widespread health information
exchange.
• The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has several initiatives
underway:
• Bar code label requirements for human drug products and bio-
logical products (FDA, 2007a).
• Draft guidelines for the safe and effective use of radio frequency
devices.
• Nanotechnology development (FDA, 2007b) and potential ex-
pansion of products covered, e.g., advanced decision support
tools and similar informatics applications.
Care delivery models
Care is no longer a local phenomenon. Patients in rural ICUs can be
monitored remotely by intensivists and ICU nurses. Pharmacists can
provide remote pharmacological assistance to rural areas. Radiologists
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM59
60 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
can read images in real time from anywhere in the world. Physicians
are assisted by robots as they examine patients in distant locations.
Care is no longer limited to traditional healthcare settings, even
when it is delivered locally. Clinicians are now available in retail
stores, work settings, and other non-traditional places. These new
settings will require new design, deployment, and support models
that will challenge the NI specialist. INS involvement in the develop-
ment of the robust health information infrastructure includes but is
not limited to:
• Continued innovation of systems and expansion into less tradi-
tional settings such as long-term care and rural communities
• Personal health records will become more numerous. INSs will
increasingly advocate for and assist patients with developing
such individually maintained records. These can include one’s
own electronic vaccination history, past medical history, medica-
tions, allergies, condition, status, and visit history in an easily
accessible online format. Patients’ online communication with
healthcare providers will continue to increase, as well.
• Clinical data repositories and regional health information organi-
zations will support accurate, timely, and secure transfer of patient
data across care settings (ultimately across hospitals, clinics, phar-
macies, laboratories, clinician office, long-term care facilities, and
others).
Consumer informatics
Patients will become stronger partners with providers, with increased
accountability for their own care and greater interest in access to their
own EMR data. As consumers become more technically adept, they will
consider their electronic healthcare data as necessary and accessible as
their online banking information or stock transactions. Likewise, con-
sumers will begin monitoring and managing the health of younger and
older family members for whom they are responsible.
External partnerships
Healthcare will likely see non-traditional organizations entering the
healthcare arena. For example, one company with an online application
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM60
Nursing Informatics.indd 173 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
174 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 61
for individual, secure financial records is now investigating expansion
into personal health records. Likewise, healthcare should create new,
non-traditional partnerships. Perhaps a partnership with the video-
gaming industry would also be fruitful for interactive EHRs and yield
ideas for optimal user interfaces.
Implications for INSs
New care models have vast implications for informatics nurses. These
new delivery models will require INSs to continue developing
informatics solutions for care in multiple, remote locations. INSs should
have a key role in informatics solutions that emphasize quality care
(McCormick et al., 2007). We need new models to shorten the time from
design to installation in the systems life cycle. An 18- to 24-month build
and implementation cycle is not tenable in an era of rapidly changing
technology, care delivery, and expanding information access.
With the increasing number of information technology installations
and the need to respond to burgeoning regulatory requirements, INSs
will be at centerstage for all phases of the systems lifecycle. They will be
developing and implementing new informatics solutions, ensuring data
quality for implemented solutions, and evaluating the impact of solu-
tions. The new model of consumer informatics will require technical
solutions and patient education jointly from clinical nurses and INSs.
INSs will need to devise the best methods of care as well as designing
solutions that enable patients to monitor and maintain their own health.
INSs will play a key role in designing new tools for data capture and
analyses to comply with regulatory guidelines.
NI Future and Trends: Conclusions
The positions and competencies of nurses, changes in technology, and
new trends in health delivery and regulation will shape the future of
nursing informatics. Important concepts underlying these trends:
• Preparing for and evolving with new information and technology
changes.
• Inventing and delivering new educational models to teach both
new and existing nursing professionals.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM61
62 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating solutions for
new information technologies across all areas of nursing and health
settings.
• Incorporating newer technologies and methods to redesign care,
research and administrative processes.
• Pioneering, designing, and facilitating changes in care models as
they evolve away from episodic care toward more predictive and
preventive models.
• Focusing on usability—designing and evaluating how informa-
tion is presented to promote ease of use and adoption (human–
computer interaction).
The global nature of informatics is already clear. In the future, care
models and data will be shared even more widely. New technologies will
create wider access to information and the need for a new generation
of data and information management skills, analytic tools, new educa-
tional models, and different cognitive skills. Traditional boundaries of
institutions, care delivery, and education will continue to erode. New
positions and functional areas are emerging. Increased collaboration
among NI colleagues and a shared scope and standard of NI practice will
be the hallmark of the future.
References: Future and Trends
Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (CCHIT ).
(2007). Home page. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
www.cchit.org/
Cisco Systems. (2007). Telemedicine pioneer helps physicians on the
move stay close to patients. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns554/c647/
cdccont_0900aecd804073a3.pdf
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2007a). FDA rule requires bar codes
on drugs and blood to help reduce errors. Retrieved October 10, 2007
from http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/barcode-sadr/
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2007b). FDA nanotechnology
task force report. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from www.fda.gov/
nanotechnology.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM62
Nursing Informatics.indd 174 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 175
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 61
for individual, secure financial records is now investigating expansion
into personal health records. Likewise, healthcare should create new,
non-traditional partnerships. Perhaps a partnership with the video-
gaming industry would also be fruitful for interactive EHRs and yield
ideas for optimal user interfaces.
Implications for INSs
New care models have vast implications for informatics nurses. These
new delivery models will require INSs to continue developing
informatics solutions for care in multiple, remote locations. INSs should
have a key role in informatics solutions that emphasize quality care
(McCormick et al., 2007). We need new models to shorten the time from
design to installation in the systems life cycle. An 18- to 24-month build
and implementation cycle is not tenable in an era of rapidly changing
technology, care delivery, and expanding information access.
With the increasing number of information technology installations
and the need to respond to burgeoning regulatory requirements, INSs
will be at centerstage for all phases of the systems lifecycle. They will be
developing and implementing new informatics solutions, ensuring data
quality for implemented solutions, and evaluating the impact of solu-
tions. The new model of consumer informatics will require technical
solutions and patient education jointly from clinical nurses and INSs.
INSs will need to devise the best methods of care as well as designing
solutions that enable patients to monitor and maintain their own health.
INSs will play a key role in designing new tools for data capture and
analyses to comply with regulatory guidelines.
NI Future and Trends: Conclusions
The positions and competencies of nurses, changes in technology, and
new trends in health delivery and regulation will shape the future of
nursing informatics. Important concepts underlying these trends:
• Preparing for and evolving with new information and technology
changes.
• Inventing and delivering new educational models to teach both
new and existing nursing professionals.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM61
62 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating solutions for
new information technologies across all areas of nursing and health
settings.
• Incorporating newer technologies and methods to redesign care,
research and administrative processes.
• Pioneering, designing, and facilitating changes in care models as
they evolve away from episodic care toward more predictive and
preventive models.
• Focusing on usability—designing and evaluating how informa-
tion is presented to promote ease of use and adoption (human–
computer interaction).
The global nature of informatics is already clear. In the future, care
models and data will be shared even more widely. New technologies will
create wider access to information and the need for a new generation
of data and information management skills, analytic tools, new educa-
tional models, and different cognitive skills. Traditional boundaries of
institutions, care delivery, and education will continue to erode. New
positions and functional areas are emerging. Increased collaboration
among NI colleagues and a shared scope and standard of NI practice will
be the hallmark of the future.
References: Future and Trends
Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (CCHIT ).
(2007). Home page. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
www.cchit.org/
Cisco Systems. (2007). Telemedicine pioneer helps physicians on the
move stay close to patients. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://
www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns554/c647/
cdccont_0900aecd804073a3.pdf
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2007a). FDA rule requires bar codes
on drugs and blood to help reduce errors. Retrieved October 10, 2007
from http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/barcode-sadr/
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2007b). FDA nanotechnology
task force report. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from www.fda.gov/
nanotechnology.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM62
Nursing Informatics.indd 175 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
176 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 63
Gordon, A.T., Lutz, G.E., Boninger, M.L., & Cooper, R.A. (2007). Introduction
to nanotechnology: potential applications in physical medicine and
rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,
86(3), 225– 241.
Greenback, L. (2007). Robot aids Johns Hopkins patients. The Baltimore
Examiner. Retrieved January 9, 2007 from http://www.examiner.com/
a-498079~Robot_aids_Johns_Hopkins_patients.html.
McCormick, K.A., Delaney, C.J., Brennan, P.F., Effken, J.A., Kendrick, K.,
Murphy, J., et al. (2007). Guideposts to the future—An agenda for nurs-
ing informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Associa-
tion, 14(1), 19–24.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab. (2007). Wearable
computing. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.media.mit.edu/
wearables.
Michaelsen, M., Fink, L, & Knight, A. (2007) Team based learning: The
power of teams for powerful learning. Retrieved October 10, 2007
from http://www.ou.edu/idp/teamlearning/
Nelson, R., & Ball, M. (Eds.). (2004) Consumer informatics: Applications and
strategies in cyber healthcare. New York: Springer Verlag.
Nelson, R., Meyer, L., Rizzolo, M.A., Rutar, P., Proto, M.B., & Newbold, S.
(2006). The evolution of educational information systems and nurse
faculty roles. Nursing Education Perspectives. 27(5), 189–195.
Offray Specialty Narrow Fabrics (OSNF). (2007). Smart textiles. Retrieved
October 10, 2007 from http://www.osnf.com/p_smart.html
One Laptop per Child (OLPC). (2007). A $100 laptop for the world’s children’s
education. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.laptop.org/
Science Daily. (2007). Robotic brace aids stroke recovery. Retrieved Octo-
ber 10, 2007 from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/
070321105223.htm
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM63
64 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
ThinkGeek. (2007). Bluetooth Laser Virtual Keyboard. Retrieved October
10, 2007 from http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/input/8193/
Mendelson, H. (2005). Moore’s law. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http:/
/www.thocp.net/biographies/papers/moores_law.htm
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM64
Nursing Informatics.indd 176 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 177
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
Nursing Informatics: Scope of Practice 63
Gordon, A.T., Lutz, G.E., Boninger, M.L., & Cooper, R.A. (2007). Introduction
to nanotechnology: potential applications in physical medicine and
rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation,
86(3), 225– 241.
Greenback, L. (2007). Robot aids Johns Hopkins patients. The Baltimore
Examiner. Retrieved January 9, 2007 from http://www.examiner.com/
a-498079~Robot_aids_Johns_Hopkins_patients.html.
McCormick, K.A., Delaney, C.J., Brennan, P.F., Effken, J.A., Kendrick, K.,
Murphy, J., et al. (2007). Guideposts to the future—An agenda for nurs-
ing informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Associa-
tion, 14(1), 19–24.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab. (2007). Wearable
computing. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.media.mit.edu/
wearables.
Michaelsen, M., Fink, L, & Knight, A. (2007) Team based learning: The
power of teams for powerful learning. Retrieved October 10, 2007
from http://www.ou.edu/idp/teamlearning/
Nelson, R., & Ball, M. (Eds.). (2004) Consumer informatics: Applications and
strategies in cyber healthcare. New York: Springer Verlag.
Nelson, R., Meyer, L., Rizzolo, M.A., Rutar, P., Proto, M.B., & Newbold, S.
(2006). The evolution of educational information systems and nurse
faculty roles. Nursing Education Perspectives. 27(5), 189–195.
Offray Specialty Narrow Fabrics (OSNF). (2007). Smart textiles. Retrieved
October 10, 2007 from http://www.osnf.com/p_smart.html
One Laptop per Child (OLPC). (2007). A $100 laptop for the world’s children’s
education. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http://www.laptop.org/
Science Daily. (2007). Robotic brace aids stroke recovery. Retrieved Octo-
ber 10, 2007 from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/
070321105223.htm
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM63
64 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
ThinkGeek. (2007). Bluetooth Laser Virtual Keyboard. Retrieved October
10, 2007 from http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/input/8193/
Mendelson, H. (2005). Moore’s law. Retrieved October 10, 2007 from http:/
/www.thocp.net/biographies/papers/moores_law.htm
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM64
Nursing Informatics.indd 177 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
178 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARDS OF NURSING INFORMATICS PRACTICE
Nursing informatics (NI) is the specialty that integrates nursing science,
computer science, and information science to manage and communi-
cate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice.
Nursing informatics facilitates the integration of data, information,
knowledge, and wisdom to support patients, nurses, and other provid-
ers in their decision-making in all roles and settings. This support is ac-
complished through the use of information structures, information
processes, and information technology.
The goal of nursing informatics is to improve the health of popula-
tions, communities, families, and individuals by optimizing information
management and communication. These activities include the design
and use of informatics solutions and technology to support all areas of
nursing, including, but not limited to, the direct provision of care,
establishing effective administrative systems, managing and delivering
educational experiences, enhancing lifelong learning, and supporting
nursing research.
The standards of nursing informatics practice include two compo-
nents: standards of practice and standards of professional performance.
Each standard includes measurement criteria that provide more detail
about the expected knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to meet
that standard. Some standards include additional measurement criteria
specific to informatics nurse specialists and their role and practice.
The standards of practice are organized using a general problem-
solving framework that closely models the language provided in Nurs-
ing: Scope and Standards of Practice (ANA, 2004) that describes the
familiar nursing process of assessment, diagnosis, identification of out-
comes, planning, implementation, and evaluation. The problem-solving
framework supports all facets of informatics practice, helps to identify
and clarify issues, and aids in the selection, development, implementa-
tion, and evaluation of informatics solutions. These steps are not mutu-
ally exclusive and may often overlap.
Informatics solution is a generic term used in this document to de-
scribe an application, product, method, tool, workflow change, or other
recommendation an informatics nurse makes after identifying and
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 65
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM65
66 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
analyzing an issue. An informatics solution may encompass technology
and non-technology elements such as developing a database, purchas-
ing a new computer application, creating a standardized nursing vo-
cabulary, designing informatics curricula, creating a spreadsheet,
tailoring an application to a particular environment, designing a re-
search study to describe required informatics competencies, describing
information flow in a process redesign, creating newly re-engineered
processes, or creating a structure for information presentation.
The standards of professional performance also reflect the model lan-
guage provided in Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice (ANA, 2004).
They have been re-ordered, and include one additional standard that
addresses advocacy.
These standards of nursing informatics practice and their measure-
ment criteria apply to all informatics nurses and their practices. The
measurement criteria for the informatics nurse specialist reflect the
higher expectations from this role and advanced level of practice.
Principles of Nursing Informatics Practice
Three overarching principles are inherent in every aspect of nursing
informatics practice and should be considered by informatics nurses
and informatics nurse specialists when reviewing the standards of
practice.
The informatics nurse:
1. Incorporates theories, principles, and concepts from appropriate
sciences into informatics practice. Examples of theories could in-
clude information, systems, and change theories. Principles and
concepts could include project management, implementation
methods, workflow analysis, process redesign, organizational cul-
ture, or database structures.
2. Integrates ergonomics and human–computer interaction (HCI)
principles into informatics solution design, development, selec-
tion, implementation, and evaluation.
3. Systematically determines the social, legal, regulatory, and ethical
impact of an informatics solution on nursing and health care.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM66
Nursing Informatics.indd 178 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 179
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARDS OF NURSING INFORMATICS PRACTICE
Nursing informatics (NI) is the specialty that integrates nursing science,
computer science, and information science to manage and communi-
cate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in nursing practice.
Nursing informatics facilitates the integration of data, information,
knowledge, and wisdom to support patients, nurses, and other provid-
ers in their decision-making in all roles and settings. This support is ac-
complished through the use of information structures, information
processes, and information technology.
The goal of nursing informatics is to improve the health of popula-
tions, communities, families, and individuals by optimizing information
management and communication. These activities include the design
and use of informatics solutions and technology to support all areas of
nursing, including, but not limited to, the direct provision of care,
establishing effective administrative systems, managing and delivering
educational experiences, enhancing lifelong learning, and supporting
nursing research.
The standards of nursing informatics practice include two compo-
nents: standards of practice and standards of professional performance.
Each standard includes measurement criteria that provide more detail
about the expected knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to meet
that standard. Some standards include additional measurement criteria
specific to informatics nurse specialists and their role and practice.
The standards of practice are organized using a general problem-
solving framework that closely models the language provided in Nurs-
ing: Scope and Standards of Practice (ANA, 2004) that describes the
familiar nursing process of assessment, diagnosis, identification of out-
comes, planning, implementation, and evaluation. The problem-solving
framework supports all facets of informatics practice, helps to identify
and clarify issues, and aids in the selection, development, implementa-
tion, and evaluation of informatics solutions. These steps are not mutu-
ally exclusive and may often overlap.
Informatics solution is a generic term used in this document to de-
scribe an application, product, method, tool, workflow change, or other
recommendation an informatics nurse makes after identifying and
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 65
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM65
66 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
analyzing an issue. An informatics solution may encompass technology
and non-technology elements such as developing a database, purchas-
ing a new computer application, creating a standardized nursing vo-
cabulary, designing informatics curricula, creating a spreadsheet,
tailoring an application to a particular environment, designing a re-
search study to describe required informatics competencies, describing
information flow in a process redesign, creating newly re-engineered
processes, or creating a structure for information presentation.
The standards of professional performance also reflect the model lan-
guage provided in Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice (ANA, 2004).
They have been re-ordered, and include one additional standard that
addresses advocacy.
These standards of nursing informatics practice and their measure-
ment criteria apply to all informatics nurses and their practices. The
measurement criteria for the informatics nurse specialist reflect the
higher expectations from this role and advanced level of practice.
Principles of Nursing Informatics Practice
Three overarching principles are inherent in every aspect of nursing
informatics practice and should be considered by informatics nurses
and informatics nurse specialists when reviewing the standards of
practice.
The informatics nurse:
1. Incorporates theories, principles, and concepts from appropriate
sciences into informatics practice. Examples of theories could in-
clude information, systems, and change theories. Principles and
concepts could include project management, implementation
methods, workflow analysis, process redesign, organizational cul-
ture, or database structures.
2. Integrates ergonomics and human–computer interaction (HCI)
principles into informatics solution design, development, selec-
tion, implementation, and evaluation.
3. Systematically determines the social, legal, regulatory, and ethical
impact of an informatics solution on nursing and health care.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM66
Nursing Informatics.indd 179 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
180 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARDS OF NURSING INFORMATICS
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 1. ASSESSMENT
The informatics nurse collects comprehensive data, information,
and knowledge pertinent to the situation.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Collects data, information, and knowledge in a systematic and on-
going process, such as with a needs assessment to refine the issue
or problem, or with workflow analyses to examine current practice,
workflow, and the potential impact of an informatics solution on
that workflow.
• Involves the patient, family, nurse, other healthcare providers, and
key stakeholders, as appropriate, in holistic data collection.
• Prioritizes data collection activities based on the immediate or an-
ticipated needs of the situation.
• Uses appropriate evidence-based assessment techniques and in-
struments in collecting pertinent data to define the issue or prob-
lem.
• Uses analytical models and assessment tools that facilitate prob-
lem solving.
• Synthesizes available data, information, and knowledge relevant to
the situation to identify patterns and variances.
• Documents relevant data in a retrievable format.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 67
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM67
68 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 2. PROBLEM AND ISSUES IDENTIFICATION
The informatics nurse analyzes the assessment data to determine
the problems or issues.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Derives the problems, needs, or issues based on assessment data.
• Validates the problems, needs, or issues with the patient, family,
nurse, other healthcare providers, and key stakeholders when pos-
sible and appropriate.
• Documents problems, needs, or issues in a manner that facilitates
the determination of the expected outcomes and plan.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM68
Nursing Informatics.indd 180 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 181
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARDS OF NURSING INFORMATICS
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 1. ASSESSMENT
The informatics nurse collects comprehensive data, information,
and knowledge pertinent to the situation.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Collects data, information, and knowledge in a systematic and on-
going process, such as with a needs assessment to refine the issue
or problem, or with workflow analyses to examine current practice,
workflow, and the potential impact of an informatics solution on
that workflow.
• Involves the patient, family, nurse, other healthcare providers, and
key stakeholders, as appropriate, in holistic data collection.
• Prioritizes data collection activities based on the immediate or an-
ticipated needs of the situation.
• Uses appropriate evidence-based assessment techniques and in-
struments in collecting pertinent data to define the issue or prob-
lem.
• Uses analytical models and assessment tools that facilitate prob-
lem solving.
• Synthesizes available data, information, and knowledge relevant to
the situation to identify patterns and variances.
• Documents relevant data in a retrievable format.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 67
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM67
68 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 2. PROBLEM AND ISSUES IDENTIFICATION
The informatics nurse analyzes the assessment data to determine
the problems or issues.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Derives the problems, needs, or issues based on assessment data.
• Validates the problems, needs, or issues with the patient, family,
nurse, other healthcare providers, and key stakeholders when pos-
sible and appropriate.
• Documents problems, needs, or issues in a manner that facilitates
the determination of the expected outcomes and plan.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM68
Nursing Informatics.indd 181 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
182 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 3. OUTCOMES IDENTIFICATION
The informatics nurse identifies expected outcomes for a plan in-
dividualized to the situation.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Involves the patient, family, nurses, other healthcare providers, and
key stakeholders in formulating expected outcomes when possible
and appropriate.
• Considers associated risks, benefits, costs, current scientific evi-
dence, environmental factors, and expertise when formulating ex-
pected outcomes.
• Defines expected outcomes in terms of the patient, patient values,
ethical considerations, environment, organization, or situation with
such consideration as associated risks, benefits, and costs, and cur-
rent evidence-based knowledge.
• Includes a time estimate for attainment of expected outcomes.
• Develops expected outcomes that provide direction for all key
stakeholders.
• Modifies expected outcomes based on changes in the status or
evaluation of the situation.
• Documents expected outcomes as measurable goals.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Identifies expected outcomes that incorporate scientific evidence
and are achievable through implementation of evidence-based
practices.
• Identifies expected outcomes that maximize quality, efficiency, and
effectiveness balanced with economy.
• Supports the use of clinical guidelines, such as but not limited to
the integration of clinical guidelines into practice, information
system and informatics solutions, and knowledge bases.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 69
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM69
70 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 4. PLANNING
The informatics nurse develops a plan that prescribes strategies,
alternatives, and recommendations to attain expected outcomes.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Develops a customized plan considering clinical and business char-
acteristics and the environmental situation.
• Develops the plan in conjunction with the patient, family, nurse, other
healthcare providers, key stakeholders, and others, as appropriate.
• Includes strategies in the plan that address each of the identified
problems and issues, which may include strategies for the synthesis
of data, information, and knowledge to enhance healthcare delivery.
• Provides for continuity within the plan.
• Incorporates an implementation pathway or timeline within the
plan.
• Establishes the plan priorities with the key stakeholders and others
as appropriate.
• Utilizes the plan to provide direction to healthcare team members
and other stakeholders.
• Defines the plan to reflect current statutes, rules and regulations,
and quality standards.
• Integrates current research and trends in the planning process.
• Considers the clinical, financial, and social impact of the plan.
• Uses standardized language, tools, and methodologies to docu-
ment the plan.
• Participates in the design and development of interdisciplinary pro-
cesses and informatics principles to address the situation or issue.
• Contributes to the development and continuous improvement of
organizational systems that support the planning process.
• Supports the integration of clinical, human, financial, and technical
resources to enhance and complete the decision-making processes.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM70
Nursing Informatics.indd 182 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 183
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 3. OUTCOMES IDENTIFICATION
The informatics nurse identifies expected outcomes for a plan in-
dividualized to the situation.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Involves the patient, family, nurses, other healthcare providers, and
key stakeholders in formulating expected outcomes when possible
and appropriate.
• Considers associated risks, benefits, costs, current scientific evi-
dence, environmental factors, and expertise when formulating ex-
pected outcomes.
• Defines expected outcomes in terms of the patient, patient values,
ethical considerations, environment, organization, or situation with
such consideration as associated risks, benefits, and costs, and cur-
rent evidence-based knowledge.
• Includes a time estimate for attainment of expected outcomes.
• Develops expected outcomes that provide direction for all key
stakeholders.
• Modifies expected outcomes based on changes in the status or
evaluation of the situation.
• Documents expected outcomes as measurable goals.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Identifies expected outcomes that incorporate scientific evidence
and are achievable through implementation of evidence-based
practices.
• Identifies expected outcomes that maximize quality, efficiency, and
effectiveness balanced with economy.
• Supports the use of clinical guidelines, such as but not limited to
the integration of clinical guidelines into practice, information
system and informatics solutions, and knowledge bases.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 69
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM69
70 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 4. PLANNING
The informatics nurse develops a plan that prescribes strategies,
alternatives, and recommendations to attain expected outcomes.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Develops a customized plan considering clinical and business char-
acteristics and the environmental situation.
• Develops the plan in conjunction with the patient, family, nurse, other
healthcare providers, key stakeholders, and others, as appropriate.
• Includes strategies in the plan that address each of the identified
problems and issues, which may include strategies for the synthesis
of data, information, and knowledge to enhance healthcare delivery.
• Provides for continuity within the plan.
• Incorporates an implementation pathway or timeline within the
plan.
• Establishes the plan priorities with the key stakeholders and others
as appropriate.
• Utilizes the plan to provide direction to healthcare team members
and other stakeholders.
• Defines the plan to reflect current statutes, rules and regulations,
and quality standards.
• Integrates current research and trends in the planning process.
• Considers the clinical, financial, and social impact of the plan.
• Uses standardized language, tools, and methodologies to docu-
ment the plan.
• Participates in the design and development of interdisciplinary pro-
cesses and informatics principles to address the situation or issue.
• Contributes to the development and continuous improvement of
organizational systems that support the planning process.
• Supports the integration of clinical, human, financial, and technical
resources to enhance and complete the decision-making processes.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM70
Nursing Informatics.indd 183 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
184 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 5. IMPLEMENTATION
The informatics nurse implements the identified plan.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Implements the plan in a safe and timely manner.
• Documents implementation and any modifications, including
changes or omissions, of the identified plan.
• Utilizes specific evidence-based actions and steps specific to the
problem or issues to achieve the defined outcomes.
• Utilizes clinical, financial, technical, and community resources and
systems to implement the plan.
• Collaborates with colleagues and other stakeholders to implement
the plan.
• Implements the plan using principles and concepts of quality,
project, or systems management.
• Fosters organizational systems that support implementation of the
plan.
• Incorporates new knowledge and strategies to initiate change in
informatics and nursing practices if desired outcomes are not
achieved.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 71
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM71
72 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 5A: COORDINATION OF ACTIVITIES
The informatics nurse coordinates activities.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Coordinates implementation of the plan, including activities and
resources necessary to achieve desired outcomes.
• Synthesizes data and information to prescribe necessary system
and environmental support measures.
• Documents coordination of the activities.
Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Provides leadership in the coordination of interdisciplinary infor-
matics activities.
· Coordinates system and community resources that enhance delivery
of care across continuums.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM72
Nursing Informatics.indd 184 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 185
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 5. IMPLEMENTATION
The informatics nurse implements the identified plan.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Implements the plan in a safe and timely manner.
• Documents implementation and any modifications, including
changes or omissions, of the identified plan.
• Utilizes specific evidence-based actions and steps specific to the
problem or issues to achieve the defined outcomes.
• Utilizes clinical, financial, technical, and community resources and
systems to implement the plan.
• Collaborates with colleagues and other stakeholders to implement
the plan.
• Implements the plan using principles and concepts of quality,
project, or systems management.
• Fosters organizational systems that support implementation of the
plan.
• Incorporates new knowledge and strategies to initiate change in
informatics and nursing practices if desired outcomes are not
achieved.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 71
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM71
72 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 5A: COORDINATION OF ACTIVITIES
The informatics nurse coordinates activities.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Coordinates implementation of the plan, including activities and
resources necessary to achieve desired outcomes.
• Synthesizes data and information to prescribe necessary system
and environmental support measures.
• Documents coordination of the activities.
Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Provides leadership in the coordination of interdisciplinary infor-
matics activities.
· Coordinates system and community resources that enhance delivery
of care across continuums.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM72
Nursing Informatics.indd 185 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
186 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 5B: HEALTH TEACHING AND HEALTH PROMOTION
AND EDUCATION
The informatics nurse employs strategies to promote health teach-
ing, health promotion, and education for informatics solutions.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Identifies the need to integrate health content and learning re-
sources into healthcare systems that address such topics as healthy
lifestyles, risk-reducing behaviors, developmental needs, activities
of daily living, and preventive self-care.
• Participates in the design, development, implementation, and
evaluation of health promotion materials and health teaching
methods appropriate to the situation and the patient’s develop-
mental level, learning needs, readiness, ability to learn, language
preference, and culture. The informatics nurse focuses on the in-
tegration of these into informatics solutions.
• Contributes to the design, development, implementation, and evalu-
ation of the educational content, materials, and teaching strategies
in a holistic manner (psychosocial, cognitive, affective) needed for the
continuing education and professional development programs nec-
essary to implement the plan.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurses Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Synthesizes empirical evidence on risk behaviors, learning theories,
behavioral change theories, motivational theories, epidemiology,
and other related theories and frameworks when designing health
information and patient education materials and programs.
• Designs health information and patient education appropriate to
the patient’s developmental level, learning needs, readiness to
learn, and cultural values and beliefs.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 73
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM73
74 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
• Evaluates health information resources, such as the Internet, within
the area of practice for accuracy, readability, and comprehensibil-
ity to help patients, family, healthcare providers, and others access
quality health information.
• Creates opportunities for feedback and evaluation of the effective-
ness of the educational content and teaching strategies used for
continuing education and professional development programs.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM74
Nursing Informatics.indd 186 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 187
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 5B: HEALTH TEACHING AND HEALTH PROMOTION
AND EDUCATION
The informatics nurse employs strategies to promote health teach-
ing, health promotion, and education for informatics solutions.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Identifies the need to integrate health content and learning re-
sources into healthcare systems that address such topics as healthy
lifestyles, risk-reducing behaviors, developmental needs, activities
of daily living, and preventive self-care.
• Participates in the design, development, implementation, and
evaluation of health promotion materials and health teaching
methods appropriate to the situation and the patient’s develop-
mental level, learning needs, readiness, ability to learn, language
preference, and culture. The informatics nurse focuses on the in-
tegration of these into informatics solutions.
• Contributes to the design, development, implementation, and evalu-
ation of the educational content, materials, and teaching strategies
in a holistic manner (psychosocial, cognitive, affective) needed for the
continuing education and professional development programs nec-
essary to implement the plan.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurses Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Synthesizes empirical evidence on risk behaviors, learning theories,
behavioral change theories, motivational theories, epidemiology,
and other related theories and frameworks when designing health
information and patient education materials and programs.
• Designs health information and patient education appropriate to
the patient’s developmental level, learning needs, readiness to
learn, and cultural values and beliefs.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 73
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM73
74 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
• Evaluates health information resources, such as the Internet, within
the area of practice for accuracy, readability, and comprehensibil-
ity to help patients, family, healthcare providers, and others access
quality health information.
• Creates opportunities for feedback and evaluation of the effective-
ness of the educational content and teaching strategies used for
continuing education and professional development programs.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM74
Nursing Informatics.indd 187 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
188 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 5C: CONSULTATION
The informatics nurse provides consultation to influence the iden-
tified plan, enhance the abilities of others, and effect change.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Synthesizes data, information, theoretical frameworks, and evi-
dence when providing consultation.
• Facilitates the effectiveness of a consultation by involving the
stakeholders in the decision-making process.
• Communicates consultation recommendations that influence the
identified plan, facilitate understanding by involved stakeholders,
enhance the work of others, and effect change.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurses Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Develops recommendations and strategies to address and resolve
complex issues and problems.
• Establishes formal and informal consultative relationships that
can also provide professional development and mentorship
opportunities.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 75
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM75
76 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 6. EVALUATION
The informatics nurse evaluates progress towards attainment of
outcomes.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Conducts a systematic, ongoing, and criterion-based evaluation of
the outcomes in relation to the structures and processes prescribed
by the plan and the indicated timeline.
• Includes key stakeholders and others involved in the plan or situ-
ation in the evaluative process.
• Supports the integration and use of evidence-based methods,
tools, and guidelines linked to effective outcomes.
• Evaluates the effectiveness of the planned strategies in relation to
the attainment of the expected outcomes.
• Uses ongoing assessment data to revise the problems and issues,
the outcomes, the plan, and the implementation and evaluative
processes as needed.
• Disseminates the results to key stakeholders and others involved
in the plan or situation as appropriate.
• Documents the results of the evaluation.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Uses the results of the evaluation analyses to make or recommend
process or structural changes including policy, procedure, or pro-
tocol documentation, as appropriate.
• Synthesizes the results of the evaluation analyses to determine
the impact of the plan on the affected patients, families, groups,
communities, and institutions, networks, and organizations.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM76
Nursing Informatics.indd 188 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 189
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 5C: CONSULTATION
The informatics nurse provides consultation to influence the iden-
tified plan, enhance the abilities of others, and effect change.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Synthesizes data, information, theoretical frameworks, and evi-
dence when providing consultation.
• Facilitates the effectiveness of a consultation by involving the
stakeholders in the decision-making process.
• Communicates consultation recommendations that influence the
identified plan, facilitate understanding by involved stakeholders,
enhance the work of others, and effect change.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurses Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Develops recommendations and strategies to address and resolve
complex issues and problems.
• Establishes formal and informal consultative relationships that
can also provide professional development and mentorship
opportunities.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 75
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM75
76 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
STANDARD 6. EVALUATION
The informatics nurse evaluates progress towards attainment of
outcomes.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Conducts a systematic, ongoing, and criterion-based evaluation of
the outcomes in relation to the structures and processes prescribed
by the plan and the indicated timeline.
• Includes key stakeholders and others involved in the plan or situ-
ation in the evaluative process.
• Supports the integration and use of evidence-based methods,
tools, and guidelines linked to effective outcomes.
• Evaluates the effectiveness of the planned strategies in relation to
the attainment of the expected outcomes.
• Uses ongoing assessment data to revise the problems and issues,
the outcomes, the plan, and the implementation and evaluative
processes as needed.
• Disseminates the results to key stakeholders and others involved
in the plan or situation as appropriate.
• Documents the results of the evaluation.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Uses the results of the evaluation analyses to make or recommend
process or structural changes including policy, procedure, or pro-
tocol documentation, as appropriate.
• Synthesizes the results of the evaluation analyses to determine
the impact of the plan on the affected patients, families, groups,
communities, and institutions, networks, and organizations.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM76
Nursing Informatics.indd 189 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
190 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 7. EDUCATION
The informatics nurse attains knowledge and competency that re-
flect current nursing and informatics practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Participates in ongoing educational activities related to appropri-
ate knowledge bases and professional issues.
• Demonstrates a commitment to lifelong learning through self-
reflection and inquiry to identify learning needs.
• Seeks experiences that reflect current practice in order to maintain
skills and competence in informatics practice and role performance.
• Acquires knowledge and skills appropriate to the specialty area,
practice setting, role, or situation.
• Maintains professional records that provide evidence of compe-
tency and lifelong learning.
• Seeks experiences and formal and independent learning activities
to maintain and develop clinical and professional skills and knowl-
edge.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Uses current research findings and other evidence to expand
knowledge, enhance role performance, and increase knowledge of
professional issues.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 77
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM77
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
78 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARD 8. PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION
The informatics nurse evaluates one’s own nursing and informatics
practice in relation to professional practice standards and guide-
lines, relevant statutes, rules, and regulations.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse’s practice reflects the application of knowledge
of current practice standards, guidelines, statutes, rules, and regulations.
The informatics nurse:
• Engages in self-evaluation of practice on a regular basis, identify-
ing areas of strength as well as areas in which professional devel-
opment would be beneficial.
• Obtains informal feedback regarding one’s own practice from
peers, professional colleagues, key stakeholders, and others.
• Participates in systematic peer review as appropriate.
• Takes action to achieve goals identified during the evaluation pro-
cess.
• Provides rationales for practice beliefs, decisions, and actions as
part of the informal and formal evaluation processes.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM78
Nursing Informatics.indd 190 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 191
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 7. EDUCATION
The informatics nurse attains knowledge and competency that re-
flect current nursing and informatics practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Participates in ongoing educational activities related to appropri-
ate knowledge bases and professional issues.
• Demonstrates a commitment to lifelong learning through self-
reflection and inquiry to identify learning needs.
• Seeks experiences that reflect current practice in order to maintain
skills and competence in informatics practice and role performance.
• Acquires knowledge and skills appropriate to the specialty area,
practice setting, role, or situation.
• Maintains professional records that provide evidence of compe-
tency and lifelong learning.
• Seeks experiences and formal and independent learning activities
to maintain and develop clinical and professional skills and knowl-
edge.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Uses current research findings and other evidence to expand
knowledge, enhance role performance, and increase knowledge of
professional issues.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 77
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM77
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
78 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARD 8. PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE EVALUATION
The informatics nurse evaluates one’s own nursing and informatics
practice in relation to professional practice standards and guide-
lines, relevant statutes, rules, and regulations.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse’s practice reflects the application of knowledge
of current practice standards, guidelines, statutes, rules, and regulations.
The informatics nurse:
• Engages in self-evaluation of practice on a regular basis, identify-
ing areas of strength as well as areas in which professional devel-
opment would be beneficial.
• Obtains informal feedback regarding one’s own practice from
peers, professional colleagues, key stakeholders, and others.
• Participates in systematic peer review as appropriate.
• Takes action to achieve goals identified during the evaluation pro-
cess.
• Provides rationales for practice beliefs, decisions, and actions as
part of the informal and formal evaluation processes.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM78
Nursing Informatics.indd 191 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
192 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 9. QUALITY OF PRACTICE
The informatics nurse systematically enhances the quality and
effectiveness of nursing and informatics practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Demonstrates quality by documenting the application of the nurs-
ing process in a responsible, accountable, and ethical manner.
• Uses the results of quality improvement activities to initiate
changes in nursing and informatics practice and in the healthcare
delivery system.
• Uses creativity and innovation in nursing and informatics practice
to improve care delivery.
• Incorporates new knowledge to initiate changes in nursing and
informatics practice if desired outcomes are not achieved.
• Participates in quality improvement activities. Such activities may
include:
• Identifying aspects of practice important for quality monitoring.
• Using indicators developed to monitor quality and effectiveness
of nursing and informatics practice.
• Collecting data to monitor quality and effectiveness of nursing
and informatics practice.
• Analyzing quality data to identify opportunities for improving
nursing and informatics practice.
• Formulating recommendations to improve nursing and infor-
matics practice or outcomes.
• Implementing activities to enhance the quality of nursing and
informatics practice.
• Engaging in the development, implementation, and evaluation
of policies, procedures, and guidelines to improve the quality of
practice.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 79
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM79
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
80 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Participating on interdisciplinary teams to evaluate clinical care
or delivery of health services.
• Participating in efforts to minimize costs and unnecessary
duplication.
• Analyzing factors related to safety, satisfaction, effectiveness, and
cost–benefit options.
• Analyzing organizational systems for barriers.
• Implementing processes to remove or decrease barriers within
organizational systems.
• Obtains and maintains professional certification if available in the
area of expertise.
• Designs quality improvement initiatives.
• Implements initiatives to evaluate the need for change.
• Evaluates the practice environment in relation to existing evidence,
identifying opportunities for the generation and use of research.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM80
Nursing Informatics.indd 192 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 193
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 9. QUALITY OF PRACTICE
The informatics nurse systematically enhances the quality and
effectiveness of nursing and informatics practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Demonstrates quality by documenting the application of the nurs-
ing process in a responsible, accountable, and ethical manner.
• Uses the results of quality improvement activities to initiate
changes in nursing and informatics practice and in the healthcare
delivery system.
• Uses creativity and innovation in nursing and informatics practice
to improve care delivery.
• Incorporates new knowledge to initiate changes in nursing and
informatics practice if desired outcomes are not achieved.
• Participates in quality improvement activities. Such activities may
include:
• Identifying aspects of practice important for quality monitoring.
• Using indicators developed to monitor quality and effectiveness
of nursing and informatics practice.
• Collecting data to monitor quality and effectiveness of nursing
and informatics practice.
• Analyzing quality data to identify opportunities for improving
nursing and informatics practice.
• Formulating recommendations to improve nursing and infor-
matics practice or outcomes.
• Implementing activities to enhance the quality of nursing and
informatics practice.
• Engaging in the development, implementation, and evaluation
of policies, procedures, and guidelines to improve the quality of
practice.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 79
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM79
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
80 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Participating on interdisciplinary teams to evaluate clinical care
or delivery of health services.
• Participating in efforts to minimize costs and unnecessary
duplication.
• Analyzing factors related to safety, satisfaction, effectiveness, and
cost–benefit options.
• Analyzing organizational systems for barriers.
• Implementing processes to remove or decrease barriers within
organizational systems.
• Obtains and maintains professional certification if available in the
area of expertise.
• Designs quality improvement initiatives.
• Implements initiatives to evaluate the need for change.
• Evaluates the practice environment in relation to existing evidence,
identifying opportunities for the generation and use of research.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM80
Nursing Informatics.indd 193 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
194 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 10. COLLEGIALITY
The informatics nurse interacts with and contributes to the profes-
sional development of peers and colleagues.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Shares knowledge and skills with peers and colleagues as evi-
denced by such activities as presentations at formal or informal
meetings and professional conferences.
• Provides peers with feedback regarding their practice and role
performance.
• Interacts with peers and colleagues to enhance one’s own profes-
sional nursing practice and role performance.
• Maintains compassionate and caring relationships with peers and
colleagues.
• Contributes to an environment that is conducive to the education
of healthcare professionals.
• Contributes to a supportive and healthy work environment.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Participates on interdisciplinary professional teams that contribute
to role development and, directly or indirectly, advance nursing,
informatics practice, and health services.
• Mentors other registered nurses and colleagues as appropriate.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 81
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM81
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
82 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARD 11. COLLABORATION
The informatics nurse collaborates with key stakeholders and
others in the conduct of nursing and informatics practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Communicates with key stakeholders regarding the practice of
nursing and informatics.
• Communicates with key stakeholders regarding the role of nurses
and nursing within the domain of healthcare informatics and
patient care delivery.
• Collaborates in creating a documented plan focused on outcomes
and decisions related to the management of data, information, and
knowledge for the delivery of healthcare services.
• Partners with others to effect change and generate positive out-
comes through knowledge of the plan and situation.
• Documents plans, communications, rationales for plan changes,
and collaborative discussions.
Additional Measurement Criteria for Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Partners with others to enhance health care, and ultimately pa-
tient care, through interdisciplinary activities such as education,
consultation, management, technological development, or re-
search opportunities.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM82
Nursing Informatics.indd 194 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 195
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 10. COLLEGIALITY
The informatics nurse interacts with and contributes to the profes-
sional development of peers and colleagues.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Shares knowledge and skills with peers and colleagues as evi-
denced by such activities as presentations at formal or informal
meetings and professional conferences.
• Provides peers with feedback regarding their practice and role
performance.
• Interacts with peers and colleagues to enhance one’s own profes-
sional nursing practice and role performance.
• Maintains compassionate and caring relationships with peers and
colleagues.
• Contributes to an environment that is conducive to the education
of healthcare professionals.
• Contributes to a supportive and healthy work environment.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Participates on interdisciplinary professional teams that contribute
to role development and, directly or indirectly, advance nursing,
informatics practice, and health services.
• Mentors other registered nurses and colleagues as appropriate.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 81
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM81
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
82 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARD 11. COLLABORATION
The informatics nurse collaborates with key stakeholders and
others in the conduct of nursing and informatics practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Communicates with key stakeholders regarding the practice of
nursing and informatics.
• Communicates with key stakeholders regarding the role of nurses
and nursing within the domain of healthcare informatics and
patient care delivery.
• Collaborates in creating a documented plan focused on outcomes
and decisions related to the management of data, information, and
knowledge for the delivery of healthcare services.
• Partners with others to effect change and generate positive out-
comes through knowledge of the plan and situation.
• Documents plans, communications, rationales for plan changes,
and collaborative discussions.
Additional Measurement Criteria for Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Partners with others to enhance health care, and ultimately pa-
tient care, through interdisciplinary activities such as education,
consultation, management, technological development, or re-
search opportunities.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM82
Nursing Informatics.indd 195 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
196 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 12. ETHICS
The informatics nurse integrates ethical provisions in all areas of
practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Uses Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements (ANA,
2001) to guide practice.
• Uses nursing and informatics principles and methodologies in a
manner that preserves and protects patient autonomy, dignity, and
rights.
• Employs informatics principles, standards, and methodologies to
establish and maintain patient confidentiality within legal and
regulatory parameters.
• Evaluates factors related to privacy, security, and confidentiality in
the use and handling of data, information, and knowledge.
• Promotes active engagement of community members in the over-
sight and management of the exchange of health information.
• Serves as a patient advocate assisting patients in developing skills
for self advocacy.
• Contributes to resolving ethical issues of patients, colleagues, or
systems as evidenced in such activities as participating on ethics
committees.
• Reports illegal, incompetent, or impaired practices.
• Seeks available resources as needed when formulating ethical
decisions.
• Demonstrates a commitment to practicing self-care, managing
stress, and connecting with self and others.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 83
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM83
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
84 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist
• Participates on multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary teams that
address ethical risks, benefits, and outcomes.
• Informs administrators or others of the risks, benefits, and outcomes
of programs and decisions that affect healthcare delivery.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM84
Nursing Informatics.indd 196 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 197
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 12. ETHICS
The informatics nurse integrates ethical provisions in all areas of
practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Uses Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements (ANA,
2001) to guide practice.
• Uses nursing and informatics principles and methodologies in a
manner that preserves and protects patient autonomy, dignity, and
rights.
• Employs informatics principles, standards, and methodologies to
establish and maintain patient confidentiality within legal and
regulatory parameters.
• Evaluates factors related to privacy, security, and confidentiality in
the use and handling of data, information, and knowledge.
• Promotes active engagement of community members in the over-
sight and management of the exchange of health information.
• Serves as a patient advocate assisting patients in developing skills
for self advocacy.
• Contributes to resolving ethical issues of patients, colleagues, or
systems as evidenced in such activities as participating on ethics
committees.
• Reports illegal, incompetent, or impaired practices.
• Seeks available resources as needed when formulating ethical
decisions.
• Demonstrates a commitment to practicing self-care, managing
stress, and connecting with self and others.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 83
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM83
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
84 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist
• Participates on multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary teams that
address ethical risks, benefits, and outcomes.
• Informs administrators or others of the risks, benefits, and outcomes
of programs and decisions that affect healthcare delivery.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM84
Nursing Informatics.indd 197 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
198 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 13. RESEARCH
The informatics nurse integrates research findings into practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Utilizes the best available evidence, including research findings, to
guide practice decisions.
• Actively participates in research activities at various levels appro-
priate to the nurse’s level of education and position. Such activities
may include:
• Identifying clinical, nursing, and informatics problems or issues
specific to nursing research.
• Participating in data collection such as surveys, pilot projects,
and formal studies.
• Participating in a formal committee or program.
• Sharing research activities and findings with peers and others.
• Conducting research.
• Critically analyzing and interpreting research for application to
practice.
• Using research findings in the development of policies, proce-
dures, and standards of practice in patient care.
• Incorporating research as a basis for learning.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Contributes to nursing knowledge by conducting or synthesizing
research that discovers, examines, and evaluates knowledge, theo-
ries, criteria, and creative approaches to improve health care.
• Formally disseminates research findings through activities such as
presentations, publications, consultation, and journal clubs.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 85
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM85
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
86 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARD 14. RESOURCE UTILIZATION
The informatics nurse considers factors related to safety, effective-
ness, cost, and impact on practice in the planning and delivery of
services to achieve expected outcomes.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Evaluates factors such as safety, effectiveness, availability, cost and
benefits, efficiencies, and impact on practice, when choosing prac-
tice options that would result in the same expected outcome.
• Assists stakeholders in identifying and securing appropriate and
available services to address identified needs and implement and
complete the plan or other activity.
• Assigns or delegates tasks based on the knowledge, skills, and abili-
ties of the individual, complexity of the task, and predictability of
the outcome.
• Assists stakeholders in becoming informed consumers about the
options, costs, risks, and benefits of the plan and its associated
activities.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Develops innovative solutions and applies strategies to obtain ap-
propriate resources for nursing initiatives.
• Secures organizational resources to ensure a work environment
conducive to completing the identified plan and outcomes.
• Develops evaluation methods to measure the safety and effective-
ness of interventions and outcomes.
• Promotes activities that assist stakeholders, as appropriate, in be-
coming informed about costs, risks, and benefits of care or of the
plan and solution.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM86
Nursing Informatics.indd 198 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 199
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 13. RESEARCH
The informatics nurse integrates research findings into practice.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Utilizes the best available evidence, including research findings, to
guide practice decisions.
• Actively participates in research activities at various levels appro-
priate to the nurse’s level of education and position. Such activities
may include:
• Identifying clinical, nursing, and informatics problems or issues
specific to nursing research.
• Participating in data collection such as surveys, pilot projects,
and formal studies.
• Participating in a formal committee or program.
• Sharing research activities and findings with peers and others.
• Conducting research.
• Critically analyzing and interpreting research for application to
practice.
• Using research findings in the development of policies, proce-
dures, and standards of practice in patient care.
• Incorporating research as a basis for learning.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Contributes to nursing knowledge by conducting or synthesizing
research that discovers, examines, and evaluates knowledge, theo-
ries, criteria, and creative approaches to improve health care.
• Formally disseminates research findings through activities such as
presentations, publications, consultation, and journal clubs.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 85
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM85
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
86 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARD 14. RESOURCE UTILIZATION
The informatics nurse considers factors related to safety, effective-
ness, cost, and impact on practice in the planning and delivery of
services to achieve expected outcomes.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Evaluates factors such as safety, effectiveness, availability, cost and
benefits, efficiencies, and impact on practice, when choosing prac-
tice options that would result in the same expected outcome.
• Assists stakeholders in identifying and securing appropriate and
available services to address identified needs and implement and
complete the plan or other activity.
• Assigns or delegates tasks based on the knowledge, skills, and abili-
ties of the individual, complexity of the task, and predictability of
the outcome.
• Assists stakeholders in becoming informed consumers about the
options, costs, risks, and benefits of the plan and its associated
activities.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Develops innovative solutions and applies strategies to obtain ap-
propriate resources for nursing initiatives.
• Secures organizational resources to ensure a work environment
conducive to completing the identified plan and outcomes.
• Develops evaluation methods to measure the safety and effective-
ness of interventions and outcomes.
• Promotes activities that assist stakeholders, as appropriate, in be-
coming informed about costs, risks, and benefits of care or of the
plan and solution.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM86
Nursing Informatics.indd 199 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
200 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 15. ADVOCACY
The informatics nurse advocates for the protections and rights of
patients, healthcare providers, institutions and organizations, and
for issues related to data, information, knowledge, and health care.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Supports patients’ access to their own personal health information
within a reasonable time.
• Promotes patients’ awareness of how their personal health data
and information may be used and who has access to it.
• Supports the individual’s right and ability to supplement, request
correction of, and share their personal health data and information.
• Evaluates factors related to privacy, security, and confidentiality in
the use and handling of health information.
• Promotes awareness and education of the healthcare consumer
with regard to appropriate data collection, information sharing,
information access, and associated issues.
• Supports patient involvement in their own care, facilitated by
access to personal healthcare data.
• Promotes active engagement of community members in the
development, oversight, and management of health information
exchange.
• Educates clinicians, patients, and communities about the rights,
responsibilities, and accountability entailed in the collection, use,
and exchange of healthcare data and information.
• Incorporates the identified needs of the patient, family, healthcare
provider, organization, and key stakeholders in policy development,
program and services planning, and systems design.
• Integrates advocacy into the implementation of policies, programs
and services, and systems for the patient.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 87
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM87
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
88 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Evaluates the effectiveness of advocating for the patient, family,
healthcare provider, organization, and key stakeholders when as-
sessing the actual outcomes.
• Demonstrates skill in advocating before providers and stakeholders
on behalf of the patient, community, or population.
• Strives to resolve conflicting expectations from patients, families,
communities, populations, healthcare providers, and other stake-
holders.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Demonstrates skill in advocating on behalf of the patient, key stake-
holders, programs, and services before public representatives and
decision-makers.
• Exhibits fiscal responsibility and integrity in advocacy and formu-
lating policy.
• Serves as an expert for patients, peers, other healthcare providers,
and other stakeholders in promoting and implementing policies
related to the management of data, information, and knowledge.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM88
Nursing Informatics.indd 200 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 201
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 15. ADVOCACY
The informatics nurse advocates for the protections and rights of
patients, healthcare providers, institutions and organizations, and
for issues related to data, information, knowledge, and health care.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Supports patients’ access to their own personal health information
within a reasonable time.
• Promotes patients’ awareness of how their personal health data
and information may be used and who has access to it.
• Supports the individual’s right and ability to supplement, request
correction of, and share their personal health data and information.
• Evaluates factors related to privacy, security, and confidentiality in
the use and handling of health information.
• Promotes awareness and education of the healthcare consumer
with regard to appropriate data collection, information sharing,
information access, and associated issues.
• Supports patient involvement in their own care, facilitated by
access to personal healthcare data.
• Promotes active engagement of community members in the
development, oversight, and management of health information
exchange.
• Educates clinicians, patients, and communities about the rights,
responsibilities, and accountability entailed in the collection, use,
and exchange of healthcare data and information.
• Incorporates the identified needs of the patient, family, healthcare
provider, organization, and key stakeholders in policy development,
program and services planning, and systems design.
• Integrates advocacy into the implementation of policies, programs
and services, and systems for the patient.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 87
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM87
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
88 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
• Evaluates the effectiveness of advocating for the patient, family,
healthcare provider, organization, and key stakeholders when as-
sessing the actual outcomes.
• Demonstrates skill in advocating before providers and stakeholders
on behalf of the patient, community, or population.
• Strives to resolve conflicting expectations from patients, families,
communities, populations, healthcare providers, and other stake-
holders.
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Demonstrates skill in advocating on behalf of the patient, key stake-
holders, programs, and services before public representatives and
decision-makers.
• Exhibits fiscal responsibility and integrity in advocacy and formu-
lating policy.
• Serves as an expert for patients, peers, other healthcare providers,
and other stakeholders in promoting and implementing policies
related to the management of data, information, and knowledge.
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM88
Nursing Informatics.indd 201 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
202 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 16. LEADERSHIP
The informatics nurse provides leadership in the professional prac-
tice setting and the profession.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Engages in teamwork as a team player and a team builder.
• Works to create and maintain healthy work environments in local,
regional, national, or international communities.
• Displays the ability to define a clear vision, the associated goals, and
a plan to implement and measure progress.
• Demonstrates a commitment to continuous, lifelong learning for
self and others.
• Teaches others to succeed by mentoring and other strategies.
• Exhibits creativity and flexibility through times of change.
• Demonstrates energy, excitement, and a passion for quality work.
• Willingly accepts mistakes by self and others, thereby creating a
culture in which risk-taking is not only safe, but expected.
• Inspires loyalty through valuing of people as the most precious
asset in an organization.
• Directs the coordination of the plan across settings and among
caregivers and other stakeholders.
• Serves in key roles in the work setting by participating on commit-
tees, councils, and administrative teams.
• Promotes advancement of the profession through participation in
professional organizations.
• Assumes leadership roles within organizations representing nurs-
ing informatics professional practice in the healthcare domain.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 89
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM89
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Serves in key leadership roles defining the vision, strategy, and tac-
tical plans related to the management of data, information, and
knowledge.
• Works to influence decision-making bodies to improve patient care,
health services, and policies through such things as the adoption
of data standards.
• Promotes communication of information and advancement of the
profession through writing, publishing, and presentations for pro-
fessional or lay audiences.
• Designs innovations to effect change in practice and outcomes.
• Provides direction to enhance the effectiveness of the interdiscipli-
nary team and key stakeholders.
90 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM90
Nursing Informatics.indd 202 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 203
Appendix B. nursing informAtics: scope & stAndArds of prActice (2008)
The content in this appendix is not current and is of historical significance only.
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARD 16. LEADERSHIP
The informatics nurse provides leadership in the professional prac-
tice setting and the profession.
Measurement Criteria:
The informatics nurse:
• Engages in teamwork as a team player and a team builder.
• Works to create and maintain healthy work environments in local,
regional, national, or international communities.
• Displays the ability to define a clear vision, the associated goals, and
a plan to implement and measure progress.
• Demonstrates a commitment to continuous, lifelong learning for
self and others.
• Teaches others to succeed by mentoring and other strategies.
• Exhibits creativity and flexibility through times of change.
• Demonstrates energy, excitement, and a passion for quality work.
• Willingly accepts mistakes by self and others, thereby creating a
culture in which risk-taking is not only safe, but expected.
• Inspires loyalty through valuing of people as the most precious
asset in an organization.
• Directs the coordination of the plan across settings and among
caregivers and other stakeholders.
• Serves in key roles in the work setting by participating on commit-
tees, councils, and administrative teams.
• Promotes advancement of the profession through participation in
professional organizations.
• Assumes leadership roles within organizations representing nurs-
ing informatics professional practice in the healthcare domain.
Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice 89
Continued R
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM89
Additional Measurement Criteria for the Informatics Nurse Specialist:
The informatics nurse specialist:
• Serves in key leadership roles defining the vision, strategy, and tac-
tical plans related to the management of data, information, and
knowledge.
• Works to influence decision-making bodies to improve patient care,
health services, and policies through such things as the adoption
of data standards.
• Promotes communication of information and advancement of the
profession through writing, publishing, and presentations for pro-
fessional or lay audiences.
• Designs innovations to effect change in practice and outcomes.
• Provides direction to enhance the effectiveness of the interdiscipli-
nary team and key stakeholders.
90 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice
STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE
Informatics Nursing_Pgs_1-204.PMD 1/10/2008, 8:59 AM90
Nursing Informatics.indd 203 11/6/14 4:06 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
This page intentionally left blank
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 205
Index
A
AACN (American Association of Colleges
of Nurses), 37
ABC Codes, 10
Access to health information
advocacy for [2008], 200
balance of privacy and [2008],
160–161
tools for, 60
[2008], 169
Access to health services, 24, 36
[2008], 119, 135, 140
Accountability, 84
[2008], 192, 200
Accountable care organizations (ACOs),
63, 64
ACOs (accountable care organizations),
63, 64
“Adjacency error,” 34
Administration, leadership, and
management (NI functional area),
19–21
[2008], 130, 131–132
Advanced practice in NI. See Informatics
Nurse Specialist (INS)
Advocacy, 31–32
[2008], 200–201
coordination of activities and [2008],
185
environmental health, and 93, 94
ethics and, 50, 79, 80
[2008], 196
health teaching and health promotion
and, 76
implementation and, 73
NI functional area, 31–32
resource utilization and, 92
standard of professional performance
[2008], 200–201
for user access and security [2008],
161–162
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality (AHRQ), 62
AHIMA (American Health Information
Management Association), 46
AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality), 62
An index entry preceded by a bracketed calendar year indicates an entry from
a previous edition or predecessor publication that is included in this edition
as an appendix.
Nursing informatics Index.indd 205 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
206 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
American Association of Colleges of
Nurses (AACN), 37, 42
American Health Information
Management Association (AHIMA), 46
American Medical Informatics
Association (AMIA), 43
[2008], 153
American Nurses Association (ANA), 43
Code of Ethics for Nurses, 49–52, 79
[2008], 160–161, 196
informatics activities of, 1, 9–10
[2008], 114–115, 120–122
NI terminologies and data element
sets, 9–10
See also Code of Ethics for Nurses
with Interpretive Statements
American Nurses Credentialing Center
(ANCC), 43, 48
[2008], 130, 149
American Nursing Informatics
Association (ANIA), 43
American Organization of Nurse
Executives
on competencies in NI, 40
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act, 44
2009 American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA), 62
AMIA (American Medical Informatics
Association), 43
[2008], 153
ANA. See American Nurses Association
(ANA)
Analysis
activities, 22
assessment and, 68
of meta-database, 21–22
as NI functional area, 21–22
[2008], 132–133
outcomes, 22
See also Critical thinking, analysis,
and synthesis
ANCC (American Nurses Credentialing
Center), 43, 48
[2008], 130, 149
ANIA (American Nursing Informatics
Association), 43
ARRA (2009 American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act), 62
Assessment, 18, 25
diagnosis problems, and issues
identification and, 70
evaluation and [2008], 189
problems and issues identification, 70
[2008], 181
standard of practice, 68–69
[2008], 180
Auditing systems, 23
B
Behavior analyst, 22
Body area network (wearable
computing), 56–57
Body of knowledge
[2008], 159
education and, 81
[2008], 190
quality of practice and, 84
[2008], 192
research and, 83
[2008], 198
See also Evidence-based practice
C
Care delivery models, 63–65
[2008], 172–173
Care recipient. See Patient
Case management. See Coordination
of activities
CCC (Clinical Care Classification)
System, 10
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention), 23
CDC-PHIN/VADS (CDC-Public Health
Information Network/Vocabulary
Access and Distribution System), 12
CDC-Public Health Information
Network/Vocabulary Access and
Nursing informatics Index.indd 206 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 207
INDEX
Distribution System (CDC-PHIN/
VADS), 12
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), 23
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), 22, 23, 65
Certification and credentialing
[2008], 130, 149
of informatics nurses, 48
quality of practice and, 85
[2008], 193
Certified Healthcare Technology
Specialist (CHTS), 46
Certified in Healthcare Privacy and
Security (CHPS®), 46
CHPS® (Certified in Healthcare Privacy
and Security), 46
CHTS (Certified Healthcare Technology
Specialist), 46
Client. See Patient
Client education, 27
Clinical Care Classification (CCC)
System, 10
Clinical settings. See Practice
environment
Clinical vocabulary standards (ONC HIT
Standards Committee recommended),
12–13
Cloud-based collaboration, 59
Code of Ethics for Nurses (ANA, 2001),
49, 79
[2008], 160–161, 196
provisions of, 49–52
See also Ethics
Code of Ethics for Nurses with
Interpretive Statements, 79
[2008], 160, 196
Collaboration
[2008], 125
implementation and, 73
[2008], 184
standard of professional performance,
89–90
[2008], 195
See also Healthcare providers;
Interdisciplinary health care
Collegiality
Collaboration
consultation and, 77
implementation and, 74
planning and, 72
standard of professional
performance, 89–90
[2008], 195
implementation and [2008], 184
professional practice evaluation and, 91
[2008], 191
standard of professional performance
[2008], 194
Communication
collaboration and, 89
[2008], 195
collegiality and [2008], 194
consultation and, 77
[2008], 188
environmental health and, 93
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
evidence-based practice and, 89
implementation and, 73, 74
information communication, 14
[2008], 123, 126, 140, 178
leadership and, 87
[2008], 203
research and, 83
[2008], 198
standard of professional performance,
86
Competence assessment. See Certification
and credentialing
Competencies in NI, 37–47
[2008], 146–156
American Organization of Nurse
Executives on, 40
assessment, 68–69
collaboration, 89–90
communication, 86
computer literacy, 28
consultation, 77
coordination of activities, 75
diagnosis, 70
Nursing informatics Index.indd 207 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
208 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
domains of [2008], 149
education, 81–82
[2008], 147–148
environmental health, 93–94
ethics, 79–80
evaluation, 78
evidence-based practice, 83
evolution of, 37
functional areas and [2008], 147–152
Healthcare Leadership Alliance
(HLA) on, 40
health teaching and health
promotion, 76
implementation, 73–74
information literacy, 28
for INs and INSs, 43
leadership, 87–88
matrix of [2008], 149–150, 151–152
metastructures and [2008], 150
National League for Nursing (NLN)
on, 41
for nurse educators, 43–44
ONC on, 44–46
outcomes identification, 71
planning, 72
problems and issues identification, 70
professional organization on, 40–41
professional practice evaluation, 91
Quality and Safety Education for
Nurses (QSEN) on, 40–41
quality of practice, 84–85
requisite for all registered nurses, 37–39
research, 39, 83
resource utilization, 92
spanning careers and roles, 41–42
synthesis of evolution of, 46–47
TIGER Initiative, 41
trends in, 52–53
[2008], 163
Compliance and integrity management
(NI functional area), 19, 22–24
[2008], 134–135
Computer literacy
as competency in NI, 28
Computer science and information
science in NI, 14, 15
Confidentiality and privacy, 79
[2008], 134, 135, 196
acccess to health information and
[2008], 160–161, 169
advocacy and [2008], 200
See also Ethics
Consulting and consultation in NI
collaboration and, 89
[2008], 195
as NI functional area, 19, 24
[2008], 135
standard of practice, 77
[2008], 188
Consumer informatics, 64–65
[2008], 173
Consumer orientation, NI research and, 33
Contact-free monitoring apps, 36
Continuity of care
planning and [2008], 183
Coordination, facilitation, and integration
(NI functional area), 19, 24–26
[2008], 136–137
Coordination of activities
standard of practice, 75
[2008], 185
See also Interdisciplinary health care
Cost control
advocacy and [2008], 201
implementation and [2008], 184
outcomes identification and, 71
[2008], 182
planning and [2008], 183
quality of practice and, 85
[2008], 193
resource utilization and, 92
[2008], 198
Cost-effectiveness. See Cost control
CPT (Current Procedural Terminology),
12, 26
Criteria. See Measurement criteria
Critical thinking, analysis, and synthesis
in NI, 17, 59, 61, 63
[2008], 124, 158, 170, 179
assessment and [2008], 180
Nursing informatics Index.indd 208 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 209
INDEX
consultation and, 77
[2008], 188
coordination of activities and [2008],
185
environmental health and, 94
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
health teaching and health
promotion, 76
[2008], 186
information systems life cycle and,
18–19, 20
[2008], 131
leadership and, 88
[2008], 203
planning and, 72
[2008], 183
professional practice evaluation and, 91
[2008], 191
quality of practice and, 84
[2008], 192
research and, 83
[2008], 198
resource utilization and, 92
[2008], 199
See also Synthesis in NI
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New
Health System for the 21st Century
(IOM report), 14
Cultural competence and issues
health teaching and health promotion
[2008], 186
implementation and, 73
outcomes identification and [2008],
182
Current Procedural Terminology (CPT),
12, 26
Curriculum design, 60
[2008], 169
Curriculum Development Centers
Program, 44–45
CVX Codes for Vaccines Administered, 12
D
Data and NI practice
analysis of meta-database, 21–22
defined, 2
as NI metastructure, 2–6
[2008], 116–118
synthesis with information into
knowledge, 3, 4, 7, 21, 116, 117
[2008], 116, 117
See also Data collection; Information
and NI practice; Knowledge and
NI practice; Metastructures,
concepts, and tools of NI
Databases
analysis of meta-database, 21–22
knowledge discovery in (KDD), 21, 59
[2008], 132–133
Data collection
advocacy and [2008], 200
assessment and, 68
[2008], 180
ethics and [2008], 162
quality of practice and, 84
[2008], 192
research and, 83
[2008], 198
Data element sets (ANA recognized), 10
[2008], 120–122
Data mining, 21, 33
Decision-making and NI practice, 17–18,
22, 59, 61, 107
[2008], 124–126
advocacy and [2008], 201
collaboration and, 89
[2008], 195
ethics and, 80
[2008], 160–161, 197
leadership and
[2008], 203
planning and [2008], 183
professional practice evaluation and, 91
[2008], 191
research and, 83
[2008], 198
Decision-support systems (DSSs), 61
[2008], 125–126
Det Norske Veritas Healthcare, Inc.
(DNV), 23
Development (NI functional area)
[2008], 137–138
Nursing informatics Index.indd 209 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
210 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
Devices and hardware, and NI, 55–57
[2008], 165
Diagnosis in NI practice, 18, 25
implementation and, 73
planning and, 72
standard of practice, 70
See also Problems and issues
identification
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition
(DSM-5), 13
Digital Imaging and Communications in
Medicine (DICOM), 26
Distance education technologies,
59–60
DNA mapping, 29
Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), 42
Documentation and NI practice, 13, 20,
26, 35
[2008], 119, 122, 125, 132, 137, 142
assessment and, 69
[2008], 180
collaboration and, 89
[2008], 195
coordination of activities and, 75
[2008], 185
education and [2008], 190
environmental health and, 93
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
evidence-based practice and, 83
implementation and, 74
[2008], 184
information systems life cycle, 18–19
[2008], 131
outcomes identification and, 71
[2008], 182
problems and issues identification, 70
[2008], 181
quality of practice and, 84
[2008], 192
Domains of NI practice [2008], 148–149
Domains of nursing practice, 22, 40
[2008], 133, 148
DSSs. See Decision-support systems
(DSSs)
E
Economic issues. See Cost control
Education and professional development
(NI functional area), 19, 27–29
[2008], 138–140
Education of NI nurses
collaboration and, 89
[2008], 195
collegiality and [2008], 194
competencies and [2008], 147–148
curriculum design, 60
[2008], 169
globalization of, 60
importance of, 46–47
information systems life cycle, 18–19
[2008], 131
professional organizations, 43
research and, 83
[2008], 198
standard of professional performance,
81–82
[2008], 190
technologies trends, 59–60
[2008], 168–169
See also Mentoring; Professional
development
Education of patients and families, 17, 27
[2008], 124, 125, 178, 187
advocacy and [2008], 200, 201
assessment and [2008], 180
evaluation and [2008], 189
outcomes identification and [2008],
182
planning and [2008], 183
problems and issues identification
[2008], 181
See also Family; Health teaching and
health promotion; Patient
Education technologies trends, 59–60
[2008], 168–169
Educators
NI competencies for, 43–44
EHR. See Electronic health record (EHR)
“e-iatrogenesis,” 34
Electronic data, 59
Nursing informatics Index.indd 210 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 211
INDEX
Electronic data capture, 11
Electronic health information systems, 7
Electronic health record (EHR), 11, 13,
29, 61
safety and security issues related to,
34–35
Embedded technologies, 23
Enterprise data warehouses, 21
Enterprise risk management (ERM), 23
Environmental factors
outcomes identification and, 71
Environmental health
as NI functional area, 19, 34–36
standard of professional performance,
93–94
Environment of NI practice. See Practice
environment
e-patients, 15, 60
Ergonomics, 14–16, 17, 55, 76
[2008], 123–124
environmental health, 93
ERM (enterprise risk management), 23
Ethics and NI, 23, 49–52
[2008], 160–162
compliance and integrity
management (NI functional area),
19, 22–24
[2008], 134–135
confidentiality, 79
[2008], 134, 135, 160–161, 196,
200
genomics and, 29–30, 62
healthcare informatics code (per
IMIA) [2008], 160–161, 162
outcomes identification and, 71
quality of practice and, 84
[2008], 192
standard of professional performance,
79–80
[2008], 196–197
See also Code of Ethics for Nurses
with Interpretive Statements;
Confidentiality and privacy
Evaluation in NI practice, 18, 25
as functional area of NI, 19, 32–34
health teaching and health promotion
and, 76
information systems life cycle, 18–19
[2008], 131
standard of practice, 78
[2008], 189
Evidence-based practice, 52
assessment and, 68
[2008], 180
consultation and, 77
[2008], 188
education and, 81
[2008], 190
environmental health and, 93
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
health teaching and health
promotion, 76
[2008], 186
implementation and, 73
[2008], 184
models of, 18
outcomes identification and [2008],
182
quality of practice and, 85
[2008], 193
standard of professional performance,
83
See also Research
Experience, user, 14–16, 17
Experimental research, 33
Expert systems, 5, 6, 18
[2008], 125, 126
See also Decision-support systems
(DSSs)
Exploratory research, 33
External environment and NI practice, 35
External partnerships, 65
[2008], 173–174
F
Facilitation (NI functional area), 19,
24–26
Family
advocacy and [2008], 200, 201
Nursing informatics Index.indd 211 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
212 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
assessment and, 68
[2008], 180
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
health teaching and health
promotion, 27, 76
[2008], 187
outcomes identification and, 71
[2008], 182
planning and, 72
[2008], 183
problems and issues identification, 70
[2008], 181
See also Education of patients and
families; Patient
Financial issues. See Cost control
Flipped classroom model, 60
Functional areas for NI practice, 18–37
[2008], 129–146
administration, leadership, and
management, 19–21
[2008], 131–132
analysis [2008], 132–133
competencies and [2008], 147–152
competencies matrix (table) [2008],
151–152
compliance and integrity
management, 22–24
[2008], 134–135
consultation, 24
[2008], 135
coordination, facilitation, and
integration, 24–26
[2008], 136–137
development [2008], 137–138
development of systems, products,
and resources, 26–27
education and professional
development, 27–29
[2008], 138–140
genetics and genomics, 29–30
information management and
operational architecture, 30–31
policy development and advocacy,
31–32
[2008], 140
quality and performance
improvement, 32
research and evaluation, 32–34
[2008], 141–142
safety, security, and environmental
health, 34–36
systems analysis and design, 21–22
telehealth services, 36–37
[2008], 142–143
The Future of Nursing: Leading Change,
Advancing Health (IOM’s report),
41–42
G
Gaming technology, and NI, 57
Generalist practice level of nursing
informatics. See Informatics Nurse (IN)
Genetics (NI functional area), 19, 29–30
Genomic Nursing State of the Science
Advisory Panel, 30
Genomics
ethical implications, 62
as NI functional area, 19, 29–30
technology trends [2008], 167–168
Geographic information system (GIS), 55
Graduate-level educational programs,
38–39
Group learning tools, 59
Guidelines in NI practice
outcomes identification and, 71
[2008], 182
professional practice evaluation and, 91
[2008], 191
quality of practice and, 84
[2008], 192
See also Standards of practice;
Standards of professional
performance
H
Hardware and devices, and NI, 55–57
[2008], 165
HCI. See Human–computer interaction
(HCI)
Nursing informatics Index.indd 212 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 213
INDEX
HCPCS (Healthcare Common Procedure
Coding System), 12
Health applications (apps), 36
Healthcare Common Procedure Coding
System (HCPCS), 12
Healthcare consumer
assessment and, 68
environmental health and, 93
health teaching and health promotion
and, 76
implementation and, 73
outcomes identification and, 71
planning and, 72
problems and issues identification, 70
Healthcare delivery and regulation
[2008], 171–172
Healthcare Facilities Accreditation
Program (HFAP), 23
Healthcare Information Technology
Standards Panel (HITSP), 63
Healthcare Leadership Alliance (HLA)
on competencies in NI, 40
Healthcare policy and NI. See Policy
and NI
Healthcare providers
advocacy and [2008], 200, 201
assessment and [2008], 180
health teaching and health promotion
[2008], 186
implementation and, 73
leadership and [2008], 202
outcomes identification and, 71
[2008], 182
planning and, 72
[2008], 183
problems and issues identification
[2008], 181
See also Collaboration;
Interdisciplinary health care
Healthcare regulatory trends [2008],
171–172
See also Laws, statutes, and
regulations
Healthcare team. See Collaboration;
Interdisciplinary health care
Health Information and Management
Systems Society (HIMSS), 14–15,
43
[2008], 129, 137, 153
Nursing Informatics Workforce
Survey, 48
Health information exchanges (HIEs), 11
Health Information Technology for
Economic and Clinical Health
(HITECH) Act, 11, 62
Health information technology specialist,
48
1996 Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA), 23
Health IT and Patient Safety: Building
Safer Systems for Better Care (report),
15, 34
Health Level Seven International (HL7),
13, 26, 63
Health records
EHR, 11, 13, 29, 61
safety and security issues related
to, 34–35
PHRs, 29
Health-related IT (HIT) products
safety and security issues, 34
Health teaching and health promotion,
27
standard of practice, 76
[2008], 186–187
HFAP (Healthcare Facilities
Accreditation Program), 23
HFES (Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society), 16
HIMSS (Health Information and
Management Systems Society), 14–15,
43
[2008], 129, 137, 153
Nursing Informatics Workforce
Survey, 48
HIPAA (1996 Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act), 23
HITECH (Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical
Health) Act, 11, 62
Nursing informatics Index.indd 213 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
214 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
HIT (health-related IT) products
safety and security issues, 34
HITSP (Healthcare Information
Technology Standards Panel), 63
HL7 (Health Level Seven International),
13, 26, 63
Holistic care [2008], 180, 186
Holograms, 58
Home care, 13
[2008], 122
Human–computer interaction (HCI),
14–16, 17, 55
[2008], 123–124
See also Ergonomics; Usability
Human factors, 14–16, 17
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
(HFES), 16
Human resources. See Education;
Professional development
I
ICNP® (International Classification for
Nursing Practice), 10, 11
IEEE P2407, 63
IHI (Institute for Healthcare
Improvement), 62
IHTSDO (International Health
Terminology Standards Development
Organisation), 13
IMIA. See International Medical
Informatics Association (IMIA)
Implementation in NI practice, 18, 25
coordination of activities and, 75
environmental health, 93, 94
evaluation and [2008], 189
information systems life cycle, 18–19
[2008], 131
leadership and, 87
[2008], 202
planning and, 72
[2008], 183
standard of practice, 73–74
[2008], 184
IN. See Informatics Nurse (IN)
Informal evaluation, 33
Informatics Nurse (IN), 7, 18, 19
[2008], 115
advocacy [2008], 200–201
assessment, 68–69
[2008], 180
certification of, 48
collaboration, 89
[2008], 195
collegiality [2008], 194
communication, 86
consultation, 77
[2008], 188
coordination of activities, 75
[2008], 185
diagnosis, 70
education, 81–82
[2008], 190
environmental health, 93
ethics, 79–80
[2008], 196
evaluation, 78
[2008], 189
evidence-based practice, 83
functional areas (See Functional areas
for NI practice)
health teaching and health
promotion, 76
[2008], 186
implementation, 73–74
[2008], 184
informatics competencies for, 42 (See
also Competencies in NI)
leadership, 87
[2008], 202
outcomes identification, 71
[2008], 182
planning, 72
[2008], 183
problem and issues identification, 70
[2008], 181
professional practice evaluation, 91
[2008], 191
quality of practice, 84–85
[2008], 192–193
research, 83
[2008], 198
Nursing informatics Index.indd 214 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 215
INDEX
resource utilization, 92
[2008], 199
role in information management, 31
roles (overview), 7–8
See also Informatics Nurse Specialist
(INS)
Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS), 7,
18, 19
[2008], 115
advocacy [2008], 200–201
assessment, 68
[2008], 180
collaboration, 90
[2008], 195
collegiality [2008], 194
communication, 86
consultation, 77
[2008], 188
coordination of activities, 75
[2008], 185
diagnosis, 70
education, 82
[2008], 190
environmental health, 93–94
ethics, 80
[2008], 197
evaluation, 78
[2008], 189
evidence-based practice, 83
functional areas (See Functional areas
for NI practice)
health teaching and health
promotion, 76
[2008], 186–187
implementation, 74
[2008], 184
informatics competencies for, 42 (See
also Competencies in NI)
leadership, 87–88
[2008], 203
outcomes identification, 71
[2008], 182
planning, 72
[2008], 183
problem and issues identification, 70
[2008], 181
professional practice evaluation, 91
[2008], 191
quality of practice, 85
[2008], 192–193
research, 83
[2008], 198
resource utilization, 92
[2008], 199
roles (overview), 7–8
See also Informatics Nurse (IN)
Information and NI practice
defined, 3
as NI metastructure, 2–6
[2008], 116–120
synthesis with data into knowledge,
3, 4, 7, 21
[2008], 116, 117
See also Data and NI practice;
Knowledge and NI practice;
Metastructures, concepts, and
tools of NI
Information communication and
NI, 14
[2008], 123, 126, 140, 178
Information literacy
as competency in NI, 28
Information management (IM), 14
as NI functional area, 19, 30–31
Information science and computer
science in NI, 14
[2008], 118, 120, 122–123, 158
Information sharing, 18
Information structures and NI, 2, 7, 14
[2008], 114, 123, 124, 126, 178
Information systems and NI, 2, 7,
11, 23
[2008], 114, 116, 119, 122, 138, 168,
169, 179
Information systems life cycle, 18–19,
20
[2008], 131
Information technology (IT), 7, 14, 15, 18,
27, 36
[2008], 122
reliability and security, 61–62
[2008], 170–171
utilization in nursing process, 18
Nursing informatics Index.indd 215 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
216 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
Information technology (IT), trends in,
53–62
devices and hardware, 55–57
[2008], 165
educational technologies, 59–60
[2008], 168–169
expanded use and, 60–61
[2008], 169–171
focus of emerging technologies, 57–58
implications, 62
knowledge representation, 59
[167], 59
nanotechnology, 54
[2008], 165–167
patient access to health information,
tools for, 60
[2008], 169
population health management tools
for, 54–55
[2008], 165
robotics, 57
[2008], 167
Innovation
trends in, 63–65
INS. See Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS)
Institute for Healthcare Improvement
(IHI), 62
Institute of Medicine (IOM), 14, 15, 41–42
Integration (NI functional area), 19,
24–26
[2008], 136–137
Integrity management (NI functional
area), 19, 22–24
[2008], 134–135
Interdisciplinary health care and
teamwork in NI
collegiality and [2008], 194
coordination of activities and, 75
[2008], 185
ethics and, 80
[2008], 197
leadership and, 87–88
[2008], 202–203
planning and [2008], 183
quality of practice and, 85
[2008], 193
Interface(s)
for consumer and healthcare
professionals, 28
between nursing informatics and
telehealth nursing, 36–37
Internal environment and NI practice, 35
International Classification for Nursing
Practice (ICNP®), 10, 11
International Classification of
Functioning, Disability, and Health
(ICF), 12
International Council of Nurses (ICN), 11
International Health Terminology
Standards Development Organisation
(IHTSDO), 13
International Medical Informatics
Association (IMIA)
code of ethics [2008], 160–161, 162
International Organization for
Standardization (ISO), 26
International Statistical Classification of
Disease and Related Health Problems
(ICD), 26
Internet, 28, 31, 32, 53
[2008], 140, 164, 187
Interprofessional collaborative practice, 20
The Interprofessional Education
Collaborative Expert Panel, 21
Interprofessional nature, in NI practice, 53
ISO-639, 13
ISO 9241-11
usability (defined), 14
user experience (defined), 16
ISO (International Organization for
Standardization), 26
J
Jakob Nielsen of the Nielsen Norman
Group, 15
Job titles and activities in NI [2008], 129
See also Functional areas for NI
practice
Nursing informatics Index.indd 216 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 217
INDEX
K
KDD (knowledge discovery in databases),
21
Knowledge and NI practice
defined, 3
evidence-based practice and, 83
NI competencies and, 47
as NI metastructure, 2–6
[2008], 116–118, 126
representation trends, 59
[2008], 167
as synthesis of data and information,
3, 4, 7, 21
Wisdom-in-Action for Clinical
Nursing© model, 107
See also Metastructures, concepts,
and tools of NI; Wisdom and NI
practice
Knowledge base. See Body of knowledge
Knowledge discovery in databases
(KDD), 21, 59
[2008], 132–133
L
Laws, statutes, and regulations
assessment and, 69
changes, trends in, 62–63
ethics and, 79
[2008], 196
information systems life cycle, 18–19
[2008], 131
planning and, 72
[2008], 183
problems and issues identification
[2008], 181
professional practice evaluation
and, 91
[2008], 191
See also Ethics
Leadership
coordination of activities and, 75
[2008], 185
as functional area in NI, 18–21
[2008], 131–132
standard of professional performance,
87–88
[2008], 202–203
See also Mentoring
Leapfrog, 62
Learning management system (LMS), 25
Licensed practical nurse (LPN), 42
Licensing. See Certification and
credentialing
LMS (learning management system), 25
Logical Observation Identifiers, Names,
and Codes (LOINC®), 10, 13
LOINC® (Logical Observation
Identifiers, Names, and Codes), 10, 13
M
Machine learning methods, 21
Management as functional area in NI,
18–21
[2008], 131–132
Matney, Susan, 107
Measurement criteria for NI practice
[2008], 180–203
advocacy [2008], 200–201
assessment [2008], 180
collaboration [2008], 195
collegiality [2008], 194
consultation [2008], 188
coordination of activities [2008],
185
education [2008], 190
ethics [2008], 196–197
evaluation [2008], 189
health teaching and health promotion
and education [2008], 186–187
implementation [2008], 184
leadership [2008], 202–203
outcomes identification [2008], 182
planning [2008], 183
problem and issues identification
[2008], 181
professional practice evaluation
[2008], 191
Nursing informatics Index.indd 217 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
218 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
quality of practice [2008], 192–193
research [2008], 198
resource utilization [2008], 199
Medication administration, new
methods, 55
Mentoring
collegiality and [2008], 194
consultation and, 77
[2008], 188
leadership and, 87, 88
[2008], 202
See also Education of NI nurses;
Professional development
Meta-database
analysis of, 21–22
Metastructures, concepts, and tools of
NI, 2–18
[2008], 116–128
competencies and [2008], 150
data, information, knowledge, and
wisdom, 2–6
[2008], 116–120
human–computer interaction (HCI),
14–16, 17
[2008], 123–124
information science and computer
science, 14
[2008], 118, 120, 122–123, 158
integration of NI into practice, 6–7
languages (nursing’s) as tool, 9
[2008], 120–121
NI practice, 7–8
nursing, nursing process, and
vocabularies, 9–13
nursing phenomena, 16–18
[2008], 124–126
sciences underpinning [2008], 120
tenets of NI, 8–9
user experience and related concepts,
14–16, 17
mHealth (mobile health), 15, 28, 36, 58
Mobile technologies
development, 27–28, 53
implications for NI, 53
Monitoring devices and NI, 55–57
[2008], 165
Multidisciplinary healthcare. See
Interdisciplinary health care
N
NANDA International, 10
Nanotechnology trend and NIs, 54
[2008], 164–165
National Council of State Boards of
Nursing (NCSBN), 41
National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST), 15
National Institutes of Health (NIH), 23
National League for Nursing (NLN), 37
on competencies in NI, 41
National Library of Medicine, 11
National Training and Dissemination
Center (NTDC), 44, 45
Nationwide Health Information Network
(NwHIN), 63
NCSBN (National Council of State
Boards of Nursing), 41
NI. See Nursing informatics (NI)
NIC (Nursing Interventions
Classification), 10
NIH (National Institutes of Health), 23
NIST (National Institute of Standards
and Technology), 15
NLN. See National League for Nursing
(NLN)
NMDS (Nursing Minimum Data Set), 10
NMMDS (Nursing Management
Minimum Data Set), 10
NOC (Nursing Outcomes Classification),
10
Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in
Clinical Nursing Practice, 6
Nurse educators
NI competencies for, 43–44
Nursing, 9
focus, 8
phenomenon of, 16–18
Nursing informatics Index.indd 218 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 219
INDEX
Nursing data set elements
(ANA recognized), 10
[2008], 120–122
Nursing informatics (NI), 1–3
[2008], 114–116
boundaries [2008], 158–159
certification, 48
Code of Ethics for Nurses (ANA,
2001), provisions of, 49–52
competencies, 37–47 (See also
Competencies in NI)
[2008], 146–156
concepts and tools from information
science and computer science,
14
definition, 1–2
ethics in, 49–52
[2008], 160–162
focus, 8
functional areas, 18–37
[2008], 129–146
future and trends, 52–66
[2008], 162–177
goals, 2
[2008], 114, 178
integration into practice, 6–7
integration of [2008], 156–157
languages, vocabularies, and
terminologies, 9–13
[2008], 120–122
metastructures, concepts, and tools,
2–18
[2008], 116–128
practice, 7–8
principles, 2
sociotechnical issues, 15–16
specialty practice, preparation for,
47–49
and telehealth nursing, interface
between, 36–37
tenets, 8–9
[2008], 159–160
user experience and related concepts,
14–16, 17
See also Scope of NI practice
Nursing Informatics Workforce Survey
(HIMSS), 48
Nursing Interventions Classification
(NIC), 10
Nursing languages, vocabularies, and
terminologies, 9–13, 33
[2008], 120–122
analysis and, 21–22
applied to outcomes, 13, 22, 33
[2008], 122, 133, 141–142
Nursing Management Minimum Data
Set (NMMDS), 10
Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS), 10
Nursing Outcomes Classification
(NOC), 10
Nursing process in NI, 9
quality of practice and, 84
[2008], 192
See also Standards of Practice
Nursing standards. See Standards of
practice; Standards of professional
performance
Nursing terminologies. See Nursing
languages, vocabularies, and
terminologies
NwHIN (Nationwide Health Information
Network), 63
O
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology
(ONC), 11, 44–46, 63
Omaha System, 10
ONC HIT Standards Committee
clinical vocabulary standards, 12–13
Operational architecture (OpArc)
as NI functional area, 19, 30–31
Oregon Health and Science Center, 44
Organizations. See Professional
organizations and NI
Outcomes and NI practice
analysis of, 22
collaboration and, 89
[2008], 195
Nursing informatics Index.indd 219 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
220 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
coordination of activities and, 75
[2008], 185
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
implementation and, 73
[2008], 184
information sharing and, 18
nursing languages and, 13, 22, 33
[2008], 122, 133, 141–142
planning and, 72
[2008], 183
problems and issues identification, 70
[2008], 181
resource utilization and, 92
[2008], 198
See also Outcomes identification
Outcomes identification, 18, 25
standard of practice, 71
[2008], 180
wisdom and [2008], 119
See also Outcomes and NI practice
P
Parents. See Family
Partnerships, external, 65
[2008], 173–174
Patient
advocacy and [2008], 200, 201
assessment and [2008], 180
ethics and, 79
[2008], 196
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
outcomes identification and [2008],
182
planning and, 72
[2008], 183
problems and issues identification
[2008], 181
See also Education of patients and
families; Family
Pay-for-performance incentives, 22
Performance appraisal. See Professional
practice evaluation
Performance improvement (NI
functional area), 19, 32
Perioperative Nursing Data Set (PNDS), 10
Personal health records (PHRs), 29
PHRs. See Personal health records
(PHRs)
PIECES, assessment algorithm is, 68
Planning in NI practice, 18, 25
collaboration and, 89
[2008], 195
consultation and, 77
[2008], 188
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
implementation and, 73–74
[2008], 184
leadership and, 87
[2008], 202
outcomes identification and, 71
[2008], 182
problems and issues identification, 70
[2008], 181
resource utilization and, 92
[2008], 198
standard of practice, 72
[2008], 183
PNDS (Perioperative Nursing Data Set),
10
Policy and NI
advocacy and 31–32
[2008], 200
advocacy and (NI functional area), 19,
31–32
[2008], 140
evaluation and, 78
[2008], 189
quality of practice and, 85
[2008], 192
research and [2008], 198
Population health management tools,
54–55
[2008], 165
Position titles and activities in NI, 19–20
[2008], 129–130
See also Functional areas for NI
practice
Practice environment, 27
[2008], 125, 138
Nursing informatics Index.indd 220 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 221
INDEX
collegiality and [2008], 194
leadership and, 87
[2008], 202
outcomes identification and [2008],
182
quality of practice and, 85
[2008], 192
resource utilization and, 92
[2008], 198
Practice settings. See Practice
environment
Preceptors. See Mentoring
Privacy. See Confidentiality and privacy
Problems and issues identification
standard of practice, 70
implementation and, 73
planning and, 72
[2008], 181
See also Diagnosis in NI practice
Process improvement, 33
Products development (NI functional
area), 19, 26–27
Professional certification, as informatics
nurse, 48
Professional development in NI
collegiality and [2008], 194
consultation and, 77
[2008], 188
education and, 27–29, 81
[2008], 190
health teaching and health
promotion, 76
[2008], 186, 187
as NI functional area, 19, 27–29
[2008], 138–140
professional practice evaluation and, 91
[2008], 191
See also Education; Leadership;
Mentoring
Professional organizations and NI, 87
[2008], 202
education in NI and, 43
See also specific organizations
Professional performance. See Standards
of professional performance
Professional practice evaluation
standard of professional performance,
91
[2008], 191
Project coordination and NI practice,
25
Q
QSEN. See Quality and Safety Education
for Nurses (QSEN)
Quality and performance improvement
(NI functional area), 19, 32
Quality and Safety Education for Nurses
(QSEN), 37
on competencies in NI, 40–41
Quality assurance (QA) analyst, 22
Quality improvement (QI) specialist, 22
Quality of care, 36
Quality of practice
implementation and [2008], 184
planning and [2008], 183
standard of professional performance,
84–85
[2008], 192–193
Quality standards, trends in, 62–63
R
Radio-frequency identification (RFID),
23
Recipient of care. See Patient
Records and records management. See
Health records
Registered Environmental Health
Specialist, 35
Regulatory issues. See Laws, statutes, and
regulations
Reliability and NI practice, 61
[2008], 170
Remote monitoring, 36, 56, 58
Reporting systems, 23
Nursing informatics Index.indd 221 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
222 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
Research in NI
activities, 33
collaboration and, 89
[2008], 195
education and, 82
[2008], 190
as functional area of NI, 19, 32–34
[2008], 141–142
NI competencies, 39
planning and, 72
[2008], 183
quality of practice and, 85
[2008], 193
security [2008], 161–162
standard of professional performance,
83
[2008], 198
See also Evidence-based practice
Resources development (NI functional
area), 19, 26–27
Resource utilization
coordination of activities and, 75
[2008], 185
environmental health and, 93
ethics and, 79
[2008], 196
health teaching and health promotion
[2008], 187
implementation and, 74
[2008], 184
planning and [2008], 183
standard of professional performance,
92
[2008], 199
RFID. See Radio-frequency identification
(RFID)
Risk assessment, 61
health teaching and health
promotion, 76
[2008], 186
outcomes identification and [2008],
182
problems and issues identification, 70
resource utilization and, 92
[2008], 198
Robotics, 57
[2008], 167
Role Delineation Study: Nursing
Informatics—National Survey Results
(ANCC), 43
RxNORM, 13
S
Safety and safety assurance and NI
as functional area of NI, 19, 34–36
implementation and [2008], 184
quality of practice and, 85
[2008], 193
resource utilization and, 92
[2008], 198
systems design and, 16, 21, 124,
132, 148
See also Ergonomics; Usability
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), 22
School health, 55
School health management tools, 54
Scientific findings. See Evidence-based
practice; Research
Scope of NI practice, 1–66
[2008], 114–177
Security (NI functional area), 19,
34–36
Security issues (data and information)
advocacy and [2008], 200
compliance and integrity
management (NI functional area),
19, 22–24
[2008], 134–135
ethics and, 79
[2008], 196
ethics and [2008], 161–162
IT, 61–62
[2008], 170–171
Self care and self management, 76, 80
[2008], 186
Self-care theory, 73
Settings. See Practice environment
SNOMED CT (Systematic Nomenclature
of Medicine Clinical Terms), 10, 11,
13, 21
Nursing informatics Index.indd 222 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 223
INDEX
Sociotechnical issues, and NI practice,
15–16
Specialty certification. See Certification
and credentialing
Specialty practice, in NI, 47–49
advancing professional nursing
specialty, 48–49
certification, 48
Standards of NI practice, 67–78
[2008], 178–189
assessment, 68–69
[2008], 180
consultation, 77
[2008], 188
coordination of activities, 75
[2008], 185
diagnosis, 70
evaluation, 78
[2008], 189
health teaching and health
promotion, 76
[2008], 186–187
implementation, 73–74
[2008], 184
outcomes identification, 71
[2008], 180
planning, 72
[2008], 183
problems and issues identification, 70
[2008], 181
significance, 67
Standards of NI professional
performance
[2008], 190–203
advocacy [2008], 200–201
collaboration, 89–90
[2008], 195
collegiality [2008], 194
communication, 86
education, 81–82
[2008], 190
environmental health, 93–94
ethics, 79–80
[2008], 196–197
evidence-based practice, 83
leadership, 87–88
[2008], 202–203
professional practice evaluation, 91
[2008], 191
quality of practice, 84–85
[2008], 192–193
research, 83
[2008], 198
resource utilization, 92
[2008], 199
Synthesis in NI
in assessment [2008], 180
in consultation, 77
[2008], 188
in coordination of activities, 75
[2008], 185
in evaluation, 78
[2008], 189
evolution of competencies, 46–47
health teaching and health promotion
[2008], 186
of information and data into
knowledge, 3, 4, 7, 21
[2008], 116, 117
planning and [2008], 183
in research, 83
[2008], 198
See also Critical thinking, analysis,
and synthesis in NI
Systematic Nomenclature of Medicine
Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT), 10,
11, 13, 21
Systems analysis and design (NI
functional area), 19, 21–22
Systems development (NI functional
area), 19, 26–27
T
Teaching. See Education of NI nurses;
Education of patients and families;
Health teaching and health promotion
Teams and teamwork. See
Interdisciplinary health care
Technology Informatics Guiding
Education Reform (TIGER) initiative,
15, 38, 46
on competencies in NI, 41
Nursing informatics Index.indd 223 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
224 Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition
INDEX
Telehealth services
NI functional area, 19, 28, 36–37
[2008], 142–143
trends in, 57–58
Terminologies and NI practice, 9–13, 33,
70, 72
[2008], 183
ANA recognized, 10
See also Nursing languages,
vocabularies, and terminologies
The Joint Commission (TJC), 23
[2008], 134, 172
Thinking-in-Action approach, 6
TIGER (Technology Informatics Guiding
Education Reform) initiative, 15, 38,
46
on competencies in NI, 41
TIGER Nursing Informatics
Competencies Model, 38
TIGER Virtual Learning Environment,
38
TJC (The Joint Commission), 23
[2008], 134, 172
To Err is Human: Building a Safer
Health System (IOM, 1999), 22
Training, 27
Transition to Practice (TTP) nursing
preceptor model, 41–42
Trends in NI, 52–66
[2008], 162–177
care delivery models and innovation,
63–65
[2008], 172–173
competencies and positions [2008],
163
consumer informatics, 64–65
[2008], 173
devices and hardware, 55–57
[2008], 165
educational technologies, 59–60
[2008], 168–169
external partnerships, 65
[2008], 173–174
focus of emerging technologies, 57–58
genomics [2008], 167–168
healthcare delivery and regulation
[2008], 171–172
implications, 62, 65
INSs and [2008], 171, 174
IT use and, 60–61
[2008], 169–171
knowledge representation, 59
[2008], 167
nanotechnology, 54
patient access to health information,
tools for, 60
[2008], 169
population health management tools
for, 54–55
[2008], 165
positions and competencies [2008],
163
practice roles and competencies,
52–53
[2008], 163
regulatory changes and quality
standards, 62–63
robotics, 57
[2008], 167
technology, 53–62
[2008], 164
wearable computing, 56–57
[2008], 165–167
U
UMLS Metathesaurus, 11
Unified Code for Units of Measure
(UCUM), 13
Unified Medical Language System
(UMLS), 21
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), 15, 23, 63
Usability, in healthcare, 14–16, 17
[2008], 123–124
of HIT products, issues related,
34–35
See also Ergonomics
User experience, 14–16, 17, 55
Nursing informatics Index.indd 224 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition 225
INDEX
V
Virtual keyboards, 57
Virtual learning environment (VLE), 41
Virtual world, and NI, 57–58
Vocabularies and NI practice, 9–13, 33
ONC HIT Standards Committee
recommended standards, 12–13
See also Nursing languages,
vocabularies, and terminologies
W
Wearable computing, 36, 56–57
[2008], 165–167
Wearable health technology devices, 36
Web-based course management systems,
59
WHO (World Health Organization), 23
Wisdom and NI practice
clinical wisdom [2008], 125
critical thinking and, 17
defined, 3
emerging model of, 107
and intuitive thinking, relationship
of, 6
as NI metastructure, 2–6
[2008], 118–120
synthesis of data and information
into, 7
See also Knowledge and NI practice;
Metastructures, concepts, and
tools of NI
Wisdom-in-Action for Clinical Nursing©
model, 107
Work environment. See Practice
environment
Workflow analysis
assessment and, 68
Workforce Development Program, 38
World Health Organization (WHO), 23
Nursing informatics Index.indd 225 11/7/14 1:53 PM
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
Standards of Professional Performance
for Nursing Informatics
Standard 7. Ethics
The informatics nurse practices ethically.
Standard 8. Education
The informatics nurse attains knowledge and competence that
reflect current nursing and informatics practice.
Standard 9. Evidence-Based Practice and Research
The informatics nurse integrates evidence and research
findings into practice.
Standard 10. Quality of Practice
The informatics nurse contributes to quality and effectiveness
of nursing and informatics practice.
Standard 11. Communication
The informatics nurse communicates effectively in a variety of
formats in all areas of practice.
Standard 12. Leadership
The informatics nurse demonstrates leadership in the
professional practice setting and the profession.
Standard 13. Collaboration
The informatics nurse collaborates with the healthcare
consumer, family, and others in the conduct of nursing and
informatics practice.
Standard 14. Professional Practice Evaluation
The informatics nurse evaluates his or her own nursing
practice in relation to professional practice standards and
guidelines, relevant statutes, rules, and regulations.
Standard 15. Resource Utilization
The informatics nurse employs appropriate resources to plan
and implement informatics and associated services that are
safe, effective, and financially responsible.
Standard 16. Environmental Health
The informatics nurse supports practice in a safe and healthy
environment.
The Standards of
Professional Performance
for Nursing Informatics
describe a competent
level of behavior in the
professional role, including
activities related to ethics,
education, evidence-based
practice and research,
quality of practice,
communication, leadership,
collaboration, professional
practice evaluation,
resource utilization, and
environmental health.
All informatics nurses
and informatics nurse
specialists are expected
to engage in professional
role activities, including
leadership, appropriate
to their education and
position. Informatics nurses
and informatics nurse
specialists are accountable
for their professional
actions to themselves, their
patients, their peers, and
ultimately to society.
source: American Nurses Association (2015). Nursing Informatics: Scope and
Standards of Practice, 2nd Edition. Silver Spring, MD: Nursesbooks.org.
ANA Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice
http://www.Nursingworld.org
© 2015 ANA
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
EBSCOhost – printed on 4/28/2022 8:49 AM via . All use subject to https://www.ebsco.com/terms-of-use
- Contents
- Contributors
- The Scope of Nursing Informatics Practice
- Introduction
- Definition of Nursing Informatics
- Metastructures, Concepts, and Tools of Nursing Informatics
- Metastructures: Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom
- Integration of Nursing Informatics into Practice
- Nursing Informatics Practice
- Tenets of Nursing Informatics
- Nursing, the Nursing Process, and Vocabularies
- Concepts and Tools from Information Science and Computer Science
- User Experience and Related Concepts
- Phenomenon of Nursing
- Functional Areas of Nursing Informatics
- Administration, Leadership, and Management
- Systems Analysis and Design
- Compliance and Integrity Management
- Consultation
- Coordination, Facilitation, and Integration
- Development of Systems, Products, and Resources
- Education and Professional Development
- Genetics and Genomics
- Information Management and Operational Architecture
- Policy Development and Advocacy
- Quality and Performance Improvement
- Research and Evaluation
- Safety, Security, and Environmental Health
- Integrated Functional Area Example: Telehealth and Informatics
- Evolution of Informatics Competencies
- Informatics Competencies Requisite for All Registered Nurses
- Research About Nursing Informatics Competencies
- Professional Organization Discussions on Informatics Competencies
- Healthcare Leadership Alliance
- American Organization of Nurse Executives
- Quality and Safety Education for Nurses
- National League for Nursing
- TIGER Initiative Foundation
- Informatics Competencies: Spanning Careers and Roles
- Informatics Competencies for Informatics Nurses and Informatics Nurse Specialists
- Informatics Competencies for Nurse Educators
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
- Synthesis of Evolution of NI Competencies
- Preparation for Nursing Informatics Specialty Practice
- Certification of Informatics Nurses
- An Advancing Professional Nursing Specialty
- Ethics in Nursing Informatics
- The Future of Nursing Informatics
- Trends in Practice Roles and Competencies for Nurses and Informatics
- Trends in Technology
- Nanotechnology
- Tools for Managing Population Health Concerns
- Devices and Hardware
- Robotics
- Focus of Emerging Technologies
- Knowledge Representation
- Educational Technologies
- Tools for Patient Access to Health Information
- Expanded Use of IT in Nursing
- Implications for Nursing Informatics
- Trends in Regulatory Changes and Quality Standards
- Trends in Care Delivery Models and Innovation
- Consumer Informatics
- External Partnerships
- Implications for Nursing Informatics
- NI Future and Trends: Summary
- Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice
- Significance of the Standards
- Standards of Practice for Nursing Informatics
- Standard 1. Assessment
- Standard 2. Diagnosis, Problems, and Issues Identification
- Standard 3. Outcomes Identification
- Standard 4. Planning
- Standard 5. Implementation
- Standard 5a. Coordination of Activities
- Standard 5b. Health Teaching and Health Promotion
- Standard 5c. Consultation
- Standard 6. Evaluation
- Standards of Professional Performance for Nursing Informatics
- Standard 7. Ethics
- Standard 8. Education
- Standard 9. Evidence-Based Practice and Research
- Standard 10. Quality of Practice
- Standard 11. Communication
- Standard 12. Leadership
- Standard 13. Collaboration
- Standard 14. Professional Practice Evaluation
- Standard 15. Resource Utilization
- Standard 16. Environmental Health
- Glossary
- References
- Appendix A. An Emerging Model of Wisdom
- Appendix B. Nursing Informatics: Scope and Standards of Practice (2008)
- Index
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
Vol.:(0123456789)1 3
Journal of Business Ethics (2019) 160:307–317
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04213-9
E D I TO R I A L
Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology: Introduction
to the Symposium
Kirsten Martin1 · Katie Shilton2 · Jeffery Smith3
Received: 22 May 2019 / Accepted: 28 May 2019 / Published online: 13 June 2019
© Springer Nature B.V. 2019
Abstract
While the ethics of technology is analyzed across disciplines from science and technology studies (STS), engineering,
computer science, critical management studies, and law, less attention is paid to the role that firms and managers play in
the design, development, and dissemination of technology across communities and within their firm. Although firms play
an important role in the development of technology, and make associated value judgments around its use, it remains open
how we should understand the contours of what firms owe society as the rate of technological development accelerates. We
focus here on digital technologies: devices that rely on rapidly accelerating digital sensing, storage, and transmission capa-
bilities to intervene in human processes. This symposium focuses on how firms should engage ethical choices in developing
and deploying these technologies. In this introduction, we, first, identify themes the symposium articles share and discuss
how the set of articles illuminate diverse facets of the intersection of technology and business ethics. Second, we use these
themes to explore what business ethics offers to the study of technology and, third, what technology studies offers to the
field of business ethics. Each field brings expertise that, together, improves our understanding of the ethical implications of
technology. Finally we introduce each of the five papers, suggest future research directions, and interpret their implications
for business ethics.
Keywords Technology · Socio-technical systems · Science and technology studies · Privacy · Values in design · Social
contract theory
Mobile phones track us as we shop at stores and can infer
where and when we vote. Algorithms based on commer-
cial data allow firms to sell us products they assume we
can afford and avoid showing us products they assume we
cannot. Drones watch our neighbors and deliver beverages
to fishermen in the middle of a frozen lake. Autonomous
vehicles will someday communicate with one another to
minimize traffic congestion and thereby energy consump-
tion. Technology has consequences, tests norms, changes
what we do or are able to do, acts for us, and makes biased
decisions (Friedman and Nissenbaum 1996). The use of
technology can also have adverse effects on people. Tech-
nology can threaten individual autonomy, violate privacy
rights (Laczniak and Murphy 2006), and directly harm indi-
viduals financially and physically. Technologies can also be
morally contentious by “forcing deep reflection on personal
values and societal norms” (Cole and Banerjee 2013, p.
555). Technologies have embedded values or politics, as
they make some actions easier or more difficult (Winner
1980), or even work differently for different groups of people
(Shcherbina et al. 2017). Technologies also have political
consequences by structuring roles and responsibilities in
society (Latour 1992) and within organizations (Orlikowski
and Barley 2001), many times with contradictory conse-
quences (Markus and Robey 1988).
While the ethics of technology is analyzed across disci-
plines from science and technology studies (STS), engineer-
ing, computer science, critical management studies, and law,
less attention is paid to the role that firms and managers play
in the design, development, and dissemination of technology
across communities and within their firm. As emphasized in
a recent Journal of Business Ethics article, Johnson (John-
son 2015) notes the possibility of a responsibility gap: the
* Kirsten Martin
[email protected]
1 George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
2 University of Maryland, College Park, MS, USA
3 Seattle University, Seattle, WA, USA
308 K. Martin et al.
1 3
abdication of responsibility around decisions that are made
as technology takes on roles and tasks previously afforded to
humans. Although firms play an important role in the devel-
opment of technology, and make associated value judgments
around its use, it remains open how we should understand
the contours of what firms owe society as the rate of tech-
nological development accelerates. We focus here on digital
technologies: devices that rely on rapidly accelerating digital
sensing, storage, and transmission capabilities to intervene
in human processes. Within the symposium, digital technol-
ogies are conceptualized to include applications of machine
learning, information and communications technologies
(ICT), and autonomous agents such as drones. This sympo-
sium focuses on how firms should engage ethical choices in
developing and deploying these technologies. How ought
organizations recognize, negotiate, and govern the values,
biases, and power uses of technology? How should the inevi-
table social costs of technology be shouldered by companies,
if at all? And what responsibilities should organizations take
for designing, implementing, and investing in technology?
This introduction is organized as follows. First, we iden-
tify themes the symposium articles share and discuss how
the set of articles illuminate diverse facets of the intersec-
tion of technology and business ethics. Second, we use these
themes to explore what business ethics offers to the study
of technology and, third, what technology studies offers to
the field of business ethics. Each field brings expertise that,
together, improves our understanding of the ethical impli-
cations of technology. Finally we introduce each of the five
papers, suggest future research directions, and interpret their
implications for business ethics.
Technology and the Scope of Business Ethics
For some it may seem self-evident that the use and applica-
tion of digital technology is value-laden in that how tech-
nology is commercialized conveys a range of commitments
on values ranging from freedom and individual autonomy,
to transparency and fairness. Each of the contributions to
this special issue discusses elements of this starting point.
They also—implicitly and explicitly—encourage readers to
explore the extent to which technology firms are the proper
locus of scrutiny when we think about how technology can
be developed in a more ethically grounded fashion.
Technology as Value‑Laden
The articles in this special issue largely draw from a long
tradition in computer ethics and critical technology stud-
ies that sees technology as ethically laden: technology is
built from various assumptions that—either implicitly or
explicitly—express certain value commitments (Johnson
2015; Moor 1985; Winner 1980). This literature argues
that, through affordances—properties of technologies that
make some actions easier than others—technological arti-
facts make abstract values material. Ethical assumptions in
technology might take the form of particular biases or values
accidentally or purposefully built into a product’s design
assumptions, as well as unforeseen outcomes that occur dur-
ing use (Shilton et al. 2013). These issues have taken on
much greater concern recently as forms of machine learning
and various autonomous digital systems drive an increasing
share of decisions made in business and government. The
articles in the symposium therefore consider ethical issues
in technology design including sources of data, methods of
computation, and assumptions in automated decision mak-
ing, in addition to technology use and outcomes.
A strong example of values-laden technology is the
machine learning (ML) algorithms that power autonomous
systems. ML technology underlies much of the automa-
tion driving business decisions in marketing, operations,
and financial management. The algorithms that make up
ML systems “learn” by processing large corpi of data. The
data upon which algorithms learn, and ultimately render
decisions, is a source of ethical challenges. For example,
biased data can lead to decisions that discriminate against
individuals due to morally arbitrary characteristic, such as
race or gender (Danks and London 2017; Barocas and Selbst
2016). One response to this problem is for companies to
think more deliberately about how the data driving automa-
tion are selected and assessed to understand discriminatory
effects. However, the view that an algorithm or computer
program can ever be ‘clean’ feeds into the (mistaken) idea
that technology can be neutral. An alternative approach is
to frame AI decisions—like all decisions—as biased and
capable of making mistakes (Martin 2019). The biases can
be from the design, the training data, or in the application
to human contexts.
Corporate Responsibility for the Ethical Challenges
of Technology
It is becoming increasingly accepted that the firms who
design and implement technology have moral obligations
to proactively address problematic assumptions behind,
and outcomes of, new digital technologies. There are two
general reasons why this responsibility rests with the firms
that develop and commercialize digital technologies. First,
in a nascent regulatory environment, the social costs and
ethical problems associated with new technologies are not
addressed through other institutions. We do not yet have
agencies of oversight, independent methods of assessment
or third parties that can examine how new digital technolo-
gies are designed and applied. This may change, but in the
interim, the non-ideal case of responsible technological
309Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology: Introduction to the Symposium
1 3
development is internal restraint, not external oversight. An
obvious example of this is the numerous efforts put forth
by large firms, such as Microsoft and Google, focused on
developing principles or standards for the responsible use
of artificial intelligence (AI). There are voices of skepti-
cism that such industry efforts will genuinely focus on the
public’s interest; however, it is safe to say that the rate of
technological development carries an expectation that firms
responsible for innovation are also responsible for showing
restraint and judgment in how technology is developed and
applied (cf. Smith and Shum 2018).
A second reason that new technologies demand greater
corporate responsibility is that technologies require atten-
tion to ethics during design, and design choices are largely
governed by corporations. Design is the projection of how a
technology will work in use and includes assumptions as to
which users and uses matter and which do not, and how the
technology will be used. As STS scholar Akrich notes “…A
large part of the work of innovators is that of ‘inscribing’
this vision of (or prediction about) the world in the technical
content of the new object” (Akrich 1992, p. 208). Engineers
and operations directors need to be concerned about how
certain values—like transparency, fairness, and economic
opportunity—are translated into design decisions.
Because values are implicated during technology design,
developers make value judgments as part of their corpo-
rate roles. Engineers and developers of technology inscribe
visions or preferences of how the world works (Akrich 1992;
Winner 1980). This inscription manifests in choices about
how transparent, easy to understand and fix, or inscrutable
a technology is (Martin 2019), as well as who can use it eas-
ily or how it might be misused (Friedman and Nissenbaum
1996). Ignoring the value-laden decisions in design does not
make them disappear. Philosopher Richard Rudner addresses
this in realm of science; for Rudner, scientists as scientists
make value judgements; and ignoring value-laden deci-
sions means those decisions are made badly because they
are made without much thought or consideration (Rudner
1953). In other words, if firms ignore the value implications
of design, engineers still make moral decisions; they simply
do so without an ethical analysis.
Returning to the example of bias-laden ML algorithms
illustrates ways that organizations can work to acknowledge
and address those biases through their business practices.
For example, acknowledging bias aligns with calls for algo-
rithms to be “explainable” or “interpretable”: capable of
being deployed in ways that allow users and affected par-
ties to more fully understand how an algorithm rendered its
decisions, including potential biases (cf. Kim and Routledge
2018; Kim 2018; Selbst and Barocas 2018). Explainable and
interpretable algorithms require design decisions that carry
implications for corporate responsibility. If a design team
creates an impenetrable AI-decision, where users are unable
to judge or address potential bias or mistakes, then the firm
in which that team works can be seen to have responsibility
for those decisions (Martin forthcoming).
It follows from these two observations—technology
firms operate with nascent external oversight and designers
are making value-laden decisions as part of their work in
firms—that the most direct means of addressing ethical chal-
lenges in new technology is through management decisions
within technology firms. The articles in this special issue
point out many ways this management might take place.
For example, in their paper “A Micro-Ethnographic Study
of Big Data Innovation in the Financial Services Sector,”
authors Richard Owen and Keren Naa Abeka Arthur give a
descriptive account focusing on how an organization makes
ethics a selling point of a new financial services platform.
Ulrich Leicht-Deobald and his colleagues take a normative
tact, writing in “The Challenges of Algorithm-Based HR
Decision-Making for Personal Integrity” that firms design-
ing technologies to replace human decision making with
algorithms should consider their impact on the personal
integrity of humans. Tae Wan Kim and Allan Scheller-Wolf
present a case for increased corporate responsibility for what
they call technological unemployment: the job losses that
will accompany an accelerated pace of automation in the
workplace. Their discussion, “Technological Unemploy-
ment, Meaning in Life, Purpose of Business and the Future
of Stakeholders,” asks what corporations owe not only to
employees who directly lose their jobs to technology, but
what corporations owe to a future society when they pursue
workerless production strategies.
The Interface of Business and Technology Ethics
One of the central insights discussed in the pages of this
special issue is that technology-driven firms assume a role
in society that demands a consideration of ethical impera-
tives beyond their financial bottom line. How does a given
technology fit within a broader understanding of the pur-
pose of a firm as value creation for a firm and its stake-
holders? The contributions to this special issue, directly or
indirectly, affirm that neither the efficiencies produced by
the use of digital technology, nor enhanced financial return
to equity investors solely justify the development, use, or
commercialization of a technology. These arguments will
not surprise business ethicists, who routinely debate the pur-
pose and responsibilities of for-profit firms. Still, the fact
that for-profit firms use new technology and profit from the
development of technology raises the question of how the
profit-motive impacts the ethics of new digital technology.
One way of addressing this question is to take a cue from
other, non-digital technologies. For example, the research,
development and commercialization necessary for phar-
maceutical products carries ethical considerations for
310 K. Martin et al.
1 3
associated entities, whether individual scientists, govern-
ment agencies, non-governmental organizations, or for-profit
companies. Ethical questions include: how are human test
subjects treated? How is research data collected and ana-
lyzed? How are research efforts funded, and are there any
conflicts of interest that could corrupt the scientific validity
of that research? Do medical professionals fully understand
the costs and benefits of a particular pharmaceutical prod-
uct? How should new drugs be priced? The special set of
ethical issues related to pharmaceutical technology financed
through private capital markets include the ones raised above
plus a consideration of how the profit-motive, first, creates
competing ethical considerations unrelated to pharmaceu-
tical innovation itself, and second, produces social rela-
tionships within firms that may compromise the standing
responsibilities that individuals and organizations have to
the development of pharmaceutical products that support
the ideal of patient health.
A parallel story can be told for digital technology. There
are some ethical issues that are closely connected to digital
technology, such as trust, knowledge, privacy, and individual
autonomy. These issues, however, take on a heightened con-
cern when the technologies in question are financed through
the profit-motive. We have to be attentive to the extent to
which a firm’s inclination to show concern for customer
privacy, for instance, can be marginalized when its business
model relies on using predictive analytics for advertising
purposes (Roose 2019). A human resource algorithm that
possibly diminishes employee autonomy may be less scru-
tinized if its use cuts operational expenses in a large, com-
petitive industry. The field of business ethics contributes to
the discussion about the responsible use of new technology
by illustrating how the interface of the market, profit-motive
and the values of technology can be brought into a more sta-
ble alignment. Taken together, the contributions in this spe-
cial issue provide a blueprint for this task. They exemplify
the role of technology firmly within the scope of business
ethics in that managers and firms can (and should) create
and implement technology in a way that remains attentive to
the value creation for a firm and its stakeholders including
employees, users, customers, and communities.
At the same time, those studying the social aspects of
technology need to remain mindful of the special nature—
and benefits—of business. Business is a valuable social
mechanism to finance large-scale innovation and economic
progress. It is hard to imagine that some of the purported
benefits of autonomous vehicles, for example, would be on
our doorstep if it were not for the presence of nimble, fast-
paced private markets in capital and decentralized transpor-
tation services. Business is important in the development
of technology even if we are concerned about how well it
upholds the values of responsible use and application of
technology. The challenge taken up by the discussions herein
is to explore how we want to configure the future and the
role that business can play in that future. Are firms exercis-
ing sufficient concern for privacy in the use of technology?
What are the human costs associated with relegating more
and more decisions to machines, rather than ourselves? Is
there an opportunity for further regulatory oversight? If so,
in what technological domain? Business ethicists interested
in technology need to pay attention to the issues raised by
this symposium’s authors and those that study technology
need to appreciate the special role that business can play in
financing the realization of technology’s potential.
In addition, the articles in this symposium illustrate
how the intersection of business ethics and technology eth-
ics illuminates how our conceptions of work—and work-
ing—shape the ethics of new technology. The symposium
contributions herein have us think critically about how the
employment relationship is altered by the use and applica-
tion of technology. Again, Ulrich Leicht-Deobald and his
co-authors prompt an examination of how the traditional
HR function is altered by the assistance of machine-learning
platforms. Kim and Scheller-Wolf force an examination of
what firms using job-automation technologies owe to both
displaced and prospective employees, which expands our
conventional notions of employee responsibility beyond
those who happens to be employed by a particular firm, in
a particular industry. Although not exclusively focused on
corporate responsibility within the domain of employment,
Aurelie Laclercq-Vandelannoitte’s contribution “Is Techno-
logical ‘Ill-Being’ Missing from Corporate Responsibility?”
encourages readers to think about the implications of “ubiq-
uitous” uses of information technology for future individual
well-being and social meaning. There are clear lines between
her examination of how uses of technology can adversely
impact freedom, privacy and respect and how ethicists and
policy makers might re-think firms’ social responsibilities
to employees. And, even more pressing, these discussions
provide a critical lens for how we think through more fun-
damental problems such as the rise of work outside of the
confines of the traditional employment relationship in the
so-called “gig economy” (Kondo and Singer 2019).
How Business Ethics Informs Technology
Ethics
Business ethics can place current technology challenges into
perspective by considering the history of business and mar-
kets behaving outside the norms, and the corrections made
over time. For example, the online content industry’s claim
that changes to the digital marketing ecosystem will kill the
industry echoes claims made by steel companies fighting
environmental regulation in the 1970s (IAB 2017; Lomas
2019). Complaints that privacy regulation would curtail
311Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology: Introduction to the Symposium
1 3
innovation echo the automobile industry’s complaints about
safety regulation in the 1970s. Here we highlight two areas
where business ethics’ understanding of the historical bal-
ance between industry desires and pro-social regulation can
offer insights on the ethical analysis of technology.
Human Autonomy and Manipulation
There are a host of market actors impacted by the rise of
digital technology. Consumers are an obvious case. What
we buy and how our identities are created through market-
ing is, arguably, ground zero for many of the ethical issues
discussed by the articles in this symposium. Recent work
has begun to examine how technology can undermine the
autonomy of consumers or users. For example, many games
and online platforms are designed to encourage a dopamine
response that makes users want to come back for more
(“Technology Designed for Addiction” n.d.). Similar to
the high produced by gambling [machines for which have
long been designed for maximum addiction (Schüll 2014)],
games and social media products encourage users to seek
the interaction’s positive feedback to the point where their
lives can be disrupted. Through addictive design patterns,
technology firms create a vulnerable consumer (Brenkert
1998). Addictive design manipulates consumers and takes
advantage of human proclivities to threaten their autonomy.
A second example of manipulation and threatened
autonomy is the use of aggregated consumer data to target
consumers. Data aggregators can frequently gather enough
information about consumers to infer their concerns and
desires, and use that information to narrowly and accurately
target ads. By pooling diverse information on consumer
behavior, such as location data harvested from a phone and
Internet browsing behavior tracked by data brokers, con-
sumers can be targeted in ways that undermine individu-
als’ ability to make a different decision (Susser et al. 2019).
If marketers infer you are worried about depression based
on what you look up or where you go, they can target you
with herbal remedies. If marketers guess you are dieting or
recently stopped gambling, they can target you with food or
casino ads. Business ethics has a long history of examining
the ways that marketing strategies target vulnerable popu-
lations in a manner that undermines autonomy. A newer,
interesting twist on this problem is that these tactics have
been extended beyond marketing products into politics and
the public sphere. Increasingly, social media and digital mar-
keting platforms are being used to inform and sway debate
in the public sphere. The Cambridge Analytica scandal is a
well-known example of the use of marketing tactics, includ-
ing consumer profiling and targeting based on social media
data, to influence voters. Such tactics have serious implica-
tions for autonomy, because individuals’ political choices
can now be influenced as powerfully as their purchasing
decisions.
More generally, the articles in this symposium help us
understand how the creation and implementation of new
technology fits alongside the other pressures experienced
within businesses. The articles give us lenses on the rela-
tionship between an organization’s culture—its values,
processes, commitments, and governance structures—and
the challenge of developing and deploying technology in a
responsible fashion. There has been some work on how indi-
vidual developers might or might not make ethical decisions,
but very little work on how pressures from organizations
and management matter to those decisions. Recent work by
Spiekermann et al., for example, set out to study develop-
ers, but discovered that corporate cultures around privacy
had large impacts on privacy and security design decisions
(Spiekermann et al. 2018). Studying corporate cultures of
ethics, and the complex motivations that managers, in-house
lawyers and strategy teams, and developers bring to ethical
decision making, is an important area in business ethics, and
one upon which the perspectives collected here shed light.
Trust
Much of the current discussion around AI, big data, algo-
rithms, and online platforms centers on trust. How can indi-
viduals (or governments) trust AI decisions? How do online
platforms reinforce or undermine the trust of their users?
How is privacy related to trust in firms and trust online?
Trust, defined as someone’s willingness to become vulnera-
ble to someone else, is studied at three levels in business eth-
ics: an individual’s general trust disposition, an individual’s
trust in a specific firm, and an individual’s institutional trust
in a market or community (Pirson et al. 2016). Each level
is critical to understanding the ethical implications of tech-
nology. Trust disposition has been found to impact whether
consumers are concerned about privacy: consumers who are
generally trusting may have high privacy expectations but
lower concerns about bad acts by firms (Turow et al. 2015).
Users’ trust in firms can be influenced by how technol-
ogy is designed and deployed. In particular, design may
inspire consumers to overly trust particular technologies.
This problem arguably creates a fourth level of trust unique
to businesses developing new digital technologies. More
and more diagnostic health care decisions, for example,
rely upon automated data analysis and algorithmic decision
making. Trust is a particularly pressing topic for such appli-
cations. Similar concerns exist for autonomous systems in
domains such as financial services and transportation. Trust
in AI is not simply about whether a system or decision mak-
ing process will “do” what it purportedly states it will do;
rather, trust is about having confidence that when the sys-
tem does something that we do not fully understand, it will
312 K. Martin et al.
1 3
nevertheless be done in a manner that supports in our inter-
ests. David Danks (2016) has argued that such a conception
of trust moves beyond mere predictability—which artificial
intelligence, by definition, makes difficult—and toward a
deeper sense of confidence in the system itself (cf. LaRosa
and Danks 2018). Finally, more work is needed to identify
how technology—e.g., AI decisions, sharing and aggregat-
ing data, online platforms, hyper-targeted ads—impact con-
sumers’ institutional trust online. Do consumers see ques-
tionable market behavior and begin to distrust an overall
market? For example, hearing about privacy violations—the
use of a data aggregator—impacts individuals’ institutional
trust online and makes consumers less likely to engage with
market actors online (Martin 2019). The study of technology
would benefit from the ongoing conversation about trust in
business ethics.
Stakeholder Relations
Technology firms face difficult ethical choices in their sup-
ply chain and how products should be developed and sold to
customers. For example, technology firms such as Google
and Microsoft are openly struggling with whether to cre-
ate technology for immigration and law enforcement agen-
cies and U.S and international militaries. Search engines
and social networks must decide the type of relationship
to have with foreign governments. Device companies must
decide where gadgets will be manufactured, under what
working conditions, and where components will be mined
and recycled.
Business ethics offers a robust discussion about whether
and how to prioritize the interests of various stakeholders.
For example, oil companies debate whether and how to
include the claims of environmental groups. Auto companies
face claims from unions, suppliers, and shareholders and
must navigate all three simultaneously. Clothing manufac-
turers decide who to partner with for outsourcing. So when
cybersecurity firms consider whether to take on foreign gov-
ernments as clients, their analysis need not be completely
new. An ethically attuned approach to cybersecurity will
inevitably face the difficult choice of how technology, if
at all, should be limited in development, scope, and sale.
Similarly, firms developing facial recognition technologies
have difficult questions to ask about the viability of those
products, if they take seriously the perspective of stakehold-
ers who may find those products an affront to privacy. More
research in the ethics of new digital technology should uti-
lize existing work on the ethics of managing stakeholder
interests to shed light on the manner in which technology
firms should appropriately balance the interests of suppliers,
financiers, employees, and customers.
How Technology Ethics Informs Business
Just as business ethics can inform the study of recent
challenges in technology ethics, scholars who have stud-
ied technology, particularly scholars of sociotechnical
systems, can add to the conversation in business ethics.
Scholarship in values in design—how social and political
values become design decisions—can inform discussions
about ethics within firms that develop new technologies.
And research in the ethical implications of technology—
the social impacts of deployed technologies—can inform
discussions of downstream consequences for consumers.
Values in Design
Values in design (ViD) is an umbrella term for research
in technology studies, computer ethics, human–computer
interaction, information studies, and media studies that
focuses on how human and social values ranging from pri-
vacy to accessibility to fairness get built into, or excluded
from, emerging technologies. Some values in design schol-
arship analyzes technologies themselves to understand
values that they do, or don’t, support well (Brey 2000;
Friedman and Nissenbaum 1996; Winner 1980). Other
ViD scholars study the people developing technologies
to understand their human and organizational motivations
and the ways those relate to design decisions (Spiekder-
mann et al. 2018; JafariNaimi et al. 2015; Manders-Huits
and Zimmer 2009; Shilton 2018; Shilton and Greene
2019). A third stream of ViD scholarship builds new tech-
nologies that purposefully center particular human values
or ethics (Friedman et al. 2017).
Particularly relevant to business ethics is the way this
literature examines how both individually and organiza-
tionally held values become translated into design features.
The values in design literature points out that the mate-
rial outputs of technology design processes belong along-
side policy and practice decisions as an ethical impact
of organizations. In this respect, the values one sees in
an organization’s culture and practices are reflected in
its approach to the design of technology, either in how
that technology is used or how it is created. Similarly, an
organization’s approach to technology is a barometer of
its implicit and explicit ethical commitments. Apple and
Facebook make use of similar data-driven technologies in
providing services to their customers; but how those tech-
nologies are put to use—within what particular domain
and for what purpose—exposes fundamental differences
in the ethical commitments to which each company sub-
scribes. As Apple CEO Tim Cook has argued publicly,
unlike Facebook, Apple’s business model does not “traffic
313Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology: Introduction to the Symposium
1 3
in your personal life” and will not “monetize [its] cus-
tomers” (Wong 2018). How Facebook and Apple manag-
ers understand the boundaries of individual privacy and
acceptable infringements on privacy is conveyed in the
manner in which their similar technologies are designed
and commercialized.
Ethical Implications of Technology and Social
Informatics
Technology studies has also developed a robust understand-
ing of technological agency—how technology acts in the
world—while also acknowledging the agency of technol-
ogy users. Scholars who study the ethical implications of
technology and social informatics focus on the ways that
deployed technology reshapes power relationships, creates
moral consequences, reinforces or undercuts ethical prin-
ciples, and enables or diminishes stakeholder rights and
dignity (Martin forthcoming; Kling 1996). Importantly,
technology studies talks about the intersecting roles of mate-
rial and non-material actors (Latour 1992; Law and Callon
1988). Technology, when working in concert with humans,
impacts who does what. For example, algorithms influence
the delegation of roles and responsibilities within a deci-
sion. Depending on how an algorithm is deployed in the
world, humans working with their results may have access
to the training data (or not), understand how the algorithm
reached a conclusion (or not), and have an ability to see the
decision relative to similar decisions (or not). Choices about
the delegation of tasks between algorithms and individuals
may have moral import, as humans with more insight into
the components of an algorithmic decision may be better
equipped to spot systemic unfairness. Technology studies
offers a robust vocabulary for describing where ethics inter-
sect with technology, ranging from design to deployment
decisions. While business includes an ongoing discussion
about human autonomy as noted above, technology studies
adds a conversation about technological agency.
Navigating the Special Issue
The five papers that comprise this thematic symposium
range in their concerns from AI and the future of work to big
data to surveillance to online cooperative platforms. They
explore ethics in the deployment of future technologies,
ethics in the relationship between firms and their workers,
ethics in the relationship between firms and other firms, and
ethical governance of technology use within a firm. All five
articles place the responsibility for navigating these difficult
ethical issues directly on firms themselves.
Technology and the Future of Employment
Tae Wan Kim and Allan Scheller-Wolf raise a number of
important issues related to technologically enabled job
automation in their paper “Technological Unemployment,
Meaning in Life, Purpose of Business, and the Future of
Stakeholders.” They begin by emphasizing what they call an
“axiological challenge” posed by job automation. The chal-
lenge, simply put, is that trends in job automation (including
in manufacturing, the service sector and knowledge-based
professions) will likely produce a “crisis in meaning” for
individuals. Work—apart from the economic means that it
provides—is a deep source of meaning in our lives and a
future where work opportunities are increasingly unavailable
means that individual citizens will be deprived of the activi-
ties that heretofore have defined their social interactions and
given their life purpose. If such a future state is likely, as
Kim and Scheller-Wolf speculate, what do we expect of cor-
porations who are using the automation strategies that cause
“technological unemployment”?
Their answer to this question is complicated, yet instruc-
tive. They argue that neither standard shareholder nor stake-
holder conceptions of corporate responsibility provide the
necessary resources to fully address the crisis in meaning
tied to automation. Both approaches fall short because they
conceive of corporate responsibility in terms of what is
owed to the constituencies that make up the modern firm.
But these approaches have little to say about whether there
is any entitlement to employment opportunities or whether
society is made better off with employment arrangements
that provide meaning to individual employees. As such, Kim
and Scheller-Wolf posit that there is a second, “teleological
challenge” posed by job automation. The moral problem of
a future without adequate life-defining employment is some-
thing that cannot straightforwardly be answered by existing
conceptions of the purpose of the corporation.
Kim and Scheller-Wolf encourage us to think about the
future of corporate responsibility with respect to “techno-
logical unemployment” by going back to the “Greek agora,”
which they take to be in line with some of the premises of
stakeholder theory. Displaced workers are neither “employ-
ees” nor “community” members in the standard senses
of the terms. So, as in ancient Greece, the authors imag-
ine a circumstance where meaningful social interactions
are facilitated by corporations who offer “university-like”
communities where would-be employees and citizens can
participate and collectively deliberate about aspects of the
common good, including, but not limited to, how corpora-
tions conduct business and how to craft better public policy.
This would add a new level of “agency” into their lives and
allow them to play an integral role in how business takes
place. The restoration of this agency allows individuals to
maintain another important sense of meaning in their lives,
314 K. Martin et al.
1 3
apart from the work that may have helped define their sense
of purpose in prior times. This suggestion is proscriptive
and, at times, seems idealistic. But, as with other proposals,
such as the recent discussion of taxing job automation, it
is part of an important set of conversations that need to be
had to creatively imagine the future in light of technological
advancement (Porter 2019).
The value in this discussion, which frames a distinc-
tive implication for future research, is that it identifies how
standard accounts of corporate responsibility are inadequate
to justify responsibilities to future workers displaced by
automation. It changes the way scholars should understand
meaningful work beyond meaning at work to meaning in
place of work and sketches an alternative to help build a
more comprehensive social response to changing nature of
employment that technology will steadily bring.
Technology and Human Well‑Being
Aurelie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte’s “Is Employee Technolog-
ical ‘Ill-Being’ Missing From Corporate Responsibility? The
Foucauldian Ethics of Ubiquitous IT Uses in Organizations”
explores the employment relationship more conceptually by
introducing the concept of “technological ill-being” with
the adoption of ubiquitous information technology in the
workplace. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte defines technological
ill-being as the tension or disconnect between an individ-
ual’s social attributes and aspirations when using modern
information technology (IT) and the system of norms, rules,
and values within the organization. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte
asks a series of research questions as to how technologi-
cal ill-being is framed in organizations, the extent to which
managers are aware of the idea, and who is responsible for
employees’ technological ill-being.
Leclercq-Vandelannoitte leverages Foucauldian theory
and a case study to answer these questions. Foucault offers
a rich narrative about the need to protect an individual’s abil-
ity to enjoy “free thought from what it silently thinks and so
enable it to think differently” (Foucault 1983, p. 216). The
Foucauldian perspective offers an ethical frame by which to
analyze ubiquitous IT, where ethics “is a practice of the self
in relation to others, through which the self endeavors to act
as a moral subject.” Perhaps most importantly, the study,
through the lens of Foucault, highlights the importance of
self-reflection and engagement as necessary to using IT
ethically. An international automotive company provides a
theoretically important case of the deployment of ubiquitous
IT contemporaneous with strong engagement with corpo-
rate social responsibility. The organization offers a unique
case in that the geographically dispersed units adopted
unique organizational patterns and working arrangements
for comparison.
The results illustrate that technological ill-being is not
analyzed in broader CSR initiatives but rather as “localized,
individual, or internal consequences for some employees.”
Further, the blind spot toward employees’ ill-being con-
stitutes an abdication of responsibility, which benefits the
firm. The paper has important implications for the corporate
responsibility of organizations with regard to the effects of
ubiquitous IT on employee well-being—an underexamined
area. The author brings to the foreground the value-laden-
ness of technology that is deployed within an organization
and centers the conversation on employees in particular. Per-
haps most importantly, ethical self-engagement becomes a
goal for ethical IT implementation and a critical concept to
understand technological ill-being. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte
frames claims of “unawareness” of the value-laden impli-
cations of ubiquitous IT as “the purposeful abdication of
responsibility” thereby placing the responsibility for tech-
nological ill-being squarely on the firm who deploys the IT.
Future work could take the same critical lens toward firms
who sell (rather than internally deploy) ubiquitous IT and
their responsibility to their consumers.
Technology and Governance
Richard Owen and Keren Naa Abeka Arthur’s “A Micro-
Ethnographic Study Of Big Data—Based Innovation In
The Financial Services Sector: Governance, Ethics And
Organisational Practices” uses a case study of a financial
services firm to illustrate how organizations might respon-
sibly govern their uses of big data. This topic is timely, as
firms in numerous industries struggle to self-regulate their
use of sensitive data about their users. The focus on how a
firm achieves ethics-oriented innovation is unusual in the
literature and provides important evidence of the factors that
influence a firms’ ability to innovate ethically.
The authors describe a company that governs its uses of
big data on multiple levels, including through responses to
legislation, industry standards, and internal controls. The
authors illustrate the ways in which the company strives for
ethical data policies that support mutual benefit for their
stakeholders. Though the company actively uses customer
data to develop new products, the company’s innovation
processes explicitly incorporate both customer consent
mechanisms, and client and customer feedback. The com-
pany also utilizes derived, non-identifiable data for develop-
ing new insights and products, rather than using customers’
identifiable data for innovation. The authors describe how
national regulation, while not directly applicable to the big
data innovations studied, guided the company’s data govern-
ance by creating a culture of compliance with national data
privacy protections. This has important consequences for
both regulators and consumers. This finding implies that
what the authors refer to as “contextual” legislation—law
315Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology: Introduction to the Symposium
1 3
that governs other marginally related data operations within
the firm—can positively influence new innovations, as well.
The authors write that contextual data protection legislation
was internalized by the company and “progressively embed-
ded” into future innovation.
The authors also found that company employees directly
linked ethical values with the success of the company, high-
lighting consumer trust as critical to both individual job
security and organizational success. This finding speaks
to the importance of corporate culture in setting the values
incorporated into technology design. Owen & Arthur use
the company’s practices as a case study to begin to define
ethical and responsible financial big data innovation. Their
evidence supports frameworks for responsible innovation
that emphasize stakeholder engagement, anticipatory eth-
ics, reflexivity on design teams, and deliberative processes
embedded in development practice.
Technology and Personal Integrity
Ulrich Leicht-Deobald and his colleagues unpack the
responsibilities organizations have to their workers when
adopting and implementing new data collection and behav-
ior analysis tools in “The Challenges of Algorithm-based
HR Decision-making for Personal Integrity.” It unites the-
ory from business ethics and the growing field of critical
algorithm and big data studies to study the topical issue of
algorithmic management of workers by human resource
departments. The authors focus on tools for human resources
decision making that monitor employees and use algorithms
and machine learning to make assessments, such as algorith-
mic hiring and fraud monitoring tools. The authors argue
that, in addition to well-documented problems with bias and
fairness, such algorithmic tools have the potential to under-
mine employees’ personal integrity, which they define as
consistency between convictions, words, and actions. The
authors argue that algorithmic hiring technologies threaten
a fundamental human value by shifting employees to a
compliance mindset. Their paper demonstrates how algo-
rithmic HR tools undermine employees’ personal integrity
by encouraging blind trust in rules and discouraging moral
imagination. The authors argue that the consequences of
such undermining include increased information asym-
metries between management and employees. The authors
classify HR decision making as an issue of corporate respon-
sibility and suggest that companies that wish to use predic-
tive HR technologies must take mitigation measures. The
authors suggest participatory design of algorithms, in which
employees would be stakeholders in the design process, as
one possible mitigative tactic. The authors also advocate for
critical data literacy for managers and workers, and adher-
ence to private regulatory regimes such as the Association
of Computing Machinery’s (ACM) code of ethics and pro-
fessional conduct and the Toronto Declaration of Machine
Learning.
This paper makes an important contribution to the scop-
ing of corporate responsibility for the algorithmic age. By
arguing that companies using hiring algorithms have a moral
duty to protect their workers’ personal integrity, it places the
ethical dimensions of the design and deployment of algo-
rithms alongside more traditional corporate duties such as
responsibility for worker safety and wellness. And like Owen
and Arthur, the authors believe that attention to ethics in
design—here framed as expanding employees’ capacity for
moral imagination—will open up spaces for reflection and
ethical discourse within companies.
Technology and Trust
Livia Levine’s “Digital Trust and Cooperation with an Inte-
grative Digital Social Contract” focuses on digital business
communities and the role of the members in creating com-
munities of trust. Levine notes that digital business commu-
nities, such as online markets or business social networking
communities, have all the markers of a moral community
as conceived by Donaldson and Dunfee in their Integrative
Social Contract Theory (ISCT) (Donaldson and Dunfee
1999): these individuals in the community form relation-
ships which generate authentic ethical norms. Digital busi-
ness communities, on the other hand, differ in that partici-
pants cannot always identify each other and do not always
have the legal or social means to punish participant busi-
nesses who renege on the community’s norms.
By identifying the hypernorm of “the efficient pursuit
of aggregate economic welfare,” which would transcend
communities and provide guidance for the development of
micronorms in a community, Levine then focuses on trust
and cooperation micronorms. Levine shows that trust and
cooperation are “an instantiation of the hypernorm of neces-
sary social efficiency and that authentic microsocial norms
developed for the ends of trust and cooperation are mor-
ally binding for members of the community.” Levine uses
a few examples, such as Wikipedia, open-source software,
online reviews, and Reddit, to illustrate micronorms at play.
In addition, Levine illustrates how the ideas of community
and moral free space should be applied in new arenas includ-
ing online.
The paper has important implications for both members
of the social contract community and platforms that host
the community to develop norms focused on trust and coop-
eration. First, the idea of community has traditionally been
applied to people who know each other. However, Levine
makes a compelling case as to why community can and
should be applied for groups online of strangers—stran-
gers in real life, but known online. Future research could
316 K. Martin et al.
1 3
explore the responsibilities of platforms who facilitate or
hinder the development of authentic norms for communities
on their service. For example, if a gaming platform is seen
as a community of gamers, then what are the obligations of
the gaming platform to enforce hypernorms and support the
development of authentic micronorms within communities?
Levine’s approach opens up many avenues to apply the ideas
behind ISCT in new areas.
While each discussion in this symposium offers a specific,
stand-alone contribution to the ongoing debate about the eth-
ics of the digital economy, the five larger themes addressed
by the articles—the future of employment, personal identity
and integrity, governance and trust—will likely continue to
occupy scholars’ attention for the foreseeable future. More
importantly, the diversity of theoretical perspectives and
methods represented within this issue is illustrative of the
how the ethical challenges presented by new information
technologies are likely best understood through continued
cross-disciplinary conversations with engineers, legal theo-
rists, philosophers, organizational behaviorists, and informa-
tion scientists.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Animal and Human Rights The authors conducted no research on
human participants or animals.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.
Informed Consent The authors had no reason to receive informed con-
sent (no empirical research).
References
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technological objects. In W.
Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society:
Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Barocas, S. I., & Selbst, A. W. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact.
California Law Review, 104, 671–733.
Brenkert, G. G. (1998). Marketing and the vulnerable. The Ruffin Series
of the Society for Business Ethics, 1, 7–20.
Brey, P. (2000). Method in computer ethics: Towards a multi-level
interdisciplinary approach. Ethics and Information Technology,
2(2), 125–129.
Cole, B. M., & Banerjee, P. M. (2013). Morally contentious technol-
ogy-field intersections: The case of biotechnology in the United
States. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 555–574.
Danks, D. (2016). Finding trust and understanding in autonomous sys-
tems. The Conversation. Retrieved from https ://theco nvers ation
.com/findi ng-trust -and-under stand ing-in-auton omous -techn ologi
es-70245
Danks, D., & London, A. J. (2017). Algorithmic bias in autonomous
systems. Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference
on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https ://www.cmu.edu/
dietr ich/philo sophy /docs/londo n/IJCAI 17-Algor ithmi cBias -Distr
ib.pdf
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that bind: A social con-
tracts approach to business ethics. Harvard Business Press.
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabi-
now (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and herme-
neutics (2nd ed., pp. 208–228). Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Friedman, B., Hendry, D. G., & Borning, A. (2017). A survey of value
sensitive design methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human–
Computer Interaction, 11(2), 63–125.
Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in computer sys-
tems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 14(3),
330–347.
IAB. (2017). The economic value of the advertising-supported Internet
Ecosystem. https ://www.iab.com/insig hts/econo mic-value -adver
tisin g-suppo rted-inter net-ecosy stem/
JafariNaimi, N., Nathan, L., & Hargraves, I. (2015). Values as hypoth-
eses: design, inquiry, and the service of values. Design issues,
31(4), 91–104.
Johnson, D. G. (2015). Technology with no human responsibility?
Journal of Business Ethics, 127(4), 707.
Kim, T. W. (2018). Explainable artificial intelligence, the goodness
criteria and the grasp-ability test. Retrieved from https ://arxiv .org/
abs/1810.09598
Kim, T. W., & Routledge, B. R. (2018). Informational privacy, a right to
explanation and interpretable AI. 2018 IEEE Symposium on Pri-
vacy-Aware Computing. https ://doi.org/10.1109/pac.2018.00013
Kling, R. (1996). Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and
social choices. San Diego: Academic Press.
Kondo, A., & Singer, A. (2019 April 3). Labor without employment.
Regulatory Review. Retrieved from https ://www.there grevi
ew.org/2019/04/03/kondo -singe r-labor -witho ut-emplo yment /
Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2006). Marketing, consumers and
technology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(3), 313–321.
LaRosa, E., & Danks, D. (2018). Impacts on trust of healthcare AI.
Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM conference on artificial
intelligence, ethics, and society. https ://doi.org/10.1145/32787
21.32787 71
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of
a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping
technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp.
225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Law, J., & Callon, M. (1988). Engineering and sociology in a mili-
tary aircraft project: A network analysis of technological change.
Social Problems, 35(3), 284–297. https ://doi.org/10.2307/80062 3.
Lomas, N. (2019). Even the IAB warned adtech risks EU privacy rules.
Tech Crunch. https ://techc runch .com/2019/02/21/even-the-iab-
warne d-adtec h-risks -eu-priva cy-rules /
Manders-Huits, N., & Zimmer, M. (2009). Values and pragmatic
action: The challenges of introducing ethical intelligence in tech-
nical design communities. International Review of Information
Ethics, 10(2), 37–45.
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and
organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research.
Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.
Martin, K. (2019). Designing Ethical Algorithms. MIS Quarterly
Executive, June.
Martin, K. (Forthcoming). Ethics and accountability of algorithms.
Journal of Business Ethics.
Moor, J. H. (1985). What is computer ethics? Metaphilosophy, 16(4),
266–275.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institu-
tions: What can research on information technology and research
on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2),
145–165.
317Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology: Introduction to the Symposium
1 3
Pirson, M., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. (2016). Public trust in busi-
ness and its determinants. Business & Society. https ://doi.
org/10.1177/00076 50316 64795 0.
Porter, E. (2019 February 23). Don’t fight the robots, tax them. New
York Times. Retrieved from https ://www.nytim es.com/2019/02/23/
sunda y-revie w/tax-artifi cial -intel ligen ce.html
Rose, K. (2019 January 30). Maybe only tim cooke can fix Face-
book’s privacy problem. Retrieved from https ://www.nytim
es.com/2019/01/30/techn ology /faceb ook-priva cy-apple -tim-cook.
html
Rudner, R. (1953). The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments.
Philosophy of Science, 20(1), 1–6.
Schüll, N. D. (2014). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las
Vegas (Reprint edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Selbst, A. D., & Barocas, S. I. (2018). The intuitive appeal of explain-
able machines. Fordham Law Review, 87, 1085–1140.
Shcherbina, A., Mattsson, C. M., Waggott, D., Salisbury, H., Christle, J.
W., Hastie, T., … Ashley, E. A. (2017). Accuracy in Wrist-Worn,
sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure
in a diverse cohort. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 7(2), 3.
https ://doi.org/10.3390/jpm70 20003
Shilton, K. (2018). Engaging values despite neutrality: Challenges
and approaches to values reflection during the design of internet
infrastructure. Science, Technology and Human Values, 43(2),
247–269.
Shilton, K., & Greene, D. (2019). Linking platforms, practices, and
developer ethics: Levers for privacy discourse in mobile applica-
tion development. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 131–146.
Shilton, K., Koepfler, J. A., & Fleischmann, K. R. (2013). Charting
sociotechnical dimensions of values for design research. The
Information Society, 29(5), 259–271.
Smith, B., & Shum, H. (2018). The future computed: Artificial intel-
ligence and its role in society. Retrieved from https ://blogs .micro
soft.com/blog/2018/01/17/futur e-compu ted-artifi cial -intel ligen
ce-role-socie ty/
Spiekermann, S., Korunovska, J., & Langheinrich, M. (2018). Inside
the organization: Why privacy and security engineering is a chal-
lenge for engineers[40pt]. Proceedings of the IEEE, PP(99), 1–16.
Susser, D., Roessler, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (2019). Online Manipula-
tion: Hidden Influences in a Digital World. Available at SSRN
3306006. https ://paper s.ssrn.com/sol3/paper s.cfm?abstr act_
id=33060 06
Turow, J., Hennessy, M., & Draper, N. (2015). The tradeoff fallacy:
how marketers are misrepresenting american consumers and open-
ing them up to exploitation. Annenburg School of Communica-
tion. https ://www.asc.upenn .edu/sites /defau lt/files /Trade offFa llacy
_1.pdf.
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1),
121–136.
Wong, J. (2018 March 28). Apple’s tim cook rebukes Zuckerberg over
Facebook’s business model. The Guardian. Retrieved from https
://www.thegu ardia n.com/techn ology /2018/mar/28/faceb ook-apple
-tim-cook-zucke rberg -busin ess-model
Zuckerberg, M. (2019 March 30). The internet needs new rules. Wash-
ington Post. Retrieved from https ://www.washi ngton post.com/
opini ons/mark-zucke rberg -the-inter net-needs -new-rules -lets-start
-in-these -four-areas /2019/03/29/
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Journal of Business Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2019. All Rights Reserved.
- Business and the Ethical Implications of Technology: Introduction to the Symposium
- Abstract
- Technology and the Scope of Business Ethics
- Technology as Value-Laden
- Corporate Responsibility for the Ethical Challenges of Technology
- The Interface of Business and Technology Ethics
- How Business Ethics Informs Technology Ethics
- Human Autonomy and Manipulation
- Trust
- Stakeholder Relations
- How Technology Ethics Informs Business
- Values in Design
- Ethical Implications of Technology and Social Informatics
- Navigating the Special Issue
- Technology and the Future of Employment
- Technology and Human Well-Being
- Technology and Governance
- Technology and Personal Integrity
- Technology and Trust
- References

Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
