Evaluation plan project: evaluation methodology
We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
Evaluation Plan Project: Evaluation Methodology
The “why,” “who,” “when,” “what,” and “how” of HIT and informatics systems are the threads that are woven throughout the evaluation plan. They help formulate viewpoints and guide goals. Answers to these questions help ensure the positive effects of health information technology and systems on outcomes.
For this work, reflect on viewpoints and the answers to key questions about Health Information Technology Evaluation related to Interoperability. Then, describe the evaluation methodology plan to be used to evaluate the situation in a case study (need to develop a case study).
Work requirement:
In a 3-page describe the evaluation methodology plan to be used to evaluate interoperability in Health Information Technology (HIT).
Be sure to address the following:
· Specify which research design, information sources, and data collection methods to use.
· Identify the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data.
· Provide a list of the stakeholders in your selected case study.
· Justify your selections.
· Write a paragraph describing the key components of your evaluation—the “who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how” of your evaluation.
· Explain how you would measure success in your evaluation. Be specific.
· Explain how you would summarize your results. Be specific.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 1/5
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Describe the
evaluation
methodology
plan you would
use to evaluate
your case study
in a 2- to 3-page
paper. You will:
Specify which
research design,
information
sources, and
data collection
methods you
would use.
23 (24.21%) – 25
(26.32%)
The response
clearly,
accurately, and
with detail
speci�es which
research
design,
information
sources, and
data collection
methods to
use.
20 (21.05%) –
22 (23.16%)
The
response
speci�es
which
research
design,
information
sources, and
data
collection
methods to
use.
18 (18.95%) –
19 (20%)
The
response
vaguely or
inaccurately
speci�es
which
research
design,
information
sources,
and/or data
collection
methods to
use.
0 (0%) – 17
(17.89%)
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
speci�es which
research
design,
information
sources,
and/or data
collection
methods to
use, or fails to
address one or
more items.
Name: NURS_6541_Week7_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 2/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Identify the
types of analyses
you would
perform on the
gathered data.
Justify your
selections.
Provide a list of
stakeholders in
your selected
study.
23 (24.21%) – 25
(26.32%)
The response
clearly,
accurately, and
in speci�c
detail identi�es
the types of
analyses to
perform on the
gathered data,
justi�es
selections, and
provides a
complete list of
stakeholders in
the selected
study.
20 (21.05%) –
22 (23.16%)
The
response
identi�es
the types of
analyses to
perform on
the gathered
data,
justi�es
selections,
and
provides a
list of
stakeholders
in the
selected
study.
18 (18.95%) –
19 (20%)
The
response
identi�es
the types of
analyses to
perform on
the gathered
data in a
vague or
inaccurate
manner,
weakly
justi�es
selections,
and/or
provides an
incomplete
list of
stakeholders
in the
selected
study.
0 (0%) – 17
(17.89%)
The response
identi�es the
types of
analyses to
perform on
the gathered
data in a
vague,
inaccurate, or
incomplete
manner,
provides a
weak or
nonexistent
justi�cation of
the selections,
and/or
provides an
incomplete or
nonexistent list
of
stakeholders in
the selected
study.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 3/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Write a
paragraph
describing the
key components
of your
evaluation—the
“who,” “what,”
“when,” “where,”
and “how” of
your evaluation.
14 (14.74%) – 15
(15.79%)
The response
clearly,
accurately, and
with speci�c
detail
describes the
components of
the evaluation,
including the
“who,” “what,”
“when,”
“where,” and
“how.”
12 (12.63%) –
13 (13.68%)
The
response
describes
the
components
of the
evaluation,
including
the “who,”
“what,”
“when,”
“where,” and
“how.”
11 (11.58%) –
11 (11.58%)
The
response
describes
the
components
of the
evaluation in
a vague
and/or
inaccurate
manner,
including
details
regarding
the “who,”
“what,”
“when,”
“where,” and
“how.”
0 (0%) – 10
(10.53%)
The response
describes the
components of
the evaluation
in a vague,
inaccurate,
and/or
incomplete
manner,
including
details
regarding the
“who,” “what,”
“when,”
“where,” and
“how.”
Explain how you
would measure
success in your
evaluation. Be
speci�c.
Explain how you
would
summarize your
results. Be
speci�c.
14 (14.74%) – 15
(15.79%)
The response
clearly,
accurately, and
in speci�c
detail explains
how to
measure
success in the
evaluation and
how to
summarize the
results.
12 (12.63%) –
13 (13.68%)
The
response
explains
how to
measure
success in
the
evaluation
and how to
summarize
the results.
11 (11.58%) –
11 (11.58%)
The
response in
a vague
and/or
inaccurate
manner
explains
how to
measure
success in
the
evaluation
and how to
summarize
the results.
0 (0%) – 10
(10.53%)
The response
in a vague,
inaccurate, or
incomplete
manner
explains how
to measure
success in the
evaluation and
how to
summarize the
results.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 4/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written
Expression and
Formatting —
Paragraph
Development
and
Organization:
Paragraphs
make clear
points that
support well-
developed ideas,
�ow logically,
and demonstrate
continuity of
ideas. Sentences
are carefully
focused—neither
long and
rambling nor
short and lacking
substance. A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement and
introduction are
provided that
delineate all
required criteria.
5 (5.26%) – 5
(5.26%)
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
�ow,
continuity, and
clarity.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement,
introduction,
and conclusion
are provided
that delineate
all required
criteria.
4 (4.21%) – 4
(4.21%)
Paragraphs
and
sentences
follow
writing
standards
for �ow,
continuity,
and clarity
80% of the
time.
Purpose,
introduction,
and
conclusion
of the
assignment
are stated,
yet are brief
and not
descriptive.
3 (3.16%) – 3
(3.16%)
Paragraphs
and
sentences
follow
writing
standards
for �ow,
continuity,
and clarity
60%–79% of
the time.
Purpose,
introduction,
and
conclusion
of the
assignment
are vague or
o� topic.
0 (0%) – 2
(2.11%)
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
�ow,
continuity, and
clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose
statement,
introduction,
or conclusion
were provided.
Written
Expression and
Formatting —
English Writing
Standards:
Correct
grammar,
mechanics, and
proper
punctuation
5 (5.26%) – 5
(5.26%)
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.
4 (4.21%) – 4
(4.21%)
Contains a
few (1 or 2)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
3 (3.16%) – 3
(3.16%)
Contains
several (3 or
4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
0 (0%) – 2
(2.11%)
Contains many
(≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors that
interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 5/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written
Expression and
Formatting —
The paper
follows correct
APA format for
title page,
headings, font,
spacing, margins,
indentations,
page numbers,
running heads,
parenthetical/in-
text citations,
and reference
list.
5 (5.26%) – 5
(5.26%)
Uses correct
APA format
with no errors.
4 (4.21%) – 4
(4.21%)
Contains a
few (1 or 2)
APA format
errors.
3 (3.16%) – 3
(3.16%)
Contains
several (3 or
4) APA
format
errors.
0 (0%) – 2
(2.11%)
Contains many
(≥ 5) APA
format errors.
Total Points: 95
Name: NURS_6541_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
EXIT
Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
