Family Health Assessment Part I – Rubric

Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns 22.5 points

Criteria Description

Interview Questionnaire Assessing Functional Health Patterns

5. Excellent 22.5 points

The interview questionnaire presented and demonstrates strong insight into family-

focused assessment strategies. All functional heath patterns include three highly

relevant open-ended questions.

4. Good 20.03 points

The interview questionnaire presented. All functional heath patterns are included,

and each has three open-ended questions that are family focused and relevant to

functional health patterns. The interview questionnaire is consistent with the

assignment criteria. Overall, the open-ended questions are family-focused and

relevant to the scope of the assignment.

3. Satisfactory 17.78 points

The interview questionnaire presented. One of the functional heath patterns has

been omitted. One of the functional health patterns has fewer than three open-

ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire is consistent with the

assignment criteria. Some of the open-ended questions are not family-focused or

not relevant to the scope of the assignment.

2. Less than Satisfactory 16.88 points

The interview questionnaire presented is incomplete. One or two of the functional

heath patterns have been omitted. Two or three of the functional health patterns

have fewer than three open-ended questions. Overall, the interview questionnaire

is inconsistent with the assignment criteria.

Family Structure 22.5 points

Criteria Description

Family Structure (individuals, relevant attributes of family composition, race/ethnicity,

social class, spirituality, environment)

5. Excellent 22.5 points

Collapse All

The family structure is clearly described. All individuals and relevant attributes are

discussed in detail. The discussion demonstrates an in-depth perspective into

family structure.

4. Good 20.03 points

The family structure is described. All individuals and relevant attributes are

presented. Overall, the discussion provides insight into the family structure.

3. Satisfactory 17.78 points

A summary of family structure is presented. All individuals are included. Most

relevant attributes listed are summarized. Some aspects are vague. There are minor

inaccuracies.

2. Less than Satisfactory 16.88 points

A partial description of family structure is presented. Not all individuals are

included. Relevant attributes are listed but incomplete. Some attributes are missing.

There are inaccuracies

Family Health and Health Behaviors 22.5 points

Criteria Description

Family Health and Health Behaviors

5. Excellent 22.5 points

Health behaviors are identified and presented in detail. The current health of the

family is described. A clear understanding of family health and health behavior is

demonstrated.

4. Good 20.03 points

Health behaviors are identified and presented. The current health behaviors of the

family are described.

3. Satisfactory 17.78 points

Health behaviors and current health of the family are summarized. Overall, the

health and health behaviors of the family are generally presented.

2. Less than Satisfactory 16.88 points

Health behaviors and current health of the family are partially presented. Overall,

the health and health behaviors of the family are unclear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Findings (functional health patterns strengths, health problems or

barriers to health)
22.5 points

Criteria Description

Findings (functional health patterns strengths, health problems or barriers to health)

5. Excellent 22.5 points

Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to

health are discussed. Discussion identifies and assesses key aspects from findings.

Discussion demonstrates insight into assessment of findings to identify functional

health pattern strengths and health problems or barriers.

4. Good 20.03 points

Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to

health are discussed. Aspects presented are relevant and consistent with findings.

3. Satisfactory 17.78 points

Two functional health pattern strengths, three health problems, and barriers to

health are summarized. Aspects presented are relevant and generally consistent

with findings.

2. Less than Satisfactory 16.88 points

Two functional health pattern strengths, and three health problems or barriers to

health are partially presented. Some aspects presented are not relevant, or are not

consistent with findings.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Application of Family Systems Theory 30 points

Criteria Description

Application of Family Systems Theory

5. Excellent 30 points

Application of family systems theory to initiate positive changes in family functions

over time is thoroughly discussed. The manner in which the theory is applied is

highly relevant and strongly supports steps to achieving the desired outcomes.

4. Good 26.7 points

Application of family systems theory to initiate positive changes in family functions

over time is discussed. The manner in which the theory is applied is relevant and

generally supports steps toward the desired outcomes.

3. Satisfactory 23.7 points

Application of family systems theory is presented. A general discussion on how the

theory will be applied to initiate positive changes in family functions over time is

presented. There are minor inaccuracies in the application or representation of the

theory.

2. Less than Satisfactory 22.5 points

Application of family systems theory is partially presented. It is unclear how the

theory will be applied to positively change overall family functions over time. There

are inaccuracies in the application or representation of the theory.

Thesis Development and Purpose 7.5 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent 7.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement

makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good 6.68 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and

reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory 5.93 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less than Satisfactory 5.63 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction 7.5 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent 7.5 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and

compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good 6.68 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident.

There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most

sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory 5.93 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents

minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the

purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less than Satisfactory 5.63 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There

are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language

use)
7.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 7.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 6.68 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety

of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. Satisfactory 5.93 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to

the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are

used.

2. Less than Satisfactory 5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in

language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 3 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent 3 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good 2.67 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory 2.37 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be

present.

2. Less than Satisfactory 2.25 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with

formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Documentation of Sources 4.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 4.01 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is

mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 3.56 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some

formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory 3.38 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Total 150 points

10/2/22, 9:22 AM NRS-429 Calendar

https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/NRS-429VN-O503-20220926 1/2

Assessment Description

Understanding family structure and style is essential to patient and family care. Conducting a family interview and
needs assessment gathers information to identify strengths, as well as potential barriers to health. This information
ultimately helps develop family-centered strategies for support and guidance.

This family health assessment is a two-part assignment. The information you gather in this initial assignment will be
utilized for the second assignment in Topic 3.

Develop an interview questionnaire to be used in a family-focused functional assessment. The questionnaire must
include three open-ended, family-focused questions to assess functional health patterns for each of the following:

1. Values/Health Perception
2. Nutrition
3. Sleep/Rest
4. Elimination
5. Activity/Exercise

6. Cognitive
7. Sensory-Perception
8. Self-Perception
9. Role Relationship

10. Sexuality
11. Coping

Select a family, other than your own, and seek permission from the family to conduct an interview. Utilize the
interview questions complied in your interview questionnaire to conduct a family-focused functional assessment.
Document the responses as you conduct the interview.

Upon completion of the interview, write a 750-1,000-word paper. Analyze your assessment findings. Your
questionnaire should be submitted as an appendix to your assignment.

Include the following in your paper:

1. Describe the family structure. Include individuals and any relevant attributes defining the family composition,
race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, and environment.

2. Summarize the overall health behaviors of the family. Describe the current health of the family.
3. Based on your findings, describe at least two of the functional health pattern strengths noted in the findings.

Discuss three areas in which health problems or barriers to health were identified.
4. Describe how family systems theory can be applied to solicit changes in family members that, in turn, initiate

positive changes to the overall family functions over time.

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within
the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center.

10/2/22, 9:22 AM NRS-429 Calendar

https://halo.gcu.edu/courses/NRS-429VN-O503-20220926 2/2

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is
located in Course Resources if you need assistance.