I need a Annotated Bibliography of my SWOT. Instructions in attachments Thank you for your Discussion entry, SWOT, Mr. Vaughn You should now determine the priorities for correction in your community b

We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

I need a Annotated Bibliography of my SWOT. Instructions in attachments

Thank you for your Discussion entry, SWOT, Mr. Vaughn You should now determine the priorities for correction in your community based on your SWOT. Then, you should look for locations that once had comparable problems but were able to find a solution. The citation plus description of the process used to solve the problem or otherwise minimize the amount of problem caused should be the subject of your annotations. Once you have found best practices for addressing the Weaknesses, move on to the Threats and find solutions to cite. From there move on to Opportunities and look for best practices for exploiting those opportunities. And, then if you still don’t have 25 references, move on to looking for best practices for making those Strengths, the good traits characteristic of your community, better by finding out what has worked elsewhere to make a good community Great. Please know that none of the references in the Annotated Bibliography should be about your jurisdiction, only best practices from elsewhere. Points will be deducted for posted assignments having less than 25 annotations.

The goal as you develop your Annotated Bibliography is for you to find solutions to the problems/challenges that have been proven to work in other jurisdictions.  Therefore, the range of materials you will need to examine will include all relevant/verifiable sources that discuss what has worked.  That includes press information, transcripts of meetings, professional reports (i.e., Army Corp of Engineers, etc.) where expertise has communicated strategies for addressing the challenges you are examining.   Such constitutes “reports” and “credible web-based material” Re Guidance #4.  To the degree that peer-reviewed journal articles actually reveal solutions, please feel free to cite.  Identify documented action that has worked elsewhere. Remember, the information you are collecting must be about locations that had once experienced and then overcame similar challenges.  Consequently, your task is to identify what works — cases where decision-makers were able to successfully address issues that currently plague your jurisdiction.  That means that your Annotated Bibliography (AB) is to constitute a collection of potential options that have  proven to work in locations other than your jurisdiction.   The AB should make no reference to strategies already in place in your jurisdiction.  You want to find out what has worked for other jurisdictions so that you can bring that information to your local officials in order to expand local options for action.

You should determine the priorities for correction in your community based on your SWOT.

Then, you should look for locations that once had comparable problems but

were able to find a solution.  The citation plus description of the process

used to solve the problem or otherwise minimize the amount of problem

caused should be the subject of your annotations.  Once you have found

best practices for addressing the Weaknesses, move on to

the Threats and find solutions to cite.  From there move on to Opportunities

and look for best practices for exploiting those opportunities. And, then

if you still don’t have 25 references, move on to looking for best practices

for making those Strengths, the good traits characteristic of your community, better by

finding out what has worked elsewhere to make a good community Great.

Please Note:  None of the references in the Annotated Bibliography

should be about your jurisdiction. The Annotated Bibliography should

only record best practices from elsewhere that may prove useful for your jurisdiction!

Any credible reference that reflects best practice will be accepted.  So, you are not limited to peer

reviewed journals, Saints.  Professional association publications that

address best practices as well as other possible sources will be accepted.

Points will be deducted for posted Annotated Bibliography entries

having less than 25 annotations.

I need a Annotated Bibliography of my SWOT. Instructions in attachments Thank you for your Discussion entry, SWOT, Mr. Vaughn You should now determine the priorities for correction in your community b
PADM 530 Annotated Bibliography Assignment Instructions Overview You will be expected to submit an Annotated Bibliography. The goal of this assignment is for you to analyze economic development initiatives and policy proposals, and in doing so evaluate the contexts and variables of economic development and community initiatives. These sources must provide the academic and research support for the Economic Development Analysis and Proposal. Instructions Sources can include the various scholarly and professional journal articles and other resources that have been assigned as part of the weekly readings throughout the course. The bibliography will require that you find and annotate sources that reflect best practices which have proven to work in other comparable jurisdictions. You are encouraged to explore the internet for information. Also, publications provided by relevant professional organizations. Additional resources can be found through Liberty University Online’s Research Portal. Length of assignment: 25 citation minimum Format of assignment: APA Acceptable sources (e.g. scholarly articles published within the last five years) Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
I need a Annotated Bibliography of my SWOT. Instructions in attachments Thank you for your Discussion entry, SWOT, Mr. Vaughn You should now determine the priorities for correction in your community b
Criteria Ratings Points Research 50 to >45 pts Advanced Majority of articles listed point to best practices demonstrated by jurisdictions other than the one under review to identify what might prove useful to your declared jurisdiction in addressing its challenges and potential. These “Best Practices” are fully summarized in the student’s bibliography. 45 to >41 pts Proficient At least half of the articles listed point to best practices demonstrated by jurisdictions other than the one under review in order to identify what might prove useful to your declared jurisdiction in addressing its challenges and potential. These “Best Practices” are fully summarized in the student’s bibliography. 41 to >0 pts Developing Less than half of articles listed point to best practices demonstrated by jurisdictions other than the one under review in order to identify what might prove useful to your declared jurisdiction in addressing its challenges and potential. These “Best Practices” are fully summarized in the student’s bibliography. 0 pts Not Present 50 pts Annotation & Summary 55 to >49 pts Advanced Summary shows consistent understanding of the article’s main points and a reflection on the importance of these main points. 49 to >44 pts Proficient Summary shows consistent understanding of the article’s main points and a reflection on the importance of these main points. 44 to >0 pts Developing Summary needs improvement on expressing importance of these main points. 0 pts Not Present 55 pts Bibliographic Information 25 to >22 pts Advanced Bibliographic information is fully consistent with the latest APA guidelines. 22 to >20 pts Proficient 1-2 APA errors on the bibliographic information. 20 to >0 pts Developing 3-4 APA errors on the bibliographic information. 0 pts Not Present 25 pts Spelling, and Grammar 20 to >18 pts Advanced Superior work in all areas. Consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding writing style, APA formatting, grammar and spelling. 18 to >16 pts Proficient Acceptable work in most areas. Demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding writing style, APA formatting, grammar, and spelling. 16 to >0 pts Developing Requires minor improvement to meet minimum standards of graduate level work. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts Total Points: 150 Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric | PADM530_D01_202320

Writerbay.net

Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net