I need this by tuesday

We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

see attachment

1

Copyright ©2018 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.

Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy

Learner’s Name

Capella University

NURS-FPX6026: Biopsychosocial Concepts for Advanced Nursing Practice II

Instructor’s Name

November 1, 2021

2

Copyright ©2018 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.

Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy

Current State of Quality of Care for Veterans Affected by Opioid Addiction

Veterans have been affected by the opioid crisis disproportionately. The rates of opioid

abuse and misuse among veterans are higher than among civilians. Veterans commonly present

with post-traumatic stress disorder and substance abuse disorder. The presence of these

behavioral issues in combination with chronic pain is likely to lead to misuse. Individuals may

attempt to soothe emotional or psychological pain with opioids, incorrectly associating the

physical relief or euphoria that opioids provide with psychological relief (Sullivan & Howe,

2013).

The Necessity of Health Policy Development for Opioid Addiction

Currently, there are policies that deal with maximum dosages and verifying dosage refills

through state prescription drug monitoring programs. However, the policy currently being

proposed will address the lack of awareness about opioids and opioid addiction. Childers and

Arnold even found that many clinicians do not believe they possess the knowledge or the skills

required to treat patients with addiction (as cited in Snow & Wynn, 2018).

Improving the Quality of Care in Treating Patients with Opioid Addiction

By adopting policy that requires making active efforts toward raising awareness about the

risks associated with opioids, health care organizations would empower individuals with

knowledge that could potentially help them and those close to them. Misconceptions about

opioid use will be clarified if the public is well-informed. Forming a committee composed of

pain management specialists, psychiatrists, and senior nurses to oversee the organization of such

programs would ensure that the programs are organized effectively and regularly. At these

programs, trained physicians would talk about the risks associated with opioid use and misuse

3

Copyright ©2018 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.

and nurses would describe the symptoms of an overdose and demonstrate correct procedure in

such situations.

Further, it is important to monitor patients who have been prescribed long-term opioid

treatment to ensure that they are not abusing their medication or allowing for it to be diverted or

misused. To address this, the policy mandates that individuals who have been prescribed long-

term opioids regularly meet with a psychiatrist. The psychiatrist would be required to update the

attending physician if any potential concerns arose.

How the Policy will Support Achievement of Desired Outcomes

The proposed policy would require significant expenditure to effectively implement

programs to raise awareness and educate individuals. Further, it could also be argued that the

expenses incurred on the patients’ side would be significant. These arguments raise important

concerns on the practical application of the policy being suggested; however, these costs could

potentially benefit the patients’ overall well-being as well as result in significant positive social

change. Studies by Rydell and Everingham and the National Institute on Drug Abuse indicate

that every dollar spent toward the prevention of drug abuse and treatment would result in

significant savings at the national level (as cited in Crowley et al., 2017).

Policy Development Advocacy

This policy would provide individuals with knowledge that can be applied outside of the

hospital setting. At home or among friends, these individuals could save lives because they

recognize potentially harmful patterns of behavior and are aware of how to proceed in such

contexts. Further, such policy would build trust and garner more positive change in time.

4

Copyright ©2018 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.

References

Crowley, R., Kirschner, N., Dunn, A. S., & Bornstein, S. S. (2017). Health and public policy to

facilitate effective prevention and treatment of substance use disorders involving illicit

and prescription drugs: An American College of Physicians position paper. Annals of

Internal Medicine, 166(10), 733–736. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2953

Snow, R., & Wynn, S. T. (2018). Managing opioid use disorder and co-occurring posttraumatic

stress disorder among veterans. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health

Services, 56(6), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20180212-03

Sullivan, M. D., & Howe, C. Q. (2013). Opioid therapy for chronic pain in the US: Promises and

perils. Pain, 154(Suppl 1), S94–100.

https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4204477/

5

Copyright ©2018 Capella University. Copy and distribution of this document are prohibited.

Appendix

Journal Guidelines

Journal Name: Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services

Submission Guidelines for Letters to the Editor: Letters to the Editor are correspondence

regarding articles previously published in the Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental

Health Services or other topics relevant to practicing psychiatric-mental health nurses. If the

letter is regarding a previously published article, it must be submitted within 12 months of the

article’s publication to be considered for possible publication, and the author of that article will

be given the opportunity to respond. Letters should be no longer than 500 words. References are

not necessary, but if included, should be kept to a maximum of three. All letters must contain a

clear message or point for readers. Letters may be edited for clarity or length, and letter authors

must disclose any competing or conflicting interests, if applicable. All letters are published at the

Editor’s discretion. Letters should be submitted by email to the editorial office.

  • Current State of Quality of Care for Veterans Affected by Opioid Addiction
  • The Necessity of Health Policy Development for Opioid Addiction
  • Improving the Quality of Care in Treating Patients with Opioid Addiction
  • How the Policy will Support Achievement of Desired Outcomes
  • Policy Development Advocacy

Assessment 3 Instructions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

· PRINT

· Write a letter to the editor of an academic or professional journal. The length and format of the letter is dictated by your choice of journal.

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Advocating for new policies is an important aspect of the master’s-prepared nurse. For new policies to be compelling they need to be supported by evidence. Supporting data can be used to illustrate why new policies and interventions are needed to help address a specific health issue. Compelling data can help sway the stakeholders and gain support for your policy.

Another aspect of advocacy is disseminating new policies and interventions outside of the immediate care environment. This can be done by reaching out to professional organizations as well as academic and professional journals. A letter to the editor is one strategy for disseminating information to a wider audience, and to potentially enlist support throughout the wider professional community.

Preparations

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment. You may use the Locating Letter Submission Guidelines for Journals library guide for additional assistance.

· Looking at your health care issue from a prevention standpoint, what are the relevant levels of prevention?

1. What would be the benefits and challenges of applying a specific level of prevention to your chosen issue and population?

1. How might one or more approaches to prevention improve the care and outcomes?

2. How could your policy be leveraged, or revised, to support the relevant levels of prevention?

· What are relevant strategies that you could use to help advocate for the policy you are proposing?

. How could these strategies help you advocate for your policy proposal?

. How does evidence from the literature support the benefits of your proposed policy?

2. How does citing evidence help lend credibility to your advocacy?

· What academic or professional journal would be the best forum to advocate for your policy?

. Why is your chosen journal an appropriate forum?

. Which advocacy strategies would be most effective in this forum?

. How will you craft your message to best appeal to the likely audience of your chosen journal?

Assessment 3 will build upon the work you have done for your previous two assessments. For this assessment, you will be writing a letter to the editor of an academic or professional journal as a means to advocate for adoption or development of policies that will improve the quality of care and outcomes around your chosen health care issue and vulnerable population. Refer to the resource listed below.

· Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [DOC].

Scenario

Throughout this course, you have focused on a specific health issue occurring within a specific population. You researched position papers regarding this health concern, and you developed a health policy proposal to positively impact the health of the affected individuals. It is now time to reach a greater audience regarding your policy proposal.

Instructions

Develop a letter to the editor of a peer-reviewed academic or professional nursing journal based on the policy proposal that you created for Assessment 2. Choose from one of the journals on the Ultimate List of Nursing Journals here is the website https://www.nursingschool.org/ultimate-list-of-nursing-journals/

 and go to that journal’s Web site to find out the requirements for submitting a letter to the editor, such as format requirements, topics, and word counts. Make sure you select a nursing journal that covers the topic about which you are going to write. If you want to use another journal that is not on this list, please make sure the journal does address health care, because this is the purpose of the assessment.

The goal of your letter is to be informative about the policy that you developed for Assessment 2, while also being persuasive about the need for and benefit of similar policies in other health care settings. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [DOC] document to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

· Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

. Look back to the data or scenario you used in Assessment 1 to address this criterion.

· Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

· Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

· Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

· Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of a developed policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.

· Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style (or the journal’s preferred style).

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

The submission requirements for your editorial will depend on the journal you choose. To find out the requirements, go to the journal’s Web site. There should be a section regarding submissions that will address how to format letters to the editor, and whether there is a word count limit (there usually is a limit).

· If the journal does not have submission guidelines for the number of resources required, use 3-5 sources.

· To be sure that your instructor knows the submission and formatting requirements for your letter, include the journal’s guidelines on a separate page at the end of the document you submit for this assessment.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

· Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.

. Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

. Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

· Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.

. Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of a developed policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.

· Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.

. Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

. Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

· Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.

. Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

. Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.


MSN-FP6026 Assessment 3 Guiding Questions


MSN-FP6026 Assessment 3 Guiding Questions

Guiding Questions

Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy

This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a pre-writing exercise or as a final check to ensure that you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment. Do not turn in this document as your assessment submission.

Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

· Based on the data that you used to identify your chosen issue in Assessment 1, what is the current state of the quality of care and outcomes?

· To what degree does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes need to be improved?

· How does the current performance compare to any relevant benchmarks?

· How does the current performance adversely impact the health of the target population?

Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

· How does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population illustrate the need for improvements?

· Why do you consider policy development and advocacy necessary?

· How will developing a health policy help to improve the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population?

· Why is advocating for health policy development necessary to drive improvements?

Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

· Why will your proposed policy (from Assessment 2) be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population?

· How will your proposed policy help drive improvements?

· What evidence or best-practices supports this? How does the evidence provide support?

Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

· Why is it important that policy development focused on your chosen issue and target population take place in care environments and settings beyond that for which you proposed the policy?

· How will wider development of policies help to drive improvements related to your chosen issue and target population?

· Ideally, what is the end result of wider policy development and implementation?

Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of a developed policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population. 

· What are the relevant interprofessional aspects of your policy?

· How will these interprofessional aspects support efficient achievement of your desired outcomes for your target population?

· How will these interprofessional aspects support effective achievement of your desired outcomes for your target population?

Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

· Is your writing clear and professional?

· Is your writing free from errors?

· Is your writing persuasive?

· Does your submission conform to the format and length requirements of your chosen journal?

Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references.

· Did you use 3–5 sources (or the number required by your chosen journal) in your assessment?

· Are the sources you used no more than five years old?

· Are your sources cited in APA format (or the journal’s preferred style) throughout your letter?

· Have you included an attached reference list?

· Did you follow the formatting guidelines of your chosen journal?

· Did you attach the submission and formatting guidelines for your chosen journal at the end of your assessment submission?

1

2


1

11

Document Format: Margins are 1 in. (2.54 cm) on all sides.

All text in the document should be double-spaced.

The font is 12-point Times New Roman. Other choices are 11-point Arial and 11-point Calibri.

The title page is page 1.

There is no running head for learner assignments. (See Academic Writer: Publication Manual §§ 2.1–2.24 for paper requirements.)

Full Title of Your Paper Comment by Author: APA Style: Sample Papers shows the title page for a student paper.

Learner’s Full Name (no credentials)

School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Capella University

Course Number: Course Name

Instructor’s Name

Month, Year Comment by Author: The due date

Abstract

An abstract is useful in professional papers, but not always in learner assignments. In fact, unless you are instructed by your faculty or in the course syllabus, do not expect to use abstracts very often at Capella. If you are submitting for publication, remember to check with the journal or professional organization about their criteria for an abstract. The abstract tells your reader about the article, is brief, and stands alone, so no citations are included. The format for an abstract is a single paragraph (not indented on the first line) that follows the title page and is less than 250 words in length. A structured abstract will have a single paragraph without indentation but having labels (e.g., Objective, Method, Results, and Conclusions) on the same line as the text and bold. For published works, the publishing organization will give you guidance on these. However, for student papers, no abstract is needed unless the faculty request one or the assignment requires it. Remember, no citations. Comment by Author: See Academic Writer: Publication Manual §§ 2.9–2.10 (p. 38 in the APA manual) for more information on abstracts.

Keywords: include keywords in the abstract—they should be labeled like this, with the words all in lowercase and separated by commas. Only the first line is indented, like a regular paragraph. No period at the end.


APA Style Seventh Edition Paper Template: A Resource for Academic Writing Comment by Author: New in APA seventh style—this heading is a regular Level 1 and should be bold.

American Psychological Association (APA) style is one of the most popular methods used to cite sources in the social sciences, but it is not the only one. When writing papers in the programs offered at Capella University, you will likely use APA style. This document serves as an APA style resource for the seventh edition guidelines, containing valuable information that you can use when writing academic papers. For more information on APA style, refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, also referred to as the APA manual (American Psychological Association, 2020b). Comment by Author: Another important resource for Capella learners is Academic Writer.

The first section of this paper shows how an introduction effectively introduces the reader to the topic of the paper. In APA style, an introduction never gets a heading. For example, this section did not begin with a heading titled “Introduction,” unlike the following section, which is titled “Writing an Effective Introduction.” The following section will explain in greater detail a model that can be used to effectively write an introduction in an academic paper. The remaining sections of the paper will continue to address APA style and effective writing concepts, including section headings, organizing information, the conclusion, and the reference list. Comment by Author: See also Academic Writer: Introduction.

Writing an Effective Introduction Comment by Author: Level 1 section heading

An effective introduction often consists of four main components, including (a) the position statement, thesis, or hypothesis, which describes the author’s main position; (b) the purpose, which outlines the objective of the paper; (c) the background, which is general information needed to understand the content of the paper; and (d) the approach, which is the process or methodology the author uses to achieve the purpose of the paper. This information will help readers understand what will be discussed in the paper. It can also serve as a tool to grab the reader’s attention. Authors may choose to briefly reference sources that will be identified later in the paper as in this example (American Psychological Association, 2020a; American Psychological Association, 2020b). The Writing Center has developed the acronym POETS to help describe the proper writing style for submissions. POETS is the acronym for purpose, organization, evidence, tone, and sentence structure (Capella Writing Center, n.d.). There will be more on this later. Comment by Author: This is the format for a complex list within a sentence. The items begin with lowercase letters and are separated by appropriate punctuation.

Related items can also be set off from the text and presented as numbered or bulleted lists. For more information on lists, see Academic Writer: Lists. Comment by Author: When you have two sources with the same author and date, use a lowercase a, b, c, after the year and alphabetize the sources in the reference list according to the title. For the same author but no date, use n.d.-a and n.d.-b as the date. See Academic Writer: Alphabetizing the Reference List for more information.

In an introduction, the writer will often present something of interest to capture the reader’s attention and introduce the issue. Adding an obvious statement of purpose helps the reader know what to expect, while helping the writer to focus and stay on task. For example, this paper will address several components necessary to effectively write an academic paper, including how to write an introduction, how to write effective paragraphs, and how to effectively use APA style.

Level 1 Section Heading Is Centered, Bold, and Title Case Comment by Author: Something new in APA seventh style—all headings are double-spaced, bold, and written in title case. See Academic Writer: Heading Levels.

Using section headings can be an effective method of organizing an academic paper. Section headings are not required according to APA style; however, they can significantly improve the quality of a paper by helping both the reader and the author, as will soon be discussed. Comment by Author: In POETS, this is the O for organization. See Writing Center: Organization.

Level 2 Section Heading Is Aligned Left, Bold, and Title Case

The heading style recommended by APA consists of five levels (APA, 2020b, pp. 47–48). This document contains multiple levels to demonstrate how headings are structured according to APA style. Immediately before the previous paragraph, a Level 1 section heading was used. That section heading describes how a Level 1 heading should be written, which is centered, bold, and using uppercase and lowercase letters (also referred to as title case). For another example, see the section heading “Writing an Effective Introduction” on page 3 of this document. The heading is centered and bold and uses uppercase and lowercase letters. If used properly, section headings can significantly contribute to the quality of a paper by helping the reader, who wants to understand the information in the document, and the author, who desires to effectively describe it.

Section Heading Purposes Comment by Author: This is a Level 3 heading. Notice it is aligned left, bold, italic, and title case. The paragraph begins on a new line. See Academic Writer: Heading Levels.

Section Headings Help the Reader. Section headings serve multiple purposes, including helping the reader understand what is being addressed in each section, maintain an interest in the paper, and choose what they want to read. For example, if the reader of this document wants to learn more about writing an effective introduction, the previous section heading clearly states that is where information can be found. When subtopics are needed to explain concepts in greater detail, different levels of headings are used according to APA style. Comment by Author: This is a Level 4 heading—it is indented, bold, and title case. The heading ends in a period, and the text begins on the same line as the heading.

Section Headings Help the Author. Section headings not only help the reader; they also help the author organize the document during the writing process. Section headings can be used to arrange topics in a logical order, and they can help an author manage the length of the paper. In addition to an effective introduction and the use of section headings, each paragraph of an academic paper can be written in a manner that helps the reader stay engaged. Comment by Author: Level 4 heading

Section Headings Can Demonstrate Fine Detail. Short papers and assignments may not require or need a Level 5 heading, but these will be indented, bold, italic, and title case and end with a period. Note the text starts on the line at the end of the heading following the period. Comment by Author: Level 5 heading

How to Write Effective Paragraphs Comment by Author: The Writing at Capella multimedia presentation will help you understand the POETS model.

Capella University’s Writing Center (n.d.) has adopted a new set of writing standards to assist learners in their goals to improve their scholarly writing. It is based on five skills known by the mnemonic POETS. In other words, a well-developed Capella paper will demonstrate the following standards. The paper will have a clear purpose statement, be logically organized, utilize current and appropriate evidence that is properly cited, maintain a scholarly tone, and demonstrate proper grammar and writing mechanics in the sentence structure (Capella Writing Center, n.d.). Academic writing is sometimes considered dry and boring. A learning experience may need that formula to encourage learning in different ways as the learner moves from passive learner to active scholar. This growth, according to Gilmore et al. (2019), requires the writer to not only think but also to write differently. Comment by Author: Notice the et al. here—this article has four authors. In APA seventh style, any source with three or more authors will use et al. for every citation, eliminating the need to remember when this appropriate. For more information, see Academic Writer: Citing References in Text.

Bias-Free Language

In the seventh edition of the APA manual, another focus is on eliminating bias in language in order to provide a more inclusive tone in scholarly writing. While long considered a grammar issue, it is acceptable in APA to utilize they as a singular pronoun (APA, 2020b). In fact, there is an entire chapter of the manual dedicated to ways to reduce bias in scholarly writing. It is important to use an appropriate level of specificity in descriptions and use sensitivity with the use of labels. Other sections include guidelines on age, disability, gender, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, and participation in research. Be aware of intersectionality, a term used to describe a person based on their identified multiple identities, interconnectivity, social context, power relations, complexity, social justice, and inequalities that can result in oppression (Cole, 2019; Hopkins, 2017). Comment by Author: See Academic Writer: Intersectionality for the guidelines. Comment by Author: Note the two citations—in a single set of parentheses and separated by a semicolon. The citations are listed alphabetically.

Considering Direct Quotations

Another important point to consider is the use of direct quotations in papers. While plagiarism is considered an academic integrity issue, many learners are concerned with issues such as self-plagiarism and unintentional plagiarism, and there are others who may go as far as purchasing papers for submission (Colella & Alahmadi, 2019). As a learner travels along their chosen academic pathway, their writing skills and mechanics are expected to improve. It is imperative that the learner transition from finding information and quoting the author word for word to using the information to support an idea, paraphrase, and then synthesize and express the findings in one’s own words. Having said that, there are situations in which quotations may be appropriate, so it is important to cite them properly. According to the seventh edition of the APA manual, “When quoting directly, always provide the author, year, and page number of the quotation in the in-text citation in either parenthetical or narrative format” (APA, 2020b, p. 270). If there are not page numbers, identify the location in another manner (such as a paragraph number). Comment by Author: Notice the quotation marks around the quoted text and the placement of the punctuation after the parenthetical citation. See Academic Writer: Quotation Marks for more on the use of quotation marks.

Notice that the above quote contains fewer than 40 words. There is a different style for quotes containing 40 words or more. These longer quotes use a block quotation format:

Do not use quotation marks to enclose a block quotation. Start a block quotation on a new line and indent the whole block 0.5 in. from the left margin. If there are additional paragraphs within the quotation, indent the first line of each subsequent paragraph an additional 0.5 in. Double-space the entire block quotation; do not add extra space before or after it. Either (a) cite the source in parentheses after the quotation’s final punctuation or (b) cite the author and year in the narrative before the quotation and place only the page number in parentheses after the quotation’s final punctuation. Do not add a period after the closing parenthesis in either case. (APA, 2020b, p. 272) Comment by Author: Notice there is no period after this citation in a block quote—it looks odd, but it is APA style. See Academic Writer: Quotation Marks.

Conclusion

A summary and conclusion section, which can also be the discussion section of an APA style paper, is the final opportunity for the author to make a lasting impression on the reader. The author can begin by restating opinions or positions and summarizing the most important points that have been presented in the paper. For example, this paper was written to demonstrate to readers how to effectively use APA style when writing academic papers. Various components of an APA style paper that were discussed or displayed in the form of examples include a title page, introduction section, levels of section headings and their use, the POETS format, bias-free language, in-text citations, a conclusion, and the reference list.

References Comment by Author: Remember all headings are bold.

American Psychological Association. (2020a). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://doi.org.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

American Psychological Association. (2020b). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Comment by Author: This is something new in APA seventh style—you no longer need the location of the publisher for print books. Also note that if the author is the publisher, it is only listed as the author. This guideline is found on page 324 of the APA manual.

Capella University. (n.d.). Writing Center. https://campus.capella.edu/writing-center/home

Cole, N. L. (2019, October 13). Definition of intersectionality: On the intersecting nature of privileges and oppression. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/intersectionality-definition-3026353

Colella, J., & Alahmadi, H. (2019). Combating plagiarism from a transformation viewpoint. Journal of Transformative Learning, 6(1), 59–67. https://jotl.uco.edu/index.php/jotl/article/view/184

Gilmore, S., Harding, N., Helin, J., & Pullen, A. (2019). Writing differently. Management Learning, 50(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618811027

Hopkins, P. (2017). Social geography I: Intersectionality. Progress in Human Geography, 43(5), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517743677

Appendix Comment by Author: See Academic Writer: Publication Manual § 2.14 for more on appendices.

Tips for the Reference List

· Always begin a reference list on a new page. It should be placed before any appendices, figures, or tables and titled References.

· Set a hanging indent that starts with the second line and is double-spaced. You can look in the Paragraph menu of Microsoft Word for formatting the hanging indent so that you will not have to tab the indent. It gives the text a smoother look that remains consistent, even if you make edits.

· The reference list is in alphabetical order by the first author’s last name. A reference list only contains sources that are cited in the body of the paper, and all sources cited in the body of the paper must be included in the reference list. If you did not cite it, do not list it.

· The reference list above contains an example of how to cite a source when two documents are written in the same year by the same author.

· The lowercase letters are used after the date to differentiate the sources. The “a” reflects the alphabetical order in the reference list—not whether it appeared first in the text.

· The year is also displayed using this method for the corresponding in-text citations, as in the following sentence: The author of the first citation (American Psychological Association, 2020b) is also the publisher; therefore, the word Author is no longer used in the seventh edition.

· DOI is the digital object identifier.

· It can be found on the first page of an article, on the copyright page of a book, in the database record of a work, or by searching Crossref.

· Even if the book is in print, if there is a DOI, use it.

· Always use the hyperlink format for a DOI—it will always start with https://doi.org/ and will be followed by a number. If the DOI is not in this format, convert it. Do not alter this format, and do not add a final period.

· There is a short DOI service at http://shortdoi.org/.

· URL is the uniform resource locator.

· If there is no DOI, the URL should be used in the reference.

· Copy and paste the URL directly into your list.

· Do not add a period at the end.

· Do use “Retrieved from” before a URL.

· The Colella and Alahmadi reference is an example of how to cite a source using a URL. Please note that you will not use the Capella link that is often provided in the courseroom. If the URL contains a database title, such as EBSCO or ProQuest, or the name Capella, do not use that in your citation as it will only work for Capella learners and faculty.

· For examples and further information on references go to:

· Academic Writer: Sample References.

· Academic Writer: Reference List.

Assessment 3 Instructions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

· PRINT

· Write a letter to the editor of an academic or professional journal. The length and format of the letter is dictated by your choice of journal.

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Advocating for new policies is an important aspect of the master’s-prepared nurse. For new policies to be compelling they need to be supported by evidence. Supporting data can be used to illustrate why new policies and interventions are needed to help address a specific health issue. Compelling data can help sway the stakeholders and gain support for your policy.

Another aspect of advocacy is disseminating new policies and interventions outside of the immediate care environment. This can be done by reaching out to professional organizations as well as academic and professional journals. A letter to the editor is one strategy for disseminating information to a wider audience, and to potentially enlist support throughout the wider professional community.

Preparations

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment. You may use the Locating Letter Submission Guidelines for Journals library guide for additional assistance.

· Looking at your health care issue from a prevention standpoint, what are the relevant levels of prevention?

1. What would be the benefits and challenges of applying a specific level of prevention to your chosen issue and population?

1. How might one or more approaches to prevention improve the care and outcomes?

2. How could your policy be leveraged, or revised, to support the relevant levels of prevention?

2. What are relevant strategies that you could use to help advocate for the policy you are proposing?

2. How could these strategies help you advocate for your policy proposal?

2. How does evidence from the literature support the benefits of your proposed policy?

2. How does citing evidence help lend credibility to your advocacy?

2. What academic or professional journal would be the best forum to advocate for your policy?

3. Why is your chosen journal an appropriate forum?

3. Which advocacy strategies would be most effective in this forum?

3. How will you craft your message to best appeal to the likely audience of your chosen journal?

Assessment 3 will build upon the work you have done for your previous two assessments. For this assessment, you will be writing a letter to the editor of an academic or professional journal as a means to advocate for adoption or development of policies that will improve the quality of care and outcomes around your chosen health care issue and vulnerable population. Refer to the resource listed below.

2. Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [DOC].

Scenario

Throughout this course, you have focused on a specific health issue occurring within a specific population. You researched position papers regarding this health concern, and you developed a health policy proposal to positively impact the health of the affected individuals. It is now time to reach a greater audience regarding your policy proposal.

Instructions

Develop a letter to the editor of a peer-reviewed academic or professional nursing journal based on the policy proposal that you created for Assessment 2. Choose from one of the journals on the Ultimate List of Nursing Journals here is the website https://www.nursingschool.org/ultimate-list-of-nursing-journals/

 and go to that journal’s Web site to find out the requirements for submitting a letter to the editor, such as format requirements, topics, and word counts. Make sure you select a nursing journal that covers the topic about which you are going to write. If you want to use another journal that is not on this list, please make sure the journal does address health care, because this is the purpose of the assessment.

The goal of your letter is to be informative about the policy that you developed for Assessment 2, while also being persuasive about the need for and benefit of similar policies in other health care settings. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy [DOC] document to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

2. Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

5. Look back to the data or scenario you used in Assessment 1 to address this criterion.

2. Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

2. Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

2. Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

2. Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of a developed policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.

2. Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

2. Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style (or the journal’s preferred style).

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

The submission requirements for your editorial will depend on the journal you choose. To find out the requirements, go to the journal’s Web site. There should be a section regarding submissions that will address how to format letters to the editor, and whether there is a word count limit (there usually is a limit).

2. If the journal does not have submission guidelines for the number of resources required, use 3-5 sources.

2. To be sure that your instructor knows the submission and formatting requirements for your letter, include the journal’s guidelines on a separate page at the end of the document you submit for this assessment.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

2. Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.

14. Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

14. Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.

2. Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.

15. Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of a developed policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.

2. Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.

16. Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.

16. Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.

2. Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.

17. Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

17. Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Writerbay.net

Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net