Lobbying for change
We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
Please follow all directions And please use the same topic from the PowerPoint
Also my state or local Government is in Maryland
Economic Health Issue; Poverty
Miatta Teasley
Capella University
NHS-FPX6008
Economics and Decision Making in Health Care
Professor Georgena Wiley
March 23, 2023
The workplace, community, and co-workers are all affected by poverty
Poor neighborhoods and poor housing are linked to poverty.
Low-income children are deprived of opportunities that most of us take for granted (Oliveras et al., 2021).
The rates of mental illness, chronic illness, death, and short lifespans are higher in the poor.
The majority of the poor are kids.
Poverty is associated with living in low-quality housing and in poor communities. Children living in poverty lack access to resources that the rest of us take for granted (Oliveras et al., 2021). The poor have a higher prevalence of mental illness, chronic illness, premature death, and shortened lifespans. There are many children among the poor.
The workplace, community, and co-workers are all affected by poverty
Families in poverty are more prone to divorce and conflict.
Numerous health problems plague the poor. Children who live in poverty are more likely to commit street crimes and quit school (Oliveras et al., 2021).
When people reach adulthood, poverty may lead to chronic illness, illiteracy, and unemployment. More than just hunger is poverty.
Malnutrition and hunger afflict families.
In low-income communities, family breakdown and strife are more common. The poor have it the worst when it comes to health. Children from low-income families are more likely to engage in antisocial behavior and drop out of school (Oliveras et al., 2021). The effects of childhood poverty on adult health, education, and employment are well documented. Being poor means more than just going hungry. Families are suffering from malnutrition and hunger.
Economics of healthcare and poverty: feasibility analysis
The feasibility study recommends using a health-based strategy to address poverty as a legitimate economic issue (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021).
For effective participation in policies to reduce poverty, you need high-quality research on poverty, national policy processes, and the political economics of changes in poverty.
According to the findings of the feasibility study, a health-oriented approach is the most effective way to combat poverty as a serious economic problem (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021). You need to have access to high-quality research on poverty, national policy processes, and the political economics of changes in poverty in order to have an effective participation in the policies that are being developed to reduce poverty.
Economics of healthcare and poverty: cost-benefit analysis
The cost of a pro-poor health policy in healthcare is reasonable (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021).
The reduction of poverty benefits society.
Food, education, and employment all improve.
By evaluating the feasibility and cost-benefit ratio, healthcare professionals can fight poverty.
A healthcare policy that prioritizes the needs of low-income people can be implemented at a reasonable cost (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021). Fighting poverty is good for everyone involved. There is a rise in availability of food, of schools, and of jobs.In order to combat poverty, medical professionals must first determine whether or not their proposed solution is feasible and whether or not the costs outweigh the benefits.
Solutions to the economic and health problems of poverty
Poverty is one economic problem that education can eliminate (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021).
Education improves skills, corrects inequities caused by marginalization, and lowers risk and susceptibility.
Education can truly be for everyone if barriers to it are removed, teachers are supported, and children living in unstable situations receive an education.
Education is one solution to the economic issue of poverty (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021). Gaining an education raises one’s skill level, mitigates the disadvantages brought on by marginalization, and makes one healthier overall. If funding issues for schools are resolved, resources for teachers are increased, and children living in poverty have access to schooling, then education truly can be for all.
Solutions to the economic and health problems of poverty
Poverty would no longer be a health or economic concern if hunger were eliminated.
Having three healthy meals a day can break the cycle of poverty.
A person who is hungry cannot work.
Rural residents may also benefit from clean water (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021).
According to this strategy, governments must offer universal access to basic social protections and affordable healthcare.
If hunger were eradicated, it would no longer be a health or economic issue that contributes to poverty. One way to break out of poverty is to ensure that everyone in a household has access to three balanced meals every day. The inability to work while hungry is universal. Water purification might also help those living in rural areas (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021). Governments, under this plan of action, would be required to provide all citizens with access to affordable healthcare and fundamental social services.
Solutions to the economic and health problems of poverty
I offer financial solutions for poverty in the health sector.
Even though they seem simple, cash and microfinance are the best ways to combat poverty.
Giving out cash is becoming more commonplace than giving out tents, water, or food boxes (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021).
Cheaper and quicker entry into the country (and can even be distributed by phone now).
It gives recipients purchasing power and stimulates regional and national economies.
I have monetary answers for health care inequity problems. Cash and microfinance, despite their apparent simplicity, are the most effective means of fighting poverty. Instead of providing necessities like shelter, water, and food, many organizations are opting to distribute cash (Ahnan-Winarno et al., 2021). Easier, more expedited entry into the country (and can even be distributed by phone now). It helps people financially and boosts local and national economies by increasing consumer spending.
Overcoming poverty as a health economic issue
Reducing health inequities that typically result from social and economic disadvantages and improving overall health are two benefits of addressing social determinants of health (LAURENS & PUTRA, 2020).
Another option is to support minority and low-income health practices.
Promoting health benefits individuals, families, communities, states, and countries.
Everyone gains from promoting their health.
Illness prevention saves lives.
Improving health systems for the underprivileged is another strategy to fight healthcare poverty (LAURENS & PUTRA, 2020).
Another choice is to support the global effort to combat poor health.
Addressing social determinants of health has two advantages: it reduces health inequities, which typically result from social and economic disadvantages, and it improves general health (LAURENS & PUTRA, 2020). Supporting low-income and minority-focused health practices is an additional choice. Individuals, families, communities, states, and nations all benefit from promoting health. Everyone benefits when their health is promoted. Preventing illness saves lives. Improving health systems for the underprivileged is another strategy to fight healthcare poverty (LAURENS & PUTRA, 2020). Supporting the global effort to combat poor health is an additional option.
Approaching poverty through morality, equality, and cultural sensitivity
The strategy for reducing poverty reveals equality, morality, and cultural sensitivity.
Poor people might have different cultural values from the majority culture.
Increasing self-worth and identity lower poverty (Sharma et al., 2021).
For many at-risk populations, participating in cultural activities may increase self-esteem, engagement in the labor market, and confidence.
The approach to alleviating poverty demonstrates fairness, morality, and cultural sensitivity. The cultural values of the poor may differ from those of the majority culture. Increasing identity and self-worth reduces poverty (Sharma et al., 2021). Participating in cultural activities can boost confidence, self-worth, and involvement in the labor market for many at-risk populations.
Approaching poverty through morality, equality, and cultural sensitivity
If the plan to fight poverty is inclusive from the start and looks at all the reasons why people are poor, it will help both the “old” and “new” poor more.
They will be better at getting rid of poverty and making people’s lives better (Sharma et al., 2021).
Social cohesion reduces poverty (growth with equity) by keeping long-term development going, even for the poor, and sharing its benefits more fairly.
It minimizes the negative effects of cultural differences while accepting them.
The “old” and “new” poor will benefit more from a plan to combat poverty if it is inclusive from the outset and considers all causes of poverty. They will be more effective at eliminating poverty and improving people’s lives (Sharma et al., 2021). Growth with equity reduces poverty by ensuring that long-term development continues, even for the poor, and more fairly distributing its benefits. , and more………
Conclusion
The issue of poverty is global.
Everyone has tried to address this issue, but nobody has been able to eradicate world poverty.
Also, quick action should be taken in order to be effective.
Poverty must be eradicated for ongoing progress that benefits all people.
Poverty is a global issue. Everyone has attempted to address this issue, but no one has been successful in eliminating global poverty. In order to be effective, quick action is also required. Poverty must be eradicated in order for progress to continue that benefits all people.
References
Ahnan‐Winarno, A. D., Cordeiro, L., Winarno, F. G., Gibbons, J., & Xiao, H. (2021). Tempeh: A semicentennial review on its health benefits, fermentation, safety, processing, sustainability, and affordability. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 20(2), 1717-1767.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12710
LAURENS, S., & PUTRA, A. H. (2020). Poverty alleviation efforts through MDGs and economic resources in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(9), 755-767.
https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.755
Oliveras, L., Peralta, A., Palència, L., Gotsens, M., López, M. J., Artazcoz, L., Borrell, C., & Marí-Dell’Olmo, M. (2021). Energy poverty and health: Trends in the European Union before and during the economic crisis, 2007–2016. Health & Place, 67, 102294.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102294
Sharma, M., Mohapatra, G., & Giri, A. K. (2021). Is tourism pro-poor in India? An empirical investigation using the ARDL approach. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 38(4), 602-618.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-02-2021-0031
Tracking universal health coverage. (2021).
https://doi.org/10.1596/36724
image1.png
image1.jpeg
image2.jpeg
image2.png
image3.jpeg
image3.png
image4.jpeg
image5.jpeg
image6.jpeg
Write a letter to an official in your state or local government. (Choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue.
Introduction
Note: Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
As health care leaders, it is important to understand strategies for advocating and lobbying elected officials. This can lead to the development of policies or laws that can help drive improved equity and outcomes for all participants in the health care environment as well as a more sustainable financial future.
Background and Context
As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you may be expected to implement plans to ensure that initiatives designed to take advantage of economic opportunities for the organization are rolled out successfully and can be sustained over multiple years. Additionally, it is important to be able to envision how an initiative could be implemented in different contexts and for different purposes to ensure the investment remains a viable and positive asset to your organization or care setting.
As a master’s-level practitioner, you will often be challenged to influence the health care environment in a variety of ways. This influence can occur on a micro-level (implementing change on your unit, institution, community, or local organizations) or at a macro level (implementing change via state or federal regulations and policy). One way you can influence the health care environment is by lobbying an elected official at the local, state, or national level to adopt policies or legislation that would support positive economic and health outcomes for patients, practitioners, and organizations within the health care environment.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will develop a letter to an official in your state or local government (choose the individual in the level of government that will best address your issue). The purpose of this letter is to advocate for action with regards to your chosen health care environment issue. Remember, when writing the letter, you must use your personal address and telephone number unless you are exclusively representing a group or your organization.
Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.
Overall, your assessment submission will be assessed on the following criteria:
Summarize the health care economic issue that you are addressing.
Keep this brief but try to include details about how the issue is currently impacting the elected officials’ constituents.
Explain the positive outcomes that will occur if the issue is addressed and the negative outcomes that will occur if the issue is not addressed.
Tailor this messaging to focus on the impacts in the communities and organizations that are relevant to the elected official you are writing to.
Summarize key information from scholarly sources to support the importance of addressing the issue; the issue’s overall impact on health care at the institutional, local, state, and national levels; and proposed changes or actions to address the issue.
Cite at least five current, scholarly sources that support your argument and help provide the elected official (who may not have a detailed knowledge of the health care environment) with an understanding of the issues, changes, or actions that you are proposing to drive improved outcomes.
Identify the impact your issue has on health care institutions and health care providers at the local community, state, and national levels.
Make sure to include information from both a health care and an economic perspective. An elected official may be more responsive to one perspective than another.
Incorporate ethical, cultural, and diversity principles when picking resources and making recommendations for change in your assessment.
Explain how personal, professional, and organizational experiences have informed the resource planning and risk analysis for working toward addressing the economic issue.
Think about how your experiences (the experiences can be personal, professional, or from your team’s perspective or experience) affect how you have planned for the resources needed to implement your desired changes or actions. How did this impact your approach to conducting a risk analysis on the project?
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.
Remember to conclude your letter with a summary of your position on the issue and a compelling reason that the elected official should act in your favor and support your issue or initiative.
Additional Requirements
Audience: Make sure you are addressing your letter to an actual local or state official.
For most states, you can use the following resource:
Open States. (n.d.).
Find your legislators. https://openstates.org/find_your_legislator/
For local officials, search your city’s government website for officials and their positions.
Length of Submission: 1–2 double spaced pages. Your letter needs to be succinct and persuasive.
Number of References: Cite at least five sources of evidence to support your identification of the gap. This could be public health data, a peer-reviewed journal article, or another scholarly source.
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s
Writing Support page.
Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
