MSN CLASS- Scorinh guide attached Write an analysis, 4-5 pages in length, of the gap between current and desired performance, with respect to the provision of safe, high-quality patient care. Introduc

We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

MSN CLASS- Scorinh guide attached

Write an analysis, 4-5 pages in length, of the gap between current and desired performance, with respect to the provision of safe, high-quality patient care.

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

As a nurse leader, you must be able to assess your organization’s ability to deliver safe, high-quality patient care. In so doing, you may be required to perform a gap analysis of a quality or safety issue as the first step in improving outcomes. Failure to meet benchmarks for safe and effective patient care can have reimbursement, regulatory, and legal consequences.

This assessment provides an opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to successfully implement changes that improve patient outcomes by:

  • Evaluating the current culture of an organization.
  • Performing an outcomes gap analysis.
  • Determining what changes are needed to bridge the gap.
  • Examining current thinking on this topic contained in the literature.

Quality and safety are everyone’s responsibility as a team of interprofessional care delivery partners. Together we develop policies that support quality and safe care delivery. As part of the interprofessional team, nurses are leaders in care and thus are responsible and accountable for leading and providing safe quality care.

Health care delivery is structured around evidenced-based information. Quality is defined by exploring proven, evidenced-based information. After reviewing and defining evidenced-based information, the interprofessional team applies this knowledge to assess the organization’s or the practice setting’s ability to provide evidenced-based care delivery. When a gap in care is identified, it is important to propose an evidenced-based change and to execute a plan for improved care.

Your quality and safety gap analysis will provide the basis for the remaining assessments in this course.

Preparation

As a nurse leader, you are fully aware of the hazardous nature of health care and that organizations must continually seek to improve the quality and safety of the care they provide to patients. For this assessment, you will identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest associated with adverse quality and safety outcomes (for example, an increase in the incidence of falls or medical errors) and analyze the gap between current and desired performance.

Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

Culture and process contribute to our ability to develop and sustain quality and safety in a health care organization. By exploring these topics, you can analyze where you may have gaps in practice that affect outcomes. In addition, organizations must create benchmarks for outcomes to determine whether they are meeting quality and safety goals.

  • What does your organization measure, related to quality and safety, and why?
  • Are there certain aspects of your organization’s culture and processes that support or hinder quality and safety?
  • Is the organization meeting outcome measurement benchmarks?
  • If not, how might you address those gaps in performance? What system could be developed to support a change to close a particular gap?

The following resources are required to complete the assessment.

APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]. Use this for your gap analysis.

Requirements

​Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide. Be sure that your written analysis addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Quality and Safety Gap Analysis [DOCX] to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

Conducting the Analysis

  • Identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest that contributes to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
  • Propose specific practice changes that will improve quality and safety outcomes and bridge the gap between current and desired performance.
  • Prioritize proposed practice changes.
  • Determine how proposed practice changes will foster a culture of quality and safety.
  • Determine how a particular organizational culture or hierarchy might affect quality and safety outcomes.
  • Justify necessary changes with respect to functions, processes, or behaviors, specific to your organization.

Writing and Supporting Evidence

  • Communicate analysis data and information clearly and accurately, using correct grammar and mechanics.
  • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Additional Requirements

Format your document using APA style.

  • Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]. Be sure to include:

    • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    • A running head on all pages.
    • Appropriate section headings.
    • Properly-formatted citations and references.
  • Your analysis should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.

Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your gap analysis to your ePortfolio.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective.

    • Identify a systemic problem in an organization related to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
    • Propose specific practice changes within an organization that will improve quality and safety outcomes and bridge the gap between current and desired performance.
    • Prioritize proposed practice changes.
  • Competency 2: Determine how outcome measures promote quality and safety processes within an organization.

    • Determine how proposed practice changes will foster a culture of quality and safety.
  • Competency 3: Determine how specific organizational functions, policies, processes, procedures, norms, and behaviors can be used to build reliable and high-performing organizations.

    • Determine how a particular organizational culture or hierarchy might affect or contribute to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
    • Justify necessary changes to particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors that correct or mitigate adverse quality and safety outcomes.
  • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.

    • Communicate analysis data and information clearly and accurately, using correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

MSN CLASS- Scorinh guide attached Write an analysis, 4-5 pages in length, of the gap between current and desired performance, with respect to the provision of safe, high-quality patient care. Introduc
1/25/23, 10:36 AM Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6212/221000/Scoring_Guides/a01_scoring_guide.html 1/2 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide CRIT E R IA N O N-P ER FO RM ANCE BASIC P R O FIC IE N T DIS TIN G UIS H ED Id en tif y a s yste m ic p ro ble m in a n o rg an iz a tio n r e la te d to a d vers e q ualit y a n d s afe ty o utc o m es. D oes n ot id entif y a s yste m ic p ro ble m in a n o rg aniz a tio n re la te d to a dve rs e q ualit y a nd s a fe ty o utc o m es. A tte m pts to id entif y a s yste m ic p ro ble m , b ut fa ils to e xp la in h ow th e pro ble m c o ntr ib ute s to a dve rs e q ualit y o r sa fe ty o utc o m es. Id enti p ro ble m in a n org aniz a tio n r e la te d to a dve rs e q ualit y a nd s a fe ty o utc o m es. Id enti p ro ble m in a n org aniz a tio n r e la te d to a dve rs e q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es, a nd id enti g aps, u nkn ow ns, m is sin g in fo rm atio n, unansw ere d q uestio ns, o r a re as o f u nce rta in ty . P ro pose s p eci p ra ctic e c h an ges w it h in a n o rg an iz a tio n t h at w ill im pro ve q ualit y a n d safe ty o utc o m es a n d brid ge t h e g ap b etw een c u rre n t a n d desir e d p erfo rm an ce. D oes n ot p ro pose sp eci ch anges w it h in a n org aniz a tio n th at w ill im pro ve q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es and b rid ge th e g ap betw een c u rre nt a nd desir e d perfo rm ance . P ro pose s s p eci p ra ctic e c h anges, b ut fa ils to e xp la in h ow th e pro pose d c h anges w ill r e su lt in b ette r outc o m es. P ro pose s s p eci p ra ctic e c h anges w it h in a n org aniz a tio n th at w ill im pro ve q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es a nd brid ge th e g ap betw een c u rre nt a nd desir e d perfo rm ance . P ro pose s s p eci p ra ctic e c h anges w it h in a n o rg aniz a tio n th at w ill im pro ve q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es a nd brid ge th e g ap b etw een cu rre nt a nd d esir e d perfo rm ance , a nd id enti o n w hic h th e p ro posa l is b ase d. P rio rit iz e p ro posed p ra ctic e c h an ges. D oes n ot p rio rit iz e p ro pose d p ra ctic e ch anges. S ets p rio rit ie s fo r pro pose d p ra ctic e ch anges th at d o n ot adequate ly r e re la tiv e im porta nce . P rio rit iz e s p ro pose d pra ctic e c h anges. P rio rit iz e s p ro pose d pra ctic e c h anges, a nd pro vid es s o und r a tio nale f o r th e p rio rit iz a tio n. D ete rm in e h ow pro posed p ra ctic e ch an ges w ill f o ste r a c u lt u re o f q ualit y a n d s afe ty . D oes n ot d ete rm in e how p ro pose d pra ctic e c h anges w ill fo ste r a c u lt u re o f q ualit y a nd s a fe ty . A tte m pts to d ete rm in e how p ro pose d p ra ctic e ch anges fo ste r a c u lt u re o f q ualit y a nd sa fe ty , b ut fa ils to e xp la in w hy p ro pose d ch anges w ill p osit iv e ly a ff e ct a ttit u des o r behavio rs . D ete rm in es h ow pro pose d p ra ctic e ch anges w ill fo ste r a c u lt u re o f q ualit y a nd sa fe ty . D ete rm in es h ow pro pose d p ra ctic e ch anges fo ste r a c u lt u re o f q ualit y a nd s a fe ty , a nd pro pose s c rit e ria th at co uld b e u se d to e va lu ate th at c u lt u re . D ete rm in e h ow a p artic u la r o rg an iz a tio nal cu lt u re o r h ie ra rc h y m ig ht a ffe ct o r co ntr ib ute t o a d vers e q ualit y a n d safe ty o utc o m es. D oes n ot d ete rm in e how a p artic u la r org aniz a tio nal cu lt u re o r h ie ra rc h y m ig ht a ff e ct o r co ntr ib ute to a dve rs e q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es. D escrib es th e org aniz a tio nal c u lt u re o r h ie ra rc h y, b ut fa ils t o e xp la in h ow it s c h ara cte ris tic s m ig ht aff e ct o r c o ntr ib ute to a dve rs e q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es. D ete rm in es h ow a p artic u la r org aniz a tio nal cu lt u re o r h ie ra rc h y m ig ht a ff e ct o r co ntr ib ute to a dve rs e q ualit y a nd s a fe ty o utc o m es. D ete rm in es h ow a p artic u la r o rg aniz a tio nal cu lt u re o r h ie ra rc h y m ig ht a ff e ct o r c o ntr ib ute to a dve rs e q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es, a nd id enti o n w hic h th at a naly sis is b ase d. Ju stif y n ecessary c h an ges t o p artic u la r o rg an iz a tio nal fu nctio ns, p ro cesses, a n d beh avio rs t h at co rre ct o r m it ig ate a d vers e q ualit y a n d safe ty o utc o m es. D oes n ot ju stif y n ece ssa ry c h anges to p artic u la r org aniz a tio nal fu nctio ns, p ro ce sse s, a nd behavio rs th at co rre ct o r m it ig ate a dve rs e q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es. D escrib es p ro pose d ch anges to p artic u la r org aniz a tio nal fu nctio ns, p ro ce sse s, a nd b ehavio rs , b ut does n ot e xp la in h ow each c h ange m ig ht co rre ct o r m it ig ate a dve rs e q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es. Ju sti c h anges to p artic u la r org aniz a tio nal fu nctio ns, p ro ce sse s, a nd behavio rs th at co rre ct o r m it ig ate a dve rs e q ualit y a nd sa fe ty o utc o m es. Ju sti c h anges to p artic u la r org aniz a tio nal fu nctio ns, p ro ce sse s, a nd behavio rs th at c o rre ct o r m it ig ate a dve rs e q ualit y a nd s a fe ty o utc o m es, a nd id enti g aps, u nkn ow ns, m is sin g in fo rm atio n, 1/25/23, 10:36 AM Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6212/221000/Scoring_Guides/a01_scoring_guide.html 2/2 CRIT E R IA N O N-P ER FO RM ANCE BASIC P R O FIC IE N T DIS TIN G UIS H ED u nansw ere d q uestio ns, o r a re as o f u nce rta in ty . C om munic ate a n aly sis d ata a n d in fo rm atio n c le arly a n d a ccu ra te ly , u sin g c o rre ct g ra m mar a n d m ech an ic s. D oes n ot co m munic a te a naly sis d ata a nd in fo rm atio n c le arly a nd a ccu ra te ly , u sin g c o rre ct g ra m mar a nd m ech anic s. C om munic a tio n is n ot co nsis te ntly c le ar a nd accu ra te , o r e rro rs in g ra m mar o r m ech anic s in hib it e ff e ctiv e co m munic a tio n. C om munic a te s analy sis d ata a nd in fo rm atio n c le arly a nd a ccu ra te ly , u sin g c o rre ct g ra m mar a nd m ech anic s. C om munic a te s a naly se s and in fo rm atio n c le arly a nd a ccu ra te ly . G ra m mar a nd m ech anic s a re e rro r- fr e e. In te g ra te r e le van t an d c re d ib le s o urc es o f e vid en ce to s u pport a ssertio ns, c o rre ctly f o rm attin g c it a tio ns an d r e fe re n ces u sin g A PA s ty le . D oes n ot in te gra te r e le va nt a nd cre dib le s o urc e s o f evid ence to s u pport a sse rtio ns; d oes n ot co rre ctly fo rm at cit a tio ns a nd re fe re nce s u sin g A PA s ty le . S ourc e s la ck re le va nce o r c re dib ilit y , a re p oorly in te gra te d, or a re in co rre ctly f o rm atte d. In te gra te s r e le va nt and c re dib le s o urc e s of e vid ence to s u pport a sse rtio ns, co rre ctly fo rm attin g cit a tio ns a nd re fe re nce s u sin g A PA s ty le . In te gra te s r e le va nt, c re dib le , a nd c o nvin cin g so urc e s o f e vid ence to s u pport a sse rtio ns. S ourc e s a re c u rre nt, a nd cit a tio ns a nd r e fe re nce s are e rro r-fr e e.

Writerbay.net

Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net