Public health laws

We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

 

Module 05: Critical Thinking Assignment

Public Law for Mass Gatherings Presentation – (105 points)

For this presentation, research public health laws in place in Saudi Arabia for religious pilgrims. 

Identify at least three laws in place. For each law, be sure to: 

  • Indicate the law, its purpose and requirements enacted to meet the purpose of the law;
  • Analyze the ethical implications; 
  • Describe any penalties associated with each law;  
  • Describe instructions provided by any international organizations regarding protecting public health during mass gatherings; and
  • Demonstrate how this advice is reflected in the law.

Your well-written presentation should meet the following requirements:

  • Be 7 slides in length, not counting the title slide, introduction slide, and references slide. 
  • Presentation notes (100-150 words) are required for each slide.  Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials.  Add notes to the speaker’s notes section of the PowerPoint presentation.  Submit the document in PowerPoint format so that speaker’s notes can be viewed by the instructor.   
  • Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles in the speaker notes as well as the references slide. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but two must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these sources and should be your primary resource for conducting research.

Reach out to your instructor if you have questions about the assignment.

Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards.

Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment to the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check Student Guide.

SEU HCM515
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 5

Exceeds
Expectation

Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Requirements Includes all of the

required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Content Demonstrates

substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.

Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.

Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.

Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Analysis Provides strong

thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

Provides poor
though, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 4-8 Points
Sources Sources go above

and beyond
required criteria
and are well
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.

Sources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.

Sources meet
required criteria
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.

Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.

Mechanics and Writing
5-6 Points 3-4 Points 2-3 Points 1-2 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.

Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
paragraph
structure, contains
no errors in
grammar, spelling,

Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure, may
include a few

Project is poorly
organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,

Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,

SEU HCM515
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 5

APA style, or APA
citations and
references.

minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.

and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style
or APA citations
and references.

and APA citations
and references.

Total points possible = 105

Writerbay.net

Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net