SCORING GUIDE ATTACHED, MSN CLASS Prepare an evaluation (5-7 pages) of an existing QI initiative to determine if the initiative is effective. IntroductionToo often, discussions about quality health ca

We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

SCORING GUIDE ATTACHED, MSN CLASS

Prepare an evaluation (5-7 pages) of an existing QI initiative to determine if the initiative is effective.

  • Introduction

Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—various groups talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care. As a result, they must develop their skills in reviewing and evaluating performance reports. They also need to be able to communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives effectively. Patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes mandate collaboration among nursing staff members to ensure the integration of their perspectives in all quality care initiatives.

  • Overview

In the first assessment, you analyzed an adverse event or a near miss, and outlined a QI initiative to address it. This assessment will give you practice and the confidence to evaluate a quality care initiative in much the same way you might in your health care setting to help determine if the initiative is effective.

Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—each group talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Because nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care, it is essential that they develop the proficiency to review, evaluate performance reports, and be able to effectively communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives. The nursing staff’s perspective and the need to collaborate on quality care initiatives are fundamental to patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes.

  • Instructions

Imagine you have been asked to prepare and deliver an analysis of an existing QI initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you, or you may use the hospice information provided in the Vila Health: Data Analysis activity in this assessment. The purpose of the report is to assess whether the specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your target audience is nurses and other health professionals with specializations or interest in your chosen condition, disease, or public health issue.

In your report, you will:

  • Analyze a current QI initiative in a health care setting.

    • Identify what prompted implementation of the QI initiative.
    • Evaluate problems that arose during the initiative or problems that were not addressed.
  • Evaluate the success of a current QI initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures as required to meet national, state, or accreditation requirements.

    • Identify the core performance measurements related to successful treatment or management of the condition.
    • Evaluate the impact of the quality indicators on the health care facility.
  • Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to the success of actions used in the QI initiative as they relate to functionality and outcomes.
  • Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a current quality initiative.
  • Ensure your analysis conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
  • Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title page and References section.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work. Review the Nursing Master’s Program (MSN) Library Guide for guidance.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Review the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.
  • Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance.

    • Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative.
  • Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.

    • Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting.
    • Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures as required to meet national, state, or accreditation requirements.
  • Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work life quality.

    • Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to the success of actions utilized in a quality improvement initiative as they relate to functionality and outcomes.
  • Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

    • Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
  • SCORING GUIDE

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

  • VIEW SCORING GUIDE

SCORING GUIDE ATTACHED, MSN CLASS Prepare an evaluation (5-7 pages) of an existing QI initiative to determine if the initiative is effective. IntroductionToo often, discussions about quality health ca
1/24/23, 12:52 PM Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6016/220700/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html 1/2 Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide CRIT E R IA N O N-P ER FO RM ANCE BASIC P R O FIC IE N T DIS TIN G UIS H ED A naly ze a c u rre n t qualit y im pro vem en t in it ia tiv e in a h ealt h c are s ettin g. D oes n ot d escrib e a c u rre nt q ualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e in a h ealt h c a re s e ttin g. D escrib es a c u rre nt qualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e in a h ealt h c a re s e ttin g, b ut fa ils t o a naly ze th e o rig in s and r e su lt s o f th e in it ia tiv e . A naly ze s a c u rre nt qualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e in a h ealt h c a re s e ttin g. A naly ze s a c u rre nt q ualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e in a h ealt h c a re s e ttin g, a nd id enti g aps, u nkn ow ns, m is sin g in fo rm atio n, u nansw ere d questio ns, o r a re as o f unce rta in ty ( w here fu rth er in fo rm atio n c o uld im pro ve th e a naly sis ). E valu ate t h e su ccess o f a c u rre n t qualit y im pro vem en t in it ia tiv e t h ro ugh re co gniz e d b en ch m ark s a n d outc o m e m easu re s as r e q uir e d t o m eet n atio nal, s ta te , o r accre d it a tio n re q uir e m en ts . D oes n ot e va lu ate th e s u cce ss o f a c u rre nt q ualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e th ro ugh re co gniz e d bench m ark s a nd outc o m e m easu re s. A tte m pts to e va lu ate th e s u cce ss o f a q ualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e , b ut fa ils to u se r e co gniz e d bench m ark s a nd outc o m e m easu re s o r re la te m easu re s to n atio nal, s ta te , o r accre dit a tio n re quir e m ents . E va lu ate s th e su cce ss o f a c u rre nt qualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e th ro ugh re co gniz e d bench m ark s a nd outc o m e m easu re s as r e quir e d to m eet natio nal, s ta te , o r accre dit a tio n re quir e m ents . E va lu ate s th e s u cce ss o f a c u rre nt q ualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e th ro ugh r e co gniz e d natio nal, s ta te , o r accre dit a tio n b ench m ark s a nd o utc o m e m easu re s. Id enti w hic h th e a naly sis is b ase d. In co rp ora te in te rp ro fe ssio nal p ers p ectiv es r e la te d to t h e s u ccess o f actio ns u tiliz e d in a q ualit y im pro vem en t in it ia tiv e a s t h ey re la te t o fu nctio nalit y a n d outc o m es. D oes n ot in co rp ora te in te rp ro fe ssio nal pers p ectiv e s r e la te d to th e s u cce ss o f actio ns u tiliz e d in a q ualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e fu nctio nalit y a nd outc o m es. A tte m pts to in co rp ora te in te rp ro fe ssio nal pers p ectiv e s, b ut in clu des in su f in te rp ro fe ssio nal fe edback r e la te d to in it ia tiv e fu nctio nalit y a nd o utc o m es. In co rp ora te s in te rp ro fe ssio nal pers p ectiv e s r e la te d to th e s u cce ss o f actio ns u tiliz e d in a q ualit y im pro ve m ent in it ia tiv e a nd h ow th ese a ctio ns r e la te to fu nctio nalit y a nd outc o m es. In co rp ora te s in te rp ro fe ssio nal pers p ectiv e s a nd a ctio ns re la te d to in it ia tiv e fu nctio nalit y a nd outc o m es, a nd id enti a re as o f u nce rta in ty , k n ow le dge g aps, a nd addit io nal in fo rm atio n th at w ould b e n eeded to g ain a m ore c o m ple te u nders ta ndin g. R eco m men d ad dit io nal in dic ato rs a n d p ro to co ls t o im pro ve a n d e xp an d outc o m es o f a q ualit y in it ia tiv e. D oes n ot re co m mend addit io nal in dic a to rs a nd p ro to co ls to im pro ve a nd exp and o utc o m es o f a q ualit y in it ia tiv e . A tte m pts to r e co m mend a ddit io nal in dic a to rs a nd pro to co ls , b ut fa ils to m ake a c a se fo r w hy re co m mendatio ns co uld im pro ve o r exp and q ualit y o utc o m es. R eco m mends addit io nal in dic a to rs a nd p ro to co ls to im pro ve a nd e xp and outc o m es o f a q ualit y in it ia tiv e . R eco m mends a ddit io nal in dic a to rs a nd p ro to co ls t o im pro ve a nd e xp and outc o m es o f a q ualit y in it ia tiv e , a nd im partia lly e xp la in s th e p ro s a nd co ns o f th ese re co m mendatio ns. C onvey p urp ose, in a n a p pro pria te t o ne an d s ty le , in co rp ora tin g su pportin g e vid en ce an d a d herin g t o o rg an iz a tio nal, p ro fe ssio nal, a n d sch ola rly w rit in g sta n dard s. D oes n ot c o nve y purp ose , in a n appro pria te to ne and s ty le , in co rp ora tin g su pportin g e vid ence a nd a dherin g to o rg aniz a tio nal, p ro fe ssio nal, a nd w rit in g s ch ola rly s ta ndard s. C onve ys p urp ose , in a n a ppro pria te to ne o r sty le . C le ar, e ff e ctiv e co m munic a tio n is in hib it e d b y in su f evid ence a nd/o r m in im al a dhere nce to a pplic a ble w rit in g sta ndard s. C onve ys p urp ose , in a n a ppro pria te to ne and s ty le , in co rp ora tin g su pportin g e vid ence a nd a dherin g to o rg aniz a tio nal, p ro fe ssio nal, a nd sch ola rly w rit in g sta ndard s. C onve ys c le ar p urp ose , in a to ne a nd s ty le w ell- s u it e d to th e in te nded audie nce . S upports a sse rtio ns, a rg um ents , a nd c o nclu sio ns w it h r e le va nt, c re dib le , a nd co nvin cin g e vid ence . E xh ib it s s tr ic t a nd n early o rg aniz a tio nal, p ro fe ssio nal, a nd sch ola rly w rit in g 1/24/23, 12:52 PM Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6016/220700/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html 2/2 CRIT E R IA N O N-P ER FO RM ANCE BASIC P R O FIC IE N T DIS TIN G UIS H ED sta ndard s, in clu din g A PA sty le a nd fo rm attin g.

Writerbay.net

Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net