Assignment 2: national organization of nurse practitioner faculties

We're the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click either of the buttons below to place your order.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

 

The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) has determined nine broad areas of core competence that apply to all nurse practitioners, regardless of specialty or patient population focus. NONPF created the first set of Nurse Practitioner Competencies in 1990; the most recent updates were incorporated in 2017. This course was designed to prepare you to synthesize knowledge gained throughout the program and to apply each of the nine core competencies within your selected areas of practice and your representative communities.

The nine areas of competency are:

  • Scientific Foundations
  • Leadership
  • Quality
  • Practice Inquiry
  • Technology and Information Literacy
  • Policy
  • Health Delivery System
  • Ethics
  • Independent Practice

To Prepare

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on the NONPF Core Competencies Content.

The Assignment

For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet the competency (for a total of at least nine paragraphs). Then, propose how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Finally, describe 1–2 legislative and/or advocacy activities in which your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved. Be specific and provide examples.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric

  Excellent

90%–100%

Good

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Poor

0%–69%

For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet it (for a total of at least nine paragraphs).

Points:

Points Range:
50 (50%) – 55 (55%)

Response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
44 (44%) – 49 (49%)

Response clearly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
39 (39%) – 43 (43%)

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies or one of the competencies is not addressed.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 38 (38%)

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Several of the competencies are not addressed or resposnse is missing.

Feedback:

Propose and explain how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Be specific and provide examples.

Points:

Points Range:
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

Response clearly and thoroughly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response clearly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner or response is missing.

Feedback:

Describe 1-2 legislative and advocacy activities that your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Points:

Points Range:
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Response clearly and concisely describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response clearly describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in, or response is missing.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.

Points:

Points Range:
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains 3-4 APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range:
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors.

Feedback:

Show Descriptions

Show Feedback

For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet it (for a total of at least nine paragraphs).–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
50 (50%) – 55 (55%)

Response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.

Good

80%–89%
44 (44%) – 49 (49%)

Response clearly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.

Fair

70%–79%
39 (39%) – 43 (43%)

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies or one of the competencies is not addressed.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 38 (38%)

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Several of the competencies are not addressed or resposnse is missing.

Feedback:

Propose and explain how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Be specific and provide examples.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

Response clearly and thoroughly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.

Good

80%–89%
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response clearly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.

Fair

70%–79%
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner or response is missing.

Feedback:

Describe 1-2 legislative and advocacy activities that your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Response clearly and concisely describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Good

80%–89%
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response clearly describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Fair

70%–79%
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in, or response is missing.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Good

80%–89%
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

Fair

70%–79%
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Good

80%–89%
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Fair

70%–79%
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent

90%–100%
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Good

80%–89%
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Fair

70%–79%
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains 3-4 APA format errors.

Poor

0%–69%
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors.

Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric

Writerbay.net

Do you need academic writing help? Our quality writers are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with a customer support representative in the chat on the bottom right corner, send us a WhatsApp message or click either of the buttons below to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net