Intl 420 discussions

/in /by

INTL 420 Discussion week two through seven 

Discussion Board writing assignment for Week Two

1. Describe some of the historical influences that impact North Korean narratives and social identities, and their perceptions of Americans and South Koreans. 

2. What do North Koreans say about their reality in relation to the world around them?

3. Describe some of the ways that cultural analysis is applied in the military today. (Use Week One and Week Two readings to support your answer).  

4. The editors of Practicing Military Anthropologydescribe Christopher Varhola’s (“Ethnicity and Shifting Identity”) arguments in favor of increased collaboration between military operations and anthropologists and other social scientists as “nested in linkages between analysis of specific cultural patterns and military operations.” What cultural patterns does Varhola believe could have been better understood (to the benefit of military operations) in Iraq, Sudan and East Africa?

Discussion Board writing assignment for Week Three

1. How does the production of cocaine impact the wider economy in Bolivia (particularly in rural areas), and in turn, impact other aspects of social life?

2. How are economic livelihoods and access to resources intertwined with the history of conflict in the Mindanao region of the Philippines?

Discussion Board writing assignment for Week Four

Q1: Outline and describe the system of segmentary lineage of the Nuer of Southern Sudan.  

Q2: How are social relations, kinship, age and status and religion reflected in the traditional system of Nuer Politics? 

Q3: Briefly describe some of the basic patterns of leadership, customary law and traditional conflict resolution techniques in Mindanao? In what situations might people in Mindanao use traditional customary law, and in what situations might they might they make appeals through formal state legal institutions?

Discussion Board writing assignment for Week Five

1. John Mueller argues “that the whole concept of ‘ethnic warfare’ may be severely misguided.” How was the “banality of ethnic war” borne out in the cases of Croatia and Bosnia, and Rwanda, according to Mueller? 

2. According to Hutchinson, how has Nuer ethnicity been militarized?  What behavioral and social changes does Hutchinson cite as evidence of this militarization of the Nuer? 

3. In “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War,” Fearon and Laitin critique “an influential conventional wisdom [which] holds that civil wars proliferated rapidly with the end of the Cold War and that the root cause of many or most of these has been ethnic and religious antagonisms.” What did Fearon and Laitin find to be the direct causes of civil conflict?  What did they find to be indirect causes, in other words, which factors did they find to be more weakly correlated with civil wars?

Discussion Board writing assignment for Week Six

Q1: Summarize how, according to Rodney Stark, social movements arise and how they succeed?  Describe where a “shared grievance” might arise from a population. 

Q2: In The True Believer, Eric Hoffer opines, “Discontent by itself does not invariably create a desire for change.”According to Hoffer, what other factor(s) have to be present to create a desire for change? What is required for success? Is Hoffer different from Stark? Explain why or why not.

Q3: Why in Toth’s view, did Islamism take root in Southern Egypt? What political, economic and social conditions does Toth attribute to the rise of Islamism in Egypt?  What does Toth cite as the catalyst for the shift of some Islamists in Egypt from pacificism to militancy?   

Q4. What is the “strategic logic of suicide terrorism,” according to Robert Pape?  Describe the five principal findings of Pape’s study.  What evidence did Pape find for “the apparent success of suicide terrorism?”

Discussion Board writing assignment for Week Seven

Q1: What is “strategic culture?” According to the authors for the week, what does strategic culture consist of? 

Q2: How does China perceive itself? What threatens China’s national security in the eyes of its influential elites?  How does China seek to address threats to China’s national security? 

Q3: Norvell De Atkine writes, ” Arabic-speaking armies have been generally ineffective in the modern era,” and gives examples of outcomes from military confrontations with Iran, Western militaries, and Israel to support his claim. 

Why does De Atkine believe the U.S. army, i.e. military, “has a poor legacy” in assessing the national character and culture of opposing forces? What evidence does he provide?

What cultural attributes of Arab armies does De Atkine believe affect combat performance?  Provide your assessment of De Atkine’s claims.  Are there any factors (political, economic, environment, etc,) not covered by De Atkine which might have significantly (or at least somewhat) impacted the outcomes of the military confrontations he uses to support his cultural attributes theory? 

Q4: Describe the three perspectives of Indian strategic culture as outlined by Kanti Bajpai.

Corporate tax

/in /by

CORPORATE TAX EXAM SAMPLE

At the beginning of Year 1, ABC, Inc. (ABC) has one class of stock (i.e., common stock), and there are only 100 shares of that common stock outstanding. Jen owns 40% of the ABC common stock and has a basis of $400 in that stock. The other 60% of the ABC stock is held equally by Jen’s friend Marina (who has a basis of $200 in her stock), Marina’s daughter Elena (who has a basis of $200 in her stock), and Jen’s mother Jacky (who has a basis of $200 in her stock). In Year 1, ABC has $50,000 of earnings and profits from its operations (that are not attributable to any specific period during that year) and no accumulated earnings and profits. On June 1 of Year 1, ABC distributes $20,000 to its shareholders. On November 12 of Year 1, ABC distributes a parcel of land with a fair market value of $10,000 and a basis of $5,000 to its shareholders. In Year 2, ABC has a current deficit in earnings and profits of $40,000 (that is not attributable to any specific period during that year). On April 1 of Year 2, ABC distributes $20,000 to its shareholders. In Years 3 and 4, ABC has ample earnings and profits.

At the beginning of Year 1, DEF, Inc. (DEF) has one class of stock (i.e., common stock), and there are only 200 shares of that common stock outstanding. Jen owns 40% of the DEF common stock and has a basis of $400 in that stock. The other 60% of the DEF stock is held equally by Jen’s friend Marina (who has a basis of $200 in her stock), Marina’s daughter Elena (who has a basis of $200 in her stock), and Jen’s mother Jacky (who has a basis of $200 in her stock). DEF is profitable and has ample earnings and profits. In Year 4, Jen, Marina, and Jacky each transfer 10 shares of ABC common stock (with a fair market value of $10,000) to DEF in exchange for one additional share of DEF stock (with a fair market value of $1,000) plus $9,000 in cash.

In Year 5, ABC adopted a periodic redemption plan under which each shareholder of ABC is eligible to have no more than 2 shares of ABC stock redeemed each year. No more than a total of 4 shares can be redeemed in any one year under the plan. In Year 5, no shareholder made an election to have shares redeemed. In Year 6, however, DEF elected to have 2 of its shares of ABC stock redeemed; no other shareholder elected to have stock redeemed that year. Based on subsequent participation in the plan, this redemption by DEF in Year 6 was not an isolated redemption.

Discuss the U.S. federal income tax consequences of this series of events to all parties involved. In your answer, please be sure to discuss all relevant tax consequences (with and without available elections)—including, but not limited to, the amount, timing, and character of

any income; basis; holding period; and tax attributes (e.g., earnings and profits and net operating losses).

Legal environment of business

/in /by

 

Heimdall Corporation’s board of directors hired a new CEO, Essa Alharbi. The Executive Search Firm that hired him found that in their search of over 200 candidates, he was the most qualified. He had extensive experience in helping businesses succeed. After the Board of Directors hired him, 11 months into the job, the company experienced significant losses in revenue and market share. As a result, the Board forced him to resign but paid him a handsome sum to leave the company, as was customary in this situation. A group of shareholders filed a lawsuit against the Board of Directors indicating that they were liable for the hiring of the incompetent CEO, and demanding they reimburse the shareholders for their losses due to his actions.

Are the members of the board liable for hiring Mr. Alharbi, and for the losses of the company?

Action Items

  1. Create your initial post responding to the discussion prompt above. After you post, you will be able to see your classmates’ posts.
  2. Reply to at least one of your classmates

Chapter 39

Corporations, Directors, Officers, and Shareholders

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

*

Chapter 39: Corporations, Directors, Officers, and Shareholders

Chapter 39 Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma

Zaxxon-Mobile Oil Company, Inc., headquartered in Mobile, Alabama, is a multinational corporation with 2009 annual profits of $45 billion. Zaxxon-Mobile has twelve (12) board members who serve the company on a part-time basis, with each board member receiving an average of $300,000 per year in compensation.

Emily D. Chanel, a pre-law student at The University of Alabama at Mobile, is very familiar with Zaxxon-Mobile Oil Company, Inc., and she has studied her business law textbook material on corporations and their directors, officers and shareholders very carefully. She recalls that the board of directors and its members owe a strict fiduciary duty to the corporation; as part of this fiduciary duty, the board must exercise oversight in monitoring the actions of corporate employees, including the executives and officers of the corporation.
Emily ponders, “How can board members of a major corporation be truly objective when they are being paid such lavish sums of money? Would not board members have a “Don’t rock the boat” mentality in terms of exercising their oversight function? Why, for example, would a Zaxxon-Mobile board member question the practices of the company’s high-ranking executives and officers, when such an inquiry might jeopardize his or her $300,000 per year annual compensation? ‘Make no bones about it,’ if I were a board member at Zaxxon-Mobile, I would probably be a ‘yes-woman” and approve of everything the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and the chief operating officer wanted to do!”

How do you respond to Emily D. Chanel’s questions and overall concerns about board member compensation and objectivity?

39-*

Chapter 39 Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma: Zaxxon-Mobile Oil Company, Inc., headquartered in Mobile, Alabama, is a multinational corporation with 2009 annual profits of $45 billion. Zaxxon-Mobile has twelve (12) board members who serve the company on a part-time basis, with each board member receiving an average of $300,000 per year in compensation. Emily D. Chanel, a pre-law student at The University of Alabama at Mobile, is very familiar with Zaxxon-Mobile Oil Company, Inc., and she has studied her business law textbook material on corporations and their directors, officers and shareholders very carefully. She recalls that the board of directors and its members owe a strict fiduciary duty to the corporation; as part of this fiduciary duty, the board must exercise oversight in monitoring the actions of corporate employees, including the executives and officers of the corporation. Emily ponders, “How can board members of a major corporation be truly objective when they are being paid such lavish sums of money? Would not board members have a “Don’t rock the boat” mentality in terms of exercising their oversight function? Why, for example, would a Zaxxon-Mobile board member question the practices of the company’s high-ranking executives and officers, when such an inquiry might jeopardize his or her $300,000 per year annual compensation? ‘Make no bones about it,’ if I were a board member at Zaxxon-Mobile, I would probably be a ‘yes-woman” and approve of everything the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and the chief operating officer wanted to do!” How do you respond to Emily D. Chanel’s questions and overall concerns about board member compensation and objectivity?

*

Chapter 39 Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma
Dr. Charles Finnegan is a newly-appointed member of the Board of Directors of Walnut Grove Community College (W.G.C.C.) in Walnut Grove, California. The position is unpaid, but does come with the “perks” of positive exposure and prestige in the local community.

At his first board meeting, the directors are discussing and considering for approval service contracts between W.G.C.C. and the local business community. The third contract for consideration is a janitorial service contract, valued at $150,000, between W.G.C.C. and Antiseptic Andy Cleaning Service, Inc. Finnegan is quite surprised; after all, “Antiseptic Andy” is owned and operated by his first cousin, Andrew Deere. Cousins Finnegan and Deere have not seen each other in three years, nor have they otherwise communicated during that period of time.

The chairperson of the Board of Directors calls for a vote on the janitorial service contract. According to W.G.C.C. regulations, the board must unanimously approve contracts with the business community.

Finnegan is perplexed. If he votes and says nothing about his kinship to Deere, he still feels he can “sleep at night,” since he will not receive any financial gain from the contract. If he discloses his kinship to Deere, he fears that Deere’s business opportunity will be jeopardized.

Does Finnegan have a legal obligation to disclose his relationship to Deere? Would it be a “conflict of interest” for Finnegan to vote in favor of the contract? Does he have an ethical obligation to disclose the relationship?

39-*

Chapter 39 Case Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma: Dr. Charles Finnegan is a newly-appointed member of the Board of Directors of Walnut Grove Community College (W.G.C.C.) in Walnut Grove, California. The position is unpaid, but does come with the “perks” of positive exposure and prestige in the local community. At his first board meeting, the directors are discussing and considering for approval service contracts between W.G.C.C. and the local business community. The third contract for consideration is a janitorial service contract, valued at $150,000, between W.G.C.C. and Antiseptic Andy Cleaning Service, Inc. Finnegan is quite surprised; after all, “Antiseptic Andy” is owned and operated by his first cousin, Andrew Deere. Cousins Finnegan and Deere have not seen each other in three years, nor have they otherwise communicated during that period of time. The chairperson of the Board of Directors calls for a vote on the janitorial service contract. According to W.G.C.C. regulations, the board must unanimously approve contracts with the business community. Finnegan is perplexed. If he votes and says nothing about his kinship to Deere, he still feels he can “sleep at night,” since he will not receive any financial gain from the contract. If he discloses his kinship to Deere, he fears that Deere’s business opportunity will be jeopardized. Does Finnegan have a legal obligation to disclose his relationship to Deere? Would it be a “conflict of interest” for Finnegan to vote in favor of the contract? Does he have an ethical obligation to disclose the relationship?

*

Summary of Roles of Directors, Officers, and Shareholders

  • Directors–

  • Officers–

  • Shareholders–
  • Vote on important corporate decisions
  • Appoint and supervise officers
  • Declare and pay corporate dividends
  • Manage corporation

  • Run “day-to-day” business of firm
  • Agents of corporation
  • Elect board of directors
  • Approve major board decisions

39-*

*

Directors vote on important corporate decisions, appoint and supervise officers, declare and pay corporate dividends, and manage the corporation. Officers run the “day-to-day” business of the firm, and are agents of the corporation. Shareholders elect the board of directors, and approve major board decisions.

Summary of Rights of Directors, Officers, and Shareholders

  • Directors–

  • Officers–

  • Shareholders–
  • Right to Compensation
  • Right to Participation
  • Right to Inspection
  • Right to Indemnification
  • Rights determined in employment contract
  • Stock certificates
  • Preemptive rights
  • Right to Dividends
  • Right to Transfer Shares
  • Inspection Rights
  • Right to Corporate Dissolution
  • Right to File Derivative Suit
  • Right to File Direct Suit

39-*

*

Corporate directors have the rights to compensation, participation, inspection, and indemnification. Officers’ rights are determined by their employment contracts. Shareholders have the rights to stock certificates, pre-emption, dividends, share transfers, inspection, corporate dissolution, derivative suits and direct lawsuits.

Fiduciary Duties

Definition: Duties to corporation that individuals

within corporation have

Primary fiduciary duties include:

  • Duty of Care
  • Duty of Loyalty
  • Duty to Disclose Conflict of Interest

39-*

*

Fiduciary duties represent responsibilities to the corporation that individuals within the corporation have. Primary fiduciary responsibilities include the duty of care, the duty of loyalty, and the duty to disclose actual or potential conflicts of interest.

Exhibit 39-2: Liability of Directors and Officers

  • Can be held personally liability for their own torts and crimes
  • Can be held personally liable for torts and crimes of other employees they supervise
  • Can be held liable for wrongful transactions involving company stock
  • Cannot be held liable for decisions that harm company if they were acting in good faith at time of decision

39-*

Corporate directors and officers can be held personally liability for their own torts and crimes, and they can be held personally liable for the torts and crimes of other employees they supervise. Further, directors and officers can be held liable for wrongful transactions involving company stock. Directors and officers cannot be held liable for decisions that harm the company if they were acting in good faith at the time of the decision.

*

Exhibit 39-3: Liability of Shareholders

  • Shareholders liable (to extent of their investment) for debts of corporation
  • Shareholders liable for breach of contract if stock subscription agreement signed and no stock purchased
  • Shareholders liable for watered stock
  • Shareholders personally liable for receiving illegal dividends

39-*

In terms of the liability of shareholders, shareholders are liable, to the extent of their investment, for the debts of the corporation. They are liable for a breach of contract if a stock subscription agreement was signed and yet no stock was purchased. Shareholders are liable for watered stock, and they can be held personally liable for receiving illegal dividends.

*

Quorum (Definition):

Minimum number of directors necessary to validate corporate directors meeting

39-*

*

A quorum constitutes the minimum number of directors necessary to validate a corporate directors’ meeting.

Proxy (Definition):

Provides authorization for third party to vote in place of shareholder at shareholder’s meeting

39-*

*

A proxy provides authorization for a third party to vote in place of a shareholder at a shareholders’ meeting.

Voting Trust (Definition):

Agreement between stockholder and trustee in which stockholder transfers his/her legal share titles to trustee; trustee is then responsible for voting for those shares

39-*

*

A voting trust is an agreement between a stockholder and a trustee in which the stockholder transfers his or her legal share titles to the trustee; the trustee is then responsible for voting for those shares.

Business Judgment Rule (Definition):

Provides that directors and officers are not liable for decisions that harmed corporation if they were acting in good faith at time of decision

39-*

*

The business judgment rule provides that directors and officers are not liable for decisions that harmed the corporation if they were acting in good faith at the time of the decision.

“Watered” Stock (Definition):

Stock issued to individuals at value below fair market value

39-*

*

“Watered” stock is stock issued to individuals at a value below fair market value.

Corporations: Directors, Officers, and Shareholders–Other Relevant Terminology

  • Par-Value Shares: Fixed face value noted on stock certificate
  • No-Par Shares: Stock shares without a par value
  • Stock Subscription Agreement: Contractually obliges individual to buy shares in corporation
  • Pre-emptive Rights: Preferential rights given to existing shareholders to purchase shares of new stock issue; preference given in proportion to percentage of stock shareholder already owns
  • Dividend: Distribution of corporate profits/income ordered by directors and paid to shareholders in proportion to their respective shares in corporation

39-*

*

In terms of other relevant terminology regarding corporate directors, officers, and shareholders, par-value shares have a fixed face value noted on the stock certificate, while no-par shares are stock shares without a par value. A stock subscription agreement contractually obliges an individual to buy shares in the corporation. Pre-emptive rights are preferential rights given to existing shareholders to purchase shares of a new stock issue, with a preference given in proportion to the percentage of stock the shareholder already owns. A dividend is a distribution of corporate profit or income ordered by directors and paid to shareholders in proportion to their respective shares in the corporation.

Corporations: Directors, Officers, and Shareholders–Other Relevant Terminology (Continued):

  • Right of First Refusal: Given to existing shareholders to purchase any shares of stock offered for resale by shareholder within specified period of time
  • Inspection Rights: Protect shareholder interest by giving them right to inspect corporation’s books and records after asking in advance to inspect and having proper purpose
  • Stock Warrants: Vouchers issued to shareholders, entitling them to given number of shares at specified price
  • Shareholder’s Derivative Suit: Filed by corporate shareholder when corporate directors fail to sue in situation where corporation has been harmed by individual/another corporation

39-*

*

Other relevant terminology regarding corporate directors, officers, and shareholders include the right of first refusal, given to existing shareholders to purchase any shares of stock offered for resale by a shareholder within a specified period of time. An inspection right protects shareholder interests by giving shareholders the right to inspect the corporation’s books and records, after asking in advance to inspect and establishing a proper purpose for inspection. Stock warrants are vouchers issued to shareholders, entitling them to a given number of shares at a specified price. Finally, a shareholder’s derivative suit is filed by a shareholder when corporate directors fail to sue in a situation where the corporation has been harmed by an individual or another corporation.

the state judicial selection & removal process

/in /by

 

Each state within the United States has its own unique judicial selection process within its own court system. Each state also has unique steps that can be taken to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons. In this assignment, you will detail your state’s judicial selection and removal process.

Using the Internet or Strayer University Online Library, research the judicial selection process for different court systems from different states within the U.S. Court System.

Write a 3–4 page paper in which you:

  1. Discuss the judicial selection process of your state and one other state. Include, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts (Supreme Court, Courts of Appeals, Bankruptcy Appellate Panels, District Courts, Bankruptcy Courts, and Article I Courts) within your specific state.
  2. Next, identify the steps that the relevant persons/entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.
  3. What impact do you think the qualifications of a judge, and the potential for disciplinary action, have on judicial decision making?
  4. Provide three quality sources—the textbook may be used as one reference source.

Discussion and response

/in /by

DISCUSSION: (1 TO 2 PARAGRAPHS) 

Creating ethical and effective information security policies can be a very challenging and time-consuming task in organizations.

  • Describe three reasons why organizations might not prioritize ethical concerns when creating policies. Choose the factor that you believe is most challenging for an organization to overcome and provide your rationale.
  • Determine what you believe are best practices for establishing an ethical and effective policy development process. Explain why you have taken this position. 

RESPONSE: (1 PARAGRAPH) 

Many companies have policies and procedures for employees to abide by, as they are part of the company handbook. Some of the policies they have are Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics that some organizations have employees sign as part of their employment. When implementing these policies, there could be some challenges when implementing an effective ethics policy. Some challenges could be resistance for employees, the cost or the payment related to training, and the capacity to regulate the ROI (return on investment) of the ethics policy(1).  Choosing which factor is the most challenging for an organization is the resistance from employees. Some employees are unwilling to adapt to change or may feel the information for implementing the change is not being communicated clearly or not at all. So, therefore, communication is the key.

The best way to establish an ethical and practical policy process is for the organization to implement proper training and reinforcement. Also, everyone would be held accountable because when the policies and procedures are no way carried out correctly, this can be a cause for disciplinary actions.

Theresa Webb,

Persuasive essay needed within 9 hrs.

/in /by

I’m looking for some one that can deliver a great quality, plagiarism free, persuasive essay. 

The tittle of this essay is ” Did President Obama Have The Legal Authority To Order Operation Geronimo.” It is also known as “Operation Spear Head”

Attached I will have the curriculum that is needed for a superior score. 

The body it self has to be at least 3 pages long in an APA format with a minimum of at least 2 properly references.

Unit 2 ip crjs455

/in /by

 

Every case brought before a judge must have evidence. Evidence is collected the moment law enforcement arrives on the scene. However, how that evidence is collected and stored allows a defense attorney the opportunity to scrutinize the individuals who collected the content. For example, the OJ Simpson and Robert Blake cases brought scrutiny to evidence collection and made the public develop a mistrust of how evidence is stored.

Write a 1 page  on the process of how evidence is collected and stored. As law enforcement presents its evidence to the state, justify some of the public’s hesitation with evidence collected and stored. Provide 2 outside references to validate your claims.

  • Visit the university library and research evidence collection.
  • Discuss why collecting and preserving evidence is important.
  • Illustrate why judges are more likely to throw out cases when the evidence is faulty or cannot be tracked.
  • Cite your sources via APA.

Wk10

/in /by

help with response

Hello Class and Professor,

John is protected under the Age Discrimination Act of 1967. He would need to show that he is in fact over 40, that he suffered an adverse employment action and that he was in fact, qualified for the job and met the expectations. Also, did the position remain open or was it filled by a similarly qualified individual that was younger?  I am sure that Johns attorney could get the aptitude test from John and the person hired, to show if there was discrimination. I feel that since the company has people who are in their 30’s, there is a good chance that they are in fact not hiring him due to age. 

The employer must show the tests are used valid.  Meaning, thee tests are related to successful job performance and that it does not have the effect of eliminating certain races from the employment market. The test can be validated in several ways.
 “Test scores of applicants can later be compared with the applicants’ eventual job performance as a means of validating the test”. (1)

‘The 
Americans with Disabilities Act protects against people like Leo. In order for hugging to constitute sexual harassment it must be frequent and severe enough to create an offensive abusive, or hostile work environment”. (3) A nonconsensual physical touch is usually a clear-cut form of harassment but Leo does have a disability and he is not forcing the hug on Tom. Does the hug make Tom feel uncomfortable, is it forced and does it involve a lot of body touching that is uncomfortable to Tom?  Sexual harassment is prohibited under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  (2) To prove the case Tom must do the following:

· Prove that he belongs to a protected group

· You were subjected to unwelcome harassment of a sexual nature;

· The harassment was pervasive enough to negatively impact a privilege, condition or term of your job; and

· Your employer knew or should have known that the harassment was occurring but failed to remedy the situation. (3) 

I do not believe that Tom will have a case against Leo.  As I stated earlier, he is not forcing the hugs on anyone and most of the employees welcome his hugs.  Of course, I know that because some employees do, doesn’t mean everyone will but I don’t feel that Tom has a case.

Sources:

.

1. Jennings, Marianne. 2018 Business Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment. Cengage Twelfth Edition.

2. The Rager Law Firm.October 27, 2018 California Sexual Harassment: When Hugging In The Workplace Creeates A Hostile Work Environment. Http://ragerlawoffices.com/california-sexual-harassment-when-hugging-in-the-workplace-cr3eates-a-hostile-work-environment/

3. SwartzSwidler, LLC. 2019. What’s The Burden of Proof For Workplace Sexual Harrassment. Https://swartz-legal.om/whats-the-burden-of-proof-for-workplace-sexual-harassment/

Business law ethics . 1 page single space.

/in /by

You are the CEO of Flower Power, Inc., a fast-growing chain of 100 florist shops based in the Southeastern United States.  The company opened for business 5 years ago with just 20 employees and now has over 1500 employees.  The company is now in the process of installing a new computer network, which will, for the first time, link all of the company’s offices and locations.  The company’s Chief Information Officer has approached you with a proposal to include a number of electronic surveillance features in the new network.  

The proposed features include:

.If a PC or laptop is issued for an employee’s use away from the office for work use, all email and activities on that PC or laptop can be monitored as well.

1)Identify the ethical dilemma

2)Evaluate how stakeholders would be affected by various solutions to your dilemma.

3)Discuss the pros and cons of alternative courses of action.

Diversity in criminal justice paper 5

/in /by

 After viewing the videos selected for this Unit, in a minimum of 1-2 pages, explain and discuss the benefits of a diversified police department. Provide 2-3 examples.  Explain why you feel diversity enhances the productivity of the department and the impact on community relations. 

 

Isiah Carey. (2019, May 17). DIVERSITY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT IN HOUSTON! (SOUTH ASIANS) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV3hMTCE1aU

 

Durham Regional Police Service. (2016, October 11). Diversity Makes A Difference [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKn_-2Kd9Mc