OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences …! Immersive Reader

Total Points: 50

Week 4 Sociologic Sciences Journal

Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submi!ng a text entry box or a file upload

NURS_500_DE – Case Study Rubric

Criteria Ra”ngs Pts

20 pts

20 pts

7.5 pts

2.5 pts

Start Assignment

Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study
Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study following the readings and presenta!on for this week.
Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instruc!ons below to
complete a journal entry about your experience.

During weeks 2 & 4, you will complete interac!ve case studies and be asked to associate what you have learned
about theory in comparison to the case study and reflect on it.

Each !me you have completed a case study, submit your reflec!on. Each reflec!on should include the following:

A comparison of what you have learned from the case study to related theories you have studied. Make sure to
cite these theories in APA format.
A comparison of the case study to your nursing prac!ce, giving one or two examples from your nursing experience
in which you might have applied a par!cular theory covered.

Your reflec!on should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs.

Cri!cal
Analysis

20 to >16.4 pts
Meets Expecta”ons

Presents an exemplary
ar!cula!on and insigh”ul
analysis of significant concepts
and/or theories presented in
the case. Offers detailed and
specific examples for all
ques!ons. Makes keen
observa!ons, making note of
essen!al informa!on provided
in the case. Ideas are
professionally sound and
crea!ve; they are supported by
scien!fic evidence that is
credible and !mely. Draws
insigh”ul and comprehensive
conclusions and solu!ons.

16.4 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expecta”ons

Presents an accurate
analysis of significant
concepts and/or theories
presented in the case.
Offers some detail and
some examples for most
ques!ons. Makes
occasional note of
essen!al informa!on
provided in the case.
Ideas are mostly
supported by scien!fic
evidence that is credible
and !mely. Makes some
a$empt to draw
conclusions and solu!ons.

15 to >11.8 pts
Falls Below
Expecta”ons

Provides insufficient
explana!ons of
significant concepts.
Offers li$le or
insignificant detail and
no examples for most
ques!ons. Fails to
address essen!al
informa!on provided
in the case. Ideas are
generally unsupported
by scien!fic evidence,
but some a$empt has
been made. Fails to
draw conclusion.

11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not
Meet
Expecta”ons

Does not, or
incorrectly,
answers with
insufficient
explana!ons.
Informa!on is
not
scien!fically
sound.

Content 20 to >16.4 pts
Meets Expecta”ons

Makes insigh”ul, clear and
accurate connec!ons to
key concepts and relevant
theories. Response
indicates a comprehensive,
high-level understanding
of the concepts presented
in the case.

16.4 to >15.0 pts
Approaches
Expecta”ons

Makes mostly
accurate connec!ons
to key concepts and
relevant theories.
Response indicates a
general
understanding of the
concepts presented in
the case.

15 to >11.8 pts
Falls Below Expecta”ons

Provides several insufficient
or inaccurate explana!ons,
although a$empts are made
to address some key
concepts. Response indicates
an introductory
understanding of the
concepts presented in the
case.

11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expecta”ons

Informa!on is
inaccurate or
inadequate.
Response
indicates li$le or
no
understanding
of the concepts
presented in the
case.

Mechanics 7.5 to >6.15 pts
Meets Expecta”ons

Answers are well wri$en
throughout. Informa!on
is well organized and
clearly communicated.
Assignment is free of
spelling and gramma!cal
errors.

6.15 to >5.63 pts
Approaches Expecta”ons

Answers are well wri$en
throughout and the
informa!on is reasonably
organized and
communicated. Assignment
is mostly free of spelling and
gramma!cal errors.

5.63 to >4.43 pts
Falls Below
Expecta”ons

Answers are
somewhat
organized and
lacks some
clarity. Contains
some spelling and
gramma!cal
errors.

4.43 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expecta”ons

Answers are not well
wri$en and lack clarity.
Informa!on is poorly
organized. Assignment
contains many spelling
and gramma!cal
errors.

APA
Format

2.5 to >2.05 pts
Meets Expecta”ons

Follows all the
requirements related
to format, length,
source cita!ons, and
layout.

2.05 to >1.88 pts
Approaches Expecta”ons

Follows length requirement
and most of the
requirements related to
format, source cita!ons, and
layout.

1.88 to >1.48 pts
Falls Below
Expecta”ons

Follows most of the
requirements related to
format, length, source
cita!ons, and layout.

1.48 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expecta”ons

Does not follow
format, length,
source cita!ons,
and layout
requirements.

“Previous Next#

WCU_202209FAIOL

Home

Announcements

Syllabus

VitalSource E-Text

Modules

Assignments

Discussions

Grades

My Panopto Videos

Zoom

Tutor.com

Course Evalua!ons

WCU Library

Remind

Chat with Gabby

Account

Dashboard

Courses

Calendar

Inbox

History

Studio

Help

OC_NURS500_202209FAIO… Assignments Week 4 Sociologic Sciences …! Immersive Reader

Total Points: 50

Week 4 Sociologic Sciences Journal

Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submi!ng a text entry box or a file upload

NURS_500_DE – Case Study Rubric

Criteria Ra”ngs Pts

20 pts

20 pts

7.5 pts

2.5 pts

Start Assignment

Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study
Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interac!ve Case Study following the readings and presenta!on for this week.
Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instruc!ons below to
complete a journal entry about your experience.

During weeks 2 & 4, you will complete interac!ve case studies and be asked to associate what you have learned
about theory in comparison to the case study and reflect on it.

Each !me you have completed a case study, submit your reflec!on. Each reflec!on should include the following:

A comparison of what you have learned from the case study to related theories you have studied. Make sure to
cite these theories in APA format.
A comparison of the case study to your nursing prac!ce, giving one or two examples from your nursing experience
in which you might have applied a par!cular theory covered.

Your reflec!on should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs.

Cri!cal
Analysis

20 to >16.4 pts
Meets Expecta”ons

Presents an exemplary
ar!cula!on and insigh”ul
analysis of significant concepts
and/or theories presented in
the case. Offers detailed and
specific examples for all
ques!ons. Makes keen
observa!ons, making note of
essen!al informa!on provided
in the case. Ideas are
professionally sound and
crea!ve; they are supported by
scien!fic evidence that is
credible and !mely. Draws
insigh”ul and comprehensive
conclusions and solu!ons.

16.4 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expecta”ons

Presents an accurate
analysis of significant
concepts and/or theories
presented in the case.
Offers some detail and
some examples for most
ques!ons. Makes
occasional note of
essen!al informa!on
provided in the case.
Ideas are mostly
supported by scien!fic
evidence that is credible
and !mely. Makes some
a$empt to draw
conclusions and solu!ons.

15 to >11.8 pts
Falls Below
Expecta”ons

Provides insufficient
explana!ons of
significant concepts.
Offers li$le or
insignificant detail and
no examples for most
ques!ons. Fails to
address essen!al
informa!on provided
in the case. Ideas are
generally unsupported
by scien!fic evidence,
but some a$empt has
been made. Fails to
draw conclusion.

11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not
Meet
Expecta”ons

Does not, or
incorrectly,
answers with
insufficient
explana!ons.
Informa!on is
not
scien!fically
sound.

Content 20 to >16.4 pts
Meets Expecta”ons

Makes insigh”ul, clear and
accurate connec!ons to
key concepts and relevant
theories. Response
indicates a comprehensive,
high-level understanding
of the concepts presented
in the case.

16.4 to >15.0 pts
Approaches
Expecta”ons

Makes mostly
accurate connec!ons
to key concepts and
relevant theories.
Response indicates a
general
understanding of the
concepts presented in
the case.

15 to >11.8 pts
Falls Below Expecta”ons

Provides several insufficient
or inaccurate explana!ons,
although a$empts are made
to address some key
concepts. Response indicates
an introductory
understanding of the
concepts presented in the
case.

11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expecta”ons

Informa!on is
inaccurate or
inadequate.
Response
indicates li$le or
no
understanding
of the concepts
presented in the
case.

Mechanics 7.5 to >6.15 pts
Meets Expecta”ons

Answers are well wri$en
throughout. Informa!on
is well organized and
clearly communicated.
Assignment is free of
spelling and gramma!cal
errors.

6.15 to >5.63 pts
Approaches Expecta”ons

Answers are well wri$en
throughout and the
informa!on is reasonably
organized and
communicated. Assignment
is mostly free of spelling and
gramma!cal errors.

5.63 to >4.43 pts
Falls Below
Expecta”ons

Answers are
somewhat
organized and
lacks some
clarity. Contains
some spelling and
gramma!cal
errors.

4.43 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expecta”ons

Answers are not well
wri$en and lack clarity.
Informa!on is poorly
organized. Assignment
contains many spelling
and gramma!cal
errors.

APA
Format

2.5 to >2.05 pts
Meets Expecta”ons

Follows all the
requirements related
to format, length,
source cita!ons, and
layout.

2.05 to >1.88 pts
Approaches Expecta”ons

Follows length requirement
and most of the
requirements related to
format, source cita!ons, and
layout.

1.88 to >1.48 pts
Falls Below
Expecta”ons

Follows most of the
requirements related to
format, length, source
cita!ons, and layout.

1.48 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expecta”ons

Does not follow
format, length,
source cita!ons,
and layout
requirements.

“Previous Next#

WCU_202209FAIOL

Home

Announcements

Syllabus

VitalSource E-Text

Modules

Assignments

Discussions

Grades

My Panopto Videos

Zoom

Tutor.com

Course Evalua!ons

WCU Library

Remind

Chat with Gabby

Account

Dashboard

Courses

Calendar

Inbox

History

Studio

Help