Select one of the following case studies for your paper:
Jennings, B., Kahn, J., Mastroianni, A., and Parker, L. S. (n.d.). Ethics and
public health: Model curriculum. Retrieved from
http://www.aspph.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/02/EthicsCurriculum.pdf

 Address them in a Q/A format, using complete
sentences. Please know that although this is not a formal written paper, you
still use APA formatting:

• Double-spaced with 1-inch
  margins
• Separate title page with the
  following:
• Title of paper
• Student’s name
• Course name and number
• Instructor’s name
• Date submitted
• Reference page formatted
  according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center
• Citations as required according
  to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center
• Must use at least two additional
  sources to support your answers to the case study questions (this does not
  include the case itself)

I chose Module 7 

• Module 7: Ethical issues in environmental and occupational health.
• Introductory Information: p. 157-168 (10 pages)
• Case Study 1: Environmental Injustice in Homer, Louisiana: p. 170-173 (4 pages)

Module 7: Case Study 1

Environmental Injustice in Homer, Louisiana

1. 
Explain why various parties might have selected Homer
as a place to build a uranium-enrichment facility. In your response, review
this from the angle of all stakeholders: city and local officials, residents,
school system personnel, public services.

2. 
Describe the reason why outsiders, like environmental
activists, took an interest in this proposal. What was it about Homer or the
plant that posed such interest from many stakeholders?

3. 
Examine whether the facility would benefit this
particular minority group (African Americans) or would it single out this group
to bear an environmental burden. In other words, address the question: What
role does the predominant race of the residents of Homer play in the siting of
the Claiborne facility? (Roles could include jobs, community growth, improved
economy, health hazards, social injustice…look at all angles of this situation.)

4. 
Examine whether a community at large can give informed
consent to the initiation of a project like the Claiborne facility and how
would this differ from individual informed consent? Provide details on
disclosures on both the positives and negatives of this project.

5. 
Explain with solid evidence and support whether you believe
this situation was one of industrial growth or environmental racism.