Topic: The Tea Party Obstacles In Congress 3 to 10 pages or 750 to 2500 words write in own words from your…

/in /by
Topic: The Tea Party Obstacles In Congress 3 to 10 pages or 750 to 2500 words write in own words from your perspective or point of view, using pronoun capture your readers attention with interesting introductory paragraph use specific examples to show what you mean use complete sentences as well as vary your sentence length and structure use fully developed paragraphs where each paragraph has only one main idea with enough supporting details to develop that idea clearly and logically

200 words in 2 hours

/in /by

Comment on similarities and/or differences between a stochastic population regression function (PRF) and a stochastic sample regression function (SRF).

3X+6 / 2x^2+x-6

/in /by
3X+6 / 2x^2+x-6

weekly summary marketing

/in /by

Write a weekly summary discussing what “you” have learned this week… you can go off these questions and the marketing papers. This has to be done today by 3pm mountain time

 

“We’ve all completed surveys in our lifetimes. Share a personal example of when you received what you feel was a poorly designed survey. In your opinion, specifically, what elements made the survey a poor research tool? Do you feel that the survey would ultimately be able to provide useful marketing data? Why or why not? What things, specifically, would you recommend to improve the final survey?

 

 

“In group dynamics, there often emerges several personality types including those who dominate a group and those who refrain from contributing in a group. Focus groups are only useful when an environment of balanced collaboration is established. As a moderator for a focus group, what sorts of tactics would you employ to ensure that everyone’s voice is equally heard and that no one person either dominates or retreats from the final contribution

Theories of Crime

/in /by
*****For Kim Woods ONLY***** Assignment 3: Theories of Crime Is justice just? Sometimes, what is legal is not always perceived by the public as “justice.” Many laws define criminal acts and the punishment that will be meted out in the event of a criminal offense. However, there sometimes seems to be a disconnect between what actions are considered criminal in nature and who gets charged for it. Sometimes, people committing the same criminal acts receive different treatments even though they are tried under the same courts of law. Based on the premise that people committing the same criminal acts receive different treatments, read the articles below and answer the questions that follow. Miller, N. P. (2006). “What kind of liberty? Competing visions of freedom . . .” Liberty: Magazine of Religious Freedom, 101(2). SIRS Researcher. From the Argosy University online library resources: •Assessing criminal justice practice using social justice theory •Racial disparities in sentencing: Implications for the criminal justice system and the African American community Consider your readings so far and answer the following questions. •How do you balance the ideals and principles set forth in the Constitution with the realities discussed in the articles presented to you? •What role does the crime control perspective play in your thinking regarding the application of the Constitution? •Is justice applied fairly when crime control is taken into perspective? Why or why not? This assignment should be at least five pages long, but no longer than ten pages, and double spaced. All CJA papers should be submitted using APA format, i.e., Times New Roman 12, double spaced with title page and reference page. See the APA manual for an examples. Submission Details: 1.Save the assignment as M1_A3_Lastname_Firstname.doc. 2.By Wednesday, February 17, 2016, submit your assignment to the M1: Assignment 3 Dropbox.

approximately fraction of the american flag is blue, explain

/in /by
approximately fraction of the american flag is blue, explain

Strategic-Managements-business-and-finance-homework-help

/in /by

Refer to the site http://www.QuickMBA.com/strategy/strategic-plannin… for an overview of the process that you will use, as repeated below.

***Unit 1 (steps 1–3) paper should be 3–5 pages in length, not including the title page, the reference page, and the appendix pages, which will consist of the provided templates. The content pages include your personal mission and vision statements as well as your environmental scan of your personal competitive landscape. Remember, both a vision and a mission statement should be short and succinct. Ideally, neither should exceed 30 words

(Steps 1–3) paper should be 3–5 pages in length, not including the title page, the reference page, and the appendix pages, which will consist of the provided templates. The content pages include your personal mission and vision statements as well as your environmental scan of your personal competitive landscape. Remember, both a vision and a mission statement should be short and succinct. Ideally, neither should exceed 30 words.

Step 1: Detailed Information

A mission differs from a vision in that the vision is broader and more life-defining than the mission. The mission can change from time to time, but the vision generally changes very little. Remember, both the vision and the mission should not exceed 30 words. Also, be sure to use scholarly sources to define what a vision and a mission are. Cite the source(s) and include them (it) in your reference section

Step 2: Create Personal Vision:

In this step, using the course reading and your chosen scholarly sources, formulate your personal vision. One easy way to think of this is to imagine your overarching career objective. Please see instructions under “mission,” above

Step 3: Conduct Environment Scanning:

In this step, you review the environment in which you will be operating. You may evaluate the Political, Economic, Social and Technological (PEST) factors relevant to your future personal success. For example, what technological changes will impact how you earn your living? Will you need to work remotely at a number of jobs at the same time, is there a chance that your current work can be outsourced using technology? Can you use technology to appeal to a broader group of potential employers in a wider geographic area? Similarly, what economic changes are likely to impact you? Will demand for what you do increase or decrease as a result of changes in the economy? Support your assessment of the particular environmental elements with research backed references.

Alternately, you may prepare a personal SWOT analysis (Your personal Strengths and Weaknesses and the external macroeconomic Opportunities and Threats that all of your competitors will assess.)

Scientific Journal Article Critique

/in /by

Scientific Journal Article Critique

Each time you evaluate an article, you will complete Part I and Part II. You will submit on a typed hardcopy Part I., and Part II on the due date listed in your syllabus.

 

Part I.

1. Skim the article (take light notes)

·      Read the abstract. The abstract informs you of the major findings of the study, and the importance. 

·      What is the big picture of the study (this is done as you read the article)

·      Record terms or techniques you are not familiar with. 

·      Include questions to parts of the article you do not understand.

·      If you are unfamiliar with concepts discussed throughout the article, then perform a Google search.

 

2. Re-read the article

·      Go to the Materials and Methods and Results section, and ask the following questions within each section

o   Was the study repeated? (You should know why a study must be repeated. If you do not know ask Prof. Olave or Dr. Bignami ASAP)

o   What was the sample size? Is this representative of a large population?

o   What were the variables? Controls?

o   What factors might affect the outcome (according to the investigators)

o   Interpret the data within each figure without looking at the text. Once you have done this, then read the text.

o   Understand the purpose of the Materials and Methods

3. Preparing to summarize the article:

·      Describe the article in your own words first. Can you explain to a friend without looking at your notes? If not, then most likely you do not understand. Go over your notes again.

·      What was the purpose of the study? 

·      A reader who has not read your article must understand your summary.

 

4. Write a draft of your summary:

·      Begin to write the article without looking at your notes. If you choose to look at your notes, then you may not understand the article, and may unintentionally plagiarize. 

·      Ask yourself the following questions to write your summary (without looking at your notes) in your own words:

o   What was the purpose of the study?

o   What questions were asked?

o   How did the study address these questions?

o   What assumptions did the author make?

o   What were the major findings?

o   What questions are still unanswered (according to the authors of the article)

 

Part II. Critical Review and Assessment of the Article

·      In your summary, include your own analysis and evaluation of the article.

·      Do not include personal opinions

·      Use professional language. For example:

Common language: Dipodomys merriami is a kangaroo rat that has a longer Loop of Henle, and this helps it survive better in the desert by retaining more water.

Professional language: A longer Loop of Henle in Dipodomys merriami allows for greater water absorption, an adaptation that has led to survival in an arid environment.  

·      How did this study answer questions proposed in the introduction section of the paper? 

·      Include the limitations of the study:

o   Does the data support the conclusions of the study. Explain.

o   What questions remain unanswered?

o   How could future studies be improved?

 

 

Note: This scientific writing critique is based on Pechenik, Jan A. “Writing Summaries and Critiques.” A Short Guide to Writing about Biology. Ed. Rebecca Gilpin. 6th ed. New York: Pearson, 2007. 130-138.